Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ln-910-community-engagement(910 社区参与)

ln-910-community-engagement 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ln-910-community-engagement 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 32,487。

总安装 2,519周安装 106GitHub Stars 441下载 882核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-910-community-engagement(910 社区参与)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-910-community-engagement
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-910-community-engagement
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-910-community-engagement

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和安装路径。建议在安装前确认维护状态、是否会触发联网或文件读写操作。ln-910-community-engagement 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ln-910-community-engagement

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-9…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ln-910-community-engagement 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-910-communi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ln-910-community-engagement 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ln-910-community-engagement 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ln-910-community-engagement 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ln-910-community-engagement 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,519 次,近一周安装 106 次,下载 882 次,GitHub 441 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ln-910-community-engagement 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ln-910-community-engagement

910 社区参与 · 本页

2,519441需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

ln-910-community-engagement

Type: L2 Coordinator (active) Category: 9XX Community Engagement

Analyzes current community health and repository state, consults the engagement strategy, and delegates to the appropriate worker. Each worker is also invocable standalone.


Overview

AspectDetails
Input$ARGUMENTS (optional): topic, action keyword, or empty for auto-analysis
OutputSituation report + delegated action via worker skill
Workersln-911 (triager), ln-912 (announcer), ln-913 (debater), ln-914 (responder)

Phase 0: GitHub Discovery

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/community_github_discovery.md

Execute the discovery protocol. Extract:

  • {owner}/{repo} for all GitHub operations
  • repo.id for GraphQL mutations (passed to workers)
  • maintainer login (authenticated user)
  • Discussion category IDs

Gate checks: gh authenticated? Discussions enabled?

Load strategy: check docs/community_engagement_strategy.md in target project, fallback to shared/references/community_strategy_template.md.


Phase 1: Situation Analysis

If $ARGUMENTS contains a direct action keyword (announce, debate, triage, respond), skip analysis and jump to Phase 3 (Direct Delegation).

Otherwise, gather context from multiple sources in parallel:

1a. Community Health

Delegate to triager in summary mode (no interactive preview):

Skill(skill: "ln-911-github-triager", args: "summary")

Extract from triager output: red flags, priority counts (P0/P1/P2), health metrics.

1b. Unreleased Changes

# Last announcement date: most recent Announcements discussion
gh api graphql -f query='query($owner: String!, $name: String!) {
  repository(owner: $owner, name: $name) {
    discussions(first: 1, categoryId: "{categories.Announcements}", orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
      nodes { createdAt title }
    }
  }
}' -f owner="{owner}" -f name="{repo}"

Then check what changed since:

git log --oneline --since="{last_announcement_date}"

Read CHANGELOG.md — any entries newer than the last announcement?

1c. Cadence Check

From strategy Section 4:

  • Days since last announcement → monthly digest overdue if >30 days?
  • Any pending architectural decisions that need RFC?

Phase 2: Decision Matrix

Apply strategy Section 1 (Announcement vs Debate) to the gathered context:

ConditionPriorityActionWorker
Red flags: unanswered discussions >7dP0Respond to unanswered items→ ln-914
Red flags: PRs needing reviewP0List PRs needing reviewRecommendations only
Unreleased changes in CHANGELOGP1Announce: new features/fixes→ ln-912
$ARGUMENTS contains RFC/debate topicP1Debate: launch RFC→ ln-913
Monthly digest overdue (>30d)P2Monthly digest announcement→ ln-912
Design questions identified in Phase 1P2Debate: RFC for open decisions→ ln-913
Community health OK, nothing unreleased—Report "all clear"No delegation

Output: Situation Report

Present to user:

## Community Status — {YYYY-MM-DD}

**Repo:** {owner}/{repo}
**Last announcement:** {date} ({days} days ago)
**Open items:** {issues} issues, {prs} PRs, {discussions} discussions

### Red Flags
{list or "None"}

### Recommended Action
{One of: Announce / Debate / Respond to items / No action needed}

**Reason:** {brief explanation based on strategy criteria}

Wait for user approval before proceeding.


Phase 3: Delegate

After user approves the recommended action:

Direct Delegation (when $ARGUMENTS specifies action)

ArgumentDelegation
announce or announce {topic}Skill(skill: "ln-912-community-announcer", args: "{topic}")
debate or debate {topic}Skill(skill: "ln-913-community-debater", args: "{topic}")
triage or triage {scope}Skill(skill: "ln-911-github-triager", args: "{scope}")
respond or respond {#number}Skill(skill: "ln-914-community-responder", args: "{#number or batch}")

Analysis-Based Delegation

Recommended actionDelegation
AnnounceSkill(skill: "ln-912-community-announcer") — worker gathers its own context
DebateSkill(skill: "ln-913-community-debater", args: "{identified topic}")
Respond to itemsSkill(skill: "ln-914-community-responder", args: "batch")
No action neededReport status, done

Shared References

FilePurpose
shared/references/community_github_discovery.mdPhase 0: dynamic repo/category/user discovery
shared/references/community_strategy_template.mdDefault engagement strategy (fallback)
shared/references/community_discussion_formatting.mdGitHub Discussion formatting rules

Strategy Override

Each target project can override the default strategy by creating docs/community_engagement_strategy.md. All skills check project-local first, then fall back to the template in shared/references/.


Phase 4: Meta-Analysis

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/meta_analysis_protocol.md

Skill type: planning-coordinator. Run after Phase 3 completes. Output to chat using the planning-coordinator format.


TodoWrite format (mandatory):

- GitHub discovery (in_progress)
- Situation analysis (pending)
- Apply decision matrix (pending)
- Invoke ln-911-github-triager (pending)
- Invoke ln-912-community-announcer (pending)
- Invoke ln-913-community-debater (pending)
- Invoke ln-914-community-responder (pending)
- Report outcome to user (pending)

Worker Invocation (MANDATORY)

PhaseWorkerContext
1ln-911-github-triagerShared (Skill tool) — community health summary
3ln-912-community-announcerShared (Skill tool) — feature/release announcements
3ln-913-community-debaterShared (Skill tool) — RFC / architectural debates
3ln-914-community-responderShared (Skill tool) — respond to unanswered items

All workers: Invoke via Skill tool — workers see coordinator context.

Definition of Done

  • GitHub discovery complete (owner/repo, categories, maintainer extracted)
  • Situation analyzed (health + unreleased changes + cadence) OR direct delegation triggered
  • Decision matrix applied with priority-based action selection
  • Worker delegated or recommendations shown to user
  • User informed of outcome

Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-03-13

平台分布

Codex

36.93%
按下载量换算326

Claude

28.16%
按下载量换算248

Cursor

17.03%
按下载量换算150

Gemini CLI

9.23%
按下载量换算81

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills