Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

test-case-design(测试用例设计)

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范、排版、配色、布局和交互体验优化。它适合让 Agent 根据产品场景整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案、检查视觉一致性或改进组件层级。使用时需要结合现有品牌、设计系统和用户任务,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及真实页面改动时,应通过截图或浏览器预览检查文本溢出、对齐和响应式表现。

test-case-design 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 16,412。

总安装 504周安装 21GitHub Stars 61下载 168核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-case-design(测试用例设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/test-case-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-design

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助界面设计、视觉规范和交互体验优化。适合整理页面结构、生成 UI 方案或检查视觉一致性。需结合现有品牌和设计系统,不应只堆装饰元素;涉及页面改动应通过截图预览检查表现。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-design。建议确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否会触发联网或文件读写。

来源仓库内路径:skills/test-case-design

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill t…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test-case-design 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill test-case-d…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test-case-design 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test-case-design 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

test-case-design 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

test-case-design 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 504 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 168 次,GitHub 61 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test-case-design 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
test-case-design

测试用例设计 · 本页

50461操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Test Case Design Techniques

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Test Case Design tasks - Working on apply systematic test case design techniques including equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision tables, and state transition testing
  • Planning or design - Need guidance on Test Case Design approaches
  • Best practices - Want to follow established patterns and standards

Overview

Systematic test case design techniques ensure thorough coverage while minimizing test case count. These black-box techniques derive test cases from specifications without knowledge of internal implementation.

Equivalence Partitioning

Divide input data into equivalent classes where any value should produce the same behavior.

Process

  1. Identify input conditions
  2. Divide into valid and invalid partitions
  3. Select one representative value from each partition
  4. Create test cases for each partition

Example: Age Validation (18-65)

PartitionRangeRepresentativeExpected
Invalid (below)< 1810Reject
Valid18-6530Accept
Invalid (above)> 6570Reject

Test Cases:

  • TC1: age = 10 → Reject (invalid below)
  • TC2: age = 30 → Accept (valid)
  • TC3: age = 70 → Reject (invalid above)

Multiple Input Partitions

Combine partitions systematically:

Input A: {Valid, Invalid}
Input B: {Valid, Invalid}

Combinations:
1. A-Valid, B-Valid → Expected: Success
2. A-Valid, B-Invalid → Expected: Error for B
3. A-Invalid, B-Valid → Expected: Error for A
4. A-Invalid, B-Invalid → Expected: Error for both

Boundary Value Analysis

Test at and around partition boundaries where defects commonly occur.

Process

  1. Identify boundaries from equivalence partitions
  2. Test at minimum, just below, just above, and maximum
  3. Include special values (0, empty, null)

Example: Age Validation (18-65)

BoundaryTest ValuesExpected
Below minimum17Reject
At minimum18Accept
Above minimum19Accept
Normal40Accept
Below maximum64Accept
At maximum65Accept
Above maximum66Reject

Extended Boundaries:

  • 0 (edge case)
  • -1 (negative)
  • MAX_INT (overflow)
  • null (missing)

.NET Example

public class AgeValidationTests
{
    [Theory]
    [InlineData(17, false)]  // Below minimum
    [InlineData(18, true)]   // At minimum
    [InlineData(19, true)]   // Above minimum
    [InlineData(40, true)]   // Normal
    [InlineData(64, true)]   // Below maximum
    [InlineData(65, true)]   // At maximum
    [InlineData(66, false)]  // Above maximum
    [InlineData(0, false)]   // Zero
    [InlineData(-1, false)]  // Negative
    public void ValidateAge_ReturnsExpected(int age, bool expected)
    {
        var result = _validator.IsValidAge(age);
        Assert.Equal(expected, result);
    }
}

Decision Table Testing

Test complex business rules with multiple conditions systematically.

Process

  1. Identify conditions (inputs)
  2. Identify actions (outputs)
  3. Create table with all condition combinations
  4. Simplify using "don't care" conditions

Example: Discount Calculation

Conditions:

  • Is member? (Y/N)
  • Order > $100? (Y/N)
  • Has coupon? (Y/N)

Actions:

  • Apply member discount (10%)
  • Apply bulk discount (5%)
  • Apply coupon discount (15%)
RuleMemberOrder>$100CouponMember%Bulk%Coupon%
R1YYYXXX
R2YYNXX-
R3YNYX-X
R4YNNX--
R5NYY-XX
R6NYN-X-
R7NNY--X
R8NNN---

.NET Example

public class DiscountCalculationTests
{
    public static TheoryData<bool, decimal, bool, decimal> DiscountScenarios => new()
    {
        { true, 150m, true, 0.30m },   // R1: Member + Bulk + Coupon
        { true, 150m, false, 0.15m },  // R2: Member + Bulk
        { true, 50m, true, 0.25m },    // R3: Member + Coupon
        { true, 50m, false, 0.10m },   // R4: Member only
        { false, 150m, true, 0.20m },  // R5: Bulk + Coupon
        { false, 150m, false, 0.05m }, // R6: Bulk only
        { false, 50m, true, 0.15m },   // R7: Coupon only
        { false, 50m, false, 0.00m },  // R8: No discount
    };

    [Theory]
    [MemberData(nameof(DiscountScenarios))]
    public void CalculateDiscount_ReturnsExpected(
        bool isMember, decimal orderTotal, bool hasCoupon, decimal expectedDiscount)
    {
        var discount = _calculator.Calculate(isMember, orderTotal, hasCoupon);
        Assert.Equal(expectedDiscount, discount);
    }
}

State Transition Testing

Test systems with distinct states and transitions between them.

Process

  1. Identify states
  2. Identify valid transitions
  3. Create state transition table/diagram
  4. Design tests for each transition
  5. Include invalid transition tests

Example: Order State Machine

         ┌──────────┐
         │  Draft   │
         └────┬─────┘
              │ submit()
              ▼
         ┌──────────┐
    ┌────│ Pending  │────┐
    │    └────┬─────┘    │
    │         │ approve()│ reject()
    │         ▼          ▼
    │    ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐
    │    │ Approved │  │ Rejected │
    │    └────┬─────┘  └──────────┘
    │         │ ship()
    │         ▼
    │    ┌──────────┐
    └────│ Shipped  │
         └────┬─────┘
              │ deliver()
              ▼
         ┌──────────┐
         │Delivered │
         └──────────┘

State Transition Table

Current StateEventNext StateValid
DraftsubmitPending✓
Draftapprove-✗
PendingapproveApproved✓
PendingrejectRejected✓
ApprovedshipShipped✓
ShippeddeliverDelivered✓
Delivered*-✗

.NET Example

public class OrderStateTests
{
    [Fact]
    public void Draft_Submit_TransitionsToPending()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Draft };
        order.Submit();
        Assert.Equal(OrderStatus.Pending, order.Status);
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Draft_Approve_ThrowsInvalidStateException()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Draft };
        Assert.Throws<InvalidOperationException>(() => order.Approve());
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Delivered_AnyAction_ThrowsFinalStateException()
    {
        var order = new Order { Status = OrderStatus.Delivered };
        Assert.Throws<InvalidOperationException>(() => order.Cancel());
    }
}

Pairwise Testing

Efficiently test combinations when full combinatorial testing is impractical.

Concept

Most defects are caused by interactions between 2 parameters. Testing all pairs covers most risks with fewer tests.

Example: Browser Compatibility

Parameters:

  • Browser: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
  • OS: Windows, macOS, Linux
  • Version: Latest, Previous

Full combinations: 4 × 3 × 2 = 24 tests Pairwise coverage: 8-12 tests (covers all pairs)

Pairwise Test Set

TestBrowserOSVersion
1ChromeWindowsLatest
2FirefoxmacOSPrevious
3SafarimacOSLatest
4EdgeWindowsPrevious
5ChromeLinuxPrevious
6FirefoxWindowsLatest
7ChromemacOSLatest
8EdgeLinuxLatest

Use tools like PICT, AllPairs, or online generators.

Error Guessing

Experience-based technique to identify likely defect areas.

Common Error Patterns

CategoryExamples
Null/Emptynull input, empty string, empty collection
Boundariesoff-by-one, overflow, underflow
FormatInvalid date, malformed email, wrong encoding
StateRace conditions, stale data, concurrency
ResourcesMemory exhaustion, connection limits, timeouts
SecuritySQL injection, XSS, path traversal

Error Guessing Checklist

  • What if input is null?
  • What if input is empty?
  • What if input contains special characters?
  • What if input exceeds maximum length?
  • What if concurrent requests occur?
  • What if external service fails?
  • What if database connection drops?
  • What if input is negative?
  • What if list has duplicates?

Technique Selection Guide

ScenarioRecommended Technique
Range validationBoundary Value + Equivalence
Complex business rulesDecision Table
State-dependent behaviorState Transition
Multi-parameter inputPairwise
Error handlingError Guessing
Critical calculationsAll techniques combined

Integration Points

Inputs from:

  • Requirements → Test conditions
  • test-strategy-planning skill → Coverage targets

Outputs to:

  • acceptance-criteria-authoring skill → Scenario coverage
  • Test automation → Test data

平台分布

Codex

35.15%
按下载量换算59

Claude

31.12%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

16.38%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

8.29%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills