Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

agents-md(特工 MD)

agents-md 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

agents-md 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,623。

总安装 3,362周安装 136GitHub Stars 33下载 1,055核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:agents-md(特工 MD)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mblode/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/agents-md
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mblode/agent-skills --skill agents-md
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mblode/agent-skills --skill agents-md

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

agents-md 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,支持关键词定位。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要快速定位候选结果时使用。通过 GitHub 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加指定仓库的 skill。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写。agents-md 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/agents-md

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mblode/agent-skills --skill agents-md;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

agents-md 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mblode/agent-skills --skill agents-md。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

agents-md 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

agents-md 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

agents-md 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

agents-md 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,362 次,近一周安装 136 次,下载 1,055 次,GitHub 33 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

agents-md 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
agents-md

特工 MD · 本页

3,36233只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

AGENTS.md Audit

AGENTS.md is the source of truth for agent instructions. Always write to AGENTS.md, never directly to CLAUDE.md. Symlink CLAUDE.md so Claude Code loads it:

ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md

AGENTS.md files are execution contracts, not knowledge bases.

Litmus test for every line: "Would removing this cause the agent to make a mistake?" If no, cut it. Bloated instruction files cause agents to ignore actual rules.

Reference Files

FileRead When
references/quick-checklist.mdDefault: fast triage (10 checks, target >= 8/10)
references/quality-criteria.mdFull audit mode or when quick audit fails
references/refactor-workflow.mdFile is bloated (>150 lines) or low-signal
references/root-content-guidance.mdDeciding what stays in root vs separate files
references/templates.mdDrafting new file or rebuilding from scratch

Quick Example

Input: AGENTS.md with stale commands and generic advice Quick audit result: 5/10 (Fail) Key issues: Missing test command, generic "follow best practices" advice, dead link to deleted folder Fix: Add npm test, replace generic advice with specific gotcha, remove dead link After: 9/10 (Pass)

How to Use

Default path:

  • Start with quick audit using references/quick-checklist.md (10 checks)
  • Escalate to full audit (references/quality-criteria.md) only when quick audit fails, file is high-risk, or user requests it
  • Apply edits only after reporting findings and getting confirmation

Progressive loading:

  • Always load the checklist for the selected audit mode
  • Load references/refactor-workflow.md only for low-signal files (below target score, stale commands, or root file over ~150 lines)
  • Load references/templates.md only when drafting a new file or rebuilding from scratch
  • Load references/root-content-guidance.md only when deciding what stays in root vs moved out

Audit Workflow

Copy this checklist to track progress:

Audit Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Discover files
- [ ] Step 2: Select audit mode (quick or full)
- [ ] Step 3: Run audit against checklist
- [ ] Step 4: Report findings with score table
- [ ] Step 5: Propose minimal diffs
- [ ] Step 6: Validate changes
- [ ] Step 7: Apply and verify

Step 1: Discover files

Run:

find . \( -name "AGENTS.md" -o -name "CLAUDE.md" -o -name "CLAUDE.local.md" \) 2>/dev/null | sort

Also check for a home-level file: ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md (applies to all sessions).

AGENTS.md is the source of truth. If a project has a CLAUDE.md that is not a symlink to AGENTS.md, recommend renaming it to AGENTS.md and creating the symlink:

mv CLAUDE.md AGENTS.md
ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md

Instruction files can exist at multiple levels — project root, parent directories, and child directories are all loaded automatically. CLAUDE.local.md is the gitignored personal variant. Audit each level independently.

For monorepos, include workspace-level AGENTS.md files.

Step 2: Select audit mode

  • Quick audit: Default for most files (10 checks, target >= 8/10)
  • Full audit: When quick audit fails, file is high-risk, or user requests full scoring

Step 3: Run audit

  • Quick audit target: >= 8/10 checks from references/quick-checklist.md
  • Full audit file-quality target: >= 91% of applicable points from references/quality-criteria.md
  • Full audit execution target: 2/2 when producing an edit proposal
  • Score each root file independently

Step 4: Report findings

Output a concise report before edits:

## AGENTS.md Audit Report

| File | Mode | Score | Grade | Key Issues |
|------|------|-------|-------|------------|
| ./AGENTS.md | Quick | 6/10 | Fail | Missing test command, stale path, doc-heavy section |

Step 5: Propose minimal diffs

  • Fix broken/stale commands first
  • Remove generic, duplicate, or obsolete guidance
  • Move deep detail into linked files using @path/to/file.md import syntax
  • Use emphasis ("IMPORTANT:", "YOU MUST") on critical rules that agents tend to skip
  • Keep rewrites incremental and preserve useful wording when possible

Show each proposed change with rationale and a diff snippet.

Step 6: Validate changes

Validation loop:

  1. Run smoke checks for core commands (dev, test, build, lint/typecheck) when applicable
  2. If commands cannot be run, verify script existence and note the limitation
  3. Check that linked paths resolve
  4. Confirm no contradictory rules remain
  5. If issues found → revise → validate again
  6. Only proceed when validation passes

Step 7: Apply and verify

  • Apply approved edits
  • After each PR, add at most one new gotcha only if it prevented or fixed a real mistake
  • Verify changes by re-running relevant commands

Gotchas

  • Don't rewrite the entire file when targeted edits would pass audit — incremental fixes preserve useful wording and reduce review burden.
  • Don't add gotchas that aren't grounded in a real failure — hypothetical warnings become noise the agent learns to ignore.
  • Don't audit CLAUDE.local.md the same way as AGENTS.md — local files are personal and not committed, so enforce less strictly.
  • Don't remove emphasis markers (IMPORTANT, YOU MUST) from rules agents consistently skip — these exist because the default phrasing was not enough.
  • Don't treat a high quick-audit score as permission to skip validation — stale commands can hide behind passing checklists.

平台分布

Codex

35.76%
按下载量换算377

Claude

29.86%
按下载量换算315

Cursor

18.4%
按下载量换算194

Gemini CLI

8.8%
按下载量换算93

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills