Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

multi-agent-filesystem-governance(多 Agent 文件系统治理)

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 15,214。

总安装 8,009周安装 324GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,514核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:multi-agent-filesystem-governance(多 Agent 文件系统治理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/darinrowe/multi-agent-filesystem-governance
安装命令:
openclaw skills install multi-agent-filesystem-governance
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install multi-agent-filesystem-governance

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

管理多代理环境下的文件系统组织与文件操作决策,确保数据归属清晰。适用于划分私有作品空间、防止文件冲突的场景。提供路径映射规则与访问控制建议,强化数据隔离。安装命令为 openclaw skills install multi-agent-filesystem-governance,建议配合日志审计使用。

使用前应定义命名规范与保留策略,避免误删重要资产。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install multi-agent-filesystem-governance;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install multi-agent-filesystem-governance。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 8,009 次,近一周安装 324 次,下载 2,514 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

multi-agent-filesystem-governance 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
multi-agent-filesystem-governance

多 Agent 文件系统治理 · 本页

8,009—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
multi-agent-filesystem-governance
description
Govern filesystem organization and file-operation decisions in multi-agent environments. Use when deciding where files should live across agent-private workspaces, shared resources, archives, downloads, scripts, notes, knowledge vaults, and code project folders; when defining directory conventions; when triaging downloads; when preventing cross-agent overwrites; or when standardizing file placement and lifecycle rules for reusable agent setups.

Multi-Agent Filesystem Governance

Use this skill to make safe, consistent filesystem decisions in environments where multiple agents may create, edit, move, download, organize, or archive files.

This skill governs ownership, placement, lifecycle, and write boundaries. It is not tied to a specific product, path layout, operating system, or note-taking tool.

Core objective

Ensure that every file has:

  1. a clear ownership scope
  2. a clear storage location
  3. a clear lifecycle state
  4. a clear modification rule

When uncertain, choose the narrowest safe scope and the least shared location.

Scope model

Classify every file, folder, and file operation into exactly one of these scopes:

  • agent-private: used by one agent only
  • shared: intentionally reusable or accessible by multiple agents
  • archive: inactive, historical, completed, frozen, or retained for reference

If scope is unclear, default to agent-private.

Storage model

Use three top-level storage categories conceptually, even if local directory names differ:

  • agent areas: private per-agent working locations
  • shared areas: common reusable resources
  • archive areas: inactive or historical materials

Do not depend on any single hard-coded path. Preserve conceptual boundaries even when adapting to local layouts.

Required decision order

Before creating, editing, moving, renaming, or deleting files, determine the following in order:

  1. What is the artifact?
  2. Is it temporary, active, reusable, frozen, or historical?
  3. Is it private to one agent or shared by multiple agents?
  4. What is the narrowest valid location?
  5. Will this action affect other agents or shared workflows?

If any answer is unclear, choose a private non-destructive location first.

Default rules

Prefer private over shared

If a file does not clearly require cross-agent reuse, place it in an agent-private location.

Do not write across agent boundaries by default

Do not create, edit, move, or overwrite files belonging to another agent unless the task explicitly requires it.

Treat shared locations as high-impact

Writing to a shared location is a wider-scope action. Use shared locations only when reuse, collaboration, or standardization is intended.

Keep archive separate from active work

Archived material is not an active workspace. Do not continue editing files in archive locations. Restore or copy them into an active or private area first.

Treat temporary locations as disposable

Do not keep the only important copy of a file in a temp or scratch location.

Content-type placement guidance

Apply these rules regardless of exact local path names.

Skills

  • Put reusable multi-agent skills in a shared skills location.
  • Put experimental, agent-specific, or override skills in an agent-private skills location.
  • If the same skill exists in both shared and private locations, prefer the more specific private version for that agent.

Workspaces

  • Put active working files, drafts, and intermediate artifacts in the current agent’s private workspace unless they are intentionally shared.
  • Do not move private task files into shared locations prematurely.

Scripts

  • Put reusable utility scripts in a shared scripts location.
  • Put task-specific or agent-specific scripts in a private scripts location or within the relevant project.
  • Do not scatter unrelated scripts across arbitrary folders.

Downloads

  • Route newly downloaded files into a dedicated intake location first.
  • Classify and move them later into proper long-term locations.
  • Do not leave downloads scattered across project folders, knowledge vaults, or temp directories without intent.

Knowledge notes and vaults

  • Put durable reference notes and curated knowledge into a designated knowledge base or vault location.
  • Keep rough task notes private until they are worth preserving or sharing.
  • Do not use the knowledge base as a dumping ground for arbitrary transient files.

Code projects

  • Store code projects in designated project locations.
  • For durable, long-lived repositories, prefer a dedicated project root such as ~/projects/<repo>.
  • Use /tmp/... for temporary reproduction, validation, or throwaway clones, then promote ongoing work into ~/projects/<repo>.
  • Separate experimental, active, frozen, and archived projects when practical.
  • Do not mix project source trees with general downloads, archives, note repositories, or agent runtime/config trees.
  • Read references/project-directory-best-practices.md when the question is specifically about where formal repositories should live versus where temporary repo work should happen.

Archives

  • Move inactive, completed, superseded, or retained materials into archive locations.
  • Keep archive structure stable and low-churn.
  • Prefer append-only archival behavior unless explicit cleanup is required.

File lifecycle model

Classify files into one of these lifecycle states:

  • temporary: scratch, disposable, rebuildable
  • active: currently being edited or used
  • shared: actively reused by multiple agents
  • frozen: paused but potentially resumable
  • archived: historical, completed, or retained for record

When lifecycle changes, move the file or justify keeping it in place.

Safety rules for file operations

Create

Create files in the narrowest valid scope first.

Edit

Edit in place only when ownership and scope are clear.

Move

Move files when ownership or lifecycle changes.

Copy

Copy instead of move when preserving history or minimizing disruption matters.

Delete

Delete only when the file is clearly temporary, redundant, or explicitly approved for removal.

Rename

Rename to improve clarity, ownership, lifecycle visibility, or discoverability — not for cosmetic churn alone.

Collision and precedence rules

When equivalent resources exist in multiple scopes, prefer the most specific valid source:

  1. agent-private
  2. shared
  3. bundled, default, or global

Use overrides intentionally. Do not create duplicate variants without reason.

What to avoid

Avoid these patterns:

  • dumping everything into one shared root
  • using archive as a live workspace
  • downloading directly into long-term storage without triage
  • scattering scripts across unrelated folders
  • mixing code projects with note-vault content
  • placing durable knowledge only in temporary notes
  • editing another agent’s private area without explicit need
  • using shared locations by default “just in case”

Recommended behavior when uncertain

If the correct location is unclear:

  1. choose agent-private
  2. choose non-destructive actions
  3. preserve reversibility
  4. avoid shared writes
  5. ask for clarification only when the ambiguity materially affects future organization or other agents

Decision template

When deciding where something should go, return:

  • Scope:
  • Lifecycle:
  • Recommended location type:
  • Reason:
  • Shared-impact note:

Output expectations

When applying this skill:

  • make scope explicit
  • make lifecycle explicit
  • recommend the narrowest valid location
  • state whether other agents are affected
  • prefer durable rules over ad hoc path guesses

平台分布

OpenClaw

76.45%
按下载量换算1,922

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills