Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor(ln 653 运行时性能审核员)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为可写文件;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 17,887。

总安装 6,365周安装 260GitHub Stars 437下载 2,038核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor(ln 653 运行时性能审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查。适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或分析鉴权逻辑。使用时不能直接采信工具输出,需结合最小权限和脱敏要求确认操作边界。涉及密钥或生产系统时,应先评估权限范围和影响范围。建议配合人工复核生成安全复核清单。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-6…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要可写文件,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-653-runtime…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是可写文件。该 Skill 可能写入或修改本地文件,使用前需要确认目标目录和修改范围。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,365 次,近一周安装 260 次,下载 2,038 次,GitHub 437 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ln-653-runtime-performance-auditor

ln 653 运行时性能审核员 · 本页

6,365437可写文件未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

Runtime Performance Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker auditing runtime performance anti-patterns in async and general code.

Purpose & Scope

  • Audit runtime performance (Priority: MEDIUM)
  • Check async anti-patterns, unnecessary allocations, blocking operations
  • Write structured findings to file with severity, location, effort, recommendations
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10) for Runtime Performance category

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md. MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/mcp_tool_preferences.md and shared/references/mcp_integration_patterns.md

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, best_practices, codebase_root, output_dir.

Domain-aware: Supports domain_mode + current_domain.

Use hex-graph first when hotspot detection materially improves runtime findings. Use hex-line first for local code reads when available. If MCP is unavailable, unsupported, or not indexed, continue with built-in Read/Grep/Glob/Bash and state the fallback in the report.

Workflow

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.

  1. Parse context from contextStore

- Extract tech_stack, best_practices, output_dir - Determine scan_path - Detect async framework: asyncio (Python), Node.js async, Tokio (Rust)

  1. Scan codebase for violations

- Grep patterns scoped to scan_path - For Rules 1, 3, 5: detect async def blocks first, then check for violations inside them

  1. Collect findings with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  2. Calculate score using penalty algorithm
  3. Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-653--global.md in single Write call
  4. Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Audit Rules (Priority: MEDIUM)

1. Blocking IO in Async

What: Synchronous file/network operations inside async functions, blocking event loop

Detection (Python):

  • Find async def functions
  • Inside them, grep for blocking calls:

- File: open(, .read_bytes(), .read_text(), .write_bytes(), .write_text(), Path(...).(read|write) - Network: requests.get, requests.post, urllib.request - Subprocess: subprocess.run(, subprocess.call(

  • Exclude: calls wrapped in await asyncio.to_thread(...) or await loop.run_in_executor(...)

Detection (Node.js):

  • Inside async function or arrow async, grep for fs.readFileSync, fs.writeFileSync, child_process.execSync

Severity:

  • HIGH: Blocking IO in API request handler (blocks entire event loop)
  • MEDIUM: Blocking IO in background task/worker
  • Downgrade when: Blocking IO in __init__/setup/bootstrap (not request path) -> LOW. Small file (<1KB) read in non-hot path -> skip

Recommendation: Use aiofiles, asyncio.to_thread(), or loop.run_in_executor() for file operations; use httpx.AsyncClient instead of requests

Effort: S (wrap in to_thread or switch to async library)

2. Unnecessary List Allocation

What: List comprehension where generator expression suffices

Detection:

  • len([x for x in...]) - allocates list just to count; use sum(1 for...)
  • any([x for x in...]) - allocates list for short-circuit check; use any(x for...)
  • all([x for x in...]) - same pattern; use all(x for...)
  • set([x for x in...]) - use set comprehension {x for x in...}
  • "".join([x for x in...]) - use generator directly "".join(x for x in...)

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: Unnecessary allocation in hot path (API handler, loop)
  • LOW: Unnecessary allocation in infrequent code

Recommendation: Replace [...] with generator (...) or set comprehension {...}

Effort: S (syntax change only)

3. Sync Sleep in Async

What: time.sleep() inside async function blocks event loop

Detection:

  • Grep for time\.sleep inside async def blocks
  • Pattern: await some_async_call()... time.sleep(N)... await another_call()

Severity:

  • HIGH: time.sleep() in async API handler (freezes all concurrent requests)
  • MEDIUM: time.sleep() in async background task
  • Downgrade when: time.sleep in CLI/script (not async server) -> skip

Recommendation: Replace with await asyncio.sleep(N)

Effort: S (one-line change)

4. String Concatenation in Loop

What: Building string via += inside loop (O(n^2) for large strings)

Detection:

  • Pattern: variable result, output, html, text with += inside for/while loop
  • Grep for: variable followed by += containing string operand inside loop body

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: String concat in loop processing large data (>100 iterations)
  • LOW: String concat in loop with small iterations (<100)

Recommendation: Use list.append() + "".join(), or io.StringIO, or f-string with "".join(generator)

Effort: S (refactor to list + join)

5. Missing to_thread for CPU-Bound

What: CPU-intensive synchronous code in async handler without offloading to thread

Detection:

  • Inside async def, find CPU-intensive operations:

- JSON parsing large files: json.loads(large_data), json.load(file) - Image processing: PIL.Image.open, cv2.imread - Crypto: hashlib, bcrypt.hashpw - XML/HTML parsing: lxml.etree.parse, BeautifulSoup( - Large data transformation without await points

  • Exclude: operations already wrapped in asyncio.to_thread() or executor

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: CPU-bound operation in async handler (blocks event loop proportionally to data size)

Recommendation: Wrap in await asyncio.to_thread(func, *args) (Python 3.9+) or loop.run_in_executor(None, func, *args)

Effort: S (wrap in to_thread)

6. Redundant Data Copies

What: Unnecessary .copy(), list(), dict() when data is only read, not mutated

Detection:

  • data = list(items) where data is only iterated (never modified)
  • config = config_dict.copy() where config is only read
  • result = dict(original) where result is returned without modification

Severity:

  • LOW: Redundant copy in most contexts (minor memory overhead)
  • MEDIUM: Redundant copy of large data in hot path

Recommendation: Remove unnecessary copy; pass original if not mutated

Effort: S (remove copy call)

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-653--global.md with category: "Runtime Performance" and checks: blocking_io_in_async, unnecessary_list_allocation, sync_sleep_in_async, string_concat_in_loop, missing_to_thread, redundant_data_copies.

Return summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-653--global.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report only
  • Async context required: Rules 1, 3, 5 apply ONLY inside async functions
  • Exclude wrappers: Do not flag calls already wrapped in to_thread/run_in_executor
  • Context-aware: Small files (<1KB) read synchronously may be acceptable
  • Exclude tests: Do not flag test utilities or test fixtures

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir)
  • scan_path determined
  • Async framework detected (asyncio/Node.js async/Tokio)
  • All 6 checks completed:

- blocking IO, unnecessary allocations, sync sleep, string concat, CPU-bound, redundant copies

  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  • Score calculated using penalty algorithm
  • Report written to {output_dir}/ln-653--global.md (atomic single Write call)
  • Summary written per contract

Reference Files

  • Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md

Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-04

平台分布

Codex

35.57%
按下载量换算725

Claude

29.78%
按下载量换算607

Cursor

19.23%
按下载量换算392

Gemini CLI

8.65%
按下载量换算176

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

可写文件

该 Skill 可能写入或修改本地文件,使用前需要确认目标目录和修改范围。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills