Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

local-service-testing(本地服务测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

local-service-testing 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 56,650。

总安装 447周安装 19GitHub Stars 6下载 157核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:local-service-testing(本地服务测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/local-service-testing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill local-service-testing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill local-service-testing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

local-service-testing 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/local-service-testing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill local-service-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

local-service-testing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/troykelly/claude-skills --skill local-service-testing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

local-service-testing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

local-service-testing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

local-service-testing 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

local-service-testing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 447 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 157 次,GitHub 6 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

local-service-testing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
local-service-testing

本地服务测试 · 本页

4476接触敏感数据MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Local Service Testing

Overview

Test against real services locally before pushing. CI validates—it doesn't discover.

Core principle: If you mock what you can run locally, you're hiding bugs.

Announce at start: "I'm using local-service-testing to verify changes against real services."

The Iron Law

CI DISCOVERS NOTHING.
IF CI FINDS A BUG, YOUR LOCAL TESTING FAILED.

Local services exist for a reason. Use them.

Critical Clarification

Unit tests with mocks: REQUIRED (for TDD cycle) Integration tests with real services: ALSO REQUIRED

This skill does NOT replace mocking in unit tests. It ADDS the requirement for integration tests against real services. Both are mandatory.

When This Skill Applies

Code ChangeRequired ServiceMust Test Against
Database models/entitiespostgresReal postgres
MigrationspostgresReal postgres
Repository/ORM layerpostgresReal postgres
SQL queriespostgresReal postgres
Cache operationsredisReal redis
Session storageredisReal redis
Pub/sub messagesredis/rabbitmqReal queue
Queue workersredis/rabbitmqReal queue
API endpointsall servicesAll running

If your change touches any of these, you MUST test against the real service.

Service Detection

At session start, the session-start.sh hook reports available services:

Checking development services...
  ✓ Found docker-compose.yml

  Available services:
    ✓ postgres (running)
    ○ redis (not running)

  Tip: Start services with: docker-compose up -d

Starting Services

# Start all services
docker-compose up -d

# Start specific service
docker-compose up -d postgres

# Check status
docker-compose ps

Service Connection Strings

ServiceDefault Connection
postgrespostgresql://localhost:5432/dev
redisredis://localhost:6379
rabbitmqamqp://localhost:5672

Check your project's .env.example or docker-compose.yml for actual values.

Testing Protocol

Step 1: Identify Service Dependencies

Before testing, identify which services your changes require:

# Check what files you've changed
git diff --name-only HEAD~1

# Map to services:
# *.sql, *migration*, *model*, *entity*, *repository* → postgres
# *cache*, *redis*, *session*, *queue*, *pub*, *sub* → redis
# *worker*, *job*, *consumer* → queue service

Step 2: Ensure Services Running

# Start required services
docker-compose up -d postgres redis

# Verify they're ready
docker-compose ps

# Test connectivity
# Postgres
psql postgresql://localhost:5432/dev -c "SELECT 1"

# Redis
redis-cli ping

Step 3: Run Integration Tests

# Run integration tests (not unit tests with mocks)
pnpm test:integration

# Or run specific integration test suite
pnpm test --grep "integration"

# For Python projects
pytest tests/integration/

# For Go projects
go test -tags=integration ./...

Step 4: Verify Locally Before Pushing

Before git push:

# Full verification
pnpm build
pnpm lint
pnpm typecheck
pnpm test              # Unit tests
pnpm test:integration  # Integration tests against real services

Two-Layer Testing Requirement

Both Are Required

Test LayerPurposeUses Mocks?Uses Real Services?Required?
Unit testsTDD cycle, verify logicYESNoYES
Integration testsVerify real behaviorNoYESYES

Why Both?

  • Unit tests with mocks: Fast, enable RED-GREEN-REFACTOR, isolate logic
  • Integration tests with services: Catch real-world failures mocks miss

We've experienced 80% failure rates with ORM migrations because unit tests with mocks passed but real databases rejected the changes.

What Mocks Miss

// Mock says this works
const mockDb = {
  query: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue([{ id: 1 }])
};

// But real postgres throws:
// ERROR: relation "users" does not exist
// ERROR: column "email" cannot be null
// ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint

Real services reveal:

  • Schema mismatches
  • Constraint violations
  • Connection issues
  • Transaction behavior
  • Performance problems

Artifact Requirement

Before creating a PR, you must post local testing evidence to the issue.

Required Artifact Format

<!-- LOCAL-TESTING:START -->
## Local Service Testing

| Service | Status | Verification |
|---------|--------|--------------|
| postgres | ✅ Running | Migrations applied, queries executed |
| redis | ✅ Running | Cache operations verified |

**Tests Run:**
- `pnpm test:integration` - PASSED
- Manual verification of [specific feature]

**Tested At:** 2025-01-15T10:30:00Z
<!-- LOCAL-TESTING:END -->

Where to Post

Post as a comment on the GitHub issue you're working on. This is checked by the validate-local-testing.sh PreToolUse hook before PR creation.

When Artifact is Required

The hook checks:

  1. Does docker-compose.yml exist?
  2. Do changed files match service patterns?
  3. If yes to both → artifact required

If no services are relevant to your changes, no artifact is needed.

Common Patterns

Database Testing

// GOOD: Test against real postgres
describe('UserRepository (integration)', () => {
  beforeAll(async () => {
    await db.migrate.latest();
  });

  afterAll(async () => {
    await db.destroy();
  });

  it('creates user with unique email constraint', async () => {
    await userRepo.create({ email: 'test@example.com' });

    // Real postgres will throw on duplicate
    await expect(
      userRepo.create({ email: 'test@example.com' })
    ).rejects.toThrow(/unique constraint/);
  });
});

Cache Testing

// GOOD: Test against real redis
describe('CacheService (integration)', () => {
  beforeEach(async () => {
    await redis.flushdb();
  });

  it('expires keys after TTL', async () => {
    await cache.set('key', 'value', { ttl: 1 });

    expect(await cache.get('key')).toBe('value');

    await sleep(1100);

    expect(await cache.get('key')).toBeNull();
  });
});

API Testing

// GOOD: Test against real services
describe('POST /users (integration)', () => {
  it('creates user and caches result', async () => {
    const response = await request(app)
      .post('/users')
      .send({ email: 'new@example.com' });

    expect(response.status).toBe(201);

    // Verify in real database
    const user = await db('users').where({ email: 'new@example.com' }).first();
    expect(user).toBeDefined();

    // Verify in real cache
    const cached = await redis.get(`user:${user.id}`);
    expect(cached).toBeDefined();
  });
});

Troubleshooting

ProblemSolution
Service not startingCheck docker-compose logs [service]
Connection refusedEnsure service is running and port is correct
Database doesn't existRun migrations: pnpm migrate
Tests pass locally, fail in CIEnvironment variable mismatch—check .env vs CI config
Flaky integration testsCheck for proper test isolation and cleanup

Checklist

Before creating PR:

  • Identified all service dependencies for changes
  • All required services are running locally
  • Integration tests pass against real services
  • Posted local testing artifact to issue
  • Did not rely on mocks for service-dependent code

Integration

This skill is called by:

  • tdd-full-coverage - For integration testing requirements
  • issue-driven-development - Before PR creation
  • verification-before-merge - As a merge gate

This skill is enforced by:

  • validate-local-testing.sh - PreToolUse hook blocks PR without artifact

This skill references:

  • environment-bootstrap - For service startup patterns
  • session-start - For service detection at session start

平台分布

Claude Code

29.55%
按下载量换算46

Antigravity

25.17%
按下载量换算40

Gemini CLI

16.45%
按下载量换算26

OpenCode

12.06%
按下载量换算19

Cursor

7.05%
按下载量换算11

kiro-cli

3.29%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills