Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

frontend-testing前端测试

Agent Skill

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

总安装

216

周安装

9

GitHub Stars

26

下载量

72
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:frontend-testing(前端测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nilecui/skillsbase
仓库路径:skills/frontend-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/nilecui/skillsbase --skill frontend-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/nilecui/skillsbase --skill frontend-testing

简介

frontend-testing 辅助前端页面、组件和样式开发,提升代码质量。

  • 适合生成或审查 React、Vue、Tailwind CSS 等相关代码,优化组件结构。
  • 使用时需结合项目现有设计系统和路由配置,避免生成孤立片段。
  • 涉及页面改动时应配合本地预览和构建检查,确保视觉效果正确。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

Dify Frontend Testing Skill

This skill enables Claude to generate high-quality, comprehensive frontend tests for the Dify project following established conventions and best practices.

⚠️ Authoritative Source: This skill is derived from web/testing/testing.md. Use Vitest mock/timer APIs (vi.*).

When to Apply This Skill

Apply this skill when the user:

  • Asks to write tests for a component, hook, or utility
  • Asks to review existing tests for completeness
  • Mentions Vitest, React Testing Library, RTL, or spec files
  • Requests test coverage improvement
  • Uses pnpm analyze-component output as context
  • Mentions testing, unit tests, or integration tests for frontend code
  • Wants to understand testing patterns in the Dify codebase

Do NOT apply when:

  • User is asking about backend/API tests (Python/pytest)
  • User is asking about E2E tests (Playwright/Cypress)
  • User is only asking conceptual questions without code context

Quick Reference

Tech Stack

ToolVersionPurpose
Vitest4.0.16Test runner
React Testing Library16.0Component testing
jsdom-Test environment
nock14.0HTTP mocking
TypeScript5.xType safety

Key Commands

# Run all tests
pnpm test

# Watch mode
pnpm test:watch

# Run specific file
pnpm test path/to/file.spec.tsx

# Generate coverage report
pnpm test:coverage

# Analyze component complexity
pnpm analyze-component <path>

# Review existing test
pnpm analyze-component <path> --review

File Naming

  • Test files: ComponentName.spec.tsx (same directory as component)
  • Integration tests: web/__tests__/ directory

Test Structure Template

import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react'
import Component from './index'

// ✅ Import real project components (DO NOT mock these)
// import Loading from '@/app/components/base/loading'
// import { ChildComponent } from './child-component'

// ✅ Mock external dependencies only
vi.mock('@/service/api')
vi.mock('next/navigation', () => ({
  useRouter: () => ({ push: vi.fn() }),
  usePathname: () => '/test',
}))

// Shared state for mocks (if needed)
let mockSharedState = false

describe('ComponentName', () => {
  beforeEach(() => {
    vi.clearAllMocks()  // ✅ Reset mocks BEFORE each test
    mockSharedState = false  // ✅ Reset shared state
  })

  // Rendering tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Rendering', () => {
    it('should render without crashing', () => {
      // Arrange
      const props = { title: 'Test' }

      // Act
      render(<Component {...props} />)

      // Assert
      expect(screen.getByText('Test')).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })

  // Props tests (REQUIRED)
  describe('Props', () => {
    it('should apply custom className', () => {
      render(<Component className="custom" />)
      expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('custom')
    })
  })

  // User Interactions
  describe('User Interactions', () => {
    it('should handle click events', () => {
      const handleClick = vi.fn()
      render(<Component onClick={handleClick} />)

      fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))

      expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
    })
  })

  // Edge Cases (REQUIRED)
  describe('Edge Cases', () => {
    it('should handle null data', () => {
      render(<Component data={null} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/no data/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })

    it('should handle empty array', () => {
      render(<Component items={[]} />)
      expect(screen.getByText(/empty/i)).toBeInTheDocument()
    })
  })
})

Testing Workflow (CRITICAL)

⚠️ Incremental Approach Required

NEVER generate all test files at once. For complex components or multi-file directories:

  1. Analyze & Plan: List all files, order by complexity (simple → complex)
  2. Process ONE at a time: Write test → Run test → Fix if needed → Next
  3. Verify before proceeding: Do NOT continue to next file until current passes
For each file:
  ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
  │ 1. Write test                          │
  │ 2. Run: pnpm test <file>.spec.tsx      │
  │ 3. PASS? → Mark complete, next file    │
  │    FAIL? → Fix first, then continue    │
  └────────────────────────────────────────┘

Complexity-Based Order

Process in this order for multi-file testing:

  1. 🟢 Utility functions (simplest)
  2. 🟢 Custom hooks
  3. 🟡 Simple components (presentational)
  4. 🟡 Medium components (state, effects)
  5. 🔴 Complex components (API, routing)
  6. 🔴 Integration tests (index files - last)

When to Refactor First

  • Complexity > 50: Break into smaller pieces before testing
  • 500+ lines: Consider splitting before testing
  • Many dependencies: Extract logic into hooks first
📖 See references/workflow.md for complete workflow details and todo list format.

Testing Strategy

Path-Level Testing (Directory Testing)

When assigned to test a directory/path, test ALL content within that path:

  • Test all components, hooks, utilities in the directory (not just index file)
  • Use incremental approach: one file at a time, verify each before proceeding
  • Goal: 100% coverage of ALL files in the directory

Integration Testing First

Prefer integration testing when writing tests for a directory:

  • Import real project components directly (including base components and siblings)
  • Only mock: API services (@/service/*), next/navigation, complex context providers
  • DO NOT mock base components (@/app/components/base/*)
  • DO NOT mock sibling/child components in the same directory
See Test Structure Template for correct import/mock patterns.

Core Principles

1. AAA Pattern (Arrange-Act-Assert)

Every test should clearly separate:

  • Arrange: Setup test data and render component
  • Act: Perform user actions
  • Assert: Verify expected outcomes

2. Black-Box Testing

  • Test observable behavior, not implementation details
  • Use semantic queries (getByRole, getByLabelText)
  • Avoid testing internal state directly
  • Prefer pattern matching over hardcoded strings in assertions:
// ❌ Avoid: hardcoded text assertions
expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: role-based queries
expect(screen.getByRole('status')).toBeInTheDocument()

// ✅ Better: pattern matching
expect(screen.getByText(/loading/i)).toBeInTheDocument()

3. Single Behavior Per Test

Each test verifies ONE user-observable behavior:

// ✅ Good: One behavior
it('should disable button when loading', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
})

// ❌ Bad: Multiple behaviors
it('should handle loading state', () => {
  render(<Button loading />)
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
  expect(screen.getByText('Loading...')).toBeInTheDocument()
  expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toHaveClass('loading')
})

4. Semantic Naming

Use should <behavior> when <condition>:

it('should show error message when validation fails')
it('should call onSubmit when form is valid')
it('should disable input when isReadOnly is true')

Required Test Scenarios

Always Required (All Components)

  1. Rendering: Component renders without crashing
  2. Props: Required props, optional props, default values
  3. Edge Cases: null, undefined, empty values, boundary conditions

Conditional (When Present)

FeatureTest Focus
useStateInitial state, transitions, cleanup
useEffectExecution, dependencies, cleanup
Event handlersAll onClick, onChange, onSubmit, keyboard
API callsLoading, success, error states
RoutingNavigation, params, query strings
useCallback/useMemoReferential equality
ContextProvider values, consumer behavior
FormsValidation, submission, error display

Coverage Goals (Per File)

For each test file generated, aim for:

  • 100% function coverage
  • 100% statement coverage
  • >95% branch coverage
  • >95% line coverage
Note: For multi-file directories, process one file at a time with full coverage each. See references/workflow.md.

Detailed Guides

For more detailed information, refer to:

  • references/workflow.md - Incremental testing workflow (MUST READ for multi-file testing)
  • references/mocking.md - Mock patterns and best practices
  • references/async-testing.md - Async operations and API calls
  • references/domain-components.md - Workflow, Dataset, Configuration testing
  • references/common-patterns.md - Frequently used testing patterns
  • references/checklist.md - Test generation checklist and validation steps

Authoritative References

Primary Specification (MUST follow)

  • web/testing/testing.md - The canonical testing specification. This skill is derived from this document.

Reference Examples in Codebase

  • web/utils/classnames.spec.ts - Utility function tests
  • web/app/components/base/button/index.spec.tsx - Component tests
  • web/__mocks__/provider-context.ts - Mock factory example

Project Configuration

  • web/vitest.config.ts - Vitest configuration
  • web/vitest.setup.ts - Test environment setup
  • web/scripts/analyze-component.js - Component analysis tool
  • Modules are not mocked automatically. Global mocks live in web/vitest.setup.ts (for example react-i18next, next/image); mock other modules like ky or mime locally in test files.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.85%
按下载量换算21

trae

22.25%
按下载量换算16

Antigravity

17.44%
按下载量换算13

windsurf

13.16%
按下载量换算9

Codex

8.42%
按下载量换算6

Gemini CLI

3.35%
按下载量换算2

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills