Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

model-equivariance-auditor(模型等方差审核员)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

model-equivariance-auditor 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 13,052。

总安装 1,032周安装 43GitHub Stars 85下载 344核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:model-equivariance-auditor(模型等方差审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude
仓库路径:skills/model-equivariance-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill model-equivariance-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill model-equivariance-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查。适合梳理敏感配置、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论,需人工复核。涉及密钥或生产系统时,应确认最小权限和脱敏方式。支持主流宿主;通过 github 安装。

model-equivariance-auditor 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/model-equivariance-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill model-equivariance-aud…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

model-equivariance-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lyndonkl/claude --skill model-equivariance-auditor。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

model-equivariance-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

model-equivariance-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

model-equivariance-auditor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

model-equivariance-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,032 次,近一周安装 43 次,下载 344 次,GitHub 85 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

model-equivariance-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
model-equivariance-auditor

模型等方差审核员 · 本页

1,03285需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Model Equivariance Auditor

Even with equivariant libraries, implementation bugs can break equivariance. A model that claims equivariance but lacks it will train poorly and give inconsistent predictions. Catching these bugs early saves significant debugging time.

Workflow

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Equivariance Audit Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Gather model and symmetry specification
- [ ] Step 2: Run numerical equivariance tests
- [ ] Step 3: Test individual layers
- [ ] Step 4: Check gradient equivariance
- [ ] Step 5: Identify and diagnose failures
- [ ] Step 6: Document audit results

Step 1: Gather model and symmetry specification

Collect: the implemented model, the intended symmetry group, whether each output should be invariant or equivariant, the transformation functions for input and output spaces. Review the architecture specification from design phase. Clarify ambiguities with user before testing.

Step 2: Run numerical equivariance tests

Execute end-to-end equivariance tests using Test Implementation. For invariance: verify ||f(T(x)) - f(x)|| < ε. For equivariance: verify ||f(T(x)) - T'(f(x))|| < ε. Use multiple random inputs and transformations. Record error statistics. See Error Interpretation for thresholds. For ready-to-use test code, see Test Code Templates.

Step 3: Test individual layers

If end-to-end test fails, isolate the problem by testing layers individually. For each layer: freeze other layers, test equivariance of that layer alone. This identifies which layer breaks equivariance. Use Layer-wise Testing protocol. Check nonlinearities, normalizations, and custom operations especially carefully.

Step 4: Check gradient equivariance

Verify that gradients also respect equivariance (important for training). Compute gradients at x and T(x). Check that gradients transform appropriately. Gradient bugs can cause training to "unlearn" equivariance. See Gradient Testing.

Step 5: Identify and diagnose failures

If tests fail, use Common Failure Modes to diagnose. Check: non-equivariant nonlinearities, batch normalization issues, incorrect output transformation, numerical precision problems, implementation bugs in custom layers. Provide specific fix recommendations. For step-by-step troubleshooting, consult Debugging Guide.

Step 6: Document audit results

Create audit report using Output Template. Include: pass/fail for each test, error magnitudes, identified issues, and recommendations. Distinguish between: exact equivariance (numerical precision), approximate equivariance (acceptable error), and broken equivariance (needs fixing). For detailed audit methodology, see Methodology Details. Quality criteria for this output are defined in Quality Rubric.

Test Implementation

End-to-End Equivariance Test

import torch

def test_model_equivariance(model, x, input_transform, output_transform,
                            n_tests=100, tol=1e-5):
    """
    Test if model is equivariant: f(T(x)) ≈ T'(f(x))

    Args:
        model: The neural network to test
        x: Sample input tensor
        input_transform: Function that transforms input
        output_transform: Function that transforms output
        n_tests: Number of random transformations to test
        tol: Error tolerance

    Returns:
        dict with test results
    """
    model.eval()
    errors = []

    with torch.no_grad():
        for _ in range(n_tests):
            # Generate random transformation
            T = sample_random_transform()

            # Method 1: Transform input, then apply model
            x_transformed = input_transform(x, T)
            y1 = model(x_transformed)

            # Method 2: Apply model, then transform output
            y = model(x)
            y2 = output_transform(y, T)

            # Compute error
            error = torch.norm(y1 - y2).item()
            relative_error = error / (torch.norm(y2).item() + 1e-8)
            errors.append({
                'absolute': error,
                'relative': relative_error
            })

    return {
        'mean_absolute': np.mean([e['absolute'] for e in errors]),
        'max_absolute': np.max([e['absolute'] for e in errors]),
        'mean_relative': np.mean([e['relative'] for e in errors]),
        'max_relative': np.max([e['relative'] for e in errors]),
        'pass': all(e['relative'] < tol for e in errors)
    }

Invariance Test (Simpler Case)

def test_model_invariance(model, x, transform, n_tests=100, tol=1e-5):
    """Test if model output is invariant to transformations."""
    model.eval()
    errors = []

    with torch.no_grad():
        y_original = model(x)

        for _ in range(n_tests):
            T = sample_random_transform()
            x_transformed = transform(x, T)
            y_transformed = model(x_transformed)

            error = torch.norm(y_transformed - y_original).item()
            errors.append(error)

    return {
        'mean_error': np.mean(errors),
        'max_error': np.max(errors),
        'pass': max(errors) < tol
    }

Layer-wise Testing

Protocol

def test_layer_equivariance(layer, x, input_transform, output_transform):
    """Test a single layer for equivariance."""
    layer.eval()

    with torch.no_grad():
        T = sample_random_transform()

        # Transform then layer
        y1 = layer(input_transform(x, T))

        # Layer then transform
        y2 = output_transform(layer(x), T)

        error = torch.norm(y1 - y2).item()

    return {
        'layer': layer.__class__.__name__,
        'error': error,
        'pass': error < tolerance
    }

def audit_all_layers(model, x, transforms):
    """Test each layer individually."""
    results = []

    for name, layer in model.named_modules():
        if is_testable_layer(layer):
            result = test_layer_equivariance(layer, x, *transforms)
            result['name'] = name
            results.append(result)

    return results

What to Test Per Layer

Layer TypeWhat to Check
ConvolutionKernel equivariance
NonlinearityShould preserve equivariance
NormalizationOften breaks equivariance
PoolingCorrect aggregation
LinearWeight sharing patterns
AttentionPermutation equivariance

Gradient Testing

Why Test Gradients?

Forward pass can be equivariant while backward pass is not. This causes:

  • Training instability
  • Model "unlearning" equivariance
  • Inconsistent optimization

Gradient Equivariance Test

def test_gradient_equivariance(model, x, loss_fn, transform, tol=1e-4):
    """Test if gradients respect equivariance."""
    model.train()

    # Gradients at original input
    x1 = x.clone().requires_grad_(True)
    y1 = model(x1)
    loss1 = loss_fn(y1)
    loss1.backward()
    grad1 = x1.grad.clone()

    # Gradients at transformed input
    model.zero_grad()
    T = sample_random_transform()
    x2 = transform(x.clone(), T).requires_grad_(True)
    y2 = model(x2)
    loss2 = loss_fn(y2)
    loss2.backward()
    grad2 = x2.grad.clone()

    # Transform grad1 and compare to grad2
    grad1_transformed = transform_gradient(grad1, T)
    error = torch.norm(grad2 - grad1_transformed).item()

    return {'error': error, 'pass': error < tol}

Error Interpretation

Error Thresholds

Error LevelInterpretationAction
< 1e-6Perfect (float32 precision)Pass
1e-6 to 1e-4Excellent (acceptable)Pass
1e-4 to 1e-2Approximate equivarianceInvestigate
> 1e-2Broken equivarianceFix required

Relative vs Absolute Error

  • Absolute error: Raw difference magnitude
  • Relative error: Normalized by output magnitude

Use relative error when output magnitudes vary. Use absolute when comparing to numerical precision.

Common Failure Modes

1. Non-Equivariant Nonlinearity

Symptom: Error increases after nonlinearity layers Cause: Using ReLU, sigmoid on equivariant features Fix: Use gated nonlinearities, norm-based, or restrict to invariant features

2. Batch Normalization Breaking Equivariance

Symptom: Error varies with batch composition Cause: BN computes different stats for different orientations Fix: Use LayerNorm, GroupNorm, or equivariant batch norm

3. Incorrect Output Transformation

Symptom: Test fails even for identity transform Cause: output_transform doesn't match model output type Fix: Verify output transformation matches layer output representation

4. Numerical Precision Issues

Symptom: Small but non-zero error everywhere Cause: Floating point accumulation, interpolation Fix: Use float64 for testing, accept small tolerance

5. Custom Layer Bug

Symptom: Error isolated to specific layer Cause: Implementation error in custom equivariant layer Fix: Review layer implementation against equivariance constraints

6. Padding/Boundary Effects

Symptom: Error higher near edges Cause: Padding doesn't respect symmetry Fix: Use circular padding or handle boundaries explicitly

Output Template

MODEL EQUIVARIANCE AUDIT REPORT
===============================

Model: [Model name/description]
Intended Symmetry: [Group]
Symmetry Type: [Invariant/Equivariant]

END-TO-END TESTS:
-----------------
Test samples: [N]
Transformations tested: [M]

Invariance/Equivariance Error:
- Mean absolute: [value]
- Max absolute: [value]
- Mean relative: [value]
- Max relative: [value]
- RESULT: [PASS/FAIL]

LAYER-WISE ANALYSIS:
--------------------
[For each layer]
- Layer: [name]
- Error: [value]
- Result: [PASS/FAIL]

GRADIENT TEST:
--------------
- Gradient equivariance error: [value]
- RESULT: [PASS/FAIL]

IDENTIFIED ISSUES:
------------------
1. [Issue description]
   - Location: [layer/component]
   - Severity: [High/Medium/Low]
   - Recommended fix: [description]

OVERALL VERDICT: [PASS/FAIL/NEEDS_ATTENTION]

Recommendations:
- [List of actions needed]

平台分布

Claude Code

30.44%
按下载量换算105

Gemini CLI

21.95%
按下载量换算76

Antigravity

15.42%
按下载量换算53

windsurf

10.6%
按下载量换算36

OpenCode

8.11%
按下载量换算28

github-copilot

2.95%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills