Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor(ln 631 测试业务逻辑审核员)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 17,307。

总安装 6,680周安装 284GitHub Stars 437下载 2,340核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor(ln 631 测试业务逻辑审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查,适合梳理敏感配置和鉴权逻辑。适用于需要分析凭据风险或生成安全复核清单的场景。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,需先确认最小权限和操作边界。涉及密钥、令牌或用户数据时应脱敏处理,避免影响生产系统。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,确保不会触发不必要的网络或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-6…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-631-test-bu…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,680 次,近一周安装 284 次,下载 2,340 次,GitHub 437 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ln-631-test-business-logic-auditor

ln 631 测试业务逻辑审核员 · 本页

6,680437需要联网MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

Business Logic Focus Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker auditing tests for Business Logic Focus (Category 1).

Purpose & Scope

  • Audit Business Logic Focus (Category 1: High Priority)
  • Detect tests validating framework/library behavior (NOT our code)
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10)

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, testFilesMetadata, codebase_root, output_dir.

Workflow

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.

  1. Parse Context: Extract tech stack, framework detection patterns, test file list, output_dir from contextStore
  2. Scan Codebase (Layer 1): Scan test files for framework/library tests (see Audit Rules below) 2b) Context Analysis (Layer 2 -- MANDATORY): For each candidate, read test code and ask:

- Does this test custom code that *wraps* a framework primitive (e.g., custom hook using useState)? -> KEEP (testing integration, not framework) - Does this test ONLY call framework API with no custom logic? -> flag for removal - Is this a test helper/utility that imports libraries for mocking setup? -> skip (not a test of framework behavior)

  1. Collect Findings: Record each violation with severity, location (file:line), effort estimate (S/M/L), recommendation
  2. Calculate Score: Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)
  3. Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-631--global.md in single Write call
  4. Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Audit Rules

1. Framework Tests Detection

What: Tests validating framework behavior (Express, Fastify, Koa) instead of OUR business logic

Detection Patterns:

  • (express|fastify|koa).(use|get|post|put|delete|patch)
  • Test names: "middleware is called", "route handler works", "Express app listens"

Severity: MEDIUM

Recommendation: Consider removing IF test only validates framework behavior. If testing integration of custom code with framework -> KEEP

Effort: S (delete test file or test block)

2. ORM/Database Library Tests

What: Tests validating Prisma/Mongoose/Sequelize/TypeORM behavior

Detection Patterns:

  • (prisma|mongoose|sequelize|typeorm).(find|findMany|create|update|delete|upsert)
  • Test names: "Prisma findMany returns array", "Mongoose save works"

Severity: MEDIUM

Recommendation: Consider removing IF test only validates ORM behavior. If testing custom query logic or repository patterns -> KEEP

Effort: S

3. Crypto/Hashing Library Tests

What: Tests validating bcrypt/argon2 hashing behavior

Detection Patterns:

  • (bcrypt|argon2).(hash|compare|verify|hashSync)
  • Test names: "bcrypt hashes password", "argon2 compares correctly"

Severity: MEDIUM

Recommendation: Consider removing IF test only validates library behavior. If testing custom password policy or hashing wrapper -> KEEP

Effort: S

4. JWT/Token Library Tests

What: Tests validating JWT signing/verification

Detection Patterns:

  • (jwt|jsonwebtoken).(sign|verify|decode)
  • Test names: "JWT signs token", "JWT verifies signature"

Severity: MEDIUM

Recommendation: Consider removing IF test only validates JWT library. If testing custom token payload, claims logic, or auth flow -> KEEP

Effort: S

5. HTTP Client Library Tests

What: Tests validating axios/fetch/got behavior

Detection Patterns:

  • (axios|fetch|got|request).(get|post|put|delete|patch)
  • Test names: "axios makes GET request", "fetch returns data"

Severity: MEDIUM

Recommendation: Consider removing IF test only validates HTTP client behavior. If testing custom API wrapper, retry logic, or error mapping -> KEEP

Effort: S

6. React Hooks/Framework Tests

What: Tests validating React hooks behavior (useState, useEffect, etc.)

Detection Patterns:

  • (useState|useEffect|useContext|useReducer|useMemo|useCallback)
  • Test names: "useState updates state", "useEffect runs on mount"

Severity: LOW (acceptable if testing OUR custom hook logic)

Recommendation: REVIEW -- if testing framework behavior -> DELETE; if testing custom hook -> KEEP

Effort: S-M

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-631--global.md with category: "Business Logic Focus" and checks: framework_tests, orm_tests, crypto_tests, jwt_tests, http_client_tests, react_hooks_tests.

Return summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-631--global.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report only
  • Framework-specific patterns: Match detection patterns to project's actual tech stack
  • Effort realism: S = <1h, M = 1-4h, L = >4h
  • Context-aware: Custom wrappers around libraries (e.g., custom hook using useState) are OUR code -- do not flag
  • Exclude test helpers: Do not flag shared test utilities that import libraries for mocking setup

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir)
  • All 6 checks completed (framework, ORM, crypto, JWT, HTTP client, React hooks)
  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  • Score calculated using penalty algorithm
  • Report written to {output_dir}/ln-631--global.md (atomic single Write call)
  • Summary written per contract

Reference Files

  • Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md

Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23

平台分布

Claude Code

28%
按下载量换算655

Gemini CLI

24.72%
按下载量换算578

Codex

19.32%
按下载量换算452

OpenCode

14.1%
按下载量换算330

Antigravity

7.67%
按下载量换算179

windsurf

3.57%
按下载量换算84

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills