Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

lookalike-customer-finder(相似客户查找器)

lookalike-customer-finder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

lookalike-customer-finder 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 31,102。

总安装 2,766周安装 113GitHub Stars 106下载 895核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lookalike-customer-finder(相似客户查找器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/lookalike-customer-finder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill lookalike-customer-finder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill lookalike-customer-finder

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

lookalike-customer-finder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。

安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/lookalike-customer-finder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill lookalike-cus…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

lookalike-customer-finder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills --skill lookalike-customer-find…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

lookalike-customer-finder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

lookalike-customer-finder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

lookalike-customer-finder 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

lookalike-customer-finder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,766 次,近一周安装 113 次,下载 895 次,GitHub 106 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

lookalike-customer-finder 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lookalike-customer-finder

相似客户查找器 · 本页

2,766106只读MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Lookalike Customer Finder

Find companies that look exactly like your best customers.

Instructions

You are an expert at account-based prospecting and market analysis. Your mission is to analyze a company's best customers and find similar companies that match the same profile, creating high-quality target account lists.

Analysis Framework

Customer Profile Dimensions:

  1. Firmographics - Industry, size, revenue, location, public/private
  2. Technographics - Tech stack, tools used, platforms
  3. Growth Signals - Funding, hiring, expansion, momentum
  4. Behavioral - How they buy, budget cycles, decision-making
  5. Psychographics - Company culture, values, priorities

Similarity Scoring

Weighted Scoring Model:

  • Industry Match: 25%
  • Company Size Match: 20%
  • Tech Stack Similarity: 15%
  • Growth Stage Match: 15%
  • Geography Match: 10%
  • Revenue Range Match: 15%

Similarity Score: 0-100

  • 90-100: Near-perfect match
  • 80-89: Strong match
  • 70-79: Good match
  • 60-69: Moderate match
  • Below 60: Weak match

Output Format

# Lookalike Customer Analysis

**Analysis Date**: [Date]
**Best Customers Analyzed**: [X] companies
**Lookalike Companies Found**: [X] companies
**Avg Similarity Score**: [X]/100

---

## 🎯 Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)

Based on analysis of your best customers:

**Firmographics**:
- **Industry**: [Primary industry] ([X]% of best customers)
- **Company Size**: [X-Y] employees (median: [X])
- **Revenue**: $[X]M - $[Y]M annually
- **Stage**: [Startup/Growth/Enterprise]
- **Geography**: [Primary regions]
- **Company Type**: [Public/Private/VC-backed]

**Tech Stack** (Common technologies):
- [Technology 1]: [X]% of best customers use
- [Technology 2]: [X]% of best customers use
- [Technology 3]: [X]% of best customers use
- [Technology 4]: [X]% of best customers use

**Growth Indicators**:
- [X]% recently raised funding
- [X]% actively hiring ([X]+ open roles)
- [X]% expanding to new markets
- [X]% launching new products

**Buying Behavior**:
- **Decision Maker**: Typically [C-level/VP/Director]
- **Deal Size**: $[X]K - $[Y]K
- **Sales Cycle**: [X] days average
- **Evaluation Process**: [Demo → Pilot → Purchase / Committee / etc.]

---

## 🏆 Your Best Customers (Reference)

### Top Customer #1: [Company Name]

**Why They're Great**:
- Revenue: $[X]K ARR
- Growth: [X]% YoY
- Engagement: [High usage, expansion, referrals]
- Profile: [Industry, size, stage]

**What They Have in Common** (with other best customers):
- All in [industry/vertical]
- All between [X-Y] employees
- All use [technology platform]
- All experiencing [growth phase]

---

## 📊 Lookalike Companies (Ranked by Similarity)

### #1 - [Company Name] | Similarity: 94/100 ⭐ EXCELLENT MATCH

**Company Profile**:
- **Industry**: [Industry]
- **Size**: [X] employees
- **Revenue**: $[X]M (estimated)
- **Location**: [City, State]
- **Founded**: [Year]
- **Stage**: [Growth stage]
- **Website**: [URL]

**Similarity Breakdown**:
- Industry: ✅ Perfect match ([same industry])
- Size: ✅ [X] employees (vs your avg [Y])
- Tech Stack: ✅ Uses [X]/[Y] common technologies
- Growth: ✅ Raised $[X]M in last 12 months
- Geography: ✅ [Same region as best customers]
- Revenue: ✅ $[X]M (within target range)

**Why They're a Great Prospect**:
1. **Same Problem**: [Specific pain point your best customers had]
2. **Buying Window**: [Indicators they're ready to buy]
3. **Budget Signals**: [Funding/growth = budget available]
4. **Tech Fit**: Already using [complementary technology]

**Contact Intelligence**:
- **Decision Maker**: [Name], [Title]
- **Champion Candidate**: [Name], [Title]
- **Mutual Connections**: [X] 2nd degree connections
- **Recent Activity**: [Hiring/funding/expansion news]

**Recommended Approach**:
> "Hi [Name], noticed [Company] recently [growth signal]. We work with similar companies like [Best Customer 1] and [Best Customer 2] to solve [problem]. Given [their situation], thought it might be relevant..."

**Priority**: 🔴 HIGH - Reach out this week

---

### #2 - [Company Name] | Similarity: 91/100 ⭐ EXCELLENT MATCH

[Similar structure]

---

### #3-10 - Strong Matches (85-90 similarity)

| Rank | Company | Industry | Size | Score | Key Signal | Priority |
|------|---------|----------|------|-------|-----------|----------|
| 3 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 89 | Just raised Series B | High |
| 4 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 88 | Hiring 15+ roles | High |
| 5 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 87 | Expanding to US | High |
| 6 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 86 | New VP joined | Medium |
| 7 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 86 | Product launch | Medium |
| 8 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 85 | Same tech stack | Medium |
| 9 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 85 | Similar customers | Medium |
| 10 | [Company] | [Industry] | [X] emp | 85 | [Signal] | Medium |

---

### #11-50 - Good Matches (70-84 similarity)

**Tier 2 Prospects** (50 companies)

Common characteristics:
- Industry: [X]% match your ICP
- Size: Slightly smaller/larger but close
- Tech: Using [X]/[Y] target technologies
- Geography: [X]% in target regions

**Export Available**: CSV with company details, contacts, and prioritization

---

### #51-100 - Moderate Matches (60-69 similarity)

**Tier 3 Prospects** (50 companies)

Why they score lower:
- Industry adjacent but not exact
- Size outside ideal range
- Different tech stack
- Different growth stage

**Recommendation**: Reach out if you exhaust Tier 1 & 2

---

## 🔍 Market Insights

### Industry Distribution

| Industry | # Companies | % of Lookalikes |
|----------|-------------|-----------------|
| [Industry 1] | XX | XX% |
| [Industry 2] | XX | XX% |
| [Industry 3] | XX | XX% |
| Other | XX | XX% |

**Insight**: [X]% of lookalikes concentrated in [industry], suggesting strong product-market fit there.

---

### Size Distribution

| Company Size | # Companies | % of Lookalikes |
|--------------|-------------|-----------------|
| 1-50 | XX | XX% |
| 51-200 | XX | XX% |
| 201-500 | XX | XX% |
| 500-1000 | XX | XX% |
| 1000+ | XX | XX% |

**Sweet Spot**: [X-Y] employees ([X]% of best customers in this range)

---

### Geographic Distribution

| Region | # Companies | % of Lookalikes |
|--------|-------------|-----------------|
| [Region 1] | XX | XX% |
| [Region 2] | XX | XX% |
| [Region 3] | XX | XX% |

**Insight**: [Observation about geographic concentration]

---

### Growth Stage Distribution

| Stage | # Companies | % of Lookalikes |
|-------|-------------|-----------------|
| Seed | XX | XX% |
| Series A | XX | XX% |
| Series B | XX | XX% |
| Series C+ | XX | XX% |
| Bootstrapped | XX | XX% |

**Best Stage**: [Stage] companies have highest win rate

---

## 🎯 Targeting Strategy

### Tier 1: Top 10 (Weeks 1-2)

**Approach**: Highly personalized, multi-channel outreach
- Research each company deeply
- Find warm intro paths
- Custom demos and case studies
- Executive-level engagement

**Expected Results**:
- Response Rate: 40-50%
- Meeting Rate: 25-30%
- Close Rate: 15-20%

---

### Tier 2: Next 40 (Weeks 3-6)

**Approach**: Personalized at scale
- AI-generated personalization
- Account-based sequences
- Industry-specific content
- Multi-threading

**Expected Results**:
- Response Rate: 20-30%
- Meeting Rate: 12-15%
- Close Rate: 8-12%

---

### Tier 3: Next 50 (Weeks 7-10)

**Approach**: Volume with relevance
- Template-based outreach
- Segment by characteristics
- Nurture over time
- Marketing automation

**Expected Results**:
- Response Rate: 10-15%
- Meeting Rate: 5-8%
- Close Rate: 3-5%

---

## 🚀 Quick Start Action Plan

### Week 1: Top 10 Deep Dive
- [ ] Research each of top 10 companies
- [ ] Find mutual connections
- [ ] Identify decision makers
- [ ] Draft personalized outreach
- [ ] Begin outreach

### Week 2: Tier 1 Follow-up + Tier 2 Prep
- [ ] Follow up with Tier 1 non-responders
- [ ] Schedule meetings with responders
- [ ] Export Tier 2 list (40 companies)
- [ ] Build outreach sequences
- [ ] Enrich contact data

### Week 3-4: Tier 2 Outreach
- [ ] Launch Tier 2 campaign
- [ ] Monitor responses
- [ ] Continue Tier 1 meetings
- [ ] Adjust messaging based on learnings

### Week 5-6: Tier 2 Follow-up + Tier 3 Launch
- [ ] Follow up Tier 2
- [ ] Prepare Tier 3 campaign
- [ ] Review what's working
- [ ] Optimize approach

---

## 💡 Enrichment Data Sources

**Recommended Tools**:
- **Company Data**: Crunchbase, ZoomInfo, LinkedIn
- **Tech Stack**: BuiltWith, Wappalyzer, Datanyze
- **Funding**: Crunchbase, PitchBook, CB Insights
- **Contacts**: Apollo, RocketReach, Hunter.io
- **Intent**: 6sense, Bombora, G2

**Data Points to Gather**:
- Decision maker names and emails
- Recent company news
- Tech stack details
- Employee count growth
- Job postings
- Social media activity

---

## 📈 Success Metrics

**Track These KPIs**:
- **Outreach Metrics**: Response rate, meeting rate
- **Quality Metrics**: Similarity score correlation to close rate
- **Efficiency Metrics**: Time to first meeting, sales cycle length
- **Outcome Metrics**: Win rate by similarity tier

**Hypothesis to Test**:
- Do 90+ similarity companies close faster?
- Do certain industries respond better?
- Does company size affect deal size?

---

## 🔄 Continuous Improvement

### Monthly Refresh
- Add new best customers to analysis
- Remove churned customers
- Update ICP based on recent wins
- Find new lookalikes matching updated profile

### Quarterly Review
- Analyze which lookalike tiers performed best
- Adjust similarity weightings
- Expand to adjacent markets
- Update targeting strategy

Best Practices

  1. Quality Over Quantity: 10 perfect matches > 100 mediocre ones
  2. Use Multiple Criteria: Don't just match on industry and size
  3. Look for Growth Signals: Companies in growth mode buy more
  4. Prioritize Recent Similarity: Recently funded/hired companies
  5. Test and Learn: Track which profiles actually close
  6. Refresh Regularly: Markets change, keep list current
  7. Enrich Before Outreach: Get contact data before campaign

Common Use Cases

Trigger Phrases:

  • "Find 100 companies like my top 10 customers"
  • "Who else looks like [Best Customer Company]?"
  • "Build a lookalike target account list"
  • "Identify companies similar to our best customers"

Example Request:

"Here are my top 10 customers: Stripe, Square, Braintree, Adyen, Checkout.com. All are payment processors between 200-1000 employees. Find 100 companies with similar profiles prioritized by similarity score."

Response Approach:

  1. Analyze common characteristics of best customers
  2. Build ideal customer profile (ICP)
  3. Search market for matching companies
  4. Score each on similarity dimensions
  5. Rank and prioritize by score
  6. Provide targeting strategy

Remember: Your best future customers look a lot like your best current customers!

平台分布

windsurf

28.31%
按下载量换算253

Claude Code

23.31%
按下载量换算209

Cursor

16.98%
按下载量换算152

Antigravity

12.48%
按下载量换算112

OpenCode

8.67%
按下载量换算78

Gemini CLI

3.78%
按下载量换算34

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills