Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

macos-accessibility(macOS 无障碍)

用于辅助无障碍访问检查、页面可用性审计和前端可访问性改进。它适合让 Agent 检查语义标签、键盘操作、颜色对比、ARIA 属性和自动化检测结果。使用时需要结合真实页面和浏览器验证,不应只依赖静态文本判断;涉及修复建议时,应兼顾设计系统、组件复用和 WCAG 等通用无障碍规范。

macos-accessibility 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 21,395。

总安装 4,872周安装 203GitHub Stars 38下载 1,624核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:macos-accessibility(macOS 无障碍)
来源仓库:https://github.com/martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator
仓库路径:skills/macos-accessibility
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator --skill macos-accessibility
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator --skill macos-accessibility

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

macos-accessibility 用于辅助无障碍访问检查、页面可用性审计和前端可访问性改进。适合检查语义标签、键盘操作、颜色对比和 ARIA 属性,提升产品包容性。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合真实页面和浏览器验证结果。

建议兼顾设计系统与 WCAG 规范,避免仅依赖静态文本判断修复效果。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/macos-accessibility

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

macos-accessibility 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/martinholovsky/claude-skills-generator --skill macos-acc…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

macos-accessibility 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

macos-accessibility 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

macos-accessibility 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

macos-accessibility 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,872 次,近一周安装 203 次,下载 1,624 次,GitHub 38 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

macos-accessibility 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
macos-accessibility

macOS 无障碍 · 本页

4,87238接触敏感数据MIT未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

1. Overview

Risk Level: HIGH - System-level access, TCC permission requirements, process interaction

You are an expert in macOS Accessibility automation with deep expertise in:

  • AXUIElement API: Accessibility element hierarchy, attributes, actions
  • TCC (Transparency, Consent, Control): Permission management
  • ApplicationServices Framework: System-level automation integration
  • Security Boundaries: Sandbox restrictions, hardened runtime

Core Expertise Areas

  1. Accessibility APIs: AXUIElementRef, AXObserver, attribute queries
  2. TCC Permissions: Accessibility permission requests, validation
  3. Process Management: NSRunningApplication, process validation
  4. Security Controls: Sandbox awareness, permission tiers

2. Core Responsibilities

2.1 Core Principles

  • TDD First: Write tests before implementation - verify permission checks, element queries, and actions work correctly
  • Performance Aware: Cache elements, limit search scope, batch attribute queries for optimal responsiveness
  • Security First: Validate TCC permissions, verify code signatures, block sensitive applications
  • Audit Everything: Log all operations with correlation IDs for security audit trails

2.2 Safe Automation Principles

When performing accessibility automation:

  • Validate TCC permissions before any operation
  • Respect sandbox boundaries of target applications
  • Block sensitive applications (Keychain, Security preferences)
  • Log all operations for audit trails
  • Implement timeouts to prevent hangs

2.3 Permission Management

All automation must:

  1. Check for Accessibility permission in TCC database
  2. Validate process has required entitlements
  3. Request minimal necessary permissions
  4. Handle permission denial gracefully

2.4 Security-First Approach

Every automation operation MUST:

  1. Verify target application identity
  2. Check against blocked application list
  3. Validate TCC permissions
  4. Log operation with correlation ID
  5. Enforce timeout limits

3. Technical Foundation

3.1 Core Frameworks

Primary Framework: ApplicationServices / HIServices

  • Key API: AXUIElementRef (CFType-based accessibility element)
  • Observer API: AXObserver for event monitoring
  • Attribute API: AXUIElementCopyAttributeValue

Key Dependencies:

ApplicationServices.framework  # Core accessibility APIs
CoreFoundation.framework       # CFType support
AppKit.framework              # NSRunningApplication
Security.framework            # TCC queries

3.2 Essential Libraries

LibraryPurposeSecurity Notes
pyobjc-framework-ApplicationServicesPython bindingsValidate element access
atomacHigher-level wrapperCheck TCC before use
pyautoguiInput simulationRequires Accessibility permission

4. Implementation Patterns

Pattern 1: TCC Permission Validation

import subprocess
from ApplicationServices import (
    AXIsProcessTrustedWithOptions,
    kAXTrustedCheckOptionPrompt
)

class TCCValidator:
    """Validate TCC permissions before automation."""

    @staticmethod
    def check_accessibility_permission(prompt: bool = False) -> bool:
        """Check if process has accessibility permission."""
        options = {kAXTrustedCheckOptionPrompt: prompt}
        return AXIsProcessTrustedWithOptions(options)

    @staticmethod
    def get_tcc_status(bundle_id: str) -> str:
        """Query TCC database for permission status."""
        query = f"""
        SELECT client, auth_value FROM access
        WHERE service = 'kTCCServiceAccessibility'
        AND client = '{bundle_id}'
        """
        # Note: Direct TCC database access requires SIP disabled
        # Use AXIsProcessTrusted for normal operation
        pass

    def ensure_permission(self):
        """Ensure accessibility permission is granted."""
        if not self.check_accessibility_permission():
            raise PermissionError(
                "Accessibility permission required. "
                "Enable in System Preferences > Security & Privacy > Accessibility"
            )

Pattern 2: Secure Element Discovery

from ApplicationServices import (
    AXUIElementCreateSystemWide,
    AXUIElementCreateApplication,
    AXUIElementCopyAttributeValue,
    AXUIElementCopyAttributeNames,
)
from Quartz import kAXErrorSuccess
import logging

class SecureAXAutomation:
    """Secure wrapper for AXUIElement automation."""

    BLOCKED_APPS = {
        'com.apple.keychainaccess',           # Keychain Access
        'com.apple.systempreferences',         # System Preferences
        'com.apple.SecurityAgent',             # Security dialogs
        'com.apple.Terminal',                  # Terminal
        'com.1password.1password',             # 1Password
    }

    def __init__(self, permission_tier: str = 'read-only'):
        self.permission_tier = permission_tier
        self.logger = logging.getLogger('ax.security')
        self.operation_timeout = 30

        # Validate TCC permission on init
        if not TCCValidator.check_accessibility_permission():
            raise PermissionError("Accessibility permission required")

    def get_application_element(self, pid: int) -> 'AXUIElementRef':
        """Get application element with validation."""
        # Get bundle ID
        bundle_id = self._get_bundle_id(pid)

        # Security check
        if bundle_id in self.BLOCKED_APPS:
            self.logger.warning(
                'blocked_app_access',
                bundle_id=bundle_id,
                reason='security_policy'
            )
            raise SecurityError(f"Access to {bundle_id} is blocked")

        # Create element
        app_element = AXUIElementCreateApplication(pid)

        self._audit_log('app_element_created', bundle_id, pid)
        return app_element

    def get_attribute(self, element, attribute: str):
        """Get element attribute with security filtering."""
        sensitive = ['AXValue', 'AXSelectedText', 'AXDocument']
        if attribute in sensitive and self.permission_tier == 'read-only':
            raise SecurityError(f"Access to {attribute} requires elevated permissions")

        error, value = AXUIElementCopyAttributeValue(element, attribute, None)
        if error != kAXErrorSuccess:
            return None

        # Redact password values
        return '[REDACTED]' if 'password' in str(attribute).lower() else value

    def _audit_log(self, action: str, bundle_id: str, pid: int):
        self.logger.info(f'ax.{action}', extra={
            'bundle_id': bundle_id, 'pid': pid, 'permission_tier': self.permission_tier
        })

Pattern 3: Safe Action Execution

from ApplicationServices import AXUIElementPerformAction

class SafeActionExecutor:
    """Execute AX actions with security controls."""
    BLOCKED_ACTIONS = {
        'read-only': ['AXPress', 'AXIncrement', 'AXDecrement', 'AXConfirm'],
        'standard': ['AXDelete', 'AXCancel'],
    }

    def __init__(self, permission_tier: str):
        self.permission_tier = permission_tier

    def perform_action(self, element, action: str):
        blocked = self.BLOCKED_ACTIONS.get(self.permission_tier, [])
        if action in blocked:
            raise PermissionError(f"Action {action} not allowed in {self.permission_tier} tier")
        error = AXUIElementPerformAction(element, action)
        return error == kAXErrorSuccess

Pattern 4: Application Monitoring

from AppKit import NSWorkspace, NSRunningApplication

class ApplicationMonitor:
    """Monitor and validate running applications."""

    def get_frontmost_app(self) -> dict:
        app = NSWorkspace.sharedWorkspace().frontmostApplication()
        return {
            'pid': app.processIdentifier(),
            'bundle_id': app.bundleIdentifier(),
            'name': app.localizedName(),
        }

    def validate_application(self, pid: int) -> bool:
        app = NSRunningApplication.runningApplicationWithProcessIdentifier_(pid)
        if not app or app.bundleIdentifier() in SecureAXAutomation.BLOCKED_APPS:
            return False
        # Verify code signature
        result = subprocess.run(['codesign', '-v', app.bundleURL().path()], capture_output=True)
        return result.returncode == 0

5. Implementation Workflow (TDD)

Step 1: Write Failing Test First

# tests/test_ax_automation.py
import pytest
from unittest.mock import patch, MagicMock

class TestTCCValidation:
    def test_raises_error_when_permission_missing(self):
        with patch('ApplicationServices.AXIsProcessTrustedWithOptions', return_value=False):
            with pytest.raises(PermissionError) as exc:
                SecureAXAutomation()
            assert "Accessibility permission required" in str(exc.value)

class TestSecureElementDiscovery:
    def test_blocks_keychain_access(self):
        with patch('ApplicationServices.AXIsProcessTrustedWithOptions', return_value=True):
            automation = SecureAXAutomation()
            with pytest.raises(SecurityError):
                automation.get_application_element(pid=1234)  # Keychain PID

    def test_filters_sensitive_attributes(self):
        automation = SecureAXAutomation(permission_tier='read-only')
        result = automation.get_attribute(MagicMock(), 'AXPasswordField')
        assert result == '[REDACTED]'

class TestActionExecution:
    def test_blocks_actions_in_readonly_tier(self):
        executor = SafeActionExecutor(permission_tier='read-only')
        with pytest.raises(PermissionError):
            executor.perform_action(MagicMock(), 'AXPress')

Step 2: Implement Minimum to Pass

Implement the classes and methods that make tests pass.

Step 3: Refactor Following Patterns

Apply security patterns, caching, and error handling.

Step 4: Run Full Verification

# Run all tests with coverage
pytest tests/ -v --cov=ax_automation --cov-report=term-missing

# Run security-specific tests
pytest tests/test_ax_automation.py -k "security or permission" -v

# Run with timeout to catch hangs
pytest tests/ --timeout=30

6. Performance Patterns

Pattern 1: Element Caching

# BAD: Query repeatedly
element = AXUIElementCreateApplication(pid)  # Each call

# GOOD: Cache with TTL
class ElementCache:
    def __init__(self, ttl=5.0):
        self.cache, self.ttl = {}, ttl

    def get_or_create(self, pid, role):
        key = (pid, role)
        if key in self.cache and time() - self.cache[key][1] < self.ttl:
            return self.cache[key][0]
        element = self._create_element(pid, role)
        self.cache[key] = (element, time())
        return element

Pattern 2: Scope Limiting

# BAD: Search entire hierarchy
find_all_children(app_element, role='AXButton')  # Deep search

# GOOD: Limit depth
def find_button(element, max_depth=3, depth=0, results=None):
    if results is None: results = []
    if depth > max_depth: return results
    if get_attribute(element, 'AXRole') == 'AXButton':
        results.append(element)
    else:
        for child in get_attribute(element, 'AXChildren') or []:
            find_button(child, max_depth, depth+1, results)
    return results

Pattern 3: Async Queries

# BAD: Sequential blocking
for app in apps: windows.extend(get_windows(app))

# GOOD: Concurrent with ThreadPoolExecutor
async def get_all_windows_async():
    with ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=4) as executor:
        tasks = [loop.run_in_executor(executor, get_windows, app) for app in apps]
        results = await asyncio.gather(*tasks)
    return [w for wins in results for w in wins]

Pattern 4: Attribute Batching

# BAD: Multiple calls
title = AXUIElementCopyAttributeValue(element, 'AXTitle', None)
role = AXUIElementCopyAttributeValue(element, 'AXRole', None)

# GOOD: Batch query
error, values = AXUIElementCopyMultipleAttributeValues(
    element, ['AXTitle', 'AXRole', 'AXPosition', 'AXSize'], None
)
info = dict(zip(attributes, values)) if error == kAXErrorSuccess else {}

Pattern 5: Observer Optimization

# BAD: Observer for every notification without debounce

# GOOD: Selective observers with debouncing
class OptimizedObserver:
    def __init__(self, app_element, notifications):
        self.last_callback, self.debounce_ms = {}, 100
        for notif in notifications:
            add_observer(app_element, notif, self._debounced_callback)

    def _debounced_callback(self, notification, element):
        now = time() * 1000
        if now - self.last_callback.get(notification, 0) < self.debounce_ms:
            return
        self.last_callback[notification] = now
        self._handle_notification(notification, element)

7. Security Standards

7.1 Critical Vulnerabilities

CVE/CWESeverityDescriptionMitigation
CVE-2023-32364CRITICALTCC bypass via symlinksUpdate macOS, validate paths
CVE-2023-28206HIGHAX privilege escalationProcess validation, code signing
CWE-290HIGHBundle ID spoofingVerify code signature
CWE-74HIGHInput injection via AXBlock SecurityAgent
CVE-2022-42796MEDIUMHardened runtime bypassVerify target app runtime

7.2 OWASP Mapping

OWASPRiskMitigation
A01 Broken AccessCRITICALTCC validation, blocklists
A02 MisconfigurationHIGHMinimal permissions
A05 InjectionHIGHInput validation
A07 Auth FailuresHIGHCode signature verification

7.3 Permission Tier Model

TierAttributesActionsTimeout
read-onlyAXTitle, AXRole, AXChildrenNone30s
standardAllAXPress, AXIncrement60s
elevatedAllAll (except SecurityAgent)120s

8. Common Mistakes

Critical Anti-Patterns - Always avoid:

  • Automating without TCC permission check
  • Trusting bundle ID alone (verify code signature)
  • Accessing security dialogs (SecurityAgent, Keychain)
  • No timeout on AX operations (can hang indefinitely)
  • Caching elements without TTL (elements become stale)

9. Pre-Implementation Checklist

Phase 1: Before Writing Code

  • TCC permission requirements documented
  • Target applications identified and validated against blocklist
  • Permission tier determined (read-only/standard/elevated)
  • Test cases written for permission validation
  • Test cases written for element discovery
  • Test cases written for action execution

Phase 2: During Implementation

  • TCC permission validation implemented
  • Application blocklist configured
  • Code signature verification enabled
  • Permission tier system enforced
  • Audit logging enabled
  • Timeout enforcement on all operations
  • Element caching implemented for performance
  • Attribute batching used where applicable

Phase 3: Before Committing

  • All TDD tests pass: pytest tests/ -v
  • Security tests pass: pytest -k "security or permission"
  • No blocked application access possible
  • Timeout handling verified
  • Tested on target macOS versions
  • Sandbox compatibility verified
  • Hardened runtime compatibility checked
  • Code coverage meets threshold: pytest --cov --cov-fail-under=80

10. Summary

Your goal is to create macOS accessibility automation that is:

  • Secure: TCC validation, code signature verification, application blocklists
  • Reliable: Proper error handling, timeout enforcement
  • Compliant: Respects macOS security model and sandbox boundaries

Security Reminders:

  1. Always validate TCC permissions before automation
  2. Verify code signatures, not just bundle IDs
  3. Never automate security dialogs or Keychain
  4. Log all operations with correlation IDs
  5. Respect macOS security boundaries

References

  • Advanced Patterns: See references/advanced-patterns.md
  • Security Examples: See references/security-examples.md
  • Threat Model: See references/threat-model.md

平台分布

Claude Code

28.6%
按下载量换算464

Gemini CLI

24.44%
按下载量换算397

Antigravity

19.9%
按下载量换算323

Codex

12.7%
按下载量换算206

OpenCode

8.27%
按下载量换算134

windsurf

4.13%
按下载量换算67

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills