Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation(tooluniverse 药物靶标验证)

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 23,167。

总安装 4,348周安装 183GitHub Stars 1,324下载 1,523核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tooluniverse-drug-target-validation(tooluniverse 药物靶标验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
仓库路径:skills/tooluniverse-drug-target-validation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-drug-target-validation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-drug-target-validation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。它支持基于关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息匹配与过滤,适用于药物靶标验证类研究检索。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 了解具体调用方式。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。可配合宿主环境中的其他工具链使用,提升信息获取效率与准确性。

来源仓库内路径:skills/tooluniverse-drug-target-validation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-drug-targ…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,348 次,近一周安装 183 次,下载 1,523 次,GitHub 1,324 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

tooluniverse-drug-target-validation 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 1,324 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
tooluniverse-drug-target-validation

tooluniverse 药物靶标验证 · 本页

4,3481,324需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Drug Target Validation Pipeline

Validate drug target hypotheses using multi-dimensional computational evidence before committing to wet-lab work. Produces a quantitative Target Validation Score (0-100) with priority tier classification and GO/NO-GO recommendation.

Reasoning Before Searching

A valid drug target must pass 4 gates in order. Failing an early gate makes later gates irrelevant:

  1. Genetic evidence linking it to disease: Does human genetic data (GWAS, rare variant studies, Mendelian genetics) support this target's role? Genetic evidence is the strongest predictor of clinical success. Use OpenTargets and GWAS catalog before anything else. If no genetic link exists, the hypothesis is speculative — document this clearly.
  2. Druggability: Can a molecule reach and modulate the target? Check structure availability (PDB, AlphaFold), binding pocket prediction (ProteinsPlus), target class (kinase, GPCR, nuclear receptor = favorable; transcription factor, scaffold protein = difficult), and existing chemical probes.
  3. Safety — essentiality in normal tissue: Is the target expressed in critical tissues (heart, liver, bone marrow)? Is knockout lethal in mice? High expression in essential tissue or lethality in mouse models is a strong safety red flag even before any clinical data.
  4. Competitive landscape: Are other drugs already approved or in late-stage trials for this target? If so, the bar is differentiation, not first-in-class. Check ChEMBL, DrugBank, and ClinicalTrials.gov early.

Do not proceed to Phase 3 (Chemical Matter) before completing Phase 1 (Disease Association). Gate 1 failures should prompt a NO-GO or pivot recommendation.

LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume a target is druggable based on its protein family alone, never assume expression is low in a tissue without checking GTEx or HPA, never assume no competitors without searching ClinicalTrials.gov.

COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

Key Principles

  1. Report-first - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
  2. Target disambiguation FIRST - Resolve all identifiers before analysis
  3. Evidence grading - Grade all evidence as T1 (experimental) to T4 (computational)
  4. Disease-specific - Tailor analysis to disease context when provided
  5. Modality-aware - Consider small molecule vs biologics tractability
  6. Safety-first - Prominently flag safety concerns early
  7. Quantitative scoring - Every dimension scored numerically (0-100 composite)
  8. Negative results documented - "No data" is data; empty sections are failures
  9. Source references - Every statement must cite tool/database
  10. English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls; respond in user's language

When to Use

Apply when users ask about:

  • "Is [target] a good drug target for [disease]?"
  • Target validation, druggability assessment, or target prioritization
  • Safety risks of modulating a target
  • Chemical starting points for target validation
  • GO/NO-GO recommendation for a target

Not for (use other skills): general target biology (tooluniverse-target-research), drug compound profiling (tooluniverse-drug-research), variant interpretation (tooluniverse-variant-interpretation), disease research (tooluniverse-disease-research).

Input Parameters

ParameterRequiredDescriptionExample
targetYesGene symbol, protein name, or UniProt IDEGFR, P00533
diseaseNoDisease/indication for contextNon-small cell lung cancer
modalityNoPreferred therapeutic modalitysmall molecule, antibody, PROTAC

Reference Files

  • SCORING_CRITERIA.md - Detailed scoring matrices, evidence grading, priority tiers, score calculation
  • REPORT_TEMPLATE.md - Full report template, completeness checklist, section format examples
  • TOOL_REFERENCE.md - Verified tool parameters, known corrections, fallback chains, modality-specific guidance, phase-by-phase tool lists
  • QUICK_START.md - Quick start guide

Scoring Overview

Total: 0-100 points across 5 dimensions (details in SCORING_CRITERIA.md):

DimensionMaxSub-dimensions
Disease Association30Genetic (10) + Literature (10) + Pathway (10)
Druggability25Structure (10) + Chemical matter (10) + Target class (5)
Safety Profile20Expression (5) + Genetic validation (10) + ADRs (5)
Clinical Precedent15Based on highest clinical stage achieved
Validation Evidence10Functional studies (5) + Disease models (5)

Priority Tiers: 80-100 = Tier 1 (GO) | 60-79 = Tier 2 (CONDITIONAL GO) | 40-59 = Tier 3 (CAUTION) | 0-39 = Tier 4 (NO-GO)

Evidence Grades: T1 (clinical proof) > T2 (functional studies) > T3 (associations) > T4 (predictions)


Pipeline Phases

Phase 0: Target Disambiguation (ALWAYS FIRST)

Resolve target to ALL identifiers before any analysis.

Steps:

  1. MyGene_query_genes - Get initial IDs (Ensembl, UniProt, Entrez)
  2. ensembl_lookup_gene - Get versioned Ensembl ID (species="homo_sapiens" REQUIRED)
  3. ensembl_get_xrefs - Cross-references (HGNC, etc.)
  4. OpenTargets_get_target_id_description_by_name - Verify OT target
  5. ChEMBL_search_targets - Get ChEMBL target ID
  6. UniProt_get_function_by_accession - Function summary (returns list of strings)
  7. UniProt_get_alternative_names_by_accession - Collision detection

Output: Table of verified identifiers (Gene Symbol, Ensembl, UniProt, Entrez, ChEMBL, HGNC) plus protein function and target class.

Phase 1: Disease Association (0-30 pts)

Quantify target-disease association from genetic, literature, and pathway evidence.

Key tools:

  • OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl - Disease associations
  • OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence - Detailed evidence (needs efoId + ensemblId)
  • OpenTargets_get_evidence_by_datasource - Evidence by data source
  • gwas_get_snps_for_gene / gwas_search_studies - GWAS evidence
  • gnomad_get_gene_constraints - Genetic constraint (pLI, LOEUF)
  • PubMed_search_articles - Literature (returns plain list of dicts)
  • OpenTargets_get_publications_by_target_ensemblID - OT publications (uses entityId)

Phase 2: Druggability (0-25 pts)

Assess whether the target is amenable to therapeutic intervention.

Key tools:

  • OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID - Tractability (SM, AB, PR, OC)
  • OpenTargets_get_target_classes_by_ensemblID - Target classification
  • Pharos_get_target - TDL: Tclin > Tchem > Tbio > Tdark
  • DGIdb_get_gene_druggability - Druggability categories
  • alphafold_get_prediction (param: qualifier) / alphafold_get_summary
  • ProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites - Pocket detection
  • OpenTargets_get_chemical_probes_by_target_ensemblID - Chemical probes
  • OpenTargets_get_target_enabling_packages_by_ensemblID - TEPs
  • TCDB_get_transporter - For SLC/ABC transporter targets: TC classification, family, PDB structures (param: uniprot_accession)
  • TCDB_search_by_substrate - Find transporters by substrate (param: substrate_name)

Phase 3: Chemical Matter (feeds Phase 2 scoring)

Identify existing chemical starting points for target validation.

Key tools:

  • ChEMBL_search_targets + ChEMBL_get_target_activities - Bioactivity data (note: target_chembl_id__exact with double underscore)
  • BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot - Binding data (affinity in nM)
  • PubChem_search_assays_by_target_gene + PubChem_get_assay_active_compounds - HTS data
  • OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID - Known drugs (size REQUIRED)
  • ChEMBL_search_mechanisms - Drug mechanisms
  • DGIdb_get_gene_info - Drug-gene interactions

Phase 4: Clinical Precedent (0-15 pts)

Assess clinical validation from approved drugs and clinical trials.

Key tools:

  • FDA_get_mechanism_of_action_by_drug_name / FDA_get_indications_by_drug_name
  • drugbank_get_targets_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id (ALL params required: query, case_sensitive, exact_match, limit)
  • search_clinical_trials (query_term REQUIRED)
  • OpenTargets_get_drug_warnings_by_chemblId / OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblId

Phase 5: Safety (0-20 pts)

Identify safety risks from expression, genetics, and known adverse events.

Key tools:

  • OpenTargets_get_target_safety_profile_by_ensemblID - Safety liabilities
  • GTEx_get_median_gene_expression - Tissue expression (operation="median" REQUIRED)
  • HPA_search_genes_by_query / HPA_get_comprehensive_gene_details_by_ensembl_id
  • OpenTargets_get_biological_mouse_models_by_ensemblID - KO phenotypes
  • FDA_get_adverse_reactions_by_drug_name / FDA_get_boxed_warning_info_by_drug_name
  • OpenTargets_get_target_homologues_by_ensemblID - Paralog risks

Critical tissues to check: heart, liver, kidney, brain, bone marrow.

Phase 6: Pathway Context

Understand the target's role in biological networks and disease pathways.

Key tools:

  • Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways (param: id, NOT uniprot_id)
  • STRING_get_protein_interactions (param: protein_ids as array, species=9606)
  • intact_get_interactions - Experimental PPI
  • OpenTargets_get_target_gene_ontology_by_ensemblID - GO terms
  • STRING_functional_enrichment - Enrichment analysis

Assess: pathway redundancy, compensation risk, feedback loops.

Phase 7: Validation Evidence (0-10 pts)

Assess existing functional validation data.

Key tools:

  • DepMap_get_gene_dependencies - Essentiality (score < -0.5 = essential)
  • PubMed_search_articles - Search for CRISPR/siRNA/knockout studies
  • CTD_get_gene_diseases - Gene-disease associations

Phase 8: Structural Insights

Leverage structural biology for druggability and mechanism understanding.

Key tools:

  • UniProt_get_entry_by_accession - Extract PDB cross-references
  • get_protein_metadata_by_pdb_id / pdbe_get_entry_summary / pdbe_get_entry_quality
  • alphafold_get_prediction / alphafold_get_summary - pLDDT confidence
  • ProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites - Druggable pockets
  • InterPro_get_protein_domains / InterPro_get_domain_details - Domain architecture

Phase 9: Literature Deep Dive

Comprehensive collision-aware literature analysis.

Steps:

  1. Collision detection: Search "{gene_symbol}"[Title] in PubMed; if >20% off-topic, add filters (AND protein OR gene OR receptor)
  2. Publication metrics: Total count, 5-year trend, drug-focused subset
  3. Key reviews: review[pt] filter in PubMed
  4. Citation metrics: openalex_search_works for impact data
  5. Broader coverage: EuropePMC_search_articles

Phase 10: Validation Roadmap (Synthesis)

Synthesize all phases into actionable output:

  1. Target Validation Score (0-100) with component breakdown
  2. Priority Tier (1-4) assignment
  3. GO/NO-GO Recommendation with justification
  4. Recommended Validation Experiments
  5. Tool Compounds for Testing
  6. Biomarker Strategy
  7. Key Risks and Mitigations

Report Output

Create file: [TARGET]_[DISEASE]_validation_report.md

Use the full template from REPORT_TEMPLATE.md. Key sections:

  • Executive Summary (score, tier, recommendation, key findings, critical risks)
  • Validation Scorecard (all 12 sub-scores with evidence)
  • Sections 1-14 covering each phase
  • Completeness Checklist (mandatory before finalizing)

Complete the Completeness Checklist (in REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) before finalizing to verify all phases were covered, all scores justified, and negative results documented.

平台分布

Codex

33.91%
按下载量换算516

Claude

27.94%
按下载量换算426

Cursor

20.29%
按下载量换算309

Gemini CLI

9.3%
按下载量换算142

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills