Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

verification-loop(验证循环)

verification-loop 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

verification-loop 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 9,918。

总安装 190周安装 8GitHub Stars 13下载 67核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:verification-loop(验证循环)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection
仓库路径:skills/verification-loop
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill verification-loop
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill verification-loop

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

verification-loop 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。适用于前端设计项目中需要验证代码质量、检查依赖关系或确保构建流程正常的场景。

通过自动化循环验证机制提升开发效率和代码可靠性。安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/verification-loop

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill verifi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

verification-loop 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill verification-loo…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

verification-loop 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

verification-loop 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill verification-loop 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

verification-loop 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

verification-loop 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 190 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 67 次,GitHub 13 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

verification-loop 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
verification-loop

验证循环 · 本页

19013执行命令未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Verification Loop

A systematic 6-check verification framework that validates implementation quality across multiple dimensions. This skill provides a structured approach to catching issues early, ensuring code compiles, type-checks, passes linting, runs tests, has no security issues, and contains no unintended changes.

TERMINOLOGY NOTE: This skill uses "Checks" (Check 1-6) for its internal verification stages. Do not confuse these with "Phases" (plan phases) or "Steps" (implement-phase steps).

Design Philosophy

Defense in Depth

Each verification check catches different categories of issues:

CheckCatchesWhy It Matters
BuildSyntax errors, missing deps, bundling issuesCode must compile to run
TypesType mismatches, null safety, interface violationsType safety prevents runtime errors
LintStyle violations, code smells, potential bugsConsistent, maintainable code
TestsLogic errors, regressions, broken contractsFunctional correctness
SecuritySecrets, debug code, vulnerable patternsProduction safety
DiffUnintended changes, scope creep, leftover codeChange discipline

Fail Fast

Checks are ordered by detection speed. Build errors appear in seconds; security scans may take longer. By running fast checks first, we provide rapid feedback on common issues.

Project-Agnostic

The framework detects project type automatically and applies appropriate tooling. The same verification loop works for Node.js, Python, Go, Rust, and mixed-language projects.

Idempotent Execution

Running the verification loop multiple times produces the same result. Each check either passes or fails deterministically based on codebase state.


When to Use This Skill

Automatically invoked by implement-phase:

  • As Step 2 (Exit Condition Verification)
  • Before proceeding to integration testing
  • After implementation subagents complete their work

Manually invoked when:

  • Validating changes before committing
  • Checking code quality after refactoring
  • Running pre-merge verification
  • Debugging CI/CD failures locally

Do NOT use when:

  • Only reading or analyzing code (no changes made)
  • Running exploratory tests (use test runner directly)
  • Checking a single file (use individual tools)

Project Type Detection

Before running verification checks, detect the project type to determine appropriate commands.

Detection Matrix

Project TypePrimary IndicatorSecondary Indicators
Node.js/TypeScriptpackage.json existstsconfig.json, node_modules/
Pythonpyproject.toml OR setup.pyrequirements.txt, .venv/, __pycache__/
Gogo.mod existsgo.sum, *.go files
RustCargo.toml existsCargo.lock, target/
Mixed/MonorepoMultiple indicatorsWorkspace files, multiple package.json

Detection Process

# Check for project type indicators
detect_project_type() {
  if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
    if [ -f "tsconfig.json" ]; then
      echo "typescript"
    else
      echo "nodejs"
    fi
  elif [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] || [ -f "setup.py" ]; then
    echo "python"
  elif [ -f "go.mod" ]; then
    echo "go"
  elif [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then
    echo "rust"
  else
    echo "unknown"
  fi
}

Package Manager Detection (Node.js)

# Determine Node.js package manager
detect_package_manager() {
  if [ -f "pnpm-lock.yaml" ]; then
    echo "pnpm"
  elif [ -f "yarn.lock" ]; then
    echo "yarn"
  elif [ -f "bun.lockb" ]; then
    echo "bun"
  else
    echo "npm"
  fi
}

Python Environment Detection

# Determine Python tooling
detect_python_tooling() {
  if [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] && grep -q "\[tool.poetry\]" pyproject.toml; then
    echo "poetry"
  elif [ -f "pyproject.toml" ] && grep -q "\[tool.pdm\]" pyproject.toml; then
    echo "pdm"
  elif [ -f "Pipfile" ]; then
    echo "pipenv"
  elif [ -f "pyproject.toml" ]; then
    echo "pip"  # PEP 517/518 compatible
  else
    echo "pip"
  fi
}

Check 1: Build Verification

Purpose: Ensure the codebase compiles, bundles, and produces valid build artifacts.

PASS Criteria

  • Build command exits with code 0
  • No compilation errors
  • All build artifacts generated successfully
  • No missing dependency errors

FAIL Criteria

  • Non-zero exit code from build command
  • Compilation/bundling errors
  • Missing or incomplete build artifacts
  • Unresolved dependency errors

Commands by Project Type

Node.js / TypeScript
# Standard build
npm run build

# Or if build script not defined, compile TypeScript
npx tsc --noEmit  # Type check only
npx tsc           # Full compilation

# Common build tools
npx vite build          # Vite
npx next build          # Next.js
npx nest build          # NestJS
npx webpack             # Webpack
npx esbuild src/index.ts --bundle --outdir=dist  # esbuild
Python
# Poetry
poetry build

# PDM
pdm build

# pip / setuptools
python -m build

# Check syntax without full build
python -m py_compile src/**/*.py

# Compile to bytecode (catches syntax errors)
python -m compileall src/
Go
# Standard build
go build ./...

# With all packages
go build -v ./...

# Check only (no output)
go build -n ./...
Rust
# Debug build
cargo build

# Release build
cargo build --release

# Check only (faster)
cargo check

Failure Handling

  1. Parse error output - Extract specific error locations
  2. Identify root cause - Missing import? Syntax error? Type mismatch?
  3. Spawn fix subagent - Provide error context for targeted fix
  4. Re-run build - Verify fix resolved the issue
  5. Max retries: 3 - Escalate to user if build keeps failing

Example Output

CHECK_1_BUILD_VERIFICATION:
  STATUS: PASS | FAIL
  COMMAND: npm run build
  EXIT_CODE: 0 | [non-zero]
  DURATION: 12.3s
  ARTIFACTS: dist/main.js, dist/main.js.map
  ERRORS: [] | [list of errors]

Check 2: Type Verification

Purpose: Ensure type safety across the codebase with no type errors.

PASS Criteria

  • Type checker exits with code 0
  • No type errors reported
  • All type assertions valid
  • No missing type definitions

FAIL Criteria

  • Type errors in any file
  • Missing type definitions for dependencies
  • Invalid type assertions
  • Unreachable code detected (in strict mode)

Commands by Project Type

TypeScript
# Standard type check
npx tsc --noEmit

# With specific config
npx tsc --noEmit --project tsconfig.json

# For monorepos with references
npx tsc --noEmit --build

# NestJS (may have separate tsconfig)
npx tsc --noEmit --project tsconfig.build.json
Python
# mypy (standard)
mypy src/

# With config
mypy src/ --config-file pyproject.toml

# pyright (faster, VSCode-compatible)
pyright src/

# Using poetry/pdm
poetry run mypy src/
pdm run mypy src/

# Type checking specific files
mypy src/module.py src/other.py
Go
# Go has built-in type checking during build
go build ./...

# Additional static analysis
go vet ./...

# With staticcheck (recommended)
staticcheck ./...
Rust
# Rust type checks during compilation
cargo check

# With all features
cargo check --all-features

# For all targets
cargo check --all-targets

Failure Handling

  1. Parse type errors - Extract file, line, and error message
  2. Categorize errors:

- Missing types: Add type annotations - Type mismatch: Fix incorrect types - Missing definitions: Install @types/* packages

  1. Spawn fix subagent with type error context
  2. Re-run type check after fix
  3. Max retries: 3

Example Output

CHECK_2_TYPE_VERIFICATION:
  STATUS: PASS | FAIL
  COMMAND: npx tsc --noEmit
  EXIT_CODE: 0 | [non-zero]
  DURATION: 8.2s
  FILES_CHECKED: 127
  ERRORS: [] | [
    { file: "src/auth.ts", line: 45, error: "Type 'string' not assignable to 'number'" }
  ]

Check 3: Lint Verification

Purpose: Ensure code follows style guidelines and catches potential bugs.

PASS Criteria

  • Linter exits with code 0
  • No errors (warnings may be acceptable based on config)
  • All auto-fixable issues resolved
  • Formatting matches project standards

FAIL Criteria

  • Lint errors present
  • Unfixable formatting issues
  • Security-related lint rules violated
  • Complexity thresholds exceeded

Commands by Project Type

Node.js / TypeScript
# ESLint
npx eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx,.js,.jsx

# With fix (run first to auto-resolve issues)
npx eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx,.js,.jsx --fix

# Prettier (formatting)
npx prettier --check .

# With fix
npx prettier --write .

# Combined (if configured)
npm run lint

# Biome (modern alternative)
npx biome check .
npx biome check . --apply  # auto-fix
Python
# Ruff (fast, recommended)
ruff check src/
ruff check src/ --fix

# Ruff formatting
ruff format src/ --check
ruff format src/

# Flake8
flake8 src/

# Black (formatting)
black src/ --check
black src/

# isort (import sorting)
isort src/ --check-only
isort src/

# pylint (comprehensive)
pylint src/

# Using poetry/pdm
poetry run ruff check src/
pdm run ruff check src/
Go
# gofmt (formatting)
gofmt -l .
gofmt -w .  # fix

# go vet (static analysis)
go vet ./...

# golangci-lint (comprehensive)
golangci-lint run

# With fix
golangci-lint run --fix
Rust
# rustfmt (formatting)
cargo fmt -- --check
cargo fmt  # fix

# clippy (linting)
cargo clippy -- -D warnings

# With all features
cargo clippy --all-features -- -D warnings

Failure Handling

  1. Run auto-fix first - Resolve mechanical issues automatically
  2. Parse remaining errors - Categorize by severity
  3. Spawn fix subagent for non-auto-fixable issues
  4. Re-run lint after fixes
  5. Max retries: 3

Example Output

CHECK_3_LINT_VERIFICATION:
  STATUS: PASS | FAIL
  COMMANDS: [
    { cmd: "npm run lint:fix", exit_code: 0 },
    { cmd: "npm run lint", exit_code: 0 }
  ]
  AUTO_FIXED: 12 issues
  REMAINING_ERRORS: 0 | [
    { rule: "no-unused-vars", file: "src/utils.ts", line: 23 }
  ]
  WARNINGS: 3

Check 4: Test Verification

Purpose: Ensure all tests pass and new code has appropriate coverage.

PASS Criteria

  • All tests pass (exit code 0)
  • No skipped tests without documented reason
  • Coverage thresholds met (if configured)
  • No flaky test failures

FAIL Criteria

  • Any test failure
  • Coverage below threshold
  • Test timeout
  • Test infrastructure errors

Commands by Project Type

Node.js / TypeScript
# Jest
npm test
npx jest
npx jest --coverage

# Vitest
npx vitest run
npx vitest run --coverage

# Mocha
npx mocha

# Specific test files
npx jest src/auth/__tests__/
npx vitest run src/auth/

# With coverage report
npm test -- --coverage --coverageReporters=text
Python
# pytest
pytest
pytest -v
pytest --cov=src

# With specific directory
pytest tests/
pytest tests/unit/ tests/integration/

# Using poetry/pdm
poetry run pytest
pdm run pytest

# unittest (built-in)
python -m unittest discover

# With coverage
coverage run -m pytest
coverage report
Go
# Standard test
go test ./...

# Verbose
go test -v ./...

# With coverage
go test -cover ./...
go test -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

# Specific package
go test -v ./pkg/auth/...
Rust
# Standard test
cargo test

# With output
cargo test -- --nocapture

# Specific tests
cargo test auth::
cargo test --package my-crate

# With all features
cargo test --all-features

Failure Handling

  1. Identify failing tests - Parse test output for failures
  2. Categorize failures:

- Test bug: Fix the test - Implementation bug: Fix the code - Environmental: Fix test setup

  1. Spawn fix subagent with test failure context
  2. Re-run failing tests first (faster feedback)
  3. Re-run full suite after fix
  4. Max retries: 3

Example Output

CHECK_4_TEST_VERIFICATION:
  STATUS: PASS | FAIL
  COMMAND: npm test
  EXIT_CODE: 0 | [non-zero]
  DURATION: 45.2s
  TESTS_RUN: 156
  TESTS_PASSED: 156 | [count]
  TESTS_FAILED: 0 | [count]
  TESTS_SKIPPED: 2
  COVERAGE: 87.3%
  FAILURES: [] | [
    { test: "should authenticate user", file: "auth.test.ts", error: "Expected 200, got 401" }
  ]

Check 5: Security Scan

Purpose: Detect secrets, debug code, and security vulnerabilities before code reaches production.

PASS Criteria

  • No hardcoded secrets detected
  • No console.log/print statements in production code
  • No debug flags enabled
  • No known vulnerable dependencies (if scanned)

FAIL Criteria

  • Secrets detected (API keys, passwords, tokens)
  • Debug code present (console.log in production paths)
  • Debug flags left enabled
  • Critical security vulnerabilities in dependencies

Scan Categories

5a. Secrets Detection
# Using git-secrets
git secrets --scan

# Using gitleaks
gitleaks detect --source .

# Using trufflehog
trufflehog filesystem .

# Manual patterns to search for
grep -r "API_KEY\|SECRET\|PASSWORD\|TOKEN" src/ --include="*.ts" --include="*.js"
grep -r "sk-\|pk_\|api_key\|secret_key" src/

Common Secret Patterns:

# AWS
AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}
aws_secret_access_key

# API Keys (generic)
[aA][pP][iI]_?[kK][eE][yY].*=.*['"][a-zA-Z0-9]{20,}['"]

# Private Keys
-----BEGIN (RSA|DSA|EC|OPENSSH) PRIVATE KEY-----

# Tokens
(ghp|gho|ghu|ghs|ghr)_[A-Za-z0-9_]{36,}  # GitHub
xox[baprs]-[0-9a-zA-Z-]+                    # Slack
5b. Console/Debug Code Detection
# JavaScript/TypeScript
grep -rn "console\.log\|console\.debug\|console\.warn\|console\.error" src/ --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.jsx"

# Exclude test files
grep -rn "console\.log" src/ --include="*.ts" --exclude="*.test.ts" --exclude="*.spec.ts"

# Python
grep -rn "print(\|pdb\|breakpoint()\|debugger" src/ --include="*.py"

# Go
grep -rn "fmt\.Print\|log\.Print" . --include="*.go"

# Rust
grep -rn "println!\|dbg!\|todo!\|unimplemented!" src/ --include="*.rs"

Allowed Exceptions:

  • Logging framework calls (logger.info, logger.debug)
  • Error handling in catch blocks (if configured)
  • Test files
  • Development-only files
5c. Debug Flag Detection
# Environment checks
grep -rn "NODE_ENV.*development\|DEBUG.*true\|SKIP_AUTH" src/

# Disabled security
grep -rn "verify.*false\|secure.*false\|https.*false" src/

# TODO/FIXME with security implications
grep -rn "TODO.*security\|FIXME.*auth\|HACK.*bypass" src/
5d. Dependency Vulnerability Scan
# Node.js
npm audit
npm audit --production

# Python
pip-audit
safety check

# Go
govulncheck ./...

# Rust
cargo audit

Failure Handling

  1. Secrets detected: CRITICAL - Must remove before proceeding
  2. Console logs: WARNING - Auto-remove or justify with logger
  3. Debug flags: WARNING - Must disable for production
  4. Vulnerabilities: Varies by severity (CRITICAL blocks, others warn)

Example Output

CHECK_5_SECURITY_SCAN:
  STATUS: PASS | FAIL
  SCANS_RUN: [
    { scan: "secrets", status: "PASS", findings: 0 },
    { scan: "console_logs", status: "WARN", findings: 3 },
    { scan: "debug_flags", status: "PASS", findings: 0 },
    { scan: "dependencies", status: "PASS", findings: 0 }
  ]
  CRITICAL_FINDINGS: 0 | [count]
  WARNINGS: 3
  DETAILS: [] | [
    { type: "console.log", file: "src/api.ts", line: 45 }
  ]

Check 6: Diff Review

Purpose: Verify only intended changes are present and no unintended modifications occurred.

PASS Criteria

  • All changes relate to the current phase/task
  • No unrelated file modifications
  • File count within expected range
  • No accidental deletions or additions
  • No formatting-only changes to unrelated files

FAIL Criteria

  • Changes outside scope of current work
  • Unexpected file additions/deletions
  • Modifications to protected files
  • Large diffs in files that should have minimal changes

Review Process

6a. Changed File Inventory
# List all changed files
git diff --name-only HEAD~1

# With status (added, modified, deleted)
git diff --name-status HEAD~1

# Compared to base branch
git diff --name-only main...HEAD

# With line counts
git diff --stat HEAD~1
6b. Scope Verification
# Expected files based on phase
# (Provided as input to verification)
EXPECTED_PATTERNS=(
  "src/auth/*"
  "tests/auth/*"
  "src/types/auth.ts"
)

# Actual changed files
CHANGED_FILES=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1)

# Check for unexpected changes
for file in $CHANGED_FILES; do
  matches_expected=false
  for pattern in "${EXPECTED_PATTERNS[@]}"; do
    if [[ $file == $pattern ]]; then
      matches_expected=true
      break
    fi
  done
  if ! $matches_expected; then
    echo "UNEXPECTED: $file"
  fi
done
6c. File Count Verification
# Count changed files
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | wc -l

# Expected range (provided as input)
MIN_FILES=3
MAX_FILES=15

# Verify within range
COUNT=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 | wc -l)
if [ $COUNT -lt $MIN_FILES ] || [ $COUNT -gt $MAX_FILES ]; then
  echo "WARNING: Changed $COUNT files, expected $MIN_FILES-$MAX_FILES"
fi
6d. Protected Files Check
# Files that should not be modified without explicit approval
PROTECTED_FILES=(
  "package-lock.json"
  ".env*"
  "*.lock"
  "docker-compose.yml"
  "Dockerfile"
  ".github/workflows/*"
)

# Check for protected file changes
for file in $CHANGED_FILES; do
  for protected in "${PROTECTED_FILES[@]}"; do
    if [[ $file == $protected ]]; then
      echo "PROTECTED FILE CHANGED: $file"
    fi
  done
done
6e. Diff Size Analysis
# Get diff stats
git diff --stat HEAD~1

# Flag large diffs
git diff --numstat HEAD~1 | while read added deleted file; do
  total=$((added + deleted))
  if [ $total -gt 500 ]; then
    echo "LARGE DIFF: $file (+$added -$deleted)"
  fi
done

Failure Handling

  1. Unexpected files: Review if changes are valid

- Valid: Update expected scope - Invalid: Revert unintended changes

  1. Protected files: Require explicit approval
  2. Large diffs: Review for scope creep
  3. Missing expected files: Investigate incomplete implementation

Example Output

CHECK_6_DIFF_REVIEW:
  STATUS: PASS | FAIL
  FILES_CHANGED: 8
  EXPECTED_RANGE: 5-12
  SCOPE_VIOLATIONS: 0 | [list]
  PROTECTED_FILES_CHANGED: 0 | [list]
  LARGE_DIFFS: 0 | [list]
  SUMMARY: [
    { type: "added", count: 3 },
    { type: "modified", count: 4 },
    { type: "deleted", count: 1 }
  ]
  DETAILS: [
    { file: "src/auth/auth.service.ts", status: "M", lines: "+45 -12" },
    { file: "src/auth/auth.guard.ts", status: "A", lines: "+78 -0" }
  ]

Integration with implement-phase

When invoked as Step 2 of implement-phase, this skill runs all 6 verification checks and returns a structured result.

Input Context

VERIFICATION_INPUT:
  phase_number: 2
  phase_name: "Authentication Service"
  plan_path: docs/plans/auth-implementation.md
  expected_file_patterns: ["src/auth/*", "tests/auth/*"]
  expected_file_range: [5, 15]
  protected_files: ["package-lock.json", ".env"]
  skip_checks: []  # Optional: skip specific checks

Output Format

VERIFICATION_LOOP_STATUS: PASS | FAIL
CHECKS_RUN: 6
CHECKS_PASSED: 6 | [count]
CHECKS_FAILED: 0 | [count]
FAILED_CHECKS: [] | [
  {
    check: 1,
    name: "build",
    error: "TypeScript compilation failed",
    details: "src/auth.ts(45): error TS2322: Type 'string' not assignable..."
  }
]
REPORT:
  check_1_build:
    status: PASS
    duration: 12.3s
  check_2_types:
    status: PASS
    duration: 8.2s
  check_3_lint:
    status: PASS
    auto_fixed: 12
    duration: 5.1s
  check_4_tests:
    status: PASS
    tests_run: 156
    tests_passed: 156
    coverage: 87.3%
    duration: 45.2s
  check_5_security:
    status: PASS
    secrets_found: 0
    console_logs: 0
    duration: 3.4s
  check_6_diff:
    status: PASS
    files_changed: 8
    scope_violations: 0
    duration: 1.2s
TOTAL_DURATION: 75.4s

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
⚡ ACTION REQUIRED: IMMEDIATELY EXECUTE STEP 3 (Integration Testing)
   DO NOT wait for user input. DO NOT ask for confirmation.
   YOU MUST proceed to Step 3 NOW as your next action.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
CRITICAL INSTRUCTION TO AI: When VERIFICATION_LOOP_STATUS is PASS, you MUST: 1. Output the above ACTION REQUIRED block exactly as shown 2. IMMEDIATELY proceed to Step 3 (Automated Integration Testing) as your very next action 3. DO NOT wait for user input or confirmation 4. DO NOT ask "shall I proceed?" or similar questions This is a direct instruction to execute, not information to display. Treat this like a function call that must happen automatically.

Implement-Phase Integration Point

implement-phase pipeline:

Step 1: Implementation (subagents)
        ↓
Step 2: VERIFICATION-LOOP (this skill) ←
        ├── Check 1: Build
        ├── Check 2: Types
        ├── Check 3: Lint
        ├── Check 4: Tests
        ├── Check 5: Security
        └── Check 6: Diff Review
        ↓
Step 3: Automated Integration Testing
        ↓
Step 4: Code Review
        ↓
...

Retry Logic

implement-phase handles retry logic:

1. INVOKE verification-loop
2. IF any check FAILS:
   a. IDENTIFY failure type
   b. SPAWN fix subagent with failure context
   c. Re-run verification-loop (or just failed checks)
   d. REPEAT until PASS (max 3 retries per check)
3. IF all checks PASS:
   a. PROCEED to Step 3 (Integration Testing)

Standalone Invocation

Command Line

/verification-loop

# With specific checks
/verification-loop checks:build,types,tests

# Skip checks
/verification-loop skip:security,diff

# Specific project path
/verification-loop path:./packages/auth

Interactive

/verification-loop

> Running verification loop...
>
> Check 1: Build Verification
>   Command: npm run build
>   Status: PASS (12.3s)
>
> Check 2: Type Verification
>   Command: npx tsc --noEmit
>   Status: PASS (8.2s)
>
> Check 3: Lint Verification
>   Command: npm run lint
>   Auto-fixed: 12 issues
>   Status: PASS (5.1s)
>
> Check 4: Test Verification
>   Command: npm test
>   Tests: 156 passed, 0 failed
>   Coverage: 87.3%
>   Status: PASS (45.2s)
>
> Check 5: Security Scan
>   Secrets: 0 found
>   Console logs: 0 found
>   Status: PASS (3.4s)
>
> Check 6: Diff Review
>   Files changed: 8
>   Scope violations: 0
>   Status: PASS (1.2s)
>
> ═══════════════════════════════════════
> VERIFICATION COMPLETE: ALL CHECKS PASSED
> Duration: 75.4s
> ═══════════════════════════════════════
>
> ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
> ⚡ ACTION REQUIRED: IMMEDIATELY EXECUTE STEP 3 (Integration Testing)
>    DO NOT wait for user input. DO NOT ask for confirmation.
>    YOU MUST proceed to Step 3 NOW as your next action.
> ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Configuration

Project-Level Configuration

The verification loop auto-detects project type and uses appropriate defaults. Override specific checks via project config if needed:

// package.json or .verification.json
{
  "verification": {
    "checks": {
      "build": { "command": "<command>", "timeout": "<ms>" },
      "types": { "command": "<command>", "timeout": "<ms>" },
      "lint": { "command": "<command>", "autoFix": "<bool>" },
      "tests": { "command": "<command>", "coverage": { "threshold": "<percent>" } },
      "security": {
        "scanSecrets": "<bool>",
        "scanConsoleLogs": "<bool>",
        "excludePatterns": ["<glob-patterns>"]
      },
      "diff": {
        "protectedFiles": ["<glob-patterns>"],
        "maxFileCount": "<number>"
      }
    }
  }
}
# pyproject.toml or .verification.toml
[tool.verification]
checks.build.command = "<command>"
checks.types.command = "<command>"
checks.lint.command = "<command>"
checks.lint.auto_fix = <bool>
checks.tests.command = "<command>"
checks.tests.coverage_threshold = <percent>
checks.security.scan_secrets = <bool>
checks.security.exclude_patterns = ["<glob-patterns>"]

Environment Variables

# Skip specific checks
VERIFICATION_SKIP_CHECKS=<comma-separated-check-names>

# Set timeouts
VERIFICATION_BUILD_TIMEOUT=<ms>
VERIFICATION_TEST_TIMEOUT=<ms>

# Security scan configuration
VERIFICATION_SECRETS_SCAN=<bool>
VERIFICATION_CONSOLE_LOG_SCAN=<bool>

Best Practices

For Check Authors

  1. Order checks by speed - Fast checks first for rapid feedback
  2. Make checks independent - Each check should run in isolation
  3. Provide clear error messages - Include file, line, and fix suggestions
  4. Support auto-fix - Automate mechanical fixes where possible
  5. Cache when possible - Avoid redundant work across runs

For Verification Consumers

  1. Run locally before commit - Catch issues before CI
  2. Trust the verification - If it passes, proceed confidently
  3. Fix root causes - Don't skip checks; fix the underlying issues
  4. Review security warnings - Even non-blocking findings need attention
  5. Keep scope tight - Large diffs often indicate scope creep

For CI/CD Integration

  1. Run full verification - Don't skip checks in CI
  2. Cache dependencies - Speed up build/install checks
  3. Parallelize when possible - Some checks can run concurrently
  4. Fail fast - Stop on first failure to save CI time
  5. Report clearly - Surface which check failed and why

Troubleshooting

Common Issues

IssueCauseSolution
Build fails with missing depsnode_modules out of syncRun npm install first
Type errors in node_modulesWrong @types versionsUpdate or remove conflicting @types
Lint auto-fix causes more errorsConflicting rulesReview ESLint/Prettier config
Tests timeoutSlow tests or hanging processesIncrease timeout or fix test
Security scan false positiveValid use of flagged patternAdd to exclude list with comment
Diff scope violationUnrelated file touchedReview and revert or expand scope

Debug Mode

Run verification with verbose output:

/verification-loop --verbose

# Or set environment
VERIFICATION_DEBUG=true /verification-loop

References


Appendix: Quick Reference

Check Summary

CheckPurposeCommandsBlocks On
1. BuildCompilationnpm run build, cargo buildAny error
2. TypesType safetytsc --noEmit, mypyAny error
3. LintCode qualityeslint, ruffErrors (not warnings)
4. TestsCorrectnessnpm test, pytestAny failure
5. SecurityProduction safetyCustom scansSecrets, critical vulns
6. DiffChange disciplinegit diff analysisScope violations

Minimum Viable Verification

For quick verification (e.g., pre-commit hook):

# Fast path: build + types + lint
npm run build && npx tsc --noEmit && npm run lint

Full Verification

For complete verification (e.g., pre-merge):

# All 6 checks
npm run build && \
npx tsc --noEmit && \
npm run lint && \
npm test && \
npm run security:scan && \
./scripts/verify-diff.sh

平台分布

Codex

39.99%
按下载量换算27

Claude

28.54%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

17.45%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

10.64%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/mhylle/claude-skills-collection --skill verification-loop 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills