Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

micro-polish(微抛光)

用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。它适合让 Agent 生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码,整理组件结构,或定位布局和性能问题。使用时需要结合项目现有设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免只生成孤立片段;涉及页面改动时,应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

micro-polish 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 9,642。

总安装 198周安装 8GitHub Stars 1下载 62核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:micro-polish(微抛光)
来源仓库:https://github.com/justingoertz/micro-polish-skill
仓库路径:skills/micro-polish
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/justingoertz/micro-polish-skill --skill micro-polish
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/justingoertz/micro-polish-skill --skill micro-polish

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑的开发与维护。适合生成或审查 React、Next.js、Vue、Tailwind、CSS 等相关代码。使用时需结合项目设计系统、路由和构建方式,避免孤立片段。涉及页面改动时应配合本地预览和构建检查确认视觉效果。

micro-polish 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/micro-polish

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/justingoertz/micro-polish-skill --skill micro-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

micro-polish 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/justingoertz/micro-polish-skill --skill micro-polish。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

micro-polish 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

micro-polish 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

micro-polish 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

micro-polish 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 198 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 62 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

micro-polish 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
micro-polish

微抛光 · 本页

1981只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Micro Polish

Apply obsessive attention to details others won't notice. The accumulated micro choices in typography, spacing, timing, and rhythm compound into a feeling of quality that registers subconsciously before it registers consciously.

How to use

  • /micro-polish Apply micro-refinement sensibility to any work in this conversation.
  • /micro-polish <file> Review the file for micro-polish opportunities and output:

- observation (quote the exact line/snippet) - why it matters (the felt difference) - a concrete refinement

Philosophy

Quality emerges from hundreds of micro-decisions that individually seem insignificant but collectively create work that feels different—even when observers can't articulate why. This skill is about developing and trusting intuition for those choices.

Understand the context

Before polishing, read the work and understand what it is and who it's for. Infer from the code or UI itself—file names, dependencies, existing patterns, visual language, and domain signals all reveal intent.

Different contexts demand different choices:

  • A healthcare app for older users needs generous contrast, larger touch targets, and clarity over cleverness. "Subtle" would be a failure mode here.
  • A luxury fashion site might prize restraint—quiet typography, refined spacing, atmosphere over accessibility. "Bold" might feel cheap.
  • A developer CLI wants zero decoration. Polish means removing friction, not adding finesse.
  • A children's game can be exuberant in ways that would feel juvenile elsewhere.

The same "refinement" can be right in one context and wrong in another. Maximum contrast is polish for an accessibility-first app. It's anti-polish for a meditation app. There are no universal rules—only appropriate choices for specific contexts.

When context is genuinely ambiguous and the right direction is unclear, ask. Otherwise, infer and proceed.

Process

Read the work slowly

Before changing anything, read the code or view the UI at half speed. Notice what creates friction. Notice what flows. Trust initial reactions before rationalizing them away.

Notice what matters here

Given what this work is and who it's for, what does "polish" mean in this specific context? What would make this feel more like itself—more aligned with its purpose? Let that understanding guide which details deserve attention.

What to output

After polishing, provide:

  1. Context understood — What you inferred about the work and its users. What "polish" means here.
  2. Changes made — Refinements applied, with the specific observation that prompted each.
  3. Rationale — Why each choice fits *this* context. Not generic craft principles—the specific reasoning for this work.
  4. Left alone — Details you noticed but chose not to change, and why they're right as-is for this context.

Trust your eye

Some refinements can't be justified by rules. A 1px shift that makes an icon "sit right." A 50ms timing adjustment that makes motion "feel better." A color that's "not quite" the computed value but reads correctly.

These intuitions are valid. They come from accumulated exposure to quality work. Over time, you'll develop your own sense of what matters—and the confidence to override any guideline when your eye tells you otherwise.

Document your choices anyway—not to justify, but to build a vocabulary for what you're sensing.

The standard

Polish until you can look at every part of the work and feel settled. Not excited, not proud—settled. The absence of small irritations. The quiet confidence that comes from knowing nothing was left approximate when it could have been precise.

平台分布

Claude Code

45.28%
按下载量换算28

OpenCode

32.03%
按下载量换算20

windsurf

14.49%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills