Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

ln-622-build-auditor(ln 622 建造审核员)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

ln-622-build-auditor 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 17,675。

总安装 6,468周安装 275GitHub Stars 437下载 2,266核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ln-622-build-auditor(ln 622 建造审核员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills
仓库路径:skills/ln-622-build-auditor
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-622-build-auditor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-622-build-auditor

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查,适合梳理敏感配置和鉴权逻辑。适用于需要分析凭据风险或生成安全复核清单的场景。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,需先确认最小权限和操作边界。涉及密钥、令牌或用户数据时应脱敏处理,避免影响生产系统。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,确保不会触发不必要的网络或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ln-622-build-auditor

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-6…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

ln-622-build-auditor 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills --skill ln-622-build-a…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ln-622-build-auditor 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ln-622-build-auditor 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

ln-622-build-auditor 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

ln-622-build-auditor 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,468 次,近一周安装 275 次,下载 2,266 次,GitHub 437 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ln-622-build-auditor 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
ln-622-build-auditor

ln 622 建造审核员 · 本页

6,468437需要联网MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root. If shared/ is missing, fetch files via WebFetch from https://raw.githubusercontent.com/levnikolaevich/claude-code-skills/master/skills/{path}.

Build Health Auditor (L3 Worker)

Type: L3 Worker

Specialized worker auditing build health and code quality tooling.

Purpose & Scope

  • Worker in codebase audit pipeline
  • Audit codebase for build health issues (Category 2: Critical Priority)
  • Check compiler/linter errors, deprecation warnings, type errors, failed tests, build config
  • Return structured findings to coordinator with severity, location, effort, recommendations
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10) for Build Health category

Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack (including build_tool, test_framework), best_practices, principles, codebase_root, output_dir.

Workflow

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.

  1. Parse Context: Extract tech stack, build tools, test framework, output_dir from contextStore
  2. Run Build Checks (Layer 1): Execute compiler, linter, type checker, tests (see Audit Rules below)
  3. Analyze Output Context (Layer 2): For deprecation warnings -- read notice to determine if removal is imminent or distant. For config issues -- check if dev-only or production config.
  4. Collect Findings: Record each violation with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  5. Calculate Score: Count violations by severity, calculate compliance score (X/10)
  6. Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/ln-622--global.md in single Write call
  7. Trend Tracking: Append build_health metric to results_log per shared/references/results_log_pattern.md. Metric: build_health | 0-10 | penalty formula. Calculate delta and status (improving/stable/declining) vs previous run.
  8. Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Audit Rules (Priority: CRITICAL)

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/ci_tool_detection.md for build commands, linter commands, type checker commands, and test framework commands per ecosystem.

1. Compiler/Linter Errors

What: Syntax errors, compilation failures, linter rule violations

Detection: Use ci_tool_detection.md Command Registry (Build + Linters sections). Check exit code, parse stderr for errors. Use JSON output flags where available.

Linters: Use ci_tool_detection.md Linters table. Use --format json / --output-format json for structured output.

Severity:

  • CRITICAL: Compilation fails, cannot build project
  • HIGH: Linter errors (not warnings)
  • MEDIUM: Linter warnings
  • LOW: Stylistic linter warnings (formatting)

Recommendation: Fix errors before proceeding, configure linter rules, add pre-commit hooks

Effort: S-M (fix syntax error vs refactor code structure)

2. Unsupported API Warnings

What: Usage of unsupported APIs, libraries, or language features

Detection:

  • Compiler warnings: UnsupportedApiWarning, @obsolete in stack trace
  • Dependency warnings: npm outdated, pip list --outdated
  • Static analysis: Grep for @obsolete annotations

Severity:

  • CRITICAL: Unsupported API removed in next major version (imminent breakage)
  • HIGH: Unsupported with migration path available
  • MEDIUM: Unsupported but still supported for 1+ year
  • LOW: Soft deprecation (no removal timeline)

Recommendation: Migrate to recommended API, update dependencies, refactor code

Effort: M-L (depends on API complexity and usage frequency)

3. Type Errors

What: Type mismatches, missing type annotations, type checker failures

Detection: Use ci_tool_detection.md Command Registry (Type Checkers section).

Severity:

  • CRITICAL: Type error prevents compilation (tsc fails, cargo check fails)
  • HIGH: Runtime type error likely (implicit any, missing type guards)
  • MEDIUM: Missing type annotations (code works but untyped)
  • LOW: Overly permissive types (any, unknown without narrowing)

Recommendation: Add type annotations, enable strict mode, use type guards

Effort: S-M (add types to single file vs refactor entire module)

4. Failed or Skipped Tests

What: Test suite failures, skipped tests, missing test coverage

Detection: Use ci_tool_detection.md Command Registry (Test Frameworks section). Use JSON output flags for structured parsing.

Severity:

  • CRITICAL: Test failures in CI/production code
  • HIGH: Skipped tests for critical features (payment, auth)
  • MEDIUM: Skipped tests for non-critical features
  • LOW: Skipped tests with "TODO" comment (acknowledged debt)

Recommendation: Fix failing tests, remove skip markers, add missing tests

Effort: S-M (update test assertion vs redesign test strategy)

5. Build Configuration Issues

What: Misconfigured build tools, missing scripts, incorrect paths

Detection:

  • Missing build scripts in package.json, Makefile, build.gradle
  • Incorrect paths in tsconfig.json, webpack.config.js, Cargo.toml
  • Missing environment-specific configs (dev, staging, prod)
  • Unused or conflicting build dependencies

Severity:

  • CRITICAL: Build fails due to misconfiguration
  • HIGH: Build succeeds but outputs incorrect artifacts (wrong target, missing assets)
  • MEDIUM: Suboptimal config (no minification, missing source maps)
  • LOW: Unused config options

Recommendation: Fix config paths, add missing build scripts, optimize build settings

Effort: S-M (update config file vs redesign build pipeline)

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write JSON summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md. In managed mode the caller passes both runId and summaryArtifactPath; in standalone mode the worker generates its own run-scoped artifact path per shared contract.

Write report to {output_dir}/ln-622--global.md with category: "Build Health" and checks: compilation_errors, linter_warnings, type_errors, test_failures, build_config.

Return summary per shared/references/audit_summary_contract.md.

When summaryArtifactPath is absent, write the standalone runtime summary under .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/evaluation-worker/{worker}--{identifier}.json and optionally echo the same summary in structured output.

Report written: .hex-skills/runtime-artifacts/runs/{run_id}/audit-report/ln-622--global.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report violations only; coordinator creates task for user to fix
  • Tech stack aware: Use contextStore to run appropriate build commands (npm vs cargo vs gradle)
  • Exit code checking: Always check exit code (0 = success, non-zero = failure)
  • Timeout handling: Set timeout for build/test commands (default 5 minutes)
  • Environment aware: Run in CI mode if detected (no interactive prompts)

Monitor (2.1.98+): For build/lint/typecheck/test commands expected >30s, use Monitor. Fallback: Bash(run_in_background=true).

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed successfully (including output_dir)
  • All 5 build checks completed (compiler, linter, type checker, tests, config)
  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  • Score calculated using penalty algorithm
  • Report written to {output_dir}/ln-622--global.md (atomic single Write call)
  • build_health metric appended to results_log with trend status
  • Summary written per contract

Reference Files

  • Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md
  • CI tool detection: shared/references/ci_tool_detection.md
  • Results log pattern: shared/references/results_log_pattern.md
  • Build audit rules: references/build_rules.md

Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23

平台分布

Claude Code

26.58%
按下载量换算602

Gemini CLI

25.28%
按下载量换算573

Codex

19.35%
按下载量换算438

OpenCode

12.25%
按下载量换算278

Antigravity

7.21%
按下载量换算163

windsurf

3.04%
按下载量换算69

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills