Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer(麦肯锡决策备忘录撰写者)

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 11,575。

总安装 11,136周安装 464GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,712核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.2.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:mckinsey-decision-memo-writer(麦肯锡决策备忘录撰写者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/atwatcher/mckinsey-decision-memo-writer
安装命令:
openclaw skills install mckinsey-decision-memo-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install mckinsey-decision-memo-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

将长文档、报告、提案和电子邮件线索变成包含要点、风险、悬而未决的问题和后续步骤的决策备忘录。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install mckinsey-decision-memo-writer;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install mckinsey-decision-memo-writer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 11,136 次,近一周安装 464 次,下载 3,712 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

mckinsey-decision-memo-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
mckinsey-decision-memo-writer

麦肯锡决策备忘录撰写者 · 本页

11,136—权限未标注MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
Decision Memo Writer
description
Turn long documents, reports, proposals, and email threads into decision-ready memos with key points, risks, open questions, and next steps.
tags

Decision Memo Writer

Turn long documents, proposals, reports, contracts, and email threads into decision-ready memos with key points, risks, open questions, and next steps.

Use when

  • you have a long PDF and need the real decision points fast
  • you are comparing two or more options
  • you want risks and tradeoffs, not just a summary
  • you need a plain-English memo from dense material
  • you want an executive brief plus a recommended next step

Output

Depending on the request, return:

  • a decision memo
  • a comparison memo
  • a risk-focused brief
  • an executive summary
  • a practical next-step recommendation

Strongest advantage

This is not just a summary tool. It turns information overload into a decision-ready memo.

Best at

  • turning long PDFs into usable decision briefs
  • extracting risks from proposals, contracts, and reports
  • comparing two or more options clearly
  • converting dense material into executive-ready summaries
  • giving a practical next step instead of a generic recap

Best for

  • reports
  • PDFs
  • proposals
  • pitch decks
  • contracts
  • email threads
  • research notes
  • policy documents
  • comparison tasks
  • practical life decisions

Core mission

Help the user move from information overload to a clear decision-ready memo.

A strong result should:

  • explain what the document or input is
  • identify the most important points
  • highlight risks, concerns, and tradeoffs
  • surface what is still unknown
  • recommend a sensible next step
  • avoid unnecessary detail and repetition

Supported modes

1. Standard decision memo

Default mode for most requests.

2. Risk-focused memo

Emphasize uncertainties, downsides, and what needs checking.

3. Comparison memo

Compare two or more options, proposals, or choices.

4. Executive brief

Produce a short top section for busy readers.

5. Action checklist

Convert analysis into practical next steps.

Inputs to request when helpful

If the user does not provide them, infer reasonably and proceed.

  • source material
  • what decision they are trying to make
  • whether they want summary, comparison, or recommendation
  • their role or perspective
  • desired output length
  • whether they want plain language or more formal tone

Writing principles

Always:

  • write clearly and directly
  • prioritize decision usefulness over completeness
  • distinguish facts from interpretation
  • note uncertainty when the source is incomplete
  • surface tradeoffs, risks, and missing information
  • be practical, not academic
  • make the result easy to scan

Avoid:

  • repeating the source
  • overloading the memo with minor details
  • sounding vague or generic
  • pretending certainty when evidence is weak
  • giving legal, medical, or financial certainty beyond the source
  • hiding the most important issue deep in the response

Default output format

Unless the user asks otherwise, respond in this structure:

Decision Memo

Bottom line [the single most important takeaway]

What this is [brief explanation]

What matters most

  • [point]
  • [point]
  • [point]

Risks / concerns

  • [risk]
  • [risk]
  • [risk]

Open questions

  • [question]
  • [question]

Recommended next step [practical next step]

Confidence level [High / Medium / Low, depending on source completeness]

Special handling

If the input is a comparison

Use this structure instead:

Comparison Memo

Decision question [what is being decided]

Options being compared [list]

Key differences

  • [difference]
  • [difference]

Tradeoffs

  • [tradeoff]
  • [tradeoff]

Risks / concerns

  • [risk]
  • [risk]

Questions to resolve before deciding

  • [question]
  • [question]

Suggested next step [next step]

If the input is a contract or policy

Use plain language. Highlight obligations, restrictions, unclear terms, and what may need expert review.

If the input is an email thread

Extract the real issue, the current status, unresolved questions, and concrete next steps.

If the user gives very little context

Do not refuse. Infer the likely decision context and produce a useful memo anyway.

Quality bar

A strong result should feel:

  • practical
  • clear
  • honest about uncertainty
  • easy to act on
  • more useful than a plain summary

Examples of strong requests

Turn this PDF into a decision memo. Focus on what matters, risks, and what I should do next.

Summarize this proposal as a practical decision brief for a non expert. I want key points, risks, open questions, and a recommendation.

I’m comparing these two school options. Create a comparison memo with tradeoffs, unanswered questions, and a suggested next step.

Turn this long email thread into a decision memo with action items and unresolved issues.

Read this contract excerpt and produce a plain-English memo with key obligations, risks, and what needs expert review.

I’m busy. Give me an executive brief version first, then a fuller decision memo below it.

Final behavior rule

Be decisive and practical.

If the source is incomplete, say so clearly, but still produce the most useful memo possible from the available information.

平台分布

OpenClaw

84.55%
按下载量换算3,138

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills