Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

proposal-generator提案生成器

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

222

周安装

9

GitHub Stars

37

下载量

70
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:proposal-generator(提案生成器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace
仓库路径:skills/proposal-generator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill proposal-generator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill proposal-generator

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和用例整理,支持回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。proposal-generator 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 使用时应确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免误改逻辑。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时,需区分本地模拟、测试环境与生产环境。
  • 安装方式:通过 npx 从 GitHub 仓库添加技能。

SKILL.md

Proposal Generator

Guide proposal creation by gathering context, validating inputs, applying the proposal-writer skill, validating output quality, and recommending delivery.

Step 1: Gather Context

Collect deal information:

  1. Prospect: Company name, industry, size
  2. Stakeholders: Who will read this? (Titles and their concerns)
  3. Discovery findings: What problems did they share? What's the business impact?
  4. Solution: What are you proposing? (Products, services, scope)
  5. Pricing: What's the investment? (Or range if flexible)
  6. Competition: Are they evaluating alternatives?
  7. Timeline: When do they need to decide? When to implement?
  8. Objections: Any concerns raised during sales process?

Step 2: Validate Inputs

Before proceeding, verify:

Required InputValidation
Prospect infoCompany name + industry present
StakeholdersAt least 1 decision-maker identified
Discovery findingsSpecific pain points, not generic
SolutionClear scope of what's proposed
PricingNumber or range provided

If missing: Ask follow-up questions. Do not proceed with incomplete context.

Step 3: Analyze Deal

FactorAnalysisImpact
Deal Size<$10K / $10-50K / $50K+Determines proposal length
Stakeholder CountSingle / MultipleDetermines sections needed
CompetitionNone / ActiveDetermines differentiation emphasis
Objection HistoryList concerns raisedMust address proactively
Timeline PressureUrgent / StandardAffects urgency framing

Step 4: Apply Proposal Writer Skill

Apply proposal-writer with structured context:

context:
  prospect: [company, industry, size]
  deal_size: [<$10K | $10-50K | $50K+]
  stakeholders: [list with concerns]
  pain_points: [from discovery]
  solution: [what we're proposing]
  pricing: [amount or options]
  competition: [who, their weakness]
  objections_to_address: [list]
  timeline: [decision date, implementation date]

Step 5: Validate Output

Must Pass

  • Executive summary can stand alone (decision-maker reads only this)
  • Pain points use prospect's words from discovery
  • Outcomes are measurable (numbers, percentages, timeframes)
  • Pricing presented strategically (options, anchoring)
  • Each stakeholder's concern addressed somewhere
  • Clear next steps with dates and owners
  • Proposal length matches deal size
  • No generic or boilerplate language
  • Valid until date creates appropriate urgency

Red Flags (Fix Before Delivery)

IssueProblemFix
Leads with company historyThey stop readingLead with their pain
Generic scope languageFeels like templateReference specific discovery
Pricing buried at endSeems evasivePut in exec summary
No clear next stepsDeal stallsAdd action table with dates
Missing ROI justificationPrice feels highAdd payback calculation

Step 6: Recommend Delivery

Deal SizeFormatDelivery Method
<$10KPDFEmail with brief note
$10K-$50KPDFScreen share walkthrough
>$50KPDF + DeckIn-person or video presentation

Always recommend: "Walk them through it rather than just sending. Control the narrative."

Handling Edge Cases

SituationAction
Missing discovery contextAsk: "What did they say was their biggest challenge?"
No clear pricingAsk: "What's your target price point or range?"
Unknown stakeholdersAsk: "Who else will be involved in the decision?"
Output too genericRe-apply skill with more specific pain points
Proposal too longRequest condensed version for deal size

Deliverables

  1. Complete proposal (markdown or requested format)
  2. Delivery recommendation
  3. Suggested talk track for walkthrough
  4. Follow-up timing recommendation

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.83%
按下载量换算26

Claude

31.99%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

17.76%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.45%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills