Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

model-patterns(模型模式)

model-patterns 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

model-patterns 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 18,535。

总安装 329周安装 14GitHub Stars 8下载 115核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:model-patterns(模型模式)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev
仓库路径:skills/model-patterns
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill model-patterns
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill model-patterns

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。可结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能范围。安装前建议确认权限和维护状态,避免意外文件读写。

支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;通过 github 安装。

来源仓库内路径:skills/model-patterns

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill model-pat…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

model-patterns 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kaakati/rails-enterprise-dev --skill model-patterns。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

model-patterns 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

model-patterns 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

model-patterns 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

model-patterns 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 329 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 115 次,GitHub 8 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

model-patterns 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
model-patterns

模型模式 · 本页

3298需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Model Patterns — Expert Decisions

Expert decision frameworks for model design choices. Claude knows Codable syntax — this skill provides judgment calls for when to separate DTOs, validation strategies, and immutability trade-offs.


Decision Trees

DTO vs Single Model

Does API response match your domain needs?
├─ YES (1:1 mapping)
│  └─ Is API contract stable?
│     ├─ YES → Single Codable model is fine
│     └─ NO → DTO protects against API changes
│
├─ NO (needs transformation)
│  └─ DTO + Domain model
│     DTO: matches API exactly
│     Domain: matches app needs
│
└─ Multiple APIs for same domain concept?
   └─ Separate DTOs per API
      Single domain model aggregates

The trap: DTO for everything. If your API matches your domain and is stable, a single Codable struct is simpler. Add DTO layer when it solves a real problem.

Validation Strategy Selection

When should validation happen?
├─ External data (API, user input)
│  └─ Validate at boundary (init or factory)
│     Fail fast with clear errors
│
├─ Internal data (already validated)
│  └─ Trust it (no re-validation)
│     Validation at boundary is sufficient
│
└─ Critical invariants (money, permissions)
   └─ Type-level enforcement
      Email type, not String
      Money type, not Double

Struct vs Class Decision

What are your requirements?
├─ Simple data container
│  └─ Struct (value semantics)
│     Passed by copy, immutable by default
│
├─ Shared mutable state needed?
│  └─ Really? Reconsider design
│     └─ If truly needed → Class with @Observable
│
├─ Identity matters (same instance)?
│  └─ Class (reference semantics)
│     But consider if ID equality suffices
│
└─ Inheritance needed?
   └─ Class (but prefer composition)

Custom Decoder Complexity

How much custom decoding?
├─ Just key mapping (snake_case → camelCase)
│  └─ Use keyDecodingStrategy
│     decoder.keyDecodingStrategy = .convertFromSnakeCase
│
├─ Few fields need transformation
│  └─ Custom init(from decoder:)
│     Transform specific fields only
│
├─ Complex nested structure flattening
│  └─ Custom init(from decoder:) with nested containers
│     Or intermediate DTO + mapping
│
└─ Polymorphic decoding (type field determines struct)
   └─ Type-discriminated enum with associated values
      Or AnyDecodable wrapper

NEVER Do

DTO Design

NEVER make DTOs mutable:

// ❌ DTO can be modified after decoding
struct UserDTO: Codable {
    var id: String
    var name: String  // var allows mutation
}

// ✅ DTOs are immutable snapshots of API response
struct UserDTO: Codable {
    let id: String
    let name: String  // let enforces immutability
}

NEVER add business logic to DTOs:

// ❌ DTO has behavior
struct UserDTO: Codable {
    let id: String
    let firstName: String
    let lastName: String

    func sendWelcomeEmail() { ... }  // Business logic in DTO!

    var isAdmin: Bool {
        roles.contains("admin")  // Business rule in DTO
    }
}

// ✅ DTO is pure data; logic in domain model or service
struct UserDTO: Codable {
    let id: String
    let firstName: String
    let lastName: String
}

struct User {
    let id: String
    let fullName: String
    let isAdmin: Bool

    init(from dto: UserDTO, roles: [String]) {
        // Mapping and business logic here
    }
}

NEVER expose DTOs to UI layer:

// ❌ View depends on API contract
struct UserView: View {
    let user: UserDTO  // If API changes, UI breaks

    var body: some View {
        Text(user.first_name)  // Snake_case in UI!
    }
}

// ✅ View uses domain model
struct UserView: View {
    let user: User  // Stable domain model

    var body: some View {
        Text(user.fullName)  // Clean API
    }
}

Codable Implementation

NEVER force-unwrap in custom decoders:

// ❌ Crashes on unexpected data
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
    let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
    let urlString = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .imageURL)
    imageURL = URL(string: urlString)!  // Crashes if invalid URL!
}

// ✅ Handle invalid data gracefully
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
    let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
    let urlString = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .imageURL)
    guard let url = URL(string: urlString) else {
        throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(
            .init(codingPath: [CodingKeys.imageURL],
                  debugDescription: "Invalid URL: \(urlString)")
        )
    }
    imageURL = url
}

NEVER silently default invalid data:

// ❌ Hides data problems
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
    let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
    // Silently uses 0 for invalid price — masks bugs!
    price = (try? container.decode(Double.self, forKey: .price)) ?? 0.0
}

// ✅ Fail or default with logging
init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
    let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
    do {
        price = try container.decode(Double.self, forKey: .price)
    } catch {
        Logger.api.warning("Invalid price, defaulting to 0: \(error)")
        price = 0.0  // Intentional default, logged
    }
}

NEVER use String for typed values:

// ❌ No type safety
struct User: Codable {
    let email: String  // Any string allowed
    let status: String  // "active", "inactive"... or typo?
}

// ✅ Type-safe wrappers
struct Email {
    let value: String
    init?(_ value: String) {
        guard value.contains("@") else { return nil }
        self.value = value
    }
}

enum UserStatus: String, Codable {
    case active, inactive, suspended
}

struct User {
    let email: Email
    let status: UserStatus
}

Validation

NEVER validate in multiple places:

// ❌ Validation scattered
func saveUser(_ user: User) {
    guard user.email.contains("@") else { return }  // Duplicate!
    // ...
}

func displayUser(_ user: User) {
    guard user.email.contains("@") else { return }  // Duplicate!
    // ...
}

// ✅ Validate once at creation
struct User {
    let email: Email  // Email type guarantees validity

    init(email: String) throws {
        guard let validEmail = Email(email) else {
            throw ValidationError.invalidEmail
        }
        self.email = validEmail
        // All downstream code trusts email is valid
    }
}

NEVER throw generic errors from validation:

// ❌ Caller can't determine what's wrong
init(name: String, email: String, age: Int) throws {
    guard !name.isEmpty else { throw NSError(domain: "error", code: -1) }
    guard email.contains("@") else { throw NSError(domain: "error", code: -1) }
    // Same error for different problems!
}

// ✅ Specific validation errors
enum ValidationError: LocalizedError {
    case emptyName
    case invalidEmail(String)
    case ageOutOfRange(Int)

    var errorDescription: String? {
        switch self {
        case .emptyName: return "Name cannot be empty"
        case .invalidEmail(let email): return "Invalid email: \(email)"
        case .ageOutOfRange(let age): return "Age \(age) is out of valid range"
        }
    }
}

Essential Patterns

DTO with Domain Mapping

// DTO: Exact API contract
struct UserDTO: Codable {
    let id: String
    let first_name: String
    let last_name: String
    let email: String
    let avatar_url: String?
    let created_at: String
    let is_verified: Bool
}

// Domain: App's representation
struct User: Identifiable {
    let id: String
    let fullName: String
    let email: Email
    let avatarURL: URL?
    let createdAt: Date
    let isVerified: Bool

    var initials: String {
        fullName.split(separator: " ")
            .compactMap { $0.first }
            .map(String.init)
            .joined()
    }
}

// Mapping extension
extension User {
    init(from dto: UserDTO) throws {
        self.id = dto.id
        self.fullName = "\(dto.first_name) \(dto.last_name)"

        guard let email = Email(dto.email) else {
            throw MappingError.invalidEmail(dto.email)
        }
        self.email = email

        self.avatarURL = dto.avatar_url.flatMap(URL.init)
        self.createdAt = ISO8601DateFormatter().date(from: dto.created_at) ?? Date()
        self.isVerified = dto.is_verified
    }
}

Type-Safe Wrapper Pattern

struct Email: Codable, Hashable {
    let value: String

    init?(_ value: String) {
        let regex = /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,}$/i
        guard value.wholeMatch(of: regex) != nil else { return nil }
        self.value = value
    }

    init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
        let container = try decoder.singleValueContainer()
        let rawValue = try container.decode(String.self)
        guard let email = Email(rawValue) else {
            throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(
                .init(codingPath: container.codingPath,
                      debugDescription: "Invalid email: \(rawValue)")
            )
        }
        self = email
    }

    func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
        var container = encoder.singleValueContainer()
        try container.encode(value)
    }
}

// Usage: compiler enforces email validity
func sendEmail(to: Email) { ... }  // Can't pass arbitrary String

Polymorphic Decoding

enum MediaItem: Codable {
    case image(ImageMedia)
    case video(VideoMedia)
    case document(DocumentMedia)

    private enum CodingKeys: String, CodingKey {
        case type
    }

    init(from decoder: Decoder) throws {
        let container = try decoder.container(keyedBy: CodingKeys.self)
        let type = try container.decode(String.self, forKey: .type)

        switch type {
        case "image":
            self = .image(try ImageMedia(from: decoder))
        case "video":
            self = .video(try VideoMedia(from: decoder))
        case "document":
            self = .document(try DocumentMedia(from: decoder))
        default:
            throw DecodingError.dataCorrupted(
                .init(codingPath: [CodingKeys.type],
                      debugDescription: "Unknown media type: \(type)")
            )
        }
    }

    func encode(to encoder: Encoder) throws {
        switch self {
        case .image(let media): try media.encode(to: encoder)
        case .video(let media): try media.encode(to: encoder)
        case .document(let media): try media.encode(to: encoder)
        }
    }
}

Quick Reference

When to Use DTO Separation

ScenarioUse DTO?
API matches domain exactlyNo
API likely to changeYes
Need transformation (flatten, combine)Yes
Multiple APIs for same conceptYes
Single stable internal APINo

Validation Strategy by Layer

LayerValidation Type
API boundary (DTO init)Structure validity
Domain model initBusiness rules
Type wrappersFormat enforcement
UIAlready validated

Red Flags

SmellProblemFix
var in DTOMutable snapshotUse let
Business logic in DTOWrong layerMove to domain model
DTO in ViewCouplingMap to domain model
Force-unwrap in decoderCrash riskThrow or optional
String for typed valuesNo safetyType wrappers
Same validation in multiple placesDRY violationValidate at creation
Generic validation errorsPoor UXSpecific error cases

Decoder Strategy Selection

NeedSolution
snake_case → camelCasekeyDecodingStrategy
Custom date formatdateDecodingStrategy
Single field transformationCustom init(from:)
Nested structure flatteningNested containers
Type-discriminated unionEnum with associated values

平台分布

Antigravity

32.69%
按下载量换算38

windsurf

22.4%
按下载量换算26

Claude Code

18.9%
按下载量换算22

OpenCode

12.49%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

8.32%
按下载量换算10

Codex

3.43%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills