Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

zero-to-launch(零启动)

zero-to-launch 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

zero-to-launch 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 58,594。

总安装 412周安装 17GitHub Stars 317下载 135核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:zero-to-launch(零启动)
来源仓库:https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills
仓库路径:skills/zero-to-launch
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill zero-to-launch
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill zero-to-launch

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

zero-to-launch 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于从零启动项目、线索筛选和任务场景匹配等研究检索场景。

通过 GitHub 仓库安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/zero-to-launch

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill zero-to-laun…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

zero-to-launch 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/menkesu/awesome-pm-skills --skill zero-to-launch。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

zero-to-launch 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

zero-to-launch 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

zero-to-launch 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

zero-to-launch 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 412 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 135 次,GitHub 317 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

zero-to-launch 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
zero-to-launch

零启动 · 本页

412317只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Zero to Launch: Idea → Prototype Playbook

When This Skill Activates

Claude uses this skill when:

  • User asks to "build", "create", or "prototype" a new feature
  • Starting from a product idea or user need
  • Planning MVP or initial scope
  • Making "what to build first" decisions
  • Guiding from concept to code

Core Frameworks

1. OpenAI's AI-First Product Development (Source: Kevin Weil, CPO of OpenAI)

The Model Improvement Mindset:

"The AI models you're using today is the worst AI model you will ever use for the rest of your life. Every two months, computers can do something they've never been able to do before."

Use when: Building any product that could benefit from AI capabilities

How:

  1. Design for Future Models: Build assuming models will get 10x better in 2 months
  2. Edge Cases Today = Core Cases Tomorrow: If it barely works now, it'll sing soon
  3. Evals as Product Specs: Write test cases that measure quality, not just functionality
  4. Hybrid Approach: Combine AI + traditional code based on task suitability

Example:

User request: "Build a search feature"

Apply AI-First Thinking:
✅ Could AI understand intent better than keyword matching?
✅ Design for streaming results (models will get faster)
✅ Add eval: "Does search return relevant results for ambiguous queries?"
✅ Hybrid: Use AI for intent, traditional for exact matches

2. Figma's Simplicity Forcing Function (Source: Dylan Field, CEO of Figma)

The Core Question:

"The hardest thing is saying no. We operationalize simplicity by constantly asking: What's the ONE thing that matters here?"

Use when: Feature scope is unclear or growing too large

How:

  1. Identify the Core Job: What's the ONE outcome users need?
  2. Remove Until It Breaks: Strip features until core value disappears
  3. Craft Quality Threshold: Details matter when they create moats
  4. Progressive Disclosure: Hide complexity, reveal when needed

Example:

User request: "Build a dashboard with 15 metrics"

Apply Simplicity Test:
❌ 15 metrics = paralysis
✅ What's the ONE metric that drives action?
✅ Show that metric prominently
✅ Hide other 14 behind "View Details"
✅ Polish the main metric display (craft quality)

3. Airbnb's Complete Experience Design (Source: Brian Chesky, CEO of Airbnb)

The One Roadmap Philosophy:

"We shifted to one company roadmap. Leaders are in the details. If you don't know the details, how do you know people are doing a good job?"

Use when: Building features that touch multiple parts of the product

How:

  1. Design Complete Flow: Map entire user journey before coding
  2. Consider All States: Loading, error, empty, success states
  3. Cross-Functional From Start: Design, eng, marketing together
  4. Story Over Features: How would you talk about this to customers?

Example:

User request: "Build user onboarding"

Apply Complete Experience:
✅ Map full journey: Signup → Setup → First Value → Habit
✅ Design all states: Loading screens, errors, empty states
✅ Include: Welcome email, in-app guidance, success celebration
✅ Story: "Get your first [outcome] in under 2 minutes"

Decision Tree: What to Build First

START: New Feature Idea
│
├─ Can AI 10x this? ─────────────────┐
│  YES: Apply AI-First Framework     │
│  NO: Continue                       ↓
│                                Use OpenAI Patterns
├─ What's the ONE core job? ─────────┤
│  Apply Simplicity Test              │
│  Define: Must-have vs nice-to-have  │
│                                     │
├─ Map complete experience ───────────┤
│  All states, full journey           │
│  Cross-functional considerations    │
│                                     │
└─ BUILD MVP ←───────────────────────┘
   Start with core job
   Add details that create moats
   Ship to small group first

Action Templates

Template 1: MVP Scope Definition

# Feature: [Name]

## The ONE Job (Figma Simplicity Test)
What outcome must this deliver?
- Core job: [describe]
- Success = when user can [achieve outcome]

## AI-First Considerations (OpenAI Thinking)
- Could AI help? [yes/no + how]
- Designed for future models? [yes/no]
- Evals needed: [list test cases]

## Complete Experience (Airbnb Approach)
- User journey: [list steps]
- States to design: [loading, error, empty, success]
- Story to tell: "[how we'll talk about this]"

## MVP Scope
**Must Have (Week 1):**
- [feature]
- [feature]

**Should Have (Week 2):**
- [feature]

**Nice to Have (Later):**
- [feature]

Template 2: Build Decision Framework

When deciding what to build:

QuestionFrameworkAction
Is this AI-suitable?OpenAIBuild with AI if: repetitive, pattern-matching, improves over time
What's essential?FigmaStrip to ONE core job, build that first
Is experience complete?AirbnbDesign all states before building any
Can we ship in 1 week?AllIf no, scope is too big - simplify

Quick Reference Card

🏗️ Zero to Launch Checklist

Before You Code:

  • Defined the ONE core job (Figma Test)
  • Considered AI-first approach (OpenAI Lens)
  • Mapped complete user experience (Airbnb Standard)
  • Identified must-have vs nice-to-have
  • Designed all states (loading, error, empty, success)

During Build:

  • Building for future model improvements (if AI)
  • Maintaining simplicity (saying no to scope creep)
  • Including cross-functional perspectives
  • Crafting details that matter

Before Ship:

  • Core job works end-to-end
  • All states handled
  • Story ready (how to talk about it)
  • Ship to small group first

Real-World Examples from Episodes

Example 1: OpenAI's ChatGPT Features (Kevin Weil)

Challenge: Users wanted ChatGPT to remember context across conversations

AI-First Approach:

  • Built knowing models would improve memory capabilities
  • Started with basic context, designed for future sophistication
  • Created evals: "Does it remember key facts across sessions?"
  • Hybrid: Explicit memory + AI interpretation

Result: Feature that gets better as models improve


Example 2: Figma's Feature Development (Dylan Field)

Challenge: Users requested 50+ features

Simplicity Test Applied:

  • Asked: "What's the ONE thing designers need most?"
  • Answer: Collaboration in real-time
  • Shipped: Multiplayer editing (core job)
  • Deferred: 45+ other requests

Result: Killer feature that defined the product


Example 3: Airbnb's Product Redesign (Brian Chesky)

Challenge: Rebuilding entire product experience

Complete Experience Approach:

  • One roadmap across all teams
  • Designed full booking journey before building any piece
  • Every feature needed a story (how to talk about it)
  • Leaders stayed in design details

Result: Coherent product, not disconnected features


Common Pitfalls to Avoid

❌ Mistake 1: Building Without the AI Lens

Problem: Missing 10x opportunities by defaulting to traditional approaches Fix: Always ask: "Could AI make this 10x better?"

❌ Mistake 2: Scope Creep

Problem: "Just one more feature" → bloated MVP that never ships Fix: Ruthlessly apply Figma simplicity test - ONE core job

❌ Mistake 3: Incomplete States

Problem: Shipping without error/empty/loading states Fix: Use Airbnb complete experience checklist

❌ Mistake 4: Feature Factory Mentality

Problem: Building what's requested vs solving jobs Fix: Start with user job, not feature request


Related Skills

  • strategic-build - For deciding if this is strategic vs tactical work
  • design-first-dev - For detailed craft and quality standards
  • ai-product-patterns - For deep AI implementation patterns
  • ship-decisions - For when to ship vs iterate more
  • jtbd-building - For understanding underlying user jobs

Key Quotes from Episodes

Kevin Weil (OpenAI):

"Our general mindset is in two months, there's going to be a better model. If you're building and the product is right on the edge of capabilities, keep going. You're doing something right."

Dylan Field (Figma):

"AI makes design, craft, and quality the new moat for startups. The bar for quality is going to go way up."

Brian Chesky (Airbnb):

"Way too many founders apologize for how they want to run the company. What everyone really wants is clarity and to row in the same direction."

Further Learning

For deeper dives on specific topics, see:

  • references/kevin-weil-openai.md - Full AI-first product philosophy
  • references/dylan-field-figma.md - Simplicity and craft standards
  • references/brian-chesky-airbnb.md - Complete experience design methodology

平台分布

Codex

37.7%
按下载量换算51

Claude

28.85%
按下载量换算39

Cursor

18.74%
按下载量换算25

Gemini CLI

8.47%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills