Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索敏感数据github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

nimble-agent-builder灵活的 Agent 构建器

Agent Skill

nimble-agent-builder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

419

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

45

下载量

147
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:nimble-agent-builder(灵活的 Agent 构建器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nimbleway/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/nimble-agent-builder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/nimbleway/agent-skills --skill nimble-agent-builder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/nimbleway/agent-skills --skill nimble-agent-builder

简介

用于查找灵活的 Agent 构建方法和相关技术方案。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据任务需求筛选信息。
  • 可结合原始 README 验证具体用法,但需注意权限和操作风险。
  • 安装方式:通过 npx 从 GitHub 仓库添加,建议先评估维护频率。
  • 注意:搜索结果可能包含实验性方案,实施前应充分测试。

SKILL.md

Nimble Agent Builder

Build, refine, and publish reusable extraction agents on the Nimble platform. Always finish with executed results or runnable code.

User request: $ARGUMENTS

Prerequisites

Quick check: nimble --version && echo "${NIMBLE_API_KEY:+API key: set}"

If CLI is missing or API key is not set, load rules/setup.md for one-time setup (CLI install, API key, MCP server).

Startup check — run this before anything else

Verify CLI is available:

nimble --version && echo "${NIMBLE_API_KEY:+API key: set}"

If CLI and API key are set → proceed with the user's request normally.

If CLI is missing → check if the MCP server is connected as a fallback:

claude mcp list 2>/dev/null | grep -q nimble-mcp-server && echo "MCP: connected" || echo "MCP: not connected"
  • MCP connected → proceed using MCP tools instead of CLI commands.
  • Neither CLI nor MCP available → load rules/setup.md for one-time setup (CLI install, API key). CLI is the preferred setup path.

Skill ecosystem

nimble-agent-builder and nimble-web-expert work as a pair in the Nimble toolkit:

SkillBest forKey commands
nimble-agent-builder (this skill)Build reusable agents — create, refine, and publish named extraction templates with fixed schemasCLI: generate, get-generation, publish
nimble-web-expertReal-time data access — fetch any URL, search, map, crawl, run published agentsextract, search, map, crawl, agent run

Stay in nimble-agent-builder for

  • Generating a new agent for a domain
  • Refining or updating an existing agent (add fields, fix selectors, change schema)
  • Publishing an agent
  • Running a published agent via nimble agent run (CLI)
  • Validating agent output quality
  • Any task phrased as "build", "refine", "update", "add a field to", "publish"

When to route to nimble-web-expert

After publishing an agent — run it directly here via nimble agent run (CLI). Route to nimble-web-expert only when the workflow needs tools this skill doesn't have:

  • Need a list of input URLs to feed into the agent? → Switch to nimble-web-expert, run nimble map --url <site> to crawl and generate the input list, then return here to run at scale.
  • Need to search for input params? → Switch to nimble-web-expert, run nimble search, then return here with the results.

When the task is not about building an agent:

  • One-off URL fetch, web search, site mapping, bulk crawl → nimble-web-expert
  • Tell the user: *"This is a direct data access task, not an agent-building task. Use nimble-web-expert for this."*

When agent generation needs site investigation

If nimble_agents_generate or nimble_agents_update_from_agent cannot produce a working agent because the site's data structure is unknown (wrong selectors, missing XHR patterns, unexpected JS rendering):

Step 1 — Announce: *"I can't generate a reliable agent without investigating the live page first. Spawning a site investigation..."*

Step 2 — Spawn a Task agent (Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", run_in_background=False)):

Investigate {url} to find CSS selectors and/or XHR API endpoints needed to extract: {fields_needed}.

Use Playwright to probe the live page:
python3 << 'EOF'
from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
with sync_playwright() as p:
    browser = p.chromium.launch(headless=True)
    page = browser.new_page()
    api_calls = []
    page.on("request", lambda req: api_calls.append(req) if req.resource_type in ("xhr","fetch") else None)
    page.goto("{url}")
    page.wait_for_timeout(5000)
    for sel in ["[data-price]",".price","h1","[data-testid*=title]","[data-testid*=price]",".product-title"]:
        el = page.query_selector(sel)
        if el: print(f"SELECTOR: {sel!r} -> {el.inner_text()[:80]!r}")
    for req in api_calls[:20]:
        print(f"XHR: {req.method} {req.url[:120]}")
    browser.close()
EOF

Also run a quick nimble extract to check raw rendered HTML:
nimble extract --url "{url}" --render --format markdown | head -100

Return a structured report:
- SELECTORS: working CSS selectors for each required field
- XHR_URLS: any relevant API endpoints found
- RENDER_REQUIRED: yes/no
- SUGGESTED_EXTRACT_COMMAND: the nimble extract command that would work
- NOTES: login walls, pagination, lazy loading, or anything unusual

Do NOT use AskUserQuestion.

Step 3 — Use the report to retry agent generation: pass the selector/XHR context and suggested extract command in the nimble_agents_update_session call.

Step 4 — If investigation also fails: Tell the user: *"This site requires complex browser automation that can't be captured in an agent at this stage. Use nimble-web-expert's Tier 4/5 commands with --browser-action or --network-capture to access the data directly."*


Core principles

  • Fastest path to data. Default route: discover agent → get schema → run → display results. Planning and generation are escalation paths.
  • Always search existing agents first. Run nimble agent list --limit 100 --search "<domain or vertical>" (CLI) before considering generate. Hard rule.
  • Update over generate — always. When a close-match agent exists (same domain/type, even if missing fields or different scope), update it rather than generating from scratch. Updating preserves proven extraction logic and is faster, cheaper, and more reliable. Only generate a new agent when the --search query returns 0 matches for the target domain. Never offer "Create new agent" as the recommended option when a close match exists.
  • AskUserQuestion at every decision point in the foreground — no exceptions. Always present the standard AskUserQuestion prompts shown in each step. Never skip them, never auto-advance without asking. Never present choices as plain numbered lists. Constraints: 2–4 options, header max 12 chars, label 1–5 words. Recommended option goes first with "(Recommended)". Note: Task agents NEVER use AskUserQuestion — all decisions are pre-made before launching the Task.
  • Schema before run — always. Run nimble agent get --template-name <name> (CLI) before nimble agent run. Present input parameters and output fields in markdown tables. This applies when switching agents too.
  • Script generation (Step 2B) is ONLY for large-scale, high-volume tasks. Never generate code for normal interactive requests. Script mode requires ALL of: scale >50 items AND the user explicitly asks for code/script/CSV/batch output. Multi-source requests, dataset requests, and comparison requests do NOT automatically trigger script mode — run them interactively first. The default path is always: discover → run → display results.
  • Verify response shape before script generation. Check skills and entity_type from nimble agent get --template-name (CLI) to determine REST API response nesting. See references/agent-api-reference.md > "Response shape inference" and references/sdk-patterns.md > "Response structure verification".
  • google_search is not a general search tool. It is a SERP analysis agent for rank tracking and SEO analysis. For finding information, use nimble search (CLI). See references/error-recovery.md.
  • All web search MUST use nimble search (CLI). Never use WebSearch, WebFetch, curl, or wget. See Guardrails.
  • Agent creation/update runs in background Task agents. Generation takes 1-3 minutes — run the generate → poll → publish loop as a Task agent so the user isn't blocked. See Delegation model.

Delegation model

The foreground conversation orchestrates and presents results. Task agents handle long-running work (generation, discovery, script generation).

Foreground — direct CLI calls via Bash:

CLI commandPurposeMax calls
nimble agent list --limit 100 --search "<domain>"Route to existing agent1 per domain
nimble agent get --template-nameDisplay schema before run1 per agent
nimble agent run --agent --paramsInteractive execution (≤5 items)1 per item
nimble searchWeb search / discoveryAs needed

Task agents — long-running operations:

PhaseTask agentForeground does
Discovery (nimble search + nimble map)Step 1DLaunch, present report
Agent create/update (nimble agent generateget-generation poll → publish)Step 3Launch, present report
Script generation (write code to call existing agent)Step 2BLaunch, present script

Agent creation runs in a Task agent because generation takes 1-3 minutes (poll loop). The Task agent uses CLI commands via Bash. If CLI is unavailable, it falls back to MCP tools.

For multi-source workflows, launch Task agents sequentially (one per source/phase). Gather reports, then present the combined plan.

CLI commands for Task agents

All Task agent prompts should include this block so the subagent knows the available commands:

**CLI tools (use via Bash):**
- `nimble agent list --limit 100 --search "<domain or vertical>"` — search agents by domain/vertical
- `nimble agent get --template-name <name>` — get agent schema
- `nimble agent run --agent <name> --params '{...}'` — run an agent
- `nimble agent generate --agent-name <name> --prompt "<prompt>" --url "<url>"` — create/refine agent
- `nimble agent generate --agent-name <name> --from-agent <name> --prompt "<prompt>"` — iterate on existing agent
- `nimble agent get-generation --generation-id <id>` — poll generation status
- `nimble agent publish --agent-name <name> --version-id <id>` — publish agent
- `nimble search --query "<query>"` — web search (deep by default)
- `nimble map --url <url> --limit 50` — discover URL patterns on a site

**MCP fallback (only if CLI is not installed):**
| CLI command | MCP tool |
|---|---|
| `nimble agent generate` | `mcp__plugin_nimble_nimble-mcp-server__nimble_agents_generate` |
| `nimble agent get-generation` | `mcp__plugin_nimble_nimble-mcp-server__nimble_agents_status` |
| `nimble agent publish` | `mcp__plugin_nimble_nimble-mcp-server__nimble_agents_publish` |

**CRITICAL: Prefer CLI for all operations. Use MCP only when CLI is unavailable. NEVER use WebSearch, WebFetch, curl, or wget. NEVER construct MCP endpoint URLs manually.**

Response shapes

LayerPathShapeWhen used
CLI (nimble agent run) — SERPdata.parsinglist (array)Interactive run (Step 2A)
CLI (nimble agent run) — PDPdata.parsingdict (flat)Interactive run (Step 2A)
REST API — ecommerce SERPdata.parsinglist (array)Script generation (Step 2B)
REST API — non-ecommerce SERPdata.parsing.entities.{Type}dict with nested arraysScript generation (Step 2B)
REST API — PDPdata.parsingdict (flat)Script generation (Step 2B)

Always check typeof/isinstance before iterating REST responses.

Step 1: Route

From $ARGUMENTS, detect 3 things:

1. Clarityclear (default) or needs-planning

Only needs-planning when ALL of these are absent: a target URL/site/domain, clear data to extract, a single well-scoped task. Most requests are clear.

2. Agent match — run nimble agent list --limit 100 --search "<domain or vertical>" (CLI, Bash). Use the user's named domain/site as the search term (e.g. --search "amazon", --search "jobs", --search "ecommerce"). This is ALWAYS the first action. For multi-source requests (e.g., "compare Amazon and Walmart prices"), run one search per source. If no match found for a source, route it to Discovery (Step 1D).

ResultRoute
Exact matchShow schema summary + AskUserQuestion: "Use this agent" (Recommended) / "Create new agent" → Step 3
Close match (same domain/type, missing fields or different scope)Show schema gaps + AskUserQuestion: "Update this agent" (Recommended) / "Create new agent". Always recommend update — it preserves existing extraction logic and is faster than generating from scratch.
2+ plausible matchesShow table + AskUserQuestion with top matches + "Update closest agent" (Recommended). Pick the agent with the most field overlap.
0 matchesLaunch Discovery Task agent (Step 1D) → results inform Step 3. This is the ONLY case where generating a new agent is appropriate.

3. Execution modeinteractive (default) or script

Interactive is ALWAYS the default. Route to script generation (Step 2B) ONLY when BOTH conditions are met: (a) scale is explicitly >50 items or the user provides a batch input file, AND (b) the user explicitly asks for code, a script, a CSV export, or batch processing. Words like "dataset", "compare", "multi-source", or "2 sources" do NOT trigger script mode — run these interactively. Script generation writes code that calls an existing agent — it does not create new agents. If no agent exists yet, resolve that first (Step 3) before generating a script.

Step 1P: Plan mode (rare — only when needs-planning)

  1. ClarifyAskUserQuestion to resolve critical unknowns (max 2 questions). Focus on: what site(s), what data fields, what output format.
  2. Explorenimble agent list --limit 100 --search "<domain>" (CLI, once per domain). For unfamiliar domains, launch Discovery Task agents (Step 1D).
  3. Present plan — gap analysis table:
#Site / Data SourceAgentStatus
1amazon.com productsamazon-product-detailsExisting
2walmart.com productsGenerate
  1. Execute — Step 2 for existing agents, Step 3 for generations (as Task agents).

Step 1D: Discovery (Task agent — for unfamiliar domains)

Launch when nimble agent list --limit 100 --search "<domain>" returns 0 matches for the target domain and it needs exploration. Runs as Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", run_in_background=False). The foreground tells the user: *"Exploring {domain} to understand available data..."*

Task prompt template:

Explore {domain} for {user_intent}.

Use the Nimble CLI to discover the site structure and available data:

1. **Map the site** (understand URL patterns and sections):

nimble map --url "https://{domain}" --limit 50


This reveals listing pages, detail pages, site sections, and URL patterns.

1. **Search for real examples** (deep content extraction): `nimble search --query "{domain} {keywords}" --max-results 5` This fetches and extracts full page content from each result, giving you product listings, field structures, and example data.

**Return a structured report:**

- DOMAIN: {domain}
- ESTIMATED_ITEMS: count matching query
- LISTING_URL_PATTERN: e.g., /category/filter?color=green
- DETAIL_URL_PATTERN: e.g., /p/{slug}-{SKU}.html
- AVAILABLE_FIELDS: list of extractable fields (name, price, description, materials, etc.)
- MISSING_FIELDS: fields the user wants but the site doesn't have (e.g., ratings, reviews)
- RECOMMENDED_APPROACH: generate custom agent / use existing agent from {alternative} / combine sources
- SAMPLE_URLS: 2–3 example URLs for agent generation
- LIMITATIONS: login walls, pagination limits, JS rendering, etc.

Do NOT use AskUserQuestion. Do NOT use nimble_find_search_agent, nimble_run_search_agent, or nimble_url_extract. Do NOT use WebSearch, WebFetch, or any non-Nimble-CLI search/fetch method.

On receiving the report, the foreground conversation:

  1. Presents key findings to the user.
  2. If data gaps exist (e.g., missing ratings), asks the user via AskUserQuestion how to proceed.
  3. Routes to Step 3 (generate) with the discovery context, or Step 2 if existing agents cover the need.

Step 2: Run existing agent

Two sub-paths based on execution mode.

2A: Interactive (small scale, display output)

2A-1. Run nimble agent get --template-name <name> (CLI). Present schema in markdown tables:

  • Input parameters: name, required, type, description, example
  • Output fields: key fields from skills dict

See references/agent-api-reference.md > "Input Parameter Mapping" for the full input_properties format and mapping rules.

2A-2. Always confirm before running via AskUserQuestion:


question: "Run {agent_name} with these parameters?" header: "Confirm" options:

- label: "Run agent (Recommended)" description: "Execute {agent_name} with {summary of inferred parameters}"
- label: "Change parameters" description: "Adjust input parameters before running"
- label: "Create new agent" description: "Create a custom agent instead (Step 3)"

2A-3. Run nimble agent run --agent <name> --params '{...}' (CLI). Present results as markdown table. Always ask what to do next:


question: "What next?" header: "Next step" options:

- label: "Done" description: "Finish with these results"
- label: "Run again" description: "Re-run with different parameters"

Do NOT offer script generation as a next step unless the user explicitly mentions needing large-scale extraction (>50 items) or batch processing. Script generation is not a natural follow-up to interactive runs.

Bulk (2–5 URLs): Run per URL, aggregate results, handle individual failures without aborting. See references/batch-patterns.md > "Interactive batch extraction".

2B: Script generation (ONLY for large-scale, high-volume tasks)

This step is ONLY reached when the user explicitly needs to process >50 items at scale or requests batch code/script generation. Normal requests — even multi-source or "dataset" requests — are handled interactively via Step 2A. Writes a runnable script that calls an existing Nimble agent at scale via the SDK/REST API. This does NOT create new agents — the agent must already exist. Runs as a Task agent. The foreground infers language, launches the agent, and presents the generated script for confirmation.

2B-1. Infer language from project context (foreground, before launching):

Project fileLanguage
pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, *.pyPython
package.json, tsconfig.jsonTypeScript/Node
go.modGo (REST API)
None of the aboveDefault to Python

2B-2. Launch script generation Task agent: Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", run_in_background=False).

Task prompt template:


Write a {language} script that calls existing Nimble agent(s) at scale via SDK/REST API.

**Use the Nimble CLI to inspect agent schemas (via Bash, NOT MCP):**

nimble agent get --template-name <agent_name>


This returns the full input/output schema for the agent.

**CRITICAL: Use CLI (Bash) for all Nimble operations. NEVER use WebSearch, WebFetch, curl, or wget. NEVER construct MCP endpoint URLs manually.**

**Existing agents to call:** {agent_names} **User intent:** {user_prompt} **Output format:** {csv/json/etc} **Scale:** {number of items/queries}

This is SCRIPT GENERATION — writing code that calls existing agents. Do NOT create new agents (no nimble_agents_generate/update/publish). The agents listed above already exist.

Steps:

1. Run `nimble agent get --template-name <agent>` (CLI) for each agent to inspect input_properties and skills.
2. Read the reference files:
  - `references/sdk-patterns.md` (Python) or `references/rest-api-patterns.md` (other languages)
  - `references/batch-patterns.md` (for multi-store normalization)
3. Write a complete, ready-to-run script with:
  - Smoke test first — validate a single query before full batch. Abort on failure.
  - Progress reporting — compact single-line status after each poll cycle.
  - Pagination handling for large result sets.
  - Multi-store field normalization (if applicable).
  - Output to {format}.
  - Incremental file writes for large pipelines (50+ jobs).

Return the complete script and a brief summary of:

- Agent schemas used (input params, key output fields)
- Normalization mappings (if multi-store)
- Total estimated API calls

Do NOT use AskUserQuestion. Do NOT use nimble_find_search_agent or nimble_run_search_agent. Do NOT call nimble_agents_generate, nimble_agents_update_from_agent, nimble_agents_update_session, or nimble_agents_publish. Do NOT use WebSearch, WebFetch, bash curl, or any non-MCP search/fetch method.

2B-3. Present the generated script and confirm execution via AskUserQuestion (foreground):


question: "Run this script?" header: "Confirm" options:

- label: "Run script (Recommended)" description: "Execute the generated script"
- label: "Edit first" description: "Review and modify the script before running"

No agent validation step here. The 50-input validation flow (Step 3) is only for agent creation/update. Script generation uses an existing, already-validated agent — just write the script and run it.

Step 3: Update existing agent or create new (on the Nimble platform)

Updates an existing agent (preferred) or creates a new one on Nimble's platform. Default to update when a close-match agent was found in Step 1 — pass the existing agent name to the Task agent so it uses nimble_agents_update_from_agent instead of nimble_agents_generate. Only create a new agent when Step 1 returned 0 matches. This is NOT code/script generation — it creates/modifies an extraction definition callable via Step 2A or 2B. ALWAYS runs as a Task agent (run_in_background=False).

3-1. Create a stable session_id (UUID v4).

3-2. Ask the user ONCE (foreground only — agent creation/update ONLY, never for script generation):


question: "Run refinement-validation before publishing?" header: "Validate" options:

- label: "Yes, validate (Recommended)" description: "Discovery → generate → validate 50 inputs (80% pass) → publish. Auto-retries on failure."
- label: "No, generate only" description: "Generate → publish immediately without validation testing"

3-3. Launch Task agent

Set refine_validate to the user's choice. Launch Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", run_in_background=False, max_turns=50) using the prompt template from references/generate-update-and-publish.md (includes MCP tool registry, lifecycle phases, and all rules). Tell the user: "Agent generation started. I'll report results when complete."

The Task agent executes a closed-loop lifecycle: Discovery → Create/Update → Poll → Validate → Publish → Report. On failure, it auto-triggers an update loop (max 2 cycles, 15-minute wall-clock timeout). See the reference file for complete details.

3-4. Present report

When the Task agent completes, present the report. On success, route to Step 2A or 2B. On failure after max cycles, offer:


question: "Agent validation did not reach 80% pass rate. How to proceed?" header: "Next step" options:

- label: "Publish anyway" description: "Publish with current pass rate ({rate}%)"
- label: "Update agent" description: "Provide specific instructions to refine the agent"

Step 4: Final response

End with a concise summary table:

FieldValue
Agent(s) usedagent_name
SourceExisting / Generated
Records extractedcount
OutputDisplayed / filename.csv

Include the extraction results (or top N if large).

Additional references

Load reference files only during large-scale script generation (Step 2B) or agent creation (Step 3). Do NOT load these for interactive runs (Step 2A) — MCP tool schemas are sufficient.

For script generation (Step 2B) only:

  • references/sdk-patterns.md — Running agents, async endpoint, batch pipelines, incremental file writes.
  • references/rest-api-patterns.md — REST API patterns for TypeScript, Node, curl, and other non-Python languages.
  • references/batch-patterns.md — Multi-store comparison, normalization, interactive batch, codegen walkthrough.

For agent creation/update (Step 3) only:

  • references/generate-update-and-publish.md — Full agent creation/update lifecycle: discovery, creation, polling, SDK validation (50 inputs, 80% threshold), publish, reporting, update loop.

General (any step, load as needed):

  • references/agent-api-reference.md — MCP tools reference plus input parameter mapping.
  • references/error-recovery.md — Error handling and recovery patterns.

Guardrails

  • Agent creation/update runs in Task agents. Generation takes 1-3 minutes — use a background Task agent for the generate → poll → publish loop. See Delegation model.
  • All operations use CLI (Bash). MCP tools are a fallback only when CLI is unavailable.
  • All web search MUST use nimble search (CLI). NEVER use WebSearch, WebFetch, curl, or wget — in foreground or Task agents.
  • Every Task agent prompt MUST include the CLI commands block (see Delegation model).
  • Never use nimble_find_search_agent, nimble_run_search_agent, or any WSA template tools.
  • Update state machine: use nimble agent generate --from-agent to iterate on existing agents. Each iteration creates a new generation to poll.
  • Hard 429 rule. On quota errors: stop, report exhaustion. Do not retry or switch tools.
  • Published agents are automatically forked when updated. UBCT-based agents cannot be updated — generate a new one instead.
  • Never load SDK/batch references for interactive runs (Step 2A). CLI output from nimble agent get --template-name is sufficient. Load references only for Step 2B (script generation) and Step 3 (agent creation).
  • Present results in markdown tables. Never show raw JSON.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.66%
按下载量换算52

Claude

28.68%
按下载量换算42

Cursor

17.57%
按下载量换算26

Gemini CLI

9.59%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills