Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

technical-writer(技术作家)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

technical-writer 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 44,194。

总安装 930周安装 38GitHub Stars 37下载 301核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:technical-writer(技术作家)
来源仓库:https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace
仓库路径:skills/technical-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill technical-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill technical-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据日志定位问题。使用时需确认测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改逻辑。涉及浏览器或服务时,应区分本地模拟与生产环境。建议结合项目实际配置使用,确保测试有效性。

technical-writer 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/technical-writer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

technical-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill technical-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

technical-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

technical-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

technical-writer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

technical-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 930 次,近一周安装 38 次,下载 301 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

technical-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
technical-writer

技术作家 · 本页

93037需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Technical Writer

For README-specific patterns (hero, TL;DR, quick start), see readme-craft skill.

Content Types & Writing Guidelines

1. Concept Explanation

Build mental models for abstract ideas.

# [Concept Name]

## The Problem It Solves

[Concrete scenario where this matters - make the reader FEEL the pain]

## The Core Idea

[One paragraph, one analogy, zero jargon]

## How It Works

[Visual or step-by-step breakdown]

### Step 1: [First thing that happens]
### Step 2: [Next thing]
### Step 3: [Result]

## In Practice

[Code example with annotations]

## Common Misconceptions

- **Myth:** [What people wrongly believe]
- **Reality:** [What's actually true]

## When NOT to Use This

[Explicit boundaries - this builds trust]

Opening example:

Bad: "Dependency injection is a design pattern where..." Good: "Your class needs a database connection. Do you create it inside the class, or pass it in from outside? This choice determines whether your code is testable or a nightmare."

Voice: "This works because..." not "As you can see...". "You might expect X, but actually Y" not "Obviously...". Never "simply" or "just" (these dismiss difficulty).

2. How-To Guide

Get the reader from A to B with minimum friction.

# How to [Accomplish Specific Goal]

**Time:** X minutes | **Difficulty:** Beginner/Intermediate/Advanced

## What You'll Build

[Screenshot or description of end result]

## Prerequisites

- [Specific tool/version]
- [Knowledge assumed]

## Steps

### 1. [Action verb] [Object]

[Why this step matters - one sentence]

[Exact command or code]


**Expected result:** [What they should see]

### 2. [Next action]

[Continue pattern]

## Verify It Works

[Test command or manual verification]

## Troubleshooting

### [Error message or symptom]

**Cause:** [Why this happens] **Fix:** [Exact solution]

## Next Steps

- [Related guide]
- [Advanced topic]

Rules: One action per step. Every step has expected output. Code is copy-paste ready.

3. Tutorial (Teaching Through Building)

Teach concepts by building something real.

# Build [Something Concrete]

## What You'll Learn

By the end, you'll understand:
- [Concept 1]
- [Concept 2]
- [Concept 3]

## The Project

[Description of what we're building and why it's useful]

## Part 1: [Foundation]

### The Concept

[Brief explanation of the underlying idea]

### Implementing It

[Code with inline explanation]

### What Just Happened

[Reinforce the concept with what they just did]

## Part 2: [Build on Foundation]

[Repeat pattern, each part introducing one new concept]

## Recap

| Concept | Where We Used It |
|---------|------------------|
| [Concept 1] | Part 1 - [specific code] |
| [Concept 2] | Part 2 - [specific code] |

## Challenges

1. **[Easy extension]** - [Hint]
2. **[Medium extension]** - [Hint]
3. **[Hard extension]** - [Hint]

Rules: One concept per section. Build something that actually works. Show mistakes and corrections. Include checkpoints to verify progress.

4. Deep Dive / Technical Article

Comprehensive exploration for mastery-level readers.

# [Topic]: A Deep Dive

**Reading time:** X minutes | **Audience:** [Intermediate/Advanced] developers

## TL;DR

[3-5 bullet points covering the key insights]

## The Landscape

[Context: what exists, what problem space we're in]

## How [Thing] Actually Works

### Under the Hood

[Technical explanation with diagrams/code]

### The Tradeoffs

| Approach | Pros | Cons | Use When |
|----------|------|------|----------|
| A | | | |
| B | | | |

## Real-World Patterns

### Pattern 1: [Name]

[Code example from production-quality source]

## Common Pitfalls

### Pitfall 1: [Name]

**The mistake:**

[Bad code]


**The fix:**

[Good code]


**Why:** [Explanation]

## Further Reading

- [Resource 1] - [What it covers]

Code Examples

Every code block needs:

  1. Context (what file, what situation)
  2. Working code (not pseudocode unless explicitly stated)
  3. Key lines highlighted or annotated
# user_service.py - handling authentication

def authenticate(self, credentials):
    user = self.repository.find_by_email(credentials.email)
    if not user:
        return AuthResult.failure("User not found")  # <- Early return pattern

    if not user.verify_password(credentials.password):
        return AuthResult.failure("Invalid password")

    return AuthResult.success(user)  # <- Only success path reaches here

Explaining code: Bad: "This code authenticates the user." Good: "We check for failure conditions first (lines 4-8), returning early. Only valid credentials reach the success path on line 10. This 'guard clause' pattern keeps the happy path unindented."

Analogies

Bridge unfamiliar concepts to familiar ones:

ConceptAnalogy
API rate limitingBouncer at a club only letting in X people per hour
Database indexingIndex in a textbook vs. reading every page
CachingKeeping frequently-used items on your desk vs. filing cabinet
Load balancingMultiple checkout lanes at a grocery store

Rules: Map key properties (not just surface similarity). Acknowledge where the analogy breaks down. Use familiar domains (not other technical concepts).

Handling Complexity

  1. Start with the simple case - "In the basic scenario, X happens"
  2. Add one complication - "But what if Y?" Show how the solution adapts
  3. Show the full picture - "In production, you'll also handle Z"

Common Failures

FailureFix
Wall of code, then explanationInterleave code and explanation
"First, let me explain the history of..."Start with the problem, not the history
Assuming knowledge ("as you know...")Either explain it or link to prerequisite
Magic numbers/values in examplesUse realistic, explained values
Only happy pathShow error handling
Abstract examples (Foo, Bar, Widget)Concrete domains (User, Order, Payment)

Quality Checklist

Structure:

  • Opens with WHY (motivation)
  • Progressive complexity (simple -> complex)
  • Each section provides standalone value

Code:

  • All code is tested and works
  • Copy-paste ready (no hidden dependencies)
  • Key lines annotated

Clarity:

  • No undefined jargon
  • Analogies for abstract concepts
  • Explicit prerequisites listed

Trust:

  • Acknowledges limitations
  • Shows when NOT to use this approach

Anti-Patterns

PatternFix
"Simply do X"Remove "simply"
"It's obvious that..."Explain anyway
Screenshot-only instructionsAdd text/code
Massive code dumpBreak into pieces
"Exercise left to reader"Show the solution
"See the docs"Summarize key points

5. System Documentation (Architecture Guides)

For comprehensive technical docs that capture the "what" and "why" of complex systems.

Documentation Process

  1. Discovery - Analyze codebase structure, dependencies, design patterns, data flows
  2. Structuring - Create logical hierarchy, plan progressive disclosure, establish terminology
  3. Writing - Executive summary first, then high-level architecture to implementation details

Key Sections to Include

SectionPurpose
Executive SummaryOne-page overview for stakeholders
Architecture OverviewSystem boundaries, components, interactions
Design DecisionsRationale behind architectural choices
Core ComponentsDeep dive into each major module/service
Data ModelsSchema design and data flow
Integration PointsAPIs, events, external dependencies
Deployment ArchitectureInfrastructure and operational considerations
Performance CharacteristicsBottlenecks, optimizations, benchmarks
Security ModelAuthentication, authorization, data protection

System Docs Best Practices

  • Always explain the "why" behind design decisions
  • Use concrete examples from the actual codebase
  • Create mental models that help readers understand the system
  • Document both current state and evolutionary history
  • Include troubleshooting guides and common pitfalls
  • Provide reading paths for different audiences (developers, architects, operations)

Reference

平台分布

Codex

39.8%
按下载量换算120

Claude

28.56%
按下载量换算86

Cursor

18.51%
按下载量换算56

Gemini CLI

9.24%
按下载量换算28

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills