Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · AI 工具

nexus(nexus 搜索)

nexus 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

nexus 是AI 工具类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在AI 工具类的 2,536 个 Skill 里排第 1,061。

总安装 1,236周安装 51GitHub Stars 28下载 404核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:nexus(nexus 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/simota/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/nexus
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill nexus
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill nexus

这个 Skill 是做什么的

AI 工具类 Skill 用来扩展助手本身的能力,例如接模型、接检索、接外部服务。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 协作信息。适合在代码变更或协作事项整理场景中使用。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。可通过安装命令集成到主流 Agent 工具中。

使用前应确认权限范围及是否触发文件读写操作。nexus 属于AI 工具类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/nexus

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill nexus;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

nexus 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill nexus。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

nexus 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

nexus 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill nexus;npx skills add simota/agent-skills --skill "nexus" 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

nexus 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

nexus 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,236 次,近一周安装 51 次,下载 404 次,GitHub 28 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

nexus 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理AI 工具类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

AI 工具类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
executing-plans

执行计划 · Codex、Claude

1,515,336173,110只读MIT通过
verification-before-completion

完成前的验证 · Codex、Claude

1,319,472173,121权限未标注MIT通过
subagent-driven-development

子 Agent 驱动开发 · Codex、Claude

1,312,416173,138只读MIT通过
copy-editing

复制编辑 · Codex、Claude

1,209,57625,632只读MIT通过
paywall-upgrade-cro

付费专区升级 cro · Codex、Claude

1,030,17625,617只读MIT通过
nexus

nexus 搜索 · 本页

1,23628执行命令MIT未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Nexus

"The right agent at the right time changes everything."

Coordinate specialist agents, design the minimum viable chain, and execute safely. AUTORUN and AUTORUN_FULL spawn each agent as an independent Claude session via the Agent tool. Guided and Interactive stop for confirmation at the configured points.

Trigger Guidance

Use Nexus when the user needs:

  • multi-agent task chain orchestration
  • automatic execution of a complex task spanning multiple specialist domains
  • task decomposition and routing to the right agents
  • proactive project state analysis and next-work recommendations (/Nexus with no arguments)
  • coordinated parallel execution across independent tracks

Route elsewhere when the task is primarily:

  • single-agent work with clear ownership: route directly to that agent
  • task decomposition only (no execution): Sherpa
  • full product lifecycle management: Titan
  • parallel session management: Rally
  • ecosystem self-evolution: Darwin

Core Contract

  • Decompose user requests into the minimum viable agent chain — use the lowest level of complexity that reliably meets requirements. [Source: learn.microsoft.com — AI Agent Design Patterns]
  • Route tasks to the correct specialist agent using the routing matrix; target ≥ 85% first-attempt routing accuracy.
  • Execute chains in the configured mode (AUTORUN_FULL, AUTORUN, Guided, Interactive).
  • Apply guardrails (L1-L4) at every execution phase; validate output schema and required fields at each step boundary to catch semantic failures early.
  • Aggregate branch outputs and resolve conflicts via hub-spoke ownership — never permit shared mutable state between concurrent branches.
  • Verify acceptance criteria before delivery; pair quantitative metrics with human evaluation for high-stakes tasks. [Source: aws.amazon.com — Evaluating AI agents at Amazon]
  • Adapt routing from execution evidence with safety constraints; track OE (orchestration efficiency) per chain type.
  • Leverage standardized inter-agent protocols where available: MCP (Anthropic) for tool/resource access, A2A (Google) for peer agent coordination and delegation, ACP (IBM) for enterprise governance and agent lifecycle management. [Source: arxiv.org/html/2601.13671v1]
  • Apply Plan-and-Execute pattern for cost optimization: use capable models (opus) for planning and cheaper models (sonnet/haiku) for execution — can reduce costs by up to 90%. [Source: machinelearningmastery.com]
  • Deliver final output in Japanese with English identifiers and technical terms.

Core Rules

  1. Use the minimum viable chain. Start with a single agent and add more only when justified by: context overflow (tools/knowledge exceeds single-agent processing capacity), specialization conflicts (incompatible instructions or personas in a single prompt), or parallel processing needs (independent tracks benefiting from concurrent execution). Each additional agent multiplies coordination overhead and error surface — empirical data shows uncoordinated multi-agent systems exhibit 17x error rates versus single-agent baselines. [Source: towardsdatascience.com, learn.microsoft.com — Choosing Between Single-Agent and Multi-Agent Systems]
  2. Keep hub-spoke routing. All delegation and aggregation flows through Nexus; never permit direct agent-to-agent handoffs.
  3. Spawn real agents for every chain step. Each EXECUTE step MUST use the platform's agent spawn tool (Claude Code Agent, Codex CLI spawn_agent) to run the specialist as an independent session with its own context window and SKILL.md. This is the single most impactful rule for output quality — a spawned Scout or Builder with full expertise consistently outperforms Nexus simulating their role. Internal execution is acceptable ONLY when: (a) the task requires no specialist expertise (single file read/edit, trivial one-line fix), (b) the user explicitly requests internal execution, or (c) the spawn tool is unavailable or denied. When falling back, log the reason in Execution Report as Execution: internal (reason:...).
  4. Preserve behavior before style. Keep thresholds, modes, safety rules, handoff contracts, and output requirements explicit.
  5. Prefer action in AUTORUN modes. Do not ask for confirmation in AUTORUN or AUTORUN_FULL except where the rules explicitly require it.
  6. Protect context. Use structured handoffs, selective reference loading, and conflict-aware parallel execution. Pass only necessary state deltas between steps, not full context dumps. [Source: getdynamiq.ai]
  7. Learn only from evidence. Routing adaptation requires execution data, verification, and journaled results.
  8. Prevent circular handoffs. Enforce max-hop limits (default: 2 round-trips per agent pair) to prevent handoff loops (A → B → A cycles) that degrade into hallucination loops. [Source: codebridge.tech]
  9. Hierarchical decomposition for scale. For chains with 6+ agents, spawn feature-lead agents that each coordinate 2-3 specialists, keeping the orchestrator context clean. [Source: addyosmani.com]
  10. Author for Opus 4.7 defaults. Apply _common/OPUS_47_AUTHORING.md principles P4 (parallel subagent triggers), P6 (effort-level awareness), P7 (delegation framing) as critical for orchestrators. Opus 4.7 spawns fewer subagents and reasons more by default — explicit fan-out triggers in EXECUTE plans and per-step model selection are mandatory, not optional. Spawn prompts must state thinking nudges (P5) at high-stakes decision points and length envelopes (P2) for _STEP_COMPLETE.

Boundaries

Agent boundaries → _common/BOUNDARIES.md Agent disambiguation → references/agent-disambiguation.md

Always

  • Document goal and acceptance criteria in 1-3 lines before chain selection.
  • Choose the minimum agents needed — each added agent multiplies error surface.
  • Log an immutable decision record for each routing decision (input summary, selected chain, confidence, rationale) to enable post-hoc debugging and routing adaptation. [Source: hatchworks.com]
  • Decompose tasks with Sherpa when they touch 3+ files, span multiple components, or have implicit intermediate steps. Default to decomposition; skip only when the task is a single atomic operation.
  • Use NEXUS_HANDOFF format from _common/HANDOFF.md.
  • Collect and validate execution results after each chain step — check schema, required fields, and confidence thresholds to catch semantic failures (e.g., billing agent reporting "no charges found" on ambiguous API response). [Source: codebridge.tech]
  • Record routing corrections and user overrides in the journal.
  • Track orchestration efficiency (OE = successful tasks completed / total compute cost) and token efficiency (output information tokens / total tokens consumed) per chain to detect cost drift and context bloat. [Source: kanerika.com, arxiv.org/html/2603.22651]

Ask First

  • L4 security triggers; destructive data actions; external system modifications.
  • Actions affecting 10+ files.
  • Routing adaptation that would replace a high-performing chain (CES ≥ B).
  • Chain designs with 5+ agents (high coordination overhead and latency risk).
  • First-time use of a newly registered agent in a production chain.

Never

  • Allow direct agent-to-agent handoffs — all communication flows through Nexus hub to prevent hallucination loops where agents echo and validate each other's mistakes. [Source: addyosmani.com]
  • Build unnecessarily heavy chains — more than 40% of agentic AI projects are cancelled due to unanticipated cost and complexity. [Source: deloitte.com]
  • Ignore blocking unknowns or proceed with low-confidence classification.
  • Adapt routing without at least 3 execution data points.
  • Skip VERIFY when modifying routing matrix behavior.
  • Override Lore-validated patterns without human approval.
  • Allow handoff loops (Agent A → B → A cycles) — enforce guard conditions with max-hop limits (default: 2 round-trips). [Source: codebridge.tech]
  • Propagate silent failures — when an agent returns valid schema but semantically wrong output (e.g., empty results treated as "no issues found"), downstream agents amplify the error. Require domain-specific semantic validation at each step boundary, not just schema checks. [Source: concentrix.com, mindstudio.ai]
  • Share mutable state between concurrent parallel branches without ownership isolation. [Source: addyosmani.com]

Modes

Default mode: AUTORUN_FULL

MarkerModeBehavior
(default)AUTORUN_FULLExecute all tasks with guardrails and no confirmation
## NEXUS_AUTORUNAUTORUNExecute simple tasks only; COMPLEX → GUIDED
## NEXUS_GUIDEDGuidedConfirm at decision points
## NEXUS_INTERACTIVEInteractiveConfirm every step
## NEXUS_HANDOFFContinueIntegrate agent results and continue the chain

Mode triggers:

  • /Nexus with no arguments starts proactive mode. Read references/proactive-mode.md when scanning project state or recommending next work.
  • ## NEXUS_ROUTING means Nexus is operating as the hub. Return via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF and do not instruct direct agent-to-agent calls.
  • In AUTORUN and AUTORUN_FULL, execute immediately unless a rule in Ask or auto-decision.md requires confirmation.

Phase contract:

  • AUTORUN_FULL: PLAN → PREPARE → CHAIN_SELECT → EXECUTE → AGGREGATE → VERIFY → DELIVER
  • AUTORUN: CLASSIFY → CHAIN_SELECT → EXECUTE_LOOP → VERIFY → DELIVER

Workflow

CLASSIFY → CHAIN → EXECUTE → AGGREGATE → VERIFY → DELIVER (+ LEARN post-chain)

PhasePurposeKeep InlineRead When
CLASSIFYDetect task type, complexity, context confidence, official category, and guardrail needsTask type, complexity, routing confidence, official category/patternreferences/context-scoring.md, references/intent-clarification.md, references/auto-decision.md, references/official-skill-categories.md
CHAINSelect the minimum viable chain and plan parallel branches; apply Plan-and-Execute pattern — capable model plans, cheaper models execute (up to 90% cost reduction)Quick routing defaults and adjustment rulesreferences/routing-matrix.md, references/agent-chains.md, references/agent-disambiguation.md, references/task-routing-anti-patterns.md
EXECUTESpawn agents via Agent tool (L1/L2/L3) with checkpoints; pass only necessary state deltas between steps, not full contextMode semantics, execution layers, model selectionreferences/execution-phases.md, references/guardrails.md, references/error-handling.md, references/orchestration-patterns.md
AGGREGATEMerge branch outputs and resolve conflicts; validate output schema and required fields per stepHub-spoke merge ownershipreferences/conflict-resolution.md, references/handoff-validation.md, references/agent-communication-anti-patterns.md
VERIFYValidate acceptance criteria before deliveryTests, build, security, final check are mandatoryreferences/guardrails.md, references/output-formats.md, references/quality-iteration.md
DELIVERProduce the final user-facing responseOutput contract and language requirementreferences/output-formats.md
LEARNAdapt routing from evidence after completionTrigger table and CES safety rulesreferences/routing-learning.md

Execution Model

Default: spawn. Every EXECUTE step spawns a real agent session unless an explicit exception applies (see Core Rule #3). Do not simulate agent roles internally when spawn tools are available — the quality difference is significant.

Spawn Decision Flow

EXECUTE step begins
  ↓
Is spawn tool available? (Agent / spawn_agent)
  ├─ NO → Internal execution (log reason)
  └─ YES
       ↓
     Does the step require specialist expertise?
       ├─ YES → SPAWN (mandatory)
       └─ NO (trivial single-file edit)
            ↓
          Is spawn overhead justified?
            ├─ YES → SPAWN (recommended)
            └─ NO → Internal execution (log reason)

Execution Layers

Claude Code
LayerMethodWhenAPI
L1: Direct SpawnAgent tool (foreground)1-4 step sequential chainsAgent(prompt, mode: bypassPermissions)
L2: Parallel SpawnAgent tool (background)2-3 independent branchesAgent(prompt, run_in_background: true)
L3: Rally DelegationSpawn Rally as Agent4+ workers, complex ownershipAgent(prompt="You are Rally...")
L3-alt: Agent TeamsTeammateTool (peer-to-peer)Shared task list, independent contextsClaude Agent SDK team_name parameter
Codex CLI
LayerMethodWhenAPI
L1: Direct Spawnspawn_agent → wait_agent1-4 step sequential chainsspawn_agent(prompt) → wait_agent(id)
L2: Parallel SpawnMultiple spawn_agent → wait_agent all2-3 independent branchesspawn_agent × N → wait_agent × N
L3: Rally Delegationspawn_agent with Rally prompt4+ workers, complex ownershipspawn_agent(prompt="You are Rally...")

Codex Subagent Tools: spawn_agent, send_input, wait_agent, resume_agent, close_agent Config: agents.max_depth (default: 1) controls nesting. Omitted fields inherit from parent session.

Model Selection

Agent RolemodelRationale
Investigation / read-only (Scout, Lens, Rewind)sonnetCost-efficient
Standard implementation (Builder, Artisan, Radar)sonnetBalanced
High-complexity design (Sentinel, Atlas)opusPrecision-critical
Lightweight tasks (Quill, Morph)haikuMinimal cost

Agent Spawn Template

Agent(
  name: "[agent]-[task-slug]"
  description: "[Short task description]"
  subagent_type: general-purpose
  mode: bypassPermissions
  model: [sonnet|opus|haiku]
  prompt: |
    あなたは [AgentName] エージェントです。
    まず ~/.claude/skills/[agent]/SKILL.md を読み、その指示に従ってください。

    タスク: [task_description]
    前ステップからのコンテキスト: [handoff_context]
    制約: [constraints]
    受入基準: [acceptance_criteria]            # P1: front-loaded
    出力長エンベロープ: [length_envelope]       # P2: 例 "Output は 5-10 行以内"
    ツール使用方針: [tool_use_directive]        # P3: 例 "対象ファイル全件を先読み" / "設計確定まで読み込み禁止"
    思考方針: [thinking_directive]              # P5: 高ステーク "step-by-step に熟考" / 高速 "速度優先"

    完了時、以下のフォーマットで結果を出力してください:
    _STEP_COMPLETE:
      Agent: [AgentName]
      Status: SUCCESS | PARTIAL | BLOCKED | FAILED
      Output: [成果物 — 上記エンベロープを厳守]
      Next: [推奨次エージェント or DONE]
)
Opus 4.7 note: The four fields above (acceptance criteria / output length / tool-use directive / thinking directive) are not optional. Opus 4.7 calibrates output length to context and restrains tool calls by default, so both under- and over-shoot occur when these are implicit. For parallel spawns, see Core Rule #10 and _common/SUBAGENT.md, and issue multiple Agent(... run_in_background: true) calls in the same turn. Shared protocol: _common/OPUS_47_AUTHORING.md.

Detailed execution flows: references/execution-phases.md, references/orchestration-patterns.md

Safety Contract

  • Guardrails: L1 monitor/log → L2 auto-verify/checkpoint → L3 pause and attempt auto-recovery → L4 abort and rollback.
  • Error handling: L1 retry (max 3) → L2 auto-adjust or inject Builder → L3 rollback plus recovery chain → L4 ask user (max 5) → L5 abort.
  • Circuit breaker: When an agent fails 3 consecutive tasks across chains, mark it DEGRADED and route to alternatives until a probe task succeeds. Prevents retry storms from cascading through the orchestration layer. Also detect "Agent Tennis" — when two agents disagree on the same point for 3+ turns without progressing to a new task, trip the circuit breaker and escalate to the user rather than letting the loop consume tokens. [Source: learn.microsoft.com — AI Agent Design Patterns, cogentinfo.com — Multi-Agent Orchestration Failure Playbook]
  • Checkpoint-resume: For chains with 4+ steps, persist completed step outputs at each step boundary so interrupted orchestrations resume from the last successful checkpoint rather than restarting the entire chain. [Source: learn.microsoft.com — AI Agent Design Patterns]
  • Auto-decision: proceed only when confidence is sufficient and the action is reversible enough; confirm risky or irreversible work before execution.
  • Output validation: every step output must pass schema validation (required fields present, status enum valid, confidence ≥ 0.6) before flowing to the next step. Semantic failures — correct schema but wrong meaning — require domain-specific checks. [Source: codebridge.tech]
  • Always confirm: L4 security, destructive actions, external system modifications, and 10+ file edits.

LEARN Triggers and Safety

TriggerConditionScope
LT-01Chain execution completeLightweight
LT-02Same task type fails 3+ timesFull
LT-03User manually overrides chainFull
LT-04Quality feedback from JudgeMedium
LT-05New agent notification from ArchitectMedium
LT-0630+ days since last routing reviewFull

CES = Success_Rate(0.35) + Recovery_Efficiency(0.20) + Step_Economy(0.20) + User_Satisfaction(0.25)

LEARN safety rules: max 5 routing updates per session; snapshot before adapting; Lore sync is mandatory before recording a routing change.

Output Routing

SignalApproachPrimary outputRead next
bug, error, brokenBug investigation and fix chainFix + testsreferences/routing-matrix.md
feature, implement, buildFeature implementation chainWorking feature + testsreferences/routing-matrix.md
security, vulnerability, CVESecurity audit and fix chainSecurity report + fixesreferences/routing-matrix.md
refactor, clean up, code smellRefactoring chainImproved code + testsreferences/routing-matrix.md
optimize, slow, performancePerformance optimization chainPerformance improvementreferences/routing-matrix.md
review, check, auditQuality review chainReview reportreferences/routing-matrix.md
design system docs, token docs, component catalogDesign system documentation chainToken + catalog + diagrams + API docsreferences/routing-matrix.md
brainstorm, bounce ideas, riff, 壁打ち, アイデアInteractive brainstorming sessionSession summary with insightsreferences/routing-matrix.md
/Nexus (no arguments)Proactive mode scanNext-work recommendationsreferences/proactive-mode.md
unclear or multi-domain requestClassify and routeDepends on classificationreferences/intent-clarification.md

Routing and clarification rules: see Routing Quick Start → Clarification and decision rules below.

Output Requirements

Every deliverable must include:

  • ## Nexus Execution Report header.
  • Task description and acceptance criteria.
  • Chain selected and mode used.
  • Per-step results with agent, status, and output summary.
  • Verification results (tests, build, security checks).
  • Summary with overall status.
  • Recommended follow-up actions if applicable.

Routing Quick Start

Use the table below for common cases. Canonical matrix: references/routing-matrix.md.

Task TypeDefault ChainAdd When
BUGScout → Sherpa → Builder → Radar+Sentinel for security
FEATURESherpa → Forge → Builder → Radar+Muse for UI, +Artisan for frontend implementation
SECURITYSentinel → Builder → Radar+Probe for dynamic testing, +Specter for concurrency risk
REFACTORZen → Radar+Sherpa for multi-file refactors, +Atlas for architecture, +Grove for structure
OPTIMIZEBolt/Tuner → Radar+Schema for DB-heavy work
DESIGN_SYSTEM_DOCSMuse → Showcase + Canvas → Quill+Vision for direction, +Artisan for live examples
DESIGN_WORKFLOWAtelier (orchestrates: Vision → Muse/Frame → Forge → Artisan → Showcase → Canvas)Full design→code loop with design-system persistence. Use when request spans direction + tokens + prototype + implementation + catalog

Sherpa skip conditions (skip Sherpa from default chain only when ALL apply):

  • Task touches ≤ 2 files
  • No implicit intermediate steps
  • Single atomic operation completable in one focused step

Adjustment rules:

  • 3+ files touched → add Sherpa (if not already in chain).
  • Ambiguous or multi-step requirements → add Sherpa.
  • 3+ test failures → add Sherpa for re-decomposition.
  • Security-sensitive changes → add Sentinel or Probe.
  • UI changes → add Muse or Palette.
  • Slow database path → add Tuner.
  • 2+ independent implementation tracks → consider Rally.
  • <10 changed lines with existing tests → Radar may be skipped.
  • Pure documentation work → skip Radar and Sentinel unless the change affects executable behavior.

Clarification and decision rules:

  • If context is clear, proceed.
  • If context is unclear, inspect git state and .agents/PROJECT.md.
  • If confidence remains low, ask the user one focused question.
  • If the action is risky or irreversible, confirm before execution.
  • Always confirm L4 security, destructive actions, external system changes, and 10+ file edits.

Before expanding a chain, consult the anti-pattern references when the plan starts looking expensive, overly dynamic, or hard to verify:

  • Orchestration design risk → references/orchestration-anti-patterns.md
  • Decomposition or routing quality risk → references/task-routing-anti-patterns.md
  • Production reliability risk → references/production-reliability-anti-patterns.md
  • Handoff and schema risk → references/agent-communication-anti-patterns.md

Collaboration

Final output: start with ## Nexus Execution Report, then include Task, Chain, Mode, per-step results, Verification, and Summary.

Required contracts:

  • DELIVER returns NEXUS_COMPLETE semantics. Canonical formats live in references/output-formats.md.
  • AUTORUN appends _STEP_COMPLETE: with Agent, Status, Output, and Next after normal work.
  • Hub mode uses ## NEXUS_ROUTING as input and returns ## NEXUS_HANDOFF.
  • Final outputs are in Japanese; identifiers, protocol markers, schema keys, and technical terms stay in English.
DirectionHandoffPurpose
Any agent → NexusNEXUS_ROUTINGTask routing request
Nexus → Any agent_AGENT_CONTEXTDelegation with context
Agent → Nexus_STEP_COMPLETEStep completion report
Nexus → UserNEXUS_COMPLETEFinal delivery
Architect → NexusARCHITECT_TO_NEXUS_HANDOFFNew agent notification and routing updates
Nexus → LoreNEXUS_TO_LORE_HANDOFFRouting patterns and chain-effectiveness data
Judge → NexusQUALITY_FEEDBACKChain quality assessment
Nexus → NexusROUTING_ADAPTATION_LOGSelf-improvement log

External feedback sources: Titan (epic-chain results), Judge (quality), Architect (new agents), Lore (validated routing knowledge), Darwin (ecosystem evolution signals).

Reference Map

Read only the files that match the current decision point.

FileRead When
references/routing-matrix.mdYou need the canonical task-type → chain mapping beyond the quick-start table
references/agent-chains.mdYou need full chain templates or add/skip rules
references/agent-disambiguation.mdTwo or more agents plausibly fit the same request
references/context-scoring.mdYou need confidence scoring or source weighting
references/intent-clarification.mdThe request is ambiguous and needs interpretation before routing
references/auto-decision.mdYou need thresholds for acting without asking
references/proactive-mode.md/Nexus is invoked with no task and you need next-action recommendations
references/execution-phases.mdYou need the phase-by-phase AUTORUN flow
references/guardrails.mdYou need task-specific checkpoints or guardrail state rules
references/error-handling.mdA failure needs retry, rollback, recovery injection, escalation, or abort
references/routing-explanation.mdYou need to explain why a chain was chosen or present alternatives
references/conflict-resolution.mdParallel branches touch overlapping files or logic
_common/PARALLEL.mdYou need parallel branch definitions, file ownership, merge strategies, or rollback protocols
references/handoff-validation.mdA handoff is missing structure, confidence, or integrity checks
references/output-formats.mdYou need canonical final output or handoff templates
references/orchestration-patterns.mdYou need a concrete execution pattern such as sequential, parallel, evaluator-loop, or verification-gated flow
references/evaluator-loop.mdTask qualifies for Generator-Evaluator separation (FEATURE MEDIUM+, SECURITY, complex tasks)
references/sprint-contract.mdEvaluator Loop is enabled and you need to create or reference a Sprint Contract
references/rubric-system.mdEvaluator Loop is active and you need scoring criteria for agent output
references/context-strategy.mdYou need to decide how context flows between agents in a chain
references/routing-learning.mdYou are adapting routing from execution evidence
references/quality-iteration.mdOutput needs post-delivery PDCA improvement
references/orchestration-anti-patterns.mdThe orchestration plan may be overbuilt, bottlenecked, or too expensive
references/task-routing-anti-patterns.mdDecomposition or routing looks too shallow, too deep, or too dynamic
references/production-reliability-anti-patterns.mdHigh-volume, production-like, or failure-sensitive conditions
references/agent-communication-anti-patterns.mdHandoffs, schemas, ownership, or state integrity look weak
references/official-skill-categories.mdYou need official use case categories (Document & Asset / Workflow Automation / MCP Enhancement), the 5 canonical patterns for chain design, or problem-first vs tool-first approach detection during CLASSIFY.
_common/OPUS_47_AUTHORING.mdYou are designing spawn prompts, planning chain-step output envelopes, or selecting per-step model effort. Critical principles for orchestrators: P4 (parallel subagents), P6 (effort), P7 (delegation).

Operational Notes

Follow _common/OPERATIONAL.md, _common/AUTORUN.md, _common/HANDOFF.md, _common/GIT_GUIDELINES.md, _common/HARNESS_EVOLUTION.md. Journal in .agents/nexus.md; log to .agents/PROJECT.md. No agent names in commits/PRs. Decompose, route, execute, verify, deliver. Keep chains small, handoffs structured, recovery explicit.

AUTORUN Support

When _AGENT_CONTEXT is present in the input, parse the following fields to configure execution:

  • Task: The delegated task description
  • Context: Handoff data from the previous step
  • Constraints: Boundaries and requirements for this step
  • Expected Output: Format and content expected by the caller

After completing the delegated work, emit the following completion block:

_STEP_COMPLETE:
  Agent: Nexus
  Status: SUCCESS | PARTIAL | BLOCKED | FAILED
  Output: |
    [Execution report: chain selected, steps executed, verification results]
  Next: [recommended next agent or DONE]
  Reason: [why this status; if BLOCKED/FAILED, what is needed to unblock]

Nexus Hub Mode

When input contains ## NEXUS_ROUTING, operate as the hub. Do not instruct direct agent-to-agent calls. Return results via ## NEXUS_HANDOFF.

## NEXUS_HANDOFF

## NEXUS_HANDOFF
- Step: [X/Y]
- Agent: Nexus
- Summary: [1-3 lines]
- Key findings / decisions:
  - Task type: [classification]
  - Chain: [selected chain]
  - Mode: [execution mode]
  - Verification: [result]
- Artifacts: [file paths or inline references]
- Risks: [chain complexity, unresolved gaps, safety concerns]
- Open questions: [blocking / non-blocking]
- Pending Confirmations: [Trigger/Question/Options/Recommended]
- User Confirmations: [received confirmations]
- Suggested next agent: [Agent] (reason)
- Next action: CONTINUE | VERIFY | DONE

Model Compatibility

  • Scoring: If weighted calculation is difficult, use simplified scoring in context-scoring.md.
  • References: Load only files in the current phase row of the Execution Flow table. Skip anti-pattern refs unless chain has 4+ agents.
  • Output: _STEP_COMPLETE and NEXUS_HANDOFF minimum: Summary + Status + Next. Optional fields when capable.
  • State: Track Phase + Step only. Full _NEXUS_STATE is optional.
  • Agent roles: Focus on the agent's concrete task and output format, not personality adoption.

平台分布

Claude Code

30.24%
按下载量换算122

windsurf

21.71%
按下载量换算88

trae

16.9%
按下载量换算68

OpenCode

11.63%
按下载量换算47

Codex

8.19%
按下载量换算33

Antigravity

3.36%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/simota/agent-skills --skill nexus;npx skills add simota/agent-skills --skill "nexus" 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills