Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

linkedin-content(链接内容)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

linkedin-content 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 32,894。

总安装 2,447周安装 103GitHub Stars 42下载 857核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:linkedin-content(链接内容)
来源仓库:https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin
仓库路径:skills/linkedin-content
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill linkedin-content
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill linkedin-content

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown 和内容稿件的整理与改写。适合提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语或检查链接。使用时保留项目事实,避免写成确定结论;对外文案需控制语气。通过 npx 安装,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor 和 Gemini CLI。建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发联网或文件读写。

来源仓库内路径:skills/linkedin-content

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill linkedi…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

linkedin-content 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/manojbajaj95/claude-gtm-plugin --skill linkedin-content。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

linkedin-content 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

linkedin-content 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

linkedin-content 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

linkedin-content 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,447 次,近一周安装 103 次,下载 857 次,GitHub 42 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

linkedin-content 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
linkedin-content

链接内容 · 本页

2,44742需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

LinkedIn Content

Write high-engagement LinkedIn posts that drive meaningful engagement and establish thought leadership.

Before Writing

Check for strategy/brand.md and about/me.md first. If they exist, read them before asking questions — use that context to match voice, audience, and positioning.


Core Principles

Authenticity Over Performance

LinkedIn has matured. Readers instantly spot manufactured vulnerability and engagement bait. What resonates now is genuinely useful or genuinely human — not optimized for virality.

What works:

  • Real experiences with honest reflection
  • Specific insights from your actual work
  • Admitting what you don't know
  • Sharing without needing validation

What doesn't:

  • Performed vulnerability for engagement
  • Stories that feel too perfectly structured
  • Lessons that sound like motivational posters

One Idea Per Post

The biggest mistake is cramming multiple tips, stories, or angles into one post. Focus on one core idea, one story, one insight, one lesson. If you have five points, that's five posts.

Value Without Strings

Every post must educate, inspire, or entertain. Ask: "Would I find this valuable if a stranger posted it?" — not "Will this get engagement?"


Post Anatomy

┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HOOK (first 1-2 lines)             │ ← Visible before "...see more"
│                                     │
│ ...see more ─────────────────────── │ ← The click gate
│                                     │
│ BODY (story/value)                  │
│ - Formatted with line breaks        │
│ - Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences)  │
│ - Lists or numbered points          │
│                                     │
│ CTA (last 1-2 lines)              │ ← Ask for engagement
│                                     │
│ #hashtags (3-5)                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘

Character Limits

ElementLimit
Post text3,000 characters
Visible before "see more"~210 characters (~2 lines on mobile)
Hashtags3-5 recommended
Comment1,250 characters
Article title100 characters
Article body125,000 characters

The first 210 characters are everything. If the hook fails, nobody clicks "see more."


Hook Formulas

Modern Hooks That Work

TypeExampleWhy It Works
Honest admission"I've been wrong about remote work."Genuine, not performed
Specific observation"I've noticed something in every founder who scaled past $10M."Credibility + curiosity
Direct challenge"Most career advice optimizes for the wrong thing."Provokes thought
Unexpected angle"The best hire I made had the worst resume."Subverts expectations
Simple truth"Nobody talks about how lonely leadership is."Resonates emotionally
Contrarian opinion"Unpopular opinion: code reviews are a waste of time."Starts conversations
Personal story opening"I got fired on a Tuesday. Best thing that ever happened."Emotional hook
List promise"I've hired 200+ engineers. Here are 5 red flags I look for."Clear value

Hooks to Retire

❌ "This one thing made me $X" (feels like a scam ad)
❌ "The CEO pulled me aside and said..." (overused curiosity bait)
❌ "I'm excited to announce..." (corporate, skippable)
❌ "[Number] words that changed my life" (too formulaic)
❌ "In today's rapidly evolving landscape..." (says nothing)
❌ Starting with a hashtag or emoji

See references/hooks.md for comprehensive examples.


Formatting Rules

Line Breaks Are Your Best Friend

❌ Dense paragraph:
"I learned something important about leadership last week. My team was struggling with a deadline and instead of pushing harder, I decided to remove scope. The result was incredible — we shipped faster and the quality was better. Sometimes less really is more."

✅ Formatted for LinkedIn:
"I learned something about leadership last week.

My team was struggling with a deadline.

Instead of pushing harder, I removed scope.

The result?

We shipped faster.
And the quality was BETTER.

Sometimes less really is more."

Formatting Guidelines

RuleWhy
One sentence per lineEasier to scan on mobile
Blank line between paragraphsVisual breathing room
Short paragraphs (1-2 sentences)Mobile readability
Use line breaks for dramatic effectCreates pacing and suspense
Bold key phrases sparinglyDraws eye to important points
Numbered lists for tipsScannable, shareable
Avoid walls of textNobody reads them
Never use hashtags inlinePlace 3-5 at the very end after a line break
One emoji max, if anyOveruse signals inauthenticity

Building Your Signature Voice

Top Voices don't just post well — they're recognizable. Their perspective, style, and focus areas are consistent.

Define Your POV

Answer these before writing:

  • What topic do I have genuine expertise in?
  • What's my contrarian belief in my industry?
  • What perspective do I bring that others don't?
  • What would I want to be known for saying?

Voice Calibration

Your LinkedIn voice should be:

  • More polished than a text to a friend
  • Less formal than a company memo
  • As smart as your best work conversations
  • As human as your real personality

Post Formats

Story Post

Best for: Personal experiences, lessons learned, career moments

[Hook — honest admission or surprising outcome]

[One sentence of context]

[What happened — the tension or challenge]

[The turning point]

[What you learned]

[Question or reflection for reader]

List Post

Best for: Frameworks, actionable advice, curated insights

[Hook — clear value promise]

[Why this matters — one sentence]

1. [Point with brief context]
2. [Point with brief context]
3. [Point with brief context]
(3-7 items max)

[Closing insight or question]

Contrarian Post

Best for: Challenging conventional wisdom (with substance)

[Your contrarian position, stated directly]

[The common belief you're challenging]

[Your reasoning — why you see it differently]

[Evidence or experience]

[Nuanced conclusion — acknowledge complexity]

[Invite discussion]

Contrarian guardrails: Have genuine expertise, argue against ideas not people, offer an alternative, acknowledge what the other side gets right, be open to being wrong.

Observation Post

Best for: Industry insights, trends, patterns you've noticed

[What you've observed]

[Specific evidence or examples]

[Why it matters]

[Your interpretation]

[Question to test if others see it too]

Post Types by Engagement

Post TypeEngagementBest For
Personal story + lessonVery HighBuilding connection, authenticity
Contrarian takeHighStarting conversations, visibility
Carousel (document post)HighEducational content, tips
List/tips (numbered)HighActionable value, saves
PollMedium-HighEasy engagement, data gathering
Photo + storyMediumHumanizing, events
Video (native)MediumDemonstrations, personality
Link postLowDriving traffic (algorithm penalizes)
ReshareVery LowDon't bother — write original

Link Posts Strategy

LinkedIn penalizes posts with links. Workarounds:

  1. Comment method: Post without link, add link as first comment, edit post to say "Link in comments"
  2. No-link method: Summarize the content in the post itself, mention "DM for link"
  3. If you must link: Put it at the very end, after strong standalone content

Content Pillars

Every LinkedIn creator should have 3-5 pillars they rotate through:

PillarWhat It CoversExample
ExpertiseIndustry knowledge, how-tos"5 database patterns every engineer should know"
StoriesPersonal experiences, failures, wins"The hardest feedback I ever received"
OpinionsTakes on industry trends, contrarian views"AI won't replace engineers. Bad managers will."
Behind the scenesBuilding in public, process"Here's our actual sprint retrospective format"
Curated insightsTrends, data, research summaries"I analyzed 500 job postings. Here's what changed."

Algorithm Signals

SignalImpactHow
Dwell timeVery HighLonger posts that people read fully
CommentsVery HighAsk questions, create discussion
SavesHighActionable, reference-worthy content
"See more" clicksHighStrong hook that makes people expand
SharesMediumRelatable, quotable content
ReactionsMediumEasy to get but weighted less
External linksNegativeReduces reach — put links in comments
Editing after postingNegativeDon't edit within first hour
Posting frequency3-5x/weekDaily is fine, more than 1/day hurts

Vulnerability Done Right

Authentic sharing builds connection. Performed vulnerability destroys trust.

Share when:

  • The experience taught you something others can learn
  • You've processed it enough to offer perspective
  • It serves the reader, not your need for validation

Don't share when:

  • The wound is still fresh
  • You're seeking sympathy, not providing value
  • It could harm others involved

Vulnerability test — ask before posting:

  1. Am I sharing this to help others or to process my own feelings?
  2. Would I be comfortable if this went viral?
  3. Does this include genuine insight or just pain?

CTA Formulas

End every post with an engagement driver:

CTA TypeExample
Genuine question"What's the worst career advice you've received?"
Agreement check"Agree or disagree?"
Experience ask"Has this happened to you?"
Bookmark prompt"Save this for your next [situation] 🔖"
Recommendation ask"What would you add to this list?"

Avoid: "Comment YES if...", "Share this with 3 people", "Follow me for more" — these are engagement bait and destroy trust.


Engagement Strategy

The First Hour

LinkedIn's algorithm weighs early engagement heavily:

  • Respond to every comment in the first 60 minutes
  • Ask follow-up questions to extend conversations
  • Thank people genuinely, not generically

Comment Quality

Your comments on others' posts build your brand too:

  • Add insight, not just agreement
  • Share relevant experience
  • Avoid "Great post!" without substance

Posting Schedule

DayBest Time (your audience's timezone)
Tuesday-Thursday7-8 AM, 12 PM, 5-6 PM
Monday8 AM (people catching up)
Friday7-8 AM (before checkout)
WeekendSkip or light content

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Content anti-patterns:

  • "I'm excited to announce..." (corporate speak)
  • Humblebrags disguised as lessons
  • Recycled viral post formats (the airport conversation, the Uber driver wisdom)
  • Tragedy exploitation (using global events for engagement)
  • Only self-promotion — 80% value, 20% promotion

Format anti-patterns:

  • Every. Sentence. As. Its. Own. Line.
  • Excessive emoji strings
  • ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS
  • Hashtag stuffing (>5 hashtags)

Engagement anti-patterns:

  • "Comment YES if you agree"
  • "Share this with 3 people"
  • Engagement pods (LinkedIn detects and penalizes these)
  • Posting and disappearing

Pre-Posting Checklist

  1. Hook: Would this stop MY scroll?
  2. Focus: Is there ONE clear idea?
  3. Value: Would I find this useful if someone else posted it?
  4. Authenticity: Does this sound like me, not "LinkedIn me"?
  5. Format: Is it scannable with short paragraphs and line breaks?
  6. Close: Does it invite genuine engagement (not bait)?
  7. Vulnerability check: Am I sharing to help or to process?
  8. Links: Are external links in comments, not the main post?

References

  • references/hooks.md — Complete hook patterns with examples
  • references/examples.md — Full post examples demonstrating best practices

平台分布

Codex

33.49%
按下载量换算287

Claude

28.07%
按下载量换算241

Cursor

20.96%
按下载量换算180

Gemini CLI

9.34%
按下载量换算80

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills