Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

meta-ads-recommendation(元广告推荐)

meta-ads-recommendation 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

meta-ads-recommendation 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 29,537。

总安装 3,036周安装 124GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 972核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:meta-ads-recommendation(元广告推荐)
来源仓库:https://github.com/elias-didoo/meta-ads-recommendation
安装命令:
openclaw skills install meta-ads-recommendation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install meta-ads-recommendation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

基于数据分析生成优先级明确的元广告优化行动计划。帮助用户决定如何处理低效或异常表现的营销活动。输出可执行建议列表,附带预期收益评估参考值。依赖前置分析技能提供准确输入数据源。meta-ads-recommendation 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

原始文档强调建议需结合业务上下文二次判断后实施。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install meta-ads-recommendation;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

meta-ads-recommendation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install meta-ads-recommendation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

meta-ads-recommendation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

meta-ads-recommendation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

meta-ads-recommendation 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

meta-ads-recommendation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,036 次,近一周安装 124 次,下载 972 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

meta-ads-recommendation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
meta-ads-recommendation

元广告推荐 · 本页

3,036—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
meta-ads-recommendation
description
[Didoo AI] Produces specific, prioritized action plans based on campaign analysis data. Use when user wants to know what to do about their campaign performance — after seeing analysis results, or alongside analysis when they ask for both. All analysis skills route here for the final recommendation output.

Meta Ads Optimization Recommendations

When to Use

Loaded when user wants to know what to do about their campaign performance — after seeing analysis results, or alongside analysis when they ask for both.


Prerequisites

Before giving recommendations, you need performance data. Either:

  1. Run an analysis skill first (meta-ads-analysis, meta-ads-lead-gen-analysis, meta-ads-audience-analysis, etc.)
  2. Or use the analysis data already in the conversation

If no analysis data exists: *"I need to look at your campaign data before I can give recommendations. What time period should I analyze?"*


Session Context Keys This Skill Reads

This skill is the single exit point for all analysis outputs. Read the relevant keys from session context before producing recommendations. See the full table at the bottom of this file.


Step 1: Understand the Full Picture

Review the analysis conclusions and extract:

  • Funnel weak points
  • Trend signals
  • Anomalies
  • Data quality

Factor in brand or campaign context:

  • Early-stage brand → higher CPL is normal initially
  • Testing campaign → focus on learning, not scaling
  • Scaling campaign → focus on efficiency and volume capacity

Step 2: Map Problems to Actions

Problem You SeeLikely CauseRecommended Action
CTR less than 1% or decliningCreative fatigue, weak hook, audience mismatchTest new creative angles; narrow audience if broad
LPV rate less than 70% or decliningAd doesn't match landing page; page loads slowlyCheck landing page relevance and speed; align messaging
Conversion rate decliningLanding page or offer issueReview page UX, form friction, offer clarity
cost_per_result risingSaturation, competition, fatigueCheck frequency; if > 3, refresh creative or widen audience
Frequency > 3Audience seeing ads too oftenExpand audience or rotate in new creative
Spend less than 50% of budgetAudience too narrow, bid too low, ad quality issuesWiden targeting; check if ad is stuck in learning
Stuck in Learning phaseNot enough results to exitIncrease budget or consolidate to fewer adsets
One segment vastly outperformingSystem finding winners correctlyShift more budget to winner; pause underperformers
All healthy but low volumeBudget ceilingIncrease budget gradually — max 20% at a time

Step 3: Prioritize — Pick 1 to 3 Actions

Prioritization rules:

  1. Severity — How much is this hurting results right now?
  2. Actionability — Can it be fixed with tools/data available?
  3. Confidence — Is the data clear enough to be sure?

Optional additions (0–2, only if genuinely useful):

  • Things worth monitoring but not urgent
  • Early warning signs to watch

If nothing needs fixing: say so and give 1–2 things to keep an eye on.


Step 4: Landing Page Diagnostic

When funnel data points to the landing page (LPV rate or CVR is the weak point), run this diagnostic before recommending creative or audience changes.

Step 4a: LPV Rate Check

First — determine campaign type:

  • Lead gen / Conversions objective → use Lead gen benchmarks below
  • E-commerce / Purchase objective → use E-commerce benchmarks below
Campaign TypeLPV RateIndicates
E-commerce< 70%Landing page issue likely
E-commerce≥ 70%Ad-to-page alignment is healthy
Lead gen< 50%Investigate form or page
Lead gen≥ 50%LPV is not the bottleneck

E-commerce only: If LPV is healthy but CVR is low → problem is deeper in the funnel (offer, pricing, trust signals).

Lead gen only: If LPV is healthy but CPL is still high → check form friction (Step 4c) and CAPI status (Step 4b) before concluding the landing page is fine.

Step 4b: CAPI Connection Check

Before diagnosing an LPV or CVR problem:

  1. Verify Meta pixel is firing on the landing page (check Events Manager → Test Events)
  2. Verify Conversions API is connected and sending events back
  3. If CAPI is not connected, CPL shown will be artificially high — this is a data problem, not an ad problem

Step 4c: Form Friction Check (Lead Gen)

  • Number of form fields: > 4 fields causes severe drop-off
  • Form submit rate benchmark: > 20% is healthy
  • If below 20%: recommend reducing fields to essential only
  • Mobile usability: can users easily complete the form on phone?

Step 4d: Disconnect Diagnosis

SignalLikely CauseRecommended Action
LPV < 70%, CVR OKAd-to-page messaging mismatchReview headline and CTA alignment
LPV OK, CVR < 50%Offer or landing page UX issueInvestigate page content and trust signals
Both LPV and CVR lowFunnel-wide problemFix landing page first before changing ads
LPV and CVR OK but CPL highAudience too broad or CAPI not connectedCheck targeting or verify CAPI is sending offline data

Step 5: Format Each Recommendation

Every recommendation needs:

  1. What — Specific action (which ad, which adset, what change, exact numbers)
  2. Why — The data point that led to this conclusion

Optional:

  1. Expected outcome — What should improve and by how much (only if it adds real clarity)

Good example:

Pause ad "Blue Banner v2" — Why: Spent $320 but only 2 leads (CPL $160) vs. account average CPL $45. CTR 0.6% vs. 1.8% average. Drags down overall efficiency.

Bad example:

"Consider optimizing your creative." (no specific action, no data)

Step 6: Constraints

Budget change exceptions — when to break the 20% rule

ConditionMax adjustment per change
cost_per_result is 15%+ below target (winner signal)+50%
cost_per_result is above target20% (standard)
Newly launched, spending < 50% of budgetCheck delivery first, then adjust

General rules

  • Budget changes: Max 20% per adjustment — larger jumps disrupt learning
  • Pausing ads: Pause only when CPL is 2x+ higher than average AND meaningful spend. Don't pause during learning phase unless clearly failing.
  • Audience changes: Major targeting changes reset learning — prefer creating a new adset.
  • Creative recommendations: Be specific about direction: "Test a hook around [specific pain point]", not just "new creative". Suggest 2–3 new variations.
  • Landing page issues: Acknowledge we can't see the page directly. Infer from LPV rate and conversion rate data.

Auction Overlap

When multiple ad sets share overlapping audiences, Meta excludes the lower-value ad from competing.

Diagnosis:

  1. Check Opportunity score in Account Overview
  2. Look for multiple ad sets stuck in Learning Limited simultaneously

Solutions:

  1. Combine similar ad sets — consolidates learning
  2. Turn off overlapping ad sets — move budget to the active ad set

Step 7: Output Format

Brief context sentence, then:

Recommendations:

  1. [Action title] — Why: [data-backed reason] — How: [specific steps in Ads Manager]
  2. [Action title] — ...
  3. [Action title] — ...

Other observations: Things worth watching, not urgent.


Multi-turn Refinement

If user pushes back ("too aggressive", "I don't want to pause that"):

  • Adjust only that specific point
  • Don't repeat the full list unless asked

Tone

Advisory — professional but warm. Specific and data-driven. "Execution needs to happen in Meta Ads Manager — I can walk you through the steps." "Once you've made these changes, I can re-analyze in a few days to see the impact."


Restrictions

  • Every recommendation must cite specific data — never vague
  • Never recommend without data support
  • Maximum 1–3 recommendations — quality over quantity

Session Context — What This Skill Reads

This skill is the single exit point for all analysis outputs. Read the relevant keys from session context before producing recommendations:

KeyWritten ByDescription
funnel_weak_pointsmeta-ads-analysisWhere the biggest funnel drop-off occurs
trend_signalsmeta-ads-analysisDirection of key metrics
anomaliesmeta-ads-analysisUnusual findings
data_qualitymeta-ads-analysisWhether data is sufficient to act on
lp_diagnosismeta-ads-lead-gen-analysis (primary)Ad side vs. landing page side — lead-gen-specific diagnosis
lp_diagnosis_generalmeta-ads-analysis (fallback)Ad side vs. landing page side — general diagnosis
capi_statusmeta-ads-lead-gen-analysisCAPI connection status
cpl_breakdownmeta-ads-lead-gen-analysisWhich funnel stage is the CPL bottleneck
recommended_fix_prioritymeta-ads-lead-gen-analysisRanked fix order for lead gen
budget_reallocation_planmeta-ads-audience-analysisSpecific audience budget shifts
audience_issuesmeta-ads-audience-analysisOverlap and misallocation findings
rotation_pipelinemeta-ads-creative-fatigueCreative inventory by status
fatigue_levelmeta-ads-creative-fatiguePer-creative fatigue classification
days_until_deathmeta-ads-creative-fatigueEstimated creative lifespan
primary_root_causemeta-ads-drop-diagnosisRoot cause of sudden performance drop
recovery_planmeta-ads-drop-diagnosisStructured recovery steps
If no analysis context keys are present, ask the user: "I need to analyze your campaign data first. What time period should I look at?"

平台分布

OpenClaw

89.04%
按下载量换算865

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills