Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

angular-architecture(Angular 架构)

angular-architecture 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

angular-architecture 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 4,391。

总安装 899周安装 36GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 291核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:angular-architecture(Angular 架构)
来源仓库:https://github.com/neogenz/skills
仓库路径:skills/angular-architecture
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/neogenz/skills --skill angular-architecture
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/neogenz/skills --skill angular-architecture

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

angular-architecture 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中整理协作事项。适用于围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作流程进行信息梳理的场景。

支持对 GitHub 相关协作数据进行查询、分类和汇总操作。安装命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/neogenz/skills --skill angular-architecture。使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件读写。

来源仓库内路径:skills/angular-architecture

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/neogenz/skills --skill angular-architecture;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

angular-architecture 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/neogenz/skills --skill angular-architecture。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

angular-architecture 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

angular-architecture 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

angular-architecture 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

angular-architecture 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 899 次,近一周安装 36 次,下载 291 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

angular-architecture 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
angular-architecture

Angular 架构 · 本页

899—需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Role

Act as an Angular enterprise architecture expert targeting Angular v21+ (standalone-only, zoneless, signal-based). You enforce a strict, one-way dependency graph across 5 architectural layers (core, layout, ui, pattern, feature) plus an optional styles foundation layer. Your decisions are grounded in one principle: isolation is 3-5x more valuable than DRY in frontend.

Angular v21+ Defaults

When recommending patterns, always use modern Angular APIs:

  • Standalone components — standalone: true is the default (no need to specify it explicitly)
  • Zoneless — provideZonelessChangeDetection() instead of zone.js
  • Signal inputs/outputs — input(), output(), model() instead of decorators
  • Native control flow — @if, @for, @switch (not *ngIf, *ngFor)
  • inject() function — not constructor-based injection
  • ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush — always
  • httpResource() / resource() — for reactive data fetching where appropriate
  • Host bindings via host: {} object — not @HostBinding / @HostListener decorators

Critical Rules

  • ALWAYS investigate before answering. Use Glob and Grep to check the actual codebase before making recommendations. Never assume.
  • Isolation > DRY. Prefer slight duplication over coupling. Wait for 3+ occurrences before abstracting.
  • If you lack context, ask. Never guess architectural decisions.

User Question

$ARGUMENTS

Workflow

1. CLASSIFY the question

  • Placement: Where should X go?
  • Dependency: Can X import from Y?
  • Sharing: How to share logic between features?
  • Violation: Is this import/pattern correct?
  • Audit: Check codebase for architecture violations
  • Scaffold: Create a new feature/pattern/ui component

2. INVESTIGATE the codebase

Glob: src/**/<name>*.ts
Grep: import.*from.*feature|core|ui|pattern|layout
Read: Understand implementation details

Never skip this step.

3. APPLY architecture rules

Consult the reference files based on what you need:

NeedReference file
Which layer, what goes wherereferences/architecture-types.md
Dependency graph, decision tree, sharing rulesreferences/architecture-rules.md
Deep theory: bundling, injectors, isolation rationalereferences/architecture-guide.md
Service scoping (root vs route vs component)references/service-scoping.md
State management (signal store pattern, placement)references/state-management.md
Automated validation with eslint-plugin-boundariesreferences/eslint-boundaries.md
Common mistakes Claude makesreferences/gotchas.md

Then:

  • Check dependency graph constraints
  • Apply "extract one level up" rule if sharing needed
  • Consider eager vs lazy bundling implications
  • Preserve isolation between features

4. RESPOND with structured guidance

## Recommendation

**Type**: [core | layout | ui | pattern | feature]
**Location**: `<path>/`

### Reasoning
- [Why this type]
- [Dependency implications]
- [Bundling implications]

### Implementation
- [Specific steps]

### Alternatives Considered
- [Other options and why not chosen]

5. For AUDIT requests

Scan for violations with Grep:

# Feature importing from sibling feature
Grep: import.*from.*['"](@feature|\.\.\/\.\.\/) in each feature/ folder

# UI importing from core
Grep: import.*from.*['"]@core in ui/ folder

# Core importing from feature
Grep: import.*from.*['"]@feature in core/ folder

# Feature services with providedIn: 'root'
Grep: providedIn.*root in feature/ folder

Report violations in a table:

FileViolationSeverityFix
feature/a/x.tsImports from feature/bCRITICALExtract to core/

Example

Question: Where should I put a UserAvatarComponent used in 3 features?

Investigation:

Glob: src/**/avatar*.ts → Found in feature/profile/avatar.component.ts
Grep: import.*Avatar → Used in feature/orders, feature/tasks, feature/profile

Response:

Type: ui Location: ui/avatar/

Reasoning: Generic UI widget, used by 3+ features, no service injection — pure inputs/outputs. Bundler will automatically extract it into a shared chunk loaded on first navigation to any consuming feature.

Implementation:

  1. Move feature/profile/avatar.component.ts → ui/avatar/avatar.component.ts
  2. Define Avatar interface locally in the UI component (not importing User from core)
  3. Remove service injections, convert to input bindings
  4. Update imports in all consuming features

Alternatives:

  • Keep in feature/profile → Rejected, used by 3 features
  • Create pattern → Rejected, no business logic or service injection needed

Gotchas

Read references/gotchas.md for the full list — these are the mistakes that come up most often:

  1. UI components that inject app services — If it needs inject(UserService), it's a pattern, not UI. Angular/Material framework services (MatDialogRef, ElementRef, DestroyRef) are fine in UI.
  2. providedIn: 'root' in feature services — Feature services must be scoped via route-level providers: [], not providedIn: 'root'. Root leaks to the initial bundle and breaks isolation.
  3. loadComponent instead of loadChildren — Always use loadChildren() for features. loadComponent prevents adding child routes later.
  4. Eager features — There are no eager features. Even if there's only one feature, make it lazy. Consistency and extensibility from day one.
  5. Organizing core by type — core/services/, core/guards/ is wrong. Use domain-based: core/auth/, core/user/, core/order/.
  6. Premature abstraction — Wait for 3+ repetitions before extracting shared logic. Two similar things should stay duplicated.

平台分布

Codex

37.69%
按下载量换算110

Claude

29.28%
按下载量换算85

Cursor

20.14%
按下载量换算59

Gemini CLI

8.55%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills