Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment(工具宇宙基因富集)

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 22,558。

总安装 4,524周安装 183GitHub Stars 1,311下载 1,420核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tooluniverse-gene-enrichment(工具宇宙基因富集)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
仓库路径:skills/tooluniverse-gene-enrichment
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-gene-enrichment
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-gene-enrichment

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。它支持基于关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息匹配与过滤,适用于基因富集类研究检索。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 了解具体调用方式。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。可配合宿主环境中的其他工具链使用,提升信息获取效率与准确性。

来源仓库内路径:skills/tooluniverse-gene-enrichment

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-gene-enri…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,524 次,近一周安装 183 次,下载 1,420 次,GitHub 1,311 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

tooluniverse-gene-enrichment 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 1,311 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment

工具宇宙基因富集 · 本页

4,5241,311需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

Gene Enrichment and Pathway Analysis

Perform comprehensive gene enrichment analysis including Gene Ontology (GO), KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, and MSigDB enrichment using both Over-Representation Analysis (ORA) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Integrates local computation via gseapy with ToolUniverse pathway databases for cross-validated, publication-ready results.

IMPORTANT: Always use English terms in tool calls (gene names, pathway names, organism names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.

Domain Reasoning: Background Selection

Enrichment results are only as good as your background. The default background (all annotated genes in the genome) inflates enrichment for tissue-specific or context-specific gene lists. Always consider: what is the appropriate background for this experiment? For brain RNA-seq, use brain-expressed genes as background; for a proteomics experiment, use detected proteins. A gene that is never expressed in your system cannot be a true negative control.

LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: adjusted p-values, gene set overlap counts, and which genes from your input list drive each enriched term. Always retrieve the inputGenes field from enrichment results — do not assume which genes caused a term to be significant. When a term looks surprising, verify by checking which genes overlap.


When to Use This Skill

Apply when users:

  • Ask about gene enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG, Reactome, etc.)
  • Have a gene list from differential expression, clustering, or any experiment
  • Want to know which biological processes, molecular functions, or cellular components are enriched
  • Need KEGG or Reactome pathway enrichment analysis
  • Ask about GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) with ranked gene lists
  • Want over-representation analysis (ORA) with Fisher's exact test
  • Need multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg, Bonferroni)
  • Ask about enrichGO, gseapy, clusterProfiler-style analyses

NOT for (use other skills instead):

  • Network pharmacology / drug repurposing → Use tooluniverse-network-pharmacology
  • Disease characterization → Use tooluniverse-multiomic-disease-characterization
  • Single gene function lookup → Use tooluniverse-disease-research
  • Spatial omics analysis → Use tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis
  • Protein-protein interaction analysis only → Use tooluniverse-protein-interactions

Input Parameters

ParameterRequiredDescriptionExample
gene_listYesList of gene symbols, Ensembl IDs, or Entrez IDs["TP53", "BRCA1", "EGFR"]
organismNoOrganism (default: human). Supported: human, mouse, rat, fly, worm, yeast, zebrafishhuman
analysis_typeNoORA (default) or GSEAORA
enrichment_databasesNoWhich databases to query. Default: all applicable["GO_BP", "GO_MF", "GO_CC", "KEGG", "Reactome"]
gene_id_typeNoInput ID type: symbol, ensembl, entrez, uniprot (auto-detected if omitted)symbol
p_value_cutoffNoSignificance threshold (default: 0.05)0.05
correction_methodNoMultiple testing: BH (Benjamini-Hochberg, default), bonferroni, fdrBH
background_genesNoCustom background gene set (default: genome-wide)["GENE1", "GENE2",...]
ranked_gene_listNoFor GSEA: gene-to-score mapping (e.g., log2FC){"TP53": 2.5, "BRCA1": -1.3,...}

Core Principles

  1. Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
  2. ID disambiguation FIRST - Detect and convert gene IDs before ANY enrichment
  3. Multi-source validation - Run enrichment on at least 2 independent tools, cross-validate
  4. Exact p-values - Report raw p-values AND adjusted p-values with correction method
  5. Multiple testing correction - ALWAYS apply Benjamini-Hochberg unless user specifies otherwise
  6. Gene set size filtering - Filter by min/max gene set size to avoid trivial/overly broad terms
  7. Evidence grading - Grade enrichment sources T1-T4
  8. Negative results documented - "No significant enrichment" is a valid finding
  9. Source references - Every enrichment result must cite the tool/database/library used
  10. Completeness checklist - Mandatory section at end showing analysis coverage

Decision Tree: ORA vs GSEA

Q: Do you have a ranked gene list (with scores/fold-changes)?
  YES → Use GSEA (gseapy.prerank)
        - Input: Gene-to-score mapping (e.g., log2FC)
        - Statistics: Running enrichment score, permutation test
        - Cutoff: FDR q-val < 0.25 (standard for GSEA)
        - Output: NES (Normalized Enrichment Score), lead genes
        See: references/gsea_workflow.md

  NO  → Use ORA (gseapy.enrichr)
        - Input: Gene list only
        - Statistics: Fisher's exact test, hypergeometric
        - Cutoff: Adjusted P-value < 0.05 (or user specified)
        - Output: P-value, adjusted P-value, overlap, odds ratio
        See: references/ora_workflow.md

Decision Tree: gseapy vs ToolUniverse Tools

Q: Which enrichment method should I use?

Primary Analysis (ALWAYS):
  ├─ gseapy.enrichr (ORA) OR gseapy.prerank (GSEA)
  │  - Most comprehensive (225+ Enrichr libraries)
  │  - GO (BP, MF, CC), KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, MSigDB
  │  - All organisms supported
  │  - Returns: P-value, Adjusted P-value, Overlap, Genes
  │  See: references/enrichr_guide.md

Cross-Validation (REQUIRED for publication):
  ├─ PANTHER_enrichment [T1 - curated]
  │  - Curated GO enrichment
  │  - Multiple organisms (taxonomy ID)
  │  - GO BP, MF, CC, PANTHER pathways, Reactome
  │
  ├─ STRING_functional_enrichment [T2 - validated]
  │  - Returns ALL categories in one call
  │  - Filter by category: Process, Function, Component, KEGG, Reactome
  │  - Network-based enrichment
  │
  └─ ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment [T1 - curated]
     - Reactome curated pathways
     - Cross-species projection
     - Detailed pathway hierarchy

Additional Context (Optional):
  ├─ GO_get_term_by_id, QuickGO_get_term_detail (GO term details)
  ├─ Reactome_get_pathway, Reactome_get_pathway_hierarchy (pathway context)
  ├─ WikiPathways_search, WikiPathways_get_pathway (community pathways)
  └─ STRING_ppi_enrichment (network topology analysis)

Quick Start Workflow

  1. Create report file immediately; populate progressively.
  2. Convert IDs: Use MyGene_batch_query (fields: symbol,entrezgene,ensembl.gene) then STRING_map_identifiers to get canonical symbols. Auto-detect: ENSG* = Ensembl, numeric = Entrez, else = Symbol.
  3. Primary enrichment: gseapy.enrichr() for ORA (gene list), gseapy.prerank() for GSEA (ranked list with scores). Use background=background_genes — do not leave as genome-wide default if your experiment has a specific expressed gene set.
  4. Cross-validate: Run PANTHER_enrichment (param: comma-sep gene_list, annotation_dataset='GO:0008150') and ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment (param: space-sep identifiers). STRING_functional_enrichment returns all categories — filter by category field.
  5. Report: Include raw p-value, adjusted p-value, overlap ratio, and inputGenes for each significant term. Note consensus terms (significant in 2+ sources).

See: references/ for complete code examples (ora_workflow.md, gsea_workflow.md, cross_validation.md)


Evidence Grading

TierSymbolCriteriaExamples
T1[T1]Curated/experimental enrichmentPANTHER, Reactome Analysis Service
T2[T2]Computational enrichment, well-validatedgseapy ORA/GSEA, STRING functional enrichment
T3[T3]Text-mining/predicted enrichmentEnrichr non-curated libraries
T4[T4]Single-source annotationIndividual gene GO annotations from QuickGO

Supported Organisms

Core organisms: human (9606), mouse (10090), rat (10116), fly (7227), worm (6239), yeast (4932). gseapy has full human/mouse support; other organisms are limited — use PANTHER or STRING for non-human enrichment.

See: references/organism_support.md for organism-specific libraries


Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Standard DEG Enrichment (ORA)

Input: List of differentially expressed gene symbols
Flow: ID validation → gseapy ORA (GO + KEGG + Reactome) →
      PANTHER + STRING cross-validation → Report top enriched terms
Use: When you have unranked gene list from DESeq2/edgeR

Pattern 2: Ranked Gene List (GSEA)

Input: Gene-to-log2FC mapping from differential expression
Flow: Convert to ranked Series → gseapy GSEA (GO + KEGG + MSigDB) →
      Filter by FDR < 0.25 → Report NES and lead genes
Use: When you have fold-changes or other ranking metric

Pattern 3: BixBench Enrichment Question

Input: Specific question about enrichment (e.g., "What is the adjusted p-val for neutrophil activation?")
Flow: Parse question for gene list and library → Run gseapy with exact library →
      Find specific term → Report exact p-value and adjusted p-value
Use: When answering targeted questions about specific terms

Pattern 4: Multi-Organism Enrichment

Input: Gene list from mouse experiment
Flow: Use organism='mouse' for gseapy → organism=10090 for PANTHER/STRING →
      projection=True for Reactome human pathway mapping
Use: When working with non-human organisms

See: references/common_patterns.md for more examples


Troubleshooting

"No significant enrichment found":

  • Verify gene symbols are valid (STRING_map_identifiers)
  • Try different library versions (2021 vs 2023 vs 2025)
  • Try relaxing significance cutoff or use GSEA instead

"Gene not found" errors:

  • Check ID type and convert using MyGene_batch_query
  • Remove version suffixes from Ensembl IDs (ENSG00000141510.16 → ENSG00000141510)

"STRING returns all categories":

  • This is expected; filter by d['category'] == 'Process' after receiving results

See: references/troubleshooting.md for complete guide


Tool Reference

Primary Enrichment Tools

ToolInputOutputUse For
gseapy.enrichr()gene_list, gene_sets, organism.results DataFrameORA with 225+ libraries
gseapy.prerank()rnk (ranked Series), gene_sets.res2d DataFrameGSEA analysis

Cross-Validation Tools

ToolKey ParametersEvidence Grade
PANTHER_enrichmentgene_list (comma-sep), organism, annotation_dataset[T1]
STRING_functional_enrichmentprotein_ids, species[T2]
ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichmentidentifiers (space-sep), page_size[T1]

ID Conversion Tools

ToolInputOutput
MyGene_batch_querygene_ids, fieldsSymbol, Entrez, Ensembl mappings
STRING_map_identifiersprotein_ids, speciesPreferred names, STRING IDs

See: references/tool_parameters.md for complete parameter documentation


Detailed Documentation

All detailed examples, code blocks, and advanced topics have been moved to references/:

  • references/ora_workflow.md - Complete ORA examples with all databases
  • references/gsea_workflow.md - Complete GSEA workflow with ranked lists
  • references/enrichr_guide.md - All 225+ Enrichr libraries and usage
  • references/cross_validation.md - Multi-source validation strategies
  • references/id_conversion.md - Gene ID disambiguation and conversion
  • references/tool_parameters.md - Complete tool parameter reference
  • references/organism_support.md - Organism-specific configurations
  • references/common_patterns.md - Detailed use case examples
  • references/troubleshooting.md - Complete troubleshooting guide
  • references/multiple_testing.md - Correction methods (BH, Bonferroni, BY)
  • references/report_template.md - Standard report format

Helper scripts:

  • scripts/format_enrichment_output.py - Format results for reports
  • scripts/compare_enrichment_sources.py - Cross-validation analysis
  • scripts/filter_by_gene_set_size.py - Filter terms by size

Resources

For network-level analysis: tooluniverse-network-pharmacology For disease characterization: tooluniverse-multiomic-disease-characterization For spatial omics: tooluniverse-spatial-omics-analysis For protein interactions: tooluniverse-protein-interactions

gseapy documentation: https://gseapy.readthedocs.io/ PANTHER API: http://pantherdb.org/services/oai/pantherdb/ STRING API: https://string-db.org/cgi/help?sessionId=&subpage=api Reactome Analysis: https://reactome.org/AnalysisService/

平台分布

Codex

36.36%
按下载量换算516

Claude

28.99%
按下载量换算412

Cursor

20.26%
按下载量换算288

Gemini CLI

10.11%
按下载量换算144

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills