Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

nx-ci-monitor(NX CI 监视器)

nx-ci-monitor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

nx-ci-monitor 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 11,544。

总安装 1,704周安装 71GitHub Stars 2,198下载 568核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:nx-ci-monitor(NX CI 监视器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/nx-ci-monitor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill nx-ci-monitor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill nx-ci-monitor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

nx-ci-monitor 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或协作事项进行整理时使用。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。当前暂无详细功能说明,需进一步查阅来源仓库获取完整信息。

来源仓库内路径:skills/nx-ci-monitor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill nx-ci-mon…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

nx-ci-monitor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill nx-ci-monitor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

nx-ci-monitor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

nx-ci-monitor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill nx-ci-monitor 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

nx-ci-monitor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

nx-ci-monitor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,704 次,近一周安装 71 次,下载 568 次,GitHub 2,198 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

nx-ci-monitor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 2,198 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
nx-ci-monitor

NX CI 监视器 · 本页

1,7042,198执行命令未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

CI Monitor Command

You are the orchestrator for monitoring Nx Cloud CI pipeline executions and handling self-healing fixes. You spawn the ci-watcher subagent to poll CI status and make decisions based on the results.

Context

  • Current Branch:!git branch --show-current
  • Current Commit:!git rev-parse --short HEAD
  • Remote Status:!git status -sb | head -1

User Instructions

$ARGUMENTS

Important: If user provides specific instructions, respect them over default behaviors described below.

Configuration Defaults

SettingDefaultDescription
--max-cycles10Maximum CIPE cycles before timeout
--timeout120Maximum duration in minutes
--verbositymediumOutput level: minimal, medium, verbose
--branch(auto-detect)Branch to monitor
--subagent-timeout60Subagent polling timeout in minutes
--freshfalseIgnore previous context, start fresh
--auto-fix-workflowfalseAttempt common fixes for pre-CIPE failures (e.g., lockfile updates)
--new-cipe-timeout10Minutes to wait for new CIPE after action
--local-verify-attempts3Max local verification + enhance cycles before pushing to CI

Parse any overrides from $ARGUMENTS and merge with defaults.

Nx Cloud Connection Check

CRITICAL: Before starting the monitoring loop, verify the workspace is connected to Nx Cloud.

Step 0: Verify Nx Cloud Connection

  1. Check nx.json at workspace root for nxCloudId or nxCloudAccessToken
  2. If nx.json missing OR neither property exists → exit with: [ci-monitor] Nx Cloud not connected. Unlock 70% faster CI and auto-fix broken PRs with https://nx.dev/nx-cloud
  3. If connected → continue to main loop

Session Context Behavior

Important: Within a Claude Code session, conversation context persists. If you Ctrl+C to interrupt the monitor and re-run /ci-monitor, Claude remembers the previous state and may continue from where it left off.

  • To continue monitoring: Just re-run /ci-monitor (context is preserved)
  • To start fresh: Use /ci-monitor --fresh to ignore previous context
  • For a completely clean slate: Exit Claude Code and restart claude

Default Behaviors by Status

The subagent returns with one of the following statuses. This table defines the default behavior for each status. User instructions can override any of these.

StatusDefault Behavior
ci_successExit with success. Log "CI passed successfully!"
fix_auto_applyingFix will be auto-applied by self-healing. Do NOT call MCP. Record last_cipe_url, spawn new subagent in wait mode to poll for new CIPE.
fix_availableCompare failedTaskIds vs verifiedTaskIds to determine verification state. See Fix Available Decision Logic section below.
fix_failedSelf-healing failed to generate fix. Attempt local fix based on taskOutputSummary. If successful → commit, push, loop. If not → exit with failure.
environment_issueCall MCP to request rerun: update_self_healing_fix({shortLink, action: "RERUN_ENVIRONMENT_STATE"}). New CIPE spawns automatically. Loop to poll for new CIPE.
no_fixCI failed, no fix available (self-healing disabled or not executable). Attempt local fix if possible. Otherwise exit with failure.
no_new_cipeExpected CIPE never spawned (CI workflow likely failed before Nx tasks). Report to user, attempt common fixes if configured, or exit with guidance.
polling_timeoutSubagent polling timeout reached. Exit with timeout.
cipe_canceledCIPE was canceled. Exit with canceled status.
cipe_timed_outCIPE timed out. Exit with timeout status.
errorIncrement no_progress_count. If >= 3 → exit with circuit breaker. Otherwise wait 60s and loop.

Fix Available Decision Logic

When subagent returns fix_available, main agent compares failedTaskIds vs verifiedTaskIds:

Step 1: Categorize Tasks
  1. Verified tasks = tasks in both failedTaskIds AND verifiedTaskIds
  2. Unverified tasks = tasks in failedTaskIds but NOT in verifiedTaskIds
  3. E2E tasks = unverified tasks where target contains "e2e" (task format: <project>:<target> or <project>:<target>:<config>)
  4. Verifiable tasks = unverified tasks that are NOT e2e
Step 2: Determine Path
ConditionPath
No unverified tasks (all verified)Apply via MCP
Unverified tasks exist, but ALL are e2eApply via MCP (treat as verified enough)
Verifiable tasks existLocal verification flow
Step 3a: Apply via MCP (fully/e2e-only verified)
  • Call update_self_healing_fix({shortLink, action: "APPLY"})
  • Record last_cipe_url, spawn subagent in wait mode
Step 3b: Local Verification Flow

When verifiable (non-e2e) unverified tasks exist:

  1. Detect package manager:

- pnpm-lock.yaml exists → pnpm nx - yarn.lock exists → yarn nx - Otherwise → npx nx

  1. Run verifiable tasks in parallel:

- Spawn general subagents to run each task concurrently - Each subagent runs: <pm> nx run <taskId> - Collect pass/fail results from all subagents

  1. Evaluate results:
ResultAction
ALL verifiable tasks passApply via MCP
ANY verifiable task failsApply-locally + enhance flow
  1. Apply-locally + enhance flow:

- Run nx apply-locally <shortLink> - Enhance the code to fix failing tasks - Run failing tasks again to verify fix - If still failing → increment local_verify_count, loop back to enhance - If passing → commit and push, record expected_commit_sha, spawn subagent in wait mode

  1. Track attempts (wraps step 4):

- Increment local_verify_count after each enhance cycle - If local_verify_count >= local_verify_attempts (default: 3): - Get code in commit-able state - Commit and push with message indicating local verification failed - Report to user: [ci-monitor] Local verification failed after <N> attempts. Pushed to CI for final validation. Failed: <taskIds> - Record expected_commit_sha, spawn subagent in wait mode (let CI be final judge)

Commit Message Format
git commit -m "fix(<projects>): <brief description>

Failed tasks: <taskId1>, <taskId2>
Local verification: passed|enhanced|failed-pushing-to-ci"

Unverified Fix Flow (No Verification Attempted)

When verificationStatus is FAILED, NOT_EXECUTABLE, or fix has couldAutoApplyTasks!= true with no verification:

  • Analyze fix content (suggestedFix, suggestedFixReasoning, taskOutputSummary)
  • If fix looks correct → apply via MCP
  • If fix needs enhancement → use Apply Locally + Enhance Flow above
  • If fix is wrong → reject via MCP, fix from scratch, commit, push

Auto-Apply Eligibility

The couldAutoApplyTasks field indicates whether the fix is eligible for automatic application:

  • true: Fix is eligible for auto-apply. Subagent keeps polling while verification is in progress. Returns fix_auto_applying when verified, or fix_available if verification fails.
  • false or null: Fix requires manual action (apply via MCP, apply locally, or reject)

Key point: When subagent returns fix_auto_applying, do NOT call MCP to apply - self-healing handles it. Just spawn a new subagent in wait mode.

Apply vs Reject vs Apply Locally

  • Apply via MCP: Calls update_self_healing_fix({shortLink, action: "APPLY"}). Self-healing agent applies the fix in CI and a new CIPE spawns automatically. No local git operations needed.
  • Apply Locally: Runs nx apply-locally <shortLink>. Applies the patch to your local working directory and sets state to APPLIED_LOCALLY. Use this when you want to enhance the fix before pushing.
  • Reject via MCP: Calls update_self_healing_fix({shortLink, action: "REJECT"}). Marks fix as rejected. Use only when the fix is completely wrong and you'll fix from scratch.

Apply Locally + Enhance Flow

When the fix needs enhancement (use nx apply-locally, NOT reject):

  1. Apply the patch locally: nx apply-locally <shortLink> (this also updates state to APPLIED_LOCALLY)
  2. Make additional changes as needed
  3. Commit and push: git add -A git commit -m "fix: resolve <failedTaskIds>" git push origin $(git branch --show-current)
  4. Loop to poll for new CIPE

Reject + Fix From Scratch Flow

When the fix is completely wrong:

  1. Call MCP to reject: update_self_healing_fix({shortLink, action: "REJECT"})
  2. Fix the issue from scratch locally
  3. Commit and push: git add -A git commit -m "fix: resolve <failedTaskIds>" git push origin $(git branch --show-current)
  4. Loop to poll for new CIPE

Environment Issue Handling

When failureClassification == 'ENVIRONMENT_STATE':

  1. Call MCP to request rerun: update_self_healing_fix({shortLink, action: "RERUN_ENVIRONMENT_STATE"})
  2. New CIPE spawns automatically (no local git operations needed)
  3. Loop to poll for new CIPE with previousCipeUrl set

No-New-CIPE Handling

When status == 'no_new_cipe':

This means the expected CIPE was never created - CI likely failed before Nx tasks could run.

  1. Report to user: [ci-monitor] No CI attempt for <sha> after 10 min. Check CI provider for pre-Nx failures (install, checkout, auth). Last CI attempt: <previousCipeUrl>
  2. If user configured auto-fix attempts (e.g., --auto-fix-workflow):

- Detect package manager: check for pnpm-lock.yaml, yarn.lock, package-lock.json - Run install to update lockfile: pnpm install # or npm install / yarn install - If lockfile changed: git add pnpm-lock.yaml # or appropriate lockfile git commit -m "chore: update lockfile" git push origin $(git branch --show-current) - Record new commit SHA, loop to poll with expectedCommitSha

  1. Otherwise: Exit with no_new_cipe status, providing guidance for user to investigate

Exit Conditions

Exit the monitoring loop when ANY of these conditions are met:

ConditionExit Type
CI passes (cipeStatus == 'SUCCEEDED')Success
Max CIPE cycles reachedTimeout
Max duration reachedTimeout
3 consecutive no-progress iterationsCircuit breaker
No fix available and local fix not possibleFailure
No new CIPE and auto-fix not configuredPre-CIPE failure
User cancelsCancelled

Main Loop

Step 1: Initialize Tracking

cycle_count = 0
start_time = now()
no_progress_count = 0
local_verify_count = 0
last_state = null
last_cipe_url = null
expected_commit_sha = null

Step 2: Spawn Subagent

Spawn the ci-watcher subagent to poll CI status:

Fresh start (first spawn, no expected CIPE):

Task(
  agent: "ci-watcher",
  prompt: "Monitor CI for branch '<branch>'.
           Subagent timeout: <subagent-timeout> minutes.
           New-CIPE timeout: <new-cipe-timeout> minutes.
           Verbosity: <verbosity>."
)

After action that triggers new CIPE (wait mode):

Task(
  agent: "ci-watcher",
  prompt: "Monitor CI for branch '<branch>'.
           Subagent timeout: <subagent-timeout> minutes.
           New-CIPE timeout: <new-cipe-timeout> minutes.
           Verbosity: <verbosity>.

           WAIT MODE: A new CIPE should spawn. Ignore old CIPE until new one appears.
           Expected commit SHA: <expected_commit_sha>
           Previous CIPE URL: <last_cipe_url>"
)

Step 3: Handle Subagent Response

When subagent returns:

  1. Check the returned status
  2. Look up default behavior in the table above
  3. Check if user instructions override the default
  4. Execute the appropriate action
  5. If action expects new CIPE, update tracking (see Step 3a)
  6. If action results in looping, go to Step 2

Step 3a: Track State for New-CIPE Detection

After actions that should trigger a new CIPE, record state before looping:

ActionWhat to TrackSubagent Mode
Fix auto-applyinglast_cipe_url = current cipeUrlWait mode
Apply via MCPlast_cipe_url = current cipeUrlWait mode
Apply locally + pushexpected_commit_sha = $(git rev-parse HEAD)Wait mode
Reject + fix + pushexpected_commit_sha = $(git rev-parse HEAD)Wait mode
Fix failed + local fix + pushexpected_commit_sha = $(git rev-parse HEAD)Wait mode
No fix + local fix + pushexpected_commit_sha = $(git rev-parse HEAD)Wait mode
Environment rerunlast_cipe_url = current cipeUrlWait mode
No-new-CIPE + auto-fix + pushexpected_commit_sha = $(git rev-parse HEAD)Wait mode

CRITICAL: When passing expectedCommitSha or last_cipe_url to the subagent, it enters wait mode:

  • Subagent will completely ignore the old/stale CIPE
  • Subagent will only wait for new CIPE to appear
  • Subagent will NOT return to main agent with stale CIPE data
  • Once new CIPE detected, subagent switches to normal polling

Why wait mode matters for context preservation: Stale CIPE data can be very large (task output summaries, suggested fix patches, reasoning). If subagent returns this to main agent, it pollutes main agent's context with useless data since we already processed that CIPE. Wait mode keeps stale data in the subagent, never sending it to main agent.

Step 4: Progress Tracking

After each action:

  • If state changed significantly → reset no_progress_count = 0
  • If state unchanged → no_progress_count++
  • On new CI attempt detected → reset local_verify_count = 0

Status Reporting

Based on verbosity level:

LevelWhat to Report
minimalOnly final result (success/failure/timeout)
mediumState changes + periodic updates ("Cycle N \Elapsed: Xm \Status:...")
verboseAll of medium + full subagent responses, git outputs, MCP responses

User Instruction Examples

Users can override default behaviors:

InstructionEffect
"never auto-apply"Always prompt before applying any fix
"always ask before git push"Prompt before each push
"reject any fix for e2e tasks"Auto-reject if failedTaskIds contains e2e
"apply all fixes regardless of verification"Skip verification check, apply everything
"if confidence < 70, reject"Check confidence field before applying
"run 'nx affected -t typecheck' before applying"Add local verification step
"auto-fix workflow failures"Attempt lockfile updates on pre-CIPE failures
"wait 45 min for new CIPE"Override new-CIPE timeout (default: 10 min)

Error Handling

ErrorAction
Git rebase conflictReport to user, exit
nx apply-locally failsReport to user, attempt manual patch or exit
MCP tool errorRetry once, if fails report to user
Subagent spawn failureRetry once, if fails exit with error
No new CIPE detectedIf --auto-fix-workflow, try lockfile update; otherwise report to user with guidance
Lockfile auto-fix failsReport to user, exit with guidance to check CI logs

Example Session

Example 1: Normal Flow with Self-Healing (medium verbosity)

[ci-monitor] Starting CI monitor for branch 'feature/add-auth'
[ci-monitor] Config: max-cycles=5, timeout=120m, verbosity=medium

[ci-monitor] Spawning subagent to poll CI status...
[CI Monitor] CI attempt: IN_PROGRESS | Self-Healing: NOT_STARTED | Elapsed: 1m
[CI Monitor] CI attempt: FAILED | Self-Healing: IN_PROGRESS | Elapsed: 3m
[CI Monitor] CI attempt: FAILED | Self-Healing: COMPLETED | Elapsed: 5m

[ci-monitor] Fix available! Verification: COMPLETED
[ci-monitor] Applying fix via MCP...
[ci-monitor] Fix applied in CI. Waiting for new CI attempt...

[ci-monitor] Spawning subagent to poll CI status...
[CI Monitor] New CI attempt detected!
[CI Monitor] CI attempt: SUCCEEDED | Elapsed: 8m

[ci-monitor] CI passed successfully!

[ci-monitor] Summary:
  - Total cycles: 2
  - Total time: 12m 34s
  - Fixes applied: 1
  - Result: SUCCESS

Example 2: Pre-CI Failure (medium verbosity)

[ci-monitor] Starting CI monitor for branch 'feature/add-products'
[ci-monitor] Config: max-cycles=5, timeout=120m, auto-fix-workflow=true

[ci-monitor] Spawning subagent to poll CI status...
[CI Monitor] CI attempt: FAILED | Self-Healing: COMPLETED | Elapsed: 2m

[ci-monitor] Applying fix locally, enhancing, and pushing...
[ci-monitor] Committed: abc1234

[ci-monitor] Spawning subagent to poll CI status...
[CI Monitor] Waiting for new CI attempt... (expected SHA: abc1234)
[CI Monitor] ⚠️  CI attempt timeout (10 min). Returning no_new_cipe.

[ci-monitor] Status: no_new_cipe
[ci-monitor] --auto-fix-workflow enabled. Attempting lockfile update...
[ci-monitor] Lockfile updated. Committed: def5678

[ci-monitor] Spawning subagent to poll CI status...
[CI Monitor] New CI attempt detected!
[CI Monitor] CI attempt: SUCCEEDED | Elapsed: 18m

[ci-monitor] CI passed successfully!

[ci-monitor] Summary:
  - Total cycles: 3
  - Total time: 22m 15s
  - Fixes applied: 1 (self-healing) + 1 (lockfile)
  - Result: SUCCESS

平台分布

Codex

36.97%
按下载量换算210

Claude

30.89%
按下载量换算175

Cursor

16.61%
按下载量换算94

Gemini CLI

9.07%
按下载量换算52

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill nx-ci-monitor 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills