Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

managing-incidents(管理事件)

managing-incidents 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

managing-incidents 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 55,410。

总安装 480周安装 20GitHub Stars 350下载 160核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:managing-incidents(管理事件)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components
仓库路径:skills/managing-incidents
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill managing-incidents
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill managing-incidents

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于需要根据关键词或任务场景进行信息检索的场景,如事件复盘、文档查询等。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和是否触发联网操作。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法,注意检查维护状态和潜在的文件读写行为。安装前应评估是否需要执行外部命令或访问敏感数据,避免误改生产环境。

来源仓库内路径:skills/managing-incidents

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill managin…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

managing-incidents 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ancoleman/ai-design-components --skill managing-incident…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

managing-incidents 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

managing-incidents 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

managing-incidents 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

managing-incidents 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 480 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 160 次,GitHub 350 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

managing-incidents 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
managing-incidents

管理事件 · 本页

480350需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Incident Management

Provide end-to-end incident management guidance covering detection, response, communication, and learning. Emphasizes SRE culture, blameless post-mortems, and structured processes for high-reliability operations.

When to Use This Skill

Apply this skill when:

  • Setting up incident response processes for a team
  • Designing on-call rotations and escalation policies
  • Creating runbooks for common failure scenarios
  • Conducting blameless post-mortems after incidents
  • Implementing incident communication protocols (internal and external)
  • Choosing incident management tooling and platforms
  • Improving MTTR and incident frequency metrics

Core Principles

Incident Management Philosophy

Declare Early and Often: Do not wait for certainty. Declaring an incident enables coordination, can be downgraded if needed, and prevents delayed response.

Mitigation First, Root Cause Later: Stop customer impact immediately (rollback, disable feature, failover). Debug and fix root cause after stability restored.

Blameless Culture: Assume good intentions. Focus on how systems failed, not who failed. Create psychological safety for honest learning.

Clear Command Structure: Assign Incident Commander (IC) to own coordination. IC delegates tasks but does not do hands-on debugging.

Communication is Critical: Internal coordination via dedicated channels, external transparency via status pages. Update stakeholders every 15-30 minutes during critical incidents.

Severity Classification

Standard severity levels with response times:

SEV0 (P0) - Critical Outage:

  • Impact: Complete service outage, critical data loss, payment processing down
  • Response: Page immediately 24/7, all hands on deck, executive notification
  • Example: API completely down, entire customer base affected

SEV1 (P1) - Major Degradation:

  • Impact: Major functionality degraded, significant customer subset affected
  • Response: Page during business hours, escalate off-hours, IC assigned
  • Example: 15% error rate, critical feature unavailable

SEV2 (P2) - Minor Issues:

  • Impact: Minor functionality impaired, edge case bug, small user subset
  • Response: Email/Slack alert, next business day response
  • Example: UI glitch, non-critical feature slow

SEV3 (P3) - Low Impact:

  • Impact: Cosmetic issues, no customer functionality affected
  • Response: Ticket queue, planned sprint
  • Example: Visual inconsistency, documentation error

For detailed severity decision framework and interactive classifier, see references/severity-classification.md.

Incident Roles

Incident Commander (IC):

  • Owns overall incident response and coordination
  • Makes strategic decisions (rollback vs. debug, when to escalate)
  • Delegates tasks to responders (does NOT do hands-on debugging)
  • Declares incident resolved when stability confirmed

Communications Lead:

  • Posts status updates to internal and external channels
  • Coordinates with stakeholders (executives, product, support)
  • Drafts post-incident customer communication
  • Cadence: Every 15-30 minutes for SEV0/SEV1

Subject Matter Experts (SMEs):

  • Hands-on debugging and mitigation
  • Execute runbooks and implement fixes
  • Provide technical context to IC

Scribe:

  • Documents timeline, actions, decisions in real-time
  • Records incident notes for post-mortem reconstruction

Assign roles based on severity:

  • SEV2/SEV3: Single responder
  • SEV1: IC + SME(s)
  • SEV0: IC + Communications Lead + SME(s) + Scribe

For detailed role responsibilities, see references/incident-roles.md.

On-Call Management

Rotation Patterns

Primary + Secondary:

  • Primary: First responder
  • Secondary: Backup if primary doesn't ack within 5 minutes
  • Rotation length: 1 week (optimal balance)

Follow-the-Sun (24/7):

  • Team A: US hours, Team B: Europe hours, Team C: Asia hours
  • Benefit: No night shifts, improved work-life balance
  • Requires: Multiple global teams

Tiered Escalation:

  • Tier 1: Junior on-call (common issues, runbook-driven)
  • Tier 2: Senior on-call (complex troubleshooting)
  • Tier 3: Team lead/architect (critical decisions)

Best Practices

  • Rotation length: 1 week per rotation
  • Handoff ceremony: 30-minute call to discuss active issues
  • Compensation: On-call stipend + time off after major incidents
  • Tooling: PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or incident.io
  • Limits: Max 2-3 pages per night; escalate if exceeded

Incident Response Workflow

Standard incident lifecycle:

Detection → Triage → Declaration → Investigation
  ↓
Mitigation → Resolution → Monitoring → Closure
  ↓
Post-Mortem (within 48 hours)

Key Decision Points

When to Declare: When in doubt, declare (can always downgrade severity)

When to Escalate:

  • No progress after 30 minutes
  • Severity increases (SEV2 → SEV1)
  • Specialized expertise needed

When to Close:

  • Issue resolved and stable for 30+ minutes
  • Monitoring shows all metrics at baseline
  • No customer-reported issues

For complete workflow details, see references/incident-workflow.md.

Communication Protocols

Internal Communication

Incident Slack Channel:

  • Format: #incident-YYYY-MM-DD-topic-description
  • Pin: Severity, IC name, status update template, runbook links

War Room: Video call for SEV0/SEV1 requiring real-time voice coordination

Status Update Cadence:

  • SEV0: Every 15 minutes
  • SEV1: Every 30 minutes
  • SEV2: Every 1-2 hours or at major milestones

External Communication

Status Page:

  • Tools: Statuspage.io, Instatus, custom
  • Stages: Investigating → Identified → Monitoring → Resolved
  • Transparency: Acknowledge issue publicly, provide ETAs when possible

Customer Email:

  • When: SEV0/SEV1 affecting customers
  • Timing: Within 1 hour (acknowledge), post-resolution (full details)
  • Tone: Apologetic, transparent, action-oriented

Regulatory Notifications:

  • Data Breach: GDPR requires notification within 72 hours
  • Financial Services: Immediate notification to regulators
  • Healthcare: HIPAA breach notification rules

For communication templates, see examples/communication-templates.md.

Runbooks and Playbooks

Runbook Structure

Every runbook should include:

  1. Trigger: Alert conditions that activate this runbook
  2. Severity: Expected severity level
  3. Prerequisites: System state requirements
  4. Steps: Numbered, executable commands (copy-pasteable)
  5. Verification: How to confirm fix worked
  6. Rollback: How to undo if steps fail
  7. Owner: Team/person responsible
  8. Last Updated: Date of last revision

Best Practices

  • Executable: Commands copy-pasteable, not just descriptions
  • Tested: Run during disaster recovery drills
  • Versioned: Track changes in Git
  • Linked: Reference from alert definitions
  • Automated: Convert manual steps to scripts over time

For runbook templates, see examples/runbooks/ directory.

Blameless Post-Mortems

Blameless Culture Tenets

Assume Good Intentions: Everyone made the best decision with information available.

Focus on Systems: Investigate how processes failed, not who failed.

Psychological Safety: Create environment where honesty is rewarded.

Learning Opportunity: Incidents are gifts of organizational knowledge.

Post-Mortem Process

1. Schedule Review (Within 48 Hours): While memory is fresh

2. Pre-Work: Reconstruct timeline, gather metrics/logs, draft document

3. Meeting Facilitation:

  • Timeline walkthrough
  • 5 Whys Analysis to identify systemic root causes
  • What Went Well / What Went Wrong
  • Define action items with owners and due dates

4. Post-Mortem Document:

  • Sections: Summary, Timeline, Root Cause, Impact, What Went Well/Wrong, Action Items
  • Distribution: Engineering, product, support, leadership
  • Storage: Archive in searchable knowledge base

5. Follow-Up: Track action items in sprint planning

For detailed facilitation guide and template, see references/blameless-postmortems.md and examples/postmortem-template.md.

Alert Design Principles

Actionable Alerts Only:

  • Every alert requires human action
  • Include graphs, runbook links, recent changes
  • Deduplicate related alerts
  • Route to appropriate team based on service ownership

Preventing Alert Fatigue:

  • Audit alerts quarterly: Remove non-actionable alerts
  • Increase thresholds for noisy metrics
  • Use anomaly detection instead of static thresholds
  • Limit: Max 2-3 pages per night

Tool Selection

Incident Management Platforms

PagerDuty:

  • Best for: Established enterprises, complex escalation policies
  • Cost: $19-41/user/month
  • When: Team size 10+, budget $500+/month

Opsgenie:

  • Best for: Atlassian ecosystem users, flexible routing
  • Cost: $9-29/user/month
  • When: Using Atlassian products, budget $200-500/month

incident.io:

  • Best for: Modern teams, AI-powered response, Slack-native
  • When: Team size 5-50, Slack-centric culture

For detailed tool comparison, see references/tool-comparison.md.

Status Page Solutions

Statuspage.io: Most trusted, easy setup ($29-399/month) Instatus: Budget-friendly, modern design ($19-99/month)

Metrics and Continuous Improvement

Key Incident Metrics

MTTA (Mean Time To Acknowledge):

  • Target: < 5 minutes for SEV1
  • Improvement: Better on-call coverage

MTTR (Mean Time To Recovery):

  • Target: < 1 hour for SEV1
  • Improvement: Runbooks, automation

MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures):

  • Target: > 30 days for critical services
  • Improvement: Root cause fixes

Incident Frequency:

  • Track: SEV0, SEV1, SEV2 counts per month
  • Target: Downward trend

Action Item Completion Rate:

  • Target: > 90%
  • Improvement: Sprint integration, ownership clarity

Continuous Improvement Loop

Incident → Post-Mortem → Action Items → Prevention
   ↑                                          ↓
   └──────────── Fewer Incidents ─────────────┘

Decision Frameworks

Severity Classification Decision Tree

Is production completely down or critical data at risk?
├─ YES → SEV0
└─ NO  → Is major functionality degraded?
          ├─ YES → Is there a workaround?
          │        ├─ YES → SEV1
          │        └─ NO  → SEV0
          └─ NO  → Are customers impacted?
                   ├─ YES → SEV2
                   └─ NO  → SEV3

Use interactive classifier: python scripts/classify-severity.py

Escalation Matrix

For detailed escalation guidance, see references/escalation-matrix.md.

Mitigation vs. Root Cause

Prioritize Mitigation When:

  • Active customer impact ongoing
  • Quick fix available (rollback, disable feature)

Prioritize Root Cause When:

  • Customer impact already mitigated
  • Fix requires careful analysis

Default: Mitigation first (99% of cases)

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Delayed Declaration: Waiting for certainty before declaring incident
  • Skipping Post-Mortems: "Small" incidents still provide learning
  • Blame Culture: Punishing individuals prevents systemic learning
  • Ignoring Action Items: Post-mortems without follow-through waste time
  • No Clear IC: Multiple people leading creates confusion
  • Alert Fatigue: Noisy, non-actionable alerts cause on-call to ignore pages
  • Hands-On IC: IC should delegate debugging, not do it themselves

Implementation Checklist

Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1)

  • Define severity levels (SEV0-SEV3)
  • Choose incident management platform
  • Set up basic on-call rotation
  • Create incident Slack channel template

Phase 2: Processes (Weeks 2-3)

  • Create first 5 runbooks for common incidents
  • Set up status page
  • Train team on incident response
  • Conduct tabletop exercise

Phase 3: Culture (Weeks 4+)

  • Conduct first blameless post-mortem
  • Establish post-mortem cadence
  • Implement MTTA/MTTR dashboards
  • Track action items in sprint planning

Phase 4: Optimization (Months 3-6)

  • Automate incident declaration
  • Implement runbook automation
  • Monthly disaster recovery drills
  • Quarterly incident trend reviews

Integration with Other Skills

Observability: Monitoring alerts trigger incidents → Use incident-management for response

Disaster Recovery: DR provides recovery procedures → Incident-management provides operational response

Security Incident Response: Similar process with added compliance/forensics

Infrastructure-as-Code: IaC enables fast recovery via automated rebuild

Performance Engineering: Performance incidents trigger response → Performance team investigates post-mitigation

Examples and Templates

Runbook Templates:

  • examples/runbooks/database-failover.md
  • examples/runbooks/cache-invalidation.md
  • examples/runbooks/ddos-mitigation.md

Post-Mortem Template:

  • examples/postmortem-template.md - Complete blameless post-mortem structure

Communication Templates:

  • examples/communication-templates.md - Status updates, customer emails

On-Call Handoff:

  • examples/oncall-handoff-template.md - Weekly handoff format

Integration Scripts:

  • examples/integrations/pagerduty-slack.py
  • examples/integrations/statuspage-auto-update.py
  • examples/integrations/postmortem-generator.py

Scripts

Interactive Severity Classifier:

python scripts/classify-severity.py

Asks questions to determine appropriate severity level based on impact and urgency.

Further Reading

Books:

  • Google SRE Book: "Postmortem Culture" (Chapter 15)
  • "The Phoenix Project" by Gene Kim
  • "Site Reliability Engineering" (Full book)

Online Resources:

  • Atlassian: "How to Run a Blameless Postmortem"
  • PagerDuty: "Incident Response Guide"
  • Google SRE: "Postmortem Culture: Learning from Failure"

Standards:

  • Incident Command System (ICS) - FEMA standard adapted for tech
  • ITIL Incident Management - Traditional IT service management

平台分布

Codex

35.59%
按下载量换算57

Claude

29.93%
按下载量换算48

Cursor

18.48%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

8.89%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills