Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ln-914-community-responder(ln 914 社区响应者)

ln-914-community-responder 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ln-914-community-responder 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 33,045。

总安装 2,423周安装 98GitHub Stars 441下载 760核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-914-community-responder(ln 914 社区响应者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-914-community-responder
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-914-community-responder
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-914-community-responder

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和安装路径。建议在安装前确认维护状态、是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。ln-914-community-responder 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ln-914-community-responder

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-9…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ln-914-community-responder 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-914-communi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ln-914-community-responder 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ln-914-community-responder 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ln-914-community-responder 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ln-914-community-responder 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,423 次,近一周安装 98 次,下载 760 次,GitHub 441 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ln-914-community-responder 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ln-914-community-responder

ln 914 社区响应者 · 本页

2,423441需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

ln-914-community-responder

Type: L3 Worker (standalone) Category: 9XX Community Engagement Responds to unanswered GitHub Discussions and Issues by analyzing the question, searching the codebase for answers, and composing a helpful reply. Supports single-item and batch modes.


Overview

AspectDetails
Input$ARGUMENTS: discussion/issue number (#42), batch (all unanswered P1), or empty (interactive)
OutputResponse comment(s) published to GitHub
PatternRead question → Search codebase → Compose response → Fact-check → Publish

Phase 0: GitHub Discovery

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/community_github_discovery.md

Execute the discovery protocol. Extract:

  • {owner}/{repo} for URLs and API calls
  • repo.id for GraphQL mutations
  • maintainer login (authenticated user)
  • Discussion category IDs

Load strategy: check docs/community_engagement_strategy.md in target project, fallback to shared/references/community_strategy_template.md. Extract Section 5 (Engagement Metrics) and Section 6 (Tone Guide).

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/community_discussion_formatting.md MANDATORY READ: Load response_styles.md MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/humanizer_checklist.md


Phase 1: Load Items

Single Item Mode

If $ARGUMENTS contains a number (e.g., 42, #42):

# For discussions
gh api graphql -f query='query($owner: String!, $name: String!) {
  repository(owner: $owner, name: $name) {
    discussion(number: {N}) {
      id number title body
      category { name }
      author { login }
      createdAt
      answerChosenAt
      comments(first: 20) {
        totalCount
        nodes { author { login } body createdAt }
      }
    }
  }
}' -f owner="{owner}" -f name="{repo}"
# For issues (if discussion not found)
gh issue view {N} --repo {owner}/{repo} --json number,title,body,author,createdAt,comments,labels

Batch Mode

If $ARGUMENTS is batch:

  1. Fetch recent discussions + issues via GraphQL (last 30 days, open, sorted by created DESC)
  2. Filter to P1 items: author!= maintainer AND zero maintainer comments
  3. Fetch full context for each item (max 10 per batch)

Interactive Mode

If $ARGUMENTS is empty, list recent unanswered items and ask the user which to respond to.


Phase 2: Analyze Context

For each item:

2a. Understand the Question

  1. Read the discussion/issue body — identify the core question or problem
  2. Read existing comments — check if partially answered or if follow-ups changed the scope
  3. Detect item type: Q&A question, bug report, feature request, configuration help, general feedback

2b. Search Codebase for Answer

Based on the question type, search for relevant information:

Question TypeSearch Strategy
"How do I..."Grep for keywords in SKILL.md files, README.md, docs/
Bug reportGrep for mentioned function/file, check git log for recent fixes
ConfigurationRead.hex-skills/environment_state.json, CLAUDE.md, relevant SKILL.md
Feature requestCheck if feature already exists, grep for related patterns
InstallationRead README.md installation section, plugin.json
FOR each item:
  1. Extract keywords from question (function names, skill names, error messages)
  2. Grep codebase for keywords (max 5 searches)
  3. Read relevant files (max 3 files, prioritize SKILL.md and docs/)
  4. Check git log for recent changes related to the topic
  5. If answer found → proceed to Phase 3
  6. If not found → mark as "needs-manual" and suggest the user respond directly

2c. Detect First-Time Poster

gh api graphql -f query='query($owner: String!, $name: String!) {
  repository(owner: $owner, name: $name) {
    discussions(first: 100) {
      nodes { author { login } }
    }
  }
}' -f owner="{owner}" -f name="{repo}"

Count how many discussions the author has created. If 0 previous (this is their first) → flag for Welcome style.


Phase 3: Classify Response Type

MANDATORY READ: Load response_styles.md — use the classification matrix.

Item TypeResponse Style
Q&A question with answer foundTechnical Answer
Bug reportBug Acknowledgment
Feature request / ideaFeature Acknowledgment
Question already answered elsewhereRedirect
First-time poster (any type)Welcome + appropriate content style
Stale item with progress updateStatus Update
Cannot find answer in codebaseMark needs-manual — skip composition

Phase 4: Compose Response

Use the selected style template from response_styles.md.

Required Elements (All Styles)

  • Thank the author — by name if possible, acknowledge their contribution
  • Answer the question — direct, clear, linked to source code/docs
  • Invite follow-up — "Let us know if this helps" or similar
  • No jargon without context — explain internal terms
  • Link to code — at least one link to relevant file in the repo

Batch Mode Composition

In batch mode, compose all responses first, then present ALL for user review before publishing any.


Phase 5: Fact-Check

Before presenting to user, verify every claim:

  1. File paths & links — verify each linked file exists: ls {path}
  2. Code references — verify mentioned functions/classes exist: grep -r "{name}"
  3. Feature descriptions — re-read source file, confirm accuracy
  4. Install/usage commands — verify against README.md
  5. Humanizer audit -- run the audit protocol from humanizer_checklist.md. If 3+ AI patterns found, rewrite flagged sections.

Gate: If any check fails, fix the response before proceeding.


Phase 6: Review and Publish

Single Item Mode

Present the composed response to the user. Wait for explicit approval before publishing.

Batch Mode

Present ALL responses in a summary table:

### Batch Responses — {N} items

| # | Type | Title | Style | Status |
|---|------|-------|-------|--------|
| {number} | {Discussion/Issue} | {title} | {Technical/Bug/Welcome/...} | Ready |
| {number} | ... | ... | ... | needs-manual |

Then show each response body. User can approve all, approve selectively, or edit individual responses.

Publish Discussion Comment

gh api graphql -f query='
  mutation($discussionId: ID!, $body: String!) {
    addDiscussionComment(input: {
      discussionId: $discussionId,
      body: $body
    }) {
      comment { url }
    }
  }
' -f discussionId="{discussion.id}" -f body="{response body}"

Publish Issue Comment

gh issue comment {number} --repo {owner}/{repo} --body "{response body}"

Report the comment URL(s) to the user.


Rules

  • Always require user approval before publishing any response
  • Never close discussions or issues — only respond
  • Never mark as answered — let the author do it (for Q&A discussions)
  • Batch limit: max 10 items per batch (prevent context overload)
  • needs-manual items: report to user with GitHub URL + reason, do not attempt response
  • Tone: per strategy Section 6 — respectful, helpful, link to code

Definition of Done

  • Items loaded (single, batch, or interactive selection)
  • Question context analyzed + codebase searched for answers
  • Response type classified per response_styles.md
  • First-time posters detected and welcomed
  • Response(s) composed with links to relevant code/docs
  • Fact-checked (file paths, code references, commands verified)
  • User approved response(s)
  • Published via GraphQL/CLI, comment URL(s) reported
  • needs-manual items reported to user with URLs

Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-14

平台分布

Codex

37.07%
按下载量换算282

Claude

27.76%
按下载量换算211

Cursor

19.44%
按下载量换算148

Gemini CLI

9.97%
按下载量换算76

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills