Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

qa-gate(质量保证门)

qa-gate 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

qa-gate 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,591。

总安装 504周安装 21GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 168核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:qa-gate(质量保证门)
来源仓库:https://github.com/michael-menard/monorepo
仓库路径:skills/qa-gate
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/michael-menard/monorepo --skill qa-gate
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/michael-menard/monorepo --skill qa-gate

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

qa-gate 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词快速定位候选结果。适用于质量保证、测试用例生成或缺陷预防相关的任务场景。支持自动化测试覆盖分析和风险点识别。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

qa-gate 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/qa-gate

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/michael-menard/monorepo --skill qa-gate;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

qa-gate 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/michael-menard/monorepo --skill qa-gate。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

qa-gate 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

qa-gate 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

qa-gate 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

qa-gate 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 504 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 168 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

qa-gate 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
qa-gate

质量保证门 · 本页

504—需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

/qa-gate - Quality Gate Decision

Description

Generate a quality gate decision with persistent YAML output. Runs automated checks and optional specialist reviews, then produces a gate file that can be tracked and referenced.

Key Features:

  • Persistent YAML gate files for traceability
  • Standardized severity scale (low, medium, high)
  • Issue ID prefixes for categorization (SEC-, PERF-, TEST-, etc.)
  • WAIVED status with approval tracking
  • Updates story file with gate reference
  • NFR validation (security, performance, reliability, accessibility)

Usage

# Quick gate for a story (tests, types, lint only)
/qa-gate 3.1.5

# Full gate with specialist reviews
/qa-gate 3.1.5 --deep

# Gate for current branch (no story reference)
/qa-gate --branch

# Gate with specific specialists
/qa-gate 3.1.5 --security --performance

# Waive known issues
/qa-gate 3.1.5 --waive --reason "Accepted for MVP" --approved-by "Product Owner"

# Quick check without persisting file
/qa-gate 3.1.5 --dry-run

Parameters

  • story - Story number (e.g., 3.1.5) or omit for branch-based review
  • --deep - Run all specialist reviews (security, performance, accessibility)
  • --security - Run security specialist review
  • --performance - Run performance specialist review
  • --accessibility - Run accessibility specialist review
  • --branch - Review current branch without story reference
  • --waive - Mark gate as WAIVED (requires --reason and --approved-by)
  • --reason - Reason for waiver
  • --approved-by - Who approved the waiver
  • --dry-run - Run checks but don't persist gate file

EXECUTION INSTRUCTIONS

Phase 1: Parse Arguments & Locate Files

1. Parse story number or --branch flag
2. If story provided:
   - Find story file: docs/stories/{STORY_NUM}.*.md
   - Extract story title and slug
3. Determine gate file path: docs/qa/gates/{STORY_NUM}-{slug}.yml
4. Check if gate file already exists (for history tracking)

Phase 2: Run Required Checks

Always run these checks first:

# Run in parallel for speed
pnpm test --filter='...[origin/main]'
pnpm check-types --filter='...[origin/main]'
pnpm lint --filter='...[origin/main]'

Collect results:

checks:
  tests: { status: PASS|FAIL, details: "X tests passed" }
  types: { status: PASS|FAIL, details: "No type errors" }
  lint: { status: PASS|FAIL, details: "No lint errors" }

Phase 3: Specialist Reviews (if --deep or specific flags)

Use haiku model for fast, focused reviews:

# Security Review (if --deep or --security)
Task(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "haiku",
  description: "Security review",
  prompt: "You are a security specialist. Review the code changes.

           Check for:
           - Authentication/authorization issues
           - Injection vulnerabilities (SQL, XSS, command)
           - Sensitive data exposure
           - OWASP Top 10 issues
           - Hardcoded secrets or credentials

           For each finding, provide:
           - id: SEC-{NNN}
           - severity: low|medium|high
           - finding: Brief description
           - suggested_action: How to fix
           - file: File path
           - line: Line number (if applicable)

           Return findings as YAML array."
)

# Performance Review (if --deep or --performance)
Task(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "haiku",
  description: "Performance review",
  prompt: "You are a performance specialist. Review the code changes.

           Check for:
           - N+1 query patterns
           - Missing database indexes
           - Unnecessary re-renders in React
           - Large bundle imports
           - Missing memoization
           - Inefficient algorithms

           For each finding, provide:
           - id: PERF-{NNN}
           - severity: low|medium|high
           - finding: Brief description
           - suggested_action: How to fix
           - file: File path

           Return findings as YAML array."
)

# Accessibility Review (if --deep or --accessibility)
Task(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "haiku",
  description: "Accessibility review",
  prompt: "You are an accessibility specialist. Review the code changes.

           Check for:
           - WCAG 2.1 AA compliance
           - Keyboard navigation support
           - Screen reader compatibility
           - Missing ARIA labels/roles
           - Color contrast issues
           - Focus management

           For each finding, provide:
           - id: A11Y-{NNN}
           - severity: low|medium|high
           - finding: Brief description with WCAG criterion
           - suggested_action: How to fix
           - file: File path

           Return findings as YAML array."
)

Phase 4: Determine Gate Decision

Decision logic:

IF --waive flag provided:
  gate = WAIVED
ELSE IF any check FAILED OR any high severity issue:
  gate = FAIL
ELSE IF any medium severity issue:
  gate = CONCERNS
ELSE:
  gate = PASS

Status reason (1-2 sentences):

  • PASS: "All checks passed with no significant issues."
  • CONCERNS: "Non-blocking issues found that should be addressed."
  • FAIL: "{reason for failure - e.g., 'Tests failing' or 'High severity security issue'}"
  • WAIVED: "{user-provided reason}"

Phase 5: Generate Gate File

Write YAML to docs/qa/gates/{STORY_NUM}-{slug}.yml:

schema: 1
story: "{STORY_NUM}"
story_title: "{STORY_TITLE}"
gate: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|WAIVED
status_reason: "{1-2 sentence explanation}"
reviewer: "Claude Code"
updated: "{ISO-8601 timestamp}"

# Waiver (only active if WAIVED)
waiver:
  active: false  # or true if WAIVED
  reason: ""     # populated if WAIVED
  approved_by: "" # populated if WAIVED

# All issues found
top_issues: []
# Example:
#   - id: "SEC-001"
#     severity: high
#     finding: "No rate limiting on login endpoint"
#     suggested_action: "Add rate limiting middleware"
#     file: "src/api/auth/login.ts"

# NFR validation summary
nfr_validation:
  security: { status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|SKIPPED, issue_count: 0 }
  performance: { status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|SKIPPED, issue_count: 0 }
  accessibility: { status: PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|SKIPPED, issue_count: 0 }
  tests: { status: PASS|FAIL, details: "" }
  types: { status: PASS|FAIL, details: "" }
  lint: { status: PASS|FAIL, details: "" }

# Risk summary
risk_summary:
  totals: { high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0 }
  recommendations:
    must_fix: []   # high severity items
    should_fix: [] # medium severity items

Phase 6: Update Story File (if story provided)

Append to story's QA Results section:

## QA Results

### Gate Status

Gate: {STATUS} → docs/qa/gates/{STORY_NUM}-{slug}.yml
Updated: {ISO-8601 timestamp}
Reviewer: Claude Code

{If issues found:}
Top Issues:
- [{ID}] {severity}: {finding}

Phase 7: Report Summary

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
  Quality Gate: {STORY_NUM} - {STORY_TITLE}
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Gate: {PASS|CONCERNS|FAIL|WAIVED}
Reason: {status_reason}

Checks:
  Tests:    {PASS|FAIL}
  Types:    {PASS|FAIL}
  Lint:     {PASS|FAIL}

{If specialist reviews run:}
NFR Validation:
  Security:      {STATUS} ({N} issues)
  Performance:   {STATUS} ({N} issues)
  Accessibility: {STATUS} ({N} issues)

{If issues found:}
Top Issues ({N} total):
  [{ID}] {severity}: {finding}
  ...

Gate File: docs/qa/gates/{STORY_NUM}-{slug}.yml

{If FAIL:}
Recommendation: Address high-severity issues before proceeding.

{If CONCERNS:}
Recommendation: Review issues and proceed with awareness.

{If WAIVED:}
Waiver: {reason}
Approved By: {approved_by}
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Issue ID Prefixes

PrefixCategory
SEC-Security issues
PERF-Performance issues
A11Y-Accessibility issues
TEST-Testing gaps
REL-Reliability issues
MNT-Maintainability concerns
ARCH-Architecture issues
DOC-Documentation gaps
REQ-Requirements issues

Severity Scale

Fixed values - no variations:

SeverityDescriptionAction
highCritical issues, should blockMust fix before release
mediumShould fix soon, not blockingSchedule for soon
lowMinor issues, cosmeticFix when convenient

Gate Statuses

StatusMeaningWhen to Use
PASSAll goodNo issues or only low severity
CONCERNSProceed with awarenessMedium severity issues present
FAILShould not proceedHigh severity issues or check failures
WAIVEDAccepted despite issuesExplicitly approved to proceed

Sub-Agent Architecture

Main Orchestrator (/qa-gate)
    │
    ├─▶ Required Checks (inline)
    │   ├── pnpm test
    │   ├── pnpm check-types
    │   └── pnpm lint
    │
    └─▶ Specialist Reviews (parallel, haiku)
        ├── Security specialist
        ├── Performance specialist
        └── Accessibility specialist

Integration with /implement

The /implement skill calls /qa-gate for its QA phase:

/implement 3.1.5
    │
    ├─▶ ... implementation phases ...
    │
    └─▶ /qa-gate 3.1.5 --deep
            └── Produces gate file and updates story

Examples

Quick Gate (tests only)

/qa-gate 3.1.5
# Runs: tests, types, lint
# Output: docs/qa/gates/3.1.5-my-story.yml

Deep Gate (all specialists)

/qa-gate 3.1.5 --deep
# Runs: tests, types, lint + security, performance, accessibility
# Output: docs/qa/gates/3.1.5-my-story.yml

Waive Known Issues

/qa-gate 3.1.5 --waive --reason "MVP release, will fix in v2" --approved-by "Tech Lead"
# Sets gate to WAIVED with approval tracking

Branch Review (no story)

/qa-gate --branch --deep
# Reviews current branch without story reference
# Output: docs/qa/gates/branch-{branch-name}.yml

平台分布

Codex

35.65%
按下载量换算60

Claude

31.43%
按下载量换算53

Cursor

17.82%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

10.29%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills