Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

nav-task-mode(导航任务模式)

nav-task-mode 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

nav-task-mode 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 161下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:nav-task-mode(导航任务模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator
仓库路径:skills/nav-task-mode
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill nav-task-mode
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill nav-task-mode

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

nav-task-mode 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,支持基于来源仓库和任务场景进行信息聚合与过滤。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,具体路径为 skills/nav-task-mode。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否涉及联网或文件操作等敏感行为。建议结合原始 README 文档进一步核验功能细节与使用边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/nav-task-mode

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill nav-task-mode;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

nav-task-mode 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/alekspetrov/navigator --skill nav-task-mode。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

nav-task-mode 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

nav-task-mode 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

nav-task-mode 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

nav-task-mode 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 161 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

nav-task-mode 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
nav-task-mode

导航任务模式 · 本页

188161只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Navigator Task Mode Skill

Unified workflow orchestration that coordinates between skills, loop mode, and direct execution based on task complexity and type.

Why This Exists

Navigator had three disconnected workflow systems:

  1. Skills (frontend-component, etc.) - have mini-workflows (Step 1 → Step 7)
  2. Loop Mode - separate phase system (INIT → COMPLETE)
  3. CLAUDE.md - documents workflow nobody enforces

Result: Conflicts when multiple systems try to run.

Solution: Task Mode acts as a coordinator - detecting when skills should handle workflow vs when to provide standalone phase guidance.

How It Works

User Request
    ↓
TASK MODE (this skill)
    ├─ Simple task? → Direct execution (no overhead)
    ├─ Skill matches? → Let skill run (it has workflow)
    └─ Substantial, no skill? → Task Mode phases

When to Invoke

Auto-invoke when:

  • User starts substantial work (3+ steps expected)
  • No obvious skill match (not "create component", "add endpoint", etc.)
  • Request involves planning, refactoring, or multi-file changes
  • Loop mode is disabled but structured execution needed

DO NOT invoke if:

  • Trivial task (typo fix, single line change)
  • Skill will clearly handle it (component creation, endpoint, migration, etc.)
  • User says "quick", "just do", "simple fix"
  • Already in Task Mode or Loop Mode

Configuration

Task Mode settings in .agent/.nav-config.json:

{
  "task_mode": {
    "enabled": true,
    "auto_detect": true,
    "defer_to_skills": true,
    "complexity_threshold": 0.5,
    "show_phase_indicator": true
  }
}

Options:

  • enabled: Master switch for Task Mode
  • auto_detect: Auto-detect complexity (vs explicit invocation only)
  • defer_to_skills: Let matching skills handle their own workflow
  • complexity_threshold: Score (0-1) required to activate
  • show_phase_indicator: Show phase banners during execution

Execution Steps

Step 1: Analyze Request

Run complexity detection:

python3 functions/complexity_detector.py \
  --request "{USER_REQUEST}" \
  --context "{RECENT_CONTEXT}"

Complexity signals:

  • Multi-file changes expected (+0.3)
  • Planning language ("implement", "refactor", "add feature") (+0.2)
  • Vague requirements needing research (+0.2)
  • Cross-system changes (frontend+backend) (+0.3)
  • Testing requirements mentioned (+0.1)

Simple task signals:

  • Single file mentioned (-0.3)
  • Fix/typo/update language (-0.2)
  • Specific location given (-0.2)
  • "Quick" or "simple" mentioned (-0.3)

Decision:

IF complexity_score < threshold:
  → Direct execution (exit Task Mode)

Step 2: Check Skill Match

Run skill detection:

python3 functions/skill_detector.py \
  --request "{USER_REQUEST}" \
  --available-skills "{SKILLS_LIST}"

Skill matching rules:

  • "create component" → frontend-component
  • "add endpoint" → backend-endpoint
  • "database migration" → database-migration
  • "write test" → backend-test/frontend-test
  • etc.

Decision:

IF matching_skill AND defer_to_skills:
  → Show: "Detected: {SKILL_NAME} skill will handle this"
  → Exit Task Mode (skill has workflow)

Step 3: Initialize Task Mode

If substantial task, no skill match:

Display activation:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
TASK MODE ACTIVATED
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Task: {TASK_SUMMARY}
Complexity: {SCORE} (threshold: {THRESHOLD})
Skills matched: None (Task Mode will orchestrate)

Phases:
  ○ RESEARCH - Understand requirements
  ○ PLAN - Create implementation strategy
  ○ IMPL - Execute changes
  ○ VERIFY - Test and validate
  ○ COMPLETE - Commit and document

Starting RESEARCH phase...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Step 4: Execute Phases

RESEARCH Phase:

  • Use Task agent for codebase exploration
  • Identify affected files
  • Find existing patterns
  • Document unknowns

Show phase transition:

python3 functions/phase_indicator.py \
  --phase "RESEARCH" \
  --status "complete" \
  --next "PLAN"
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
PHASE: RESEARCH → PLAN
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Research completed:
  ✓ Found {N} related files
  ✓ Identified patterns in {LOCATION}
  ✓ Dependencies mapped

Moving to PLAN phase...
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

PLAN Phase:

  • Create TodoWrite items
  • Identify order of changes
  • Document approach

IMPL Phase:

  • Execute planned changes
  • Follow project patterns
  • Write tests as appropriate

VERIFY Phase:

  • Run tests
  • Type check
  • Build validation
  • Run nav-simplify (if enabled)

COMPLETE Phase:

  • Commit changes
  • Update documentation
  • Close tickets (if PM configured)
  • Suggest compact

Step 5: Complete Task Mode

Display completion:

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
TASK MODE COMPLETE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Task: {TASK_SUMMARY}
Phases:
  ✓ RESEARCH - {DURATION}
  ✓ PLAN - {DURATION}
  ✓ IMPL - {DURATION}
  ✓ VERIFY - {DURATION}
  ✓ COMPLETE

Summary:
- {FILES_CHANGED} files changed
- {TESTS_ADDED} tests added
- Committed: {COMMIT_SHA}

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Predefined Functions

functions/complexity_detector.py

Analyzes request to determine complexity score.

Usage:

python3 functions/complexity_detector.py \
  --request "Refactor the auth system to use JWT" \
  --context "Working on user management"

Returns:

{
  "complexity_score": 0.7,
  "signals": {
    "multi_file": true,
    "planning_language": true,
    "cross_system": false
  },
  "recommendation": "task_mode",
  "reason": "Refactoring task with multi-file scope"
}

functions/skill_detector.py

Checks if a skill should handle this request.

Usage:

python3 functions/skill_detector.py \
  --request "Add a login component" \
  --available-skills '["frontend-component", "backend-endpoint", "database-migration"]'

Returns:

{
  "matching_skill": "frontend-component",
  "confidence": 0.95,
  "triggers": ["create component", "add component"],
  "defer": true,
  "reason": "Request matches frontend-component skill triggers"
}

functions/phase_indicator.py

Generates phase transition displays.

Usage:

python3 functions/phase_indicator.py \
  --phase "IMPL" \
  --status "in_progress" \
  --progress 60 \
  --details '{"files_changed": 3, "tests_written": 2}'

Returns: Formatted phase indicator block.


Integration with Navigator

With Loop Mode

Task Mode is lighter weight than Loop Mode:

  • Loop Mode: Strict iteration control, stagnation detection, EXIT_SIGNAL
  • Task Mode: Phase guidance, skill coordination, no strict gates

When to use which:

  • Loop Mode: "Run until done", autonomous iteration
  • Task Mode: Substantial task, need structure but not strict iteration

Can coexist: Loop Mode wraps Task Mode phases if both active.

With Skills

Task Mode defers to skills by default:

  • Skill has its own workflow (Steps 1-7)
  • Task Mode doesn't add overhead
  • Just shows "Skill X will handle this"

Override: Set defer_to_skills: false to always use Task Mode phases.

With nav-simplify

Simplification runs during VERIFY phase:

  • After tests pass
  • Before committing
  • Respects simplification.enabled config

With Autonomous Completion

COMPLETE phase triggers autonomous protocol:

  • Commit changes
  • Archive documentation
  • Close tickets
  • Create markers

Comparison Table

AspectDirect ExecutionTask ModeLoop Mode
ComplexityLowMedium-HighHigh
Phase trackingNoneVisual phasesStrict phases
Iteration controlNoneNoneEXIT_SIGNAL
Skill coordinationNoneDefersIndependent
Best forQuick fixesFeaturesAutonomous work

Examples

Example 1: Simple Fix (Direct Execution)

User: "Fix the typo in README"

→ Complexity: 0.1 (below threshold)
→ Direct execution (no Task Mode overhead)

Example 2: Component Creation (Skill Defers)

User: "Create a UserProfile component"

→ Complexity: 0.6
→ Skill match: frontend-component (0.95 confidence)
→ Task Mode defers: "frontend-component skill will handle this"
→ Skill executes its own Step 1-7 workflow

Example 3: Refactoring (Task Mode Active)

User: "Refactor auth to use JWT instead of sessions"

→ Complexity: 0.8
→ Skill match: None
→ Task Mode activates
→ RESEARCH: Explore current auth implementation
→ PLAN: Document JWT migration steps
→ IMPL: Execute changes across files
→ VERIFY: Run tests, simplify code
→ COMPLETE: Commit, document

Example 4: With Loop Mode

User: "Run until done: implement user roles"

→ Loop Mode activated (explicit trigger)
→ Task Mode phases guide each iteration:
    Iteration 1: RESEARCH phase
    Iteration 2: PLAN + IMPL phases
    Iteration 3: IMPL + VERIFY phases
    Iteration 4: COMPLETE + EXIT_SIGNAL

Error Handling

Config not found:

Task Mode config not found in .nav-config.json.
Using defaults: auto_detect=true, threshold=0.5

Skill detection fails:

  • Fall back to Task Mode (conservative)
  • Log warning but continue

Phase detection ambiguous:

  • Default to current or next logical phase
  • Show reasoning for user

Success Criteria

Task Mode succeeds when:

  • Simple tasks execute without overhead
  • Skills handle their matched requests
  • Substantial tasks get phase structure
  • No conflicts between systems
  • User sees clear progress indicators

Verification Checklist

After implementation:

  • "Add login component" → frontend-component runs (not Task Mode)
  • "Refactor auth system" → Task Mode runs (no matching skill)
  • "Fix typo" → Direct execution (not substantial)
  • Phase indicators show during Task Mode
  • Skills continue working unchanged
  • Loop Mode can wrap Task Mode phases

This skill provides unified workflow orchestration, resolving conflicts between Navigator's multiple workflow systems.

平台分布

Codex

35.78%
按下载量换算24

Claude

32.3%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

17.67%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

10.01%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills