Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

first-principles(第一原则)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

first-principles 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 39,432。

总安装 1,416周安装 59GitHub Stars 37下载 472核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:first-principles(第一原则)
来源仓库:https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace
仓库路径:skills/first-principles
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill first-principles
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill first-principles

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据。涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分本地模拟、测试环境与生产环境。first-principles 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/first-principles

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

first-principles 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/majesticlabs-dev/majestic-marketplace --skill first-prin…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

first-principles 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

first-principles 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

first-principles 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

first-principles 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,416 次,近一周安装 59 次,下载 472 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

first-principles 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
first-principles

第一原则 · 本页

1,41637只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

First-Principles Thinking

Apply systematic first-principles analysis to break down complex problems into fundamental truths and rebuild solutions from the ground up.

When to Apply This Framework

Use first-principles thinking when you encounter:

  • Complex decisions with no clear answer
  • Conventional approaches that aren't working
  • Assumptions that may be limiting solutions
  • Need to innovate beyond industry norms
  • Problems that feel "impossible"

The 15 First-Principles Prompts

Category 1: Foundation (Strip to Fundamentals)

1. "What are the physics of this problem?" Strip everything to objective reality. Remove opinions, preferences, and history.

*Apply when:* You need to understand what's actually true vs what you believe is true.

2. "If I couldn't rely on existing assumptions, how would I solve this?" Assumptions are invisible cages. This prompt forces fresh thinking.

*Apply when:* You're stuck in conventional approaches or "the way things are done."

3. "What are the problem's fundamental components?" Break problems into atoms. What are the irreducible elements?

*Apply when:* A problem feels overwhelming or too complex to tackle.

Category 2: Ideal State (Unconstrained Vision)

4. "What would the optimal solution look like if cost didn't exist?" Constraints ruin creativity too early. First imagine the ideal, then work backward.

*Apply when:* Budget or resources are limiting your thinking prematurely.

5. "If I were forced to cut 90 percent of this, what would remain?" Brutal prioritization. What is truly essential?

*Apply when:* You have too many options, features, or tasks competing for attention.

Category 3: Risk Analysis (Failure Modes)

6. "If this failed completely, what would be the root cause?" Start with failure to engineer success. Pre-mortem thinking.

*Apply when:* Planning a launch, making a major commitment, or assessing risk.

7. "What would a solution look like if I ignored industry norms?" Bypass entire industries by refusing to copy them.

*Apply when:* You're building something new or disrupting an existing market.

8. "What part of this is actually impossible and what part just feels impossible?" Most limits are emotional, not physical. Separate real constraints from fear.

*Apply when:* You're hesitating on a big decision or feeling stuck.

Category 4: Breakthrough (Minimum Viable Impact)

9. "What is the minimum viable breakthrough?" Not minimum viable product. Minimum viable *breakthrough*. What's the smallest thing that changes everything?

*Apply when:* You need traction but resources are limited.

10. "If I restarted this entire project today, knowing what I know now, what would I build?" Clean slate thinking. Sunk costs are irrelevant.

*Apply when:* You've accumulated technical debt, complexity, or legacy decisions.

Category 5: Constraints & Politics (Hidden Blockers)

11. "What are the hidden constraints I'm not questioning?" Most problems hide fake walls. Find and challenge them.

*Apply when:* Growth has plateaued or you feel artificially limited.

12. "How would I solve this if I only cared about physics, not politics?" Remove social friction from problem solving. What's the objectively best answer?

*Apply when:* Organizational dynamics are clouding decision-making.

Category 6: Scale & Leverage (10x Thinking)

13. "If I had to achieve this 10 times faster, what would I do?" Extreme deadlines force extreme creativity. Compression reveals what's essential.

*Apply when:* You need to accelerate timelines dramatically.

14. "What would this look like if it had to scale to millions?" Think in orders of magnitude. What breaks? What must change?

*Apply when:* Planning for growth or designing systems.

15. "Which part of this solution creates the most leverage?" Always build the part that changes everything first.

*Apply when:* Deciding where to focus limited resources.

Meta-Prompts (Combining Multiple Lenses)

Full Analysis Stack:

"Break my problem into fundamental truths, strip all assumptions, find the optimal solution, identify hidden constraints, and rebuild the idea from first principles."

Universal Reset:

"If I rebuilt this from raw truth, what would it become?"

How to Structure Your Analysis

When applying first-principles thinking, produce:

  1. Problem Statement - Clarified, specific challenge
  2. Assumptions Identified - List of assumptions being questioned
  3. Fundamental Truths - What is objectively true
  4. Analysis - Application of relevant prompts from above
  5. Insights - Key realizations from the analysis
  6. Recommendations - Actionable next steps
  7. Open Questions - What still needs investigation

Quick Reference by Situation

SituationStart With Prompts
Stuck on a decision#8 (impossible vs feels impossible), #5 (cut 90%)
Building something new#7 (ignore industry norms), #9 (minimum viable breakthrough)
Scaling challenges#13 (10x faster), #14 (scale to millions)
Technical debt#10 (restart today), #3 (fundamental components)
Resource constraints#4 (if cost didn't exist), #15 (maximum leverage)
Risk assessment#6 (pre-mortem), #11 (hidden constraints)

平台分布

Codex

37.51%
按下载量换算177

Claude

29.19%
按下载量换算138

Cursor

19.07%
按下载量换算90

Gemini CLI

9.98%
按下载量换算47

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills