Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计需要联网github未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

modernizemodernize 命令行

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

441

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

1

下载量

143
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:modernize(modernize 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/modernize
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins --skill modernize
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/jschulte/claude-plugins --skill modernize

简介

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

  • 适合梳理敏感配置、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。
  • 不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,需确认最小权限和操作边界。
  • 涉及密钥、令牌或生产系统时应先脱敏并控制操作范围。
  • modernize 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Modernize (Brownfield Dependency Upgrade)

Runs after Gear 6 for brownfield projects with modernize: true in .stackshift-state.json.

Prerequisites: Gears 1-6 complete, 100% spec coverage established Output: Modern dependency versions, updated tests, synchronized specs, upgrade report Scope: Node.js/TypeScript projects only


Constraints

  • Do NOT upgrade to pre-release, beta, or canary versions. Use only stable releases.
  • Do NOT delete lockfiles (package-lock.json, yarn.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml).
  • Do NOT run npm audit fix --force. Use npm audit fix only.
  • Do NOT proceed to the next phase until the current phase passes its gate check.
  • Execute phases sequentially. No phases run in parallel.
  • If /speckit.analyze is unavailable, manually compare spec acceptance criteria against test results as a fallback.

Trigger Conditions

Read .stackshift-state.json in the project root. Verify ALL of:

  1. path is "brownfield"
  2. modernize is true
  3. Gear 6 (implement) is complete

If any condition is false, stop and report which condition failed.

If path is "greenfield", stop. This skill is for brownfield projects only.


State Management

State file: .stackshift-state.json (project root) Working directory: .modernize/

On start, update .stackshift-state.json:

{ "modernize": true, "modernizeStatus": "in-progress", "modernizeStarted": "<ISO timestamp>" }

On success, update:

{ "modernizeStatus": "complete", "modernizeCompleted": "<ISO timestamp>" }

On failure, update:

{ "modernizeStatus": "failed", "modernizeError": "<summary of failure>" }

Rollback Procedure

If any phase fails and cannot be recovered:

  1. Copy .modernize/baseline-package.json back to package.json.
  2. Copy .modernize/baseline-lockfile back to the original lockfile location (if saved).
  3. Run npm install.
  4. Run npm test to verify baseline is restored.
  5. If baseline tests pass, log "Rolled back to baseline successfully."
  6. If baseline tests fail, stop and ask the user for guidance.
  7. Update .stackshift-state.json with modernizeStatus: "failed".

Phase 1: Pre-Upgrade Baseline

Create the working directory and capture baseline state.

mkdir -p .modernize

cp package.json .modernize/baseline-package.json

# Save lockfile if present
if [ -f package-lock.json ]; then cp package-lock.json .modernize/baseline-lockfile; fi
if [ -f yarn.lock ]; then cp yarn.lock .modernize/baseline-lockfile; fi
if [ -f pnpm-lock.yaml ]; then cp pnpm-lock.yaml .modernize/baseline-lockfile; fi

npm test 2>&1 | tee .modernize/baseline-test-results.txt
npm run test:coverage 2>&1 | tee .modernize/baseline-coverage.txt
npm outdated 2>&1 | tee .modernize/upgrade-plan.txt

If npm test fails at baseline: Stop. The project has pre-existing test failures. Ask the user whether to proceed or fix tests first.

Gate check: .modernize/baseline-package.json exists AND .modernize/baseline-test-results.txt exists.

Log: "Phase 1 complete -- baseline captured. X packages have available updates."


Phase 2: Dependency Upgrade

Upgrade all dependencies to latest stable versions.

npx npm-check-updates -u --target latest --reject '*alpha*,*beta*,*canary*,*rc*'
npm install 2>&1 | tee .modernize/install-output.txt

If npm install fails after ncu -u:

  1. Read the error output from .modernize/install-output.txt.
  2. Identify the failing package(s) from peer dependency or resolution errors.
  3. Revert those specific packages to their previous versions in package.json (read versions from .modernize/baseline-package.json).
  4. Run npm install again.
  5. Document skipped packages in .modernize/skipped-packages.txt.
  6. If install still fails after 3 attempts, execute the Rollback Procedure and ask the user.

Run security fixes:

npm audit fix 2>&1 | tee .modernize/audit-fix-output.txt

Gate check: node_modules directory exists AND npm install exited with code 0.

Log: "Phase 2 complete -- dependencies upgraded. X packages updated, Y skipped."


Phase 3: Breaking Change Detection

Run the full test suite against upgraded dependencies.

npm test 2>&1 | tee .modernize/post-upgrade-test-results.txt

Compare results to baseline:

diff .modernize/baseline-test-results.txt .modernize/post-upgrade-test-results.txt > .modernize/test-diff.txt 2>&1 || true

Classify failures:

  • Breaking change failures: Tests that were passing now fail with different assertion values or changed API signatures. These are expected and get fixed in Phase 4.
  • Infrastructure failures: Tests fail with import errors, module-not-found, syntax errors, or timeout errors unrelated to behavior changes. These indicate install problems.

If more than 50% of tests fail: Execute the Rollback Procedure. The upgrade scope is too broad. Ask the user whether to attempt incremental upgrades (major versions one at a time).

If infrastructure failures exist: Fix import/module resolution issues before proceeding. These are not breaking changes -- they indicate incomplete installation or missing peer dependencies.

Gate check: Test results captured AND failure rate is below 50%.

Log: "Phase 3 complete -- X tests passing, Y tests failing (Z breaking changes, W infrastructure issues)."


Phase 4: Fix Breaking Changes (Spec-Guided)

For each breaking change identified in Phase 3:

  1. Match the failing test to its feature spec in specs/.
  2. Read the spec's acceptance criteria to understand required behavior.
  3. Update the code to work with the new dependency version while preserving spec compliance.
  4. Update the test if the test itself used deprecated APIs.
  5. Run the specific test to verify the fix.

After fixing all breaking changes, run the full test suite:

npm test 2>&1 | tee .modernize/post-fix-test-results.txt

If tests still fail after fixing all identified breaking changes: Compare against baseline. If failures exist that were not in the baseline, investigate. If after 3 fix iterations tests still fail, ask the user for guidance.

Gate check: All tests that passed at baseline now pass. No regressions.

Log: "Phase 4 complete -- X breaking changes fixed. All baseline tests restored."


Phase 5: Spec Synchronization

Determine whether dependency upgrades changed observable behavior (not just implementation).

Detection method: Compare test output diffs from Phase 3. If tests that were passing now produce different output values (not errors), behavior changed. If tests only failed with import/syntax/API signature errors, only implementation changed.

If behavior changed:

  1. Update the relevant feature spec to document the new behavior.
  2. Update acceptance criteria if outputs or interfaces changed.
  3. Update technical requirements with new dependency versions.
  4. Run /speckit.analyze to validate spec-implementation alignment. If /speckit.analyze is unavailable, manually verify each spec's acceptance criteria against test results.

If only implementation changed:

  • Update version numbers in spec technical details only.
  • No functional spec changes needed.

Gate check: All specs in specs/ reflect current dependency versions AND /speckit.analyze (or manual check) shows no drift.

Log: "Phase 5 complete -- X specs updated. No spec drift detected."


Phase 6: Test Coverage Improvement

Run coverage and assess against the 85% threshold.

npm run test:coverage 2>&1 | tee .modernize/post-upgrade-coverage.txt

If all modules are already at 85%+: Skip to Phase 7. Log: "Phase 6 skipped -- all modules already at 85%+ coverage."

If any module is below 85%:

  1. Identify modules below threshold from coverage output.
  2. For each module, read its spec's acceptance criteria.
  3. Write tests covering each acceptance criterion that lacks a test.
  4. Re-run coverage after adding tests.

Gate check: npm run test:coverage shows all modules at 85%+.

Log: "Phase 6 complete -- coverage improved from X% to Y%. Z new tests added."


Phase 7: Final Validation

Run the complete validation suite. Every check must pass.

npm run build 2>&1 | tee .modernize/build-output.txt

If build fails: Read error output. Fix compilation errors. Re-run build. If build fails after 3 attempts, ask the user.

npm test 2>&1 | tee .modernize/final-test-results.txt

If any test fails: This is a regression. Do not proceed. Fix the failing test or execute Rollback Procedure.

npm run test:coverage 2>&1 | tee .modernize/final-coverage.txt

If any module is below 85%: Return to Phase 6.

Run /speckit.analyze (or manual spec check). If spec drift detected: Return to Phase 5.

npm audit 2>&1 | tee .modernize/final-audit.txt

If high or critical vulnerabilities remain: Run npm audit fix (not --force). If vulnerabilities persist, document them in the upgrade report and inform the user.

Gate check: Build passes AND all tests pass AND coverage >= 85% AND no spec drift AND no high/critical vulnerabilities.

Log: "Phase 7 complete -- all validations passed. Modernization successful."


Output: Upgrade Report

Write .modernize/UPGRADE_REPORT.md with the following structure:

# Dependency Modernization Report

**Date**: <ISO date>
**Project**: <project name from package.json>

## Summary

- **Dependencies upgraded**: X packages
- **Major version bumps**: X packages
- **Breaking changes fixed**: X
- **Tests fixed/added**: X tests
- **Coverage**: X% -> Y%
- **Specs updated**: X specs
- **Skipped packages**: X (see details below)

## Upgraded Dependencies

| Package | Old Version | New Version | Breaking? |
|---------|-------------|-------------|-----------|
| <name>  | <old>       | <new>       | Yes/No    |

## Skipped Packages

<List any packages that could not be upgraded and why>

## Breaking Changes Fixed

For each breaking change:
- **Package**: <name>
- **Affected feature**: <feature name>
- **Fix**: <what was changed>
- **Spec impact**: <behavior change or implementation only>

## Spec Updates

<List specs that were modified and why>

## Test Coverage

- Before: X%
- After: Y%
- New tests: Z

## Validation Results

- Build: pass/fail
- Tests: X passing, Y failing
- Coverage: X% (target: 85%+)
- Spec drift: none/details
- Vulnerabilities: X high, Y critical (or none)

After writing the report, update .stackshift-state.json with modernizeStatus: "complete".


Success Criteria

Modernization is complete when ALL of:

  • All dependencies updated to latest stable versions (or documented as skipped)
  • All tests passing (zero failures)
  • Test coverage >= 85% on all modules
  • Build successful
  • No spec drift (verified by /speckit.analyze or manual check)
  • No high/critical security vulnerabilities (or documented with user acknowledgment)
  • Specs updated where behavior changed
  • .modernize/UPGRADE_REPORT.md generated
  • .stackshift-state.json updated with modernizeStatus: "complete"

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Claude Code

28.33%
按下载量换算41

OpenCode

22.3%
按下载量换算32

Codex

17.73%
按下载量换算25

github-copilot

11.57%
按下载量换算17

Antigravity

7.43%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

3.18%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills