Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

llm-obsidian-wiki(LLM Obsidian wiki 搜索)

llm-obsidian-wiki 用于辅助前端页面、组件、样式和交互逻辑开发,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要维护前端项目、生成组件或检查界面实现时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

llm-obsidian-wiki 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 5,771。

总安装 5,710周安装 231GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,793核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.2

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:llm-obsidian-wiki(LLM Obsidian wiki 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/fengsusky/llm-obsidian-wiki
安装命令:
openclaw skills install llm-obsidian-wiki
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install llm-obsidian-wiki

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

专为 Markdown/Obsidian 知识 Wiki 设计的智能维护助手。支持 Wiki 初始化、内容归档、查询优化与一致性审核。自动检测链接断裂与术语冲突,提升知识网络健壮性。需配置本地 Obsidian vault 路径与同步策略。适合构建个人或团队级知识管理平台的基础设施层。

llm-obsidian-wiki 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install llm-obsidian-wiki;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

llm-obsidian-wiki 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install llm-obsidian-wiki。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

llm-obsidian-wiki 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

llm-obsidian-wiki 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

llm-obsidian-wiki 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

llm-obsidian-wiki 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,710 次,近一周安装 231 次,下载 1,793 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

llm-obsidian-wiki 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
llm-obsidian-wiki

LLM Obsidian wiki 搜索 · 本页

5,710—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
llm-wiki
description
Build, maintain, query, archive, and audit a Markdown / Obsidian knowledge Wiki continuously maintained by an LLM. Use this skill to initialize a personal knowledge base; import raw materials grouped by source under source/ into wiki/; organize articles, papers, book notes, interviews, and meeting notes; maintain source pages, entity pages, concept pages, synthesis pages, comparison pages, and query archive pages; update index.md and log.md; answer questions based on the Wiki and archive answers with long-term value; check broken links, orphan pages, duplicate concepts, outdated conclusions, unlabeled contradictions, encoding corruption, and organizational disorder.

LLM Wiki

Goal

Maintain a Markdown / Obsidian Wiki that is accumulative, linkable, and evolvable. Whenever importing material or answering a question, do not merely generate a summary. Instead, compile new knowledge into existing pages: update entities, concepts, synthesized judgments, comparisons, and query archives so the Wiki becomes more valuable through continued use.

Default Three-Layer Structure

source/          # Raw material layer: factual sources, read-only by default
wiki/            # Knowledge compilation layer: structured Wiki maintained by the LLM
schema/SKILL.md  # Convention layer: this skill / schema

Knowledge Root Directory

The Knowledge/ root directory should contain only a small number of structural entry points and tool files. Do not place ordinary knowledge pages there.

Recommended root contents:

Knowledge/
  source/
  wiki/
  schema/
  verify_wiki.py   # Optional compatibility wrapper delegating to schema/scripts/verify_wiki.py
  README.md        # Optional: minimal entry point

The root directory should not contain:

  • Single-source summaries;
  • Concept pages;
  • Synthesis pages;
  • Topic maps;
  • Temporary organization reports.

If a root entry point is needed, create a minimal Knowledge/README.md that only links to:

  • [[Knowledge/wiki/README]]
  • [[Knowledge/wiki/index]]
  • [[Knowledge/wiki/syntheses/Knowledge Wiki Topic Map]]
  • [[Knowledge/wiki/log]]
  • [[Knowledge/source]]

Principle: the root directory is for “entry points”; wiki/ is for “knowledge”.

source/

  • Raw materials are read-only by default. Do not rewrite their body text.
  • Preserve original titles, authors, URLs, dates, clipping metadata, image references, and similar source information.
  • If original materials need to be renamed or supplemented with metadata, ask the user for confirmation first.

wiki/

Use English for the default directory names in the English schema:

wiki/
  index.md      # Main index; keep the English file name
  log.md        # Operation log; keep the English file name
  README.md     # Wiki documentation; keep the English file name
  sources/
  entities/
  concepts/
  syntheses/
  comparisons/
  queries/

Conventions:

  • Except for agreed convention files such as index.md, log.md, README.md, and schema/SKILL.md, use readable English directory and file names whenever possible.
  • Terminological proper nouns may remain in English or use mixed Chinese-English naming, for example AI Agent.md, OpenClaw.md, Claude Code.md, or Harness Engineering.md.
  • Use canonical plural English directories such as sources/, concepts/, and entities/. If historical empty duplicates are found, clean them up. If they contain content, migrate that content into the canonical directories and update links.
  • File names should be readable, clickable, and maintainable over the long term. Avoid machine-style prefixes such as source-*, concept-*, or synthesis-*.

Page Types

Source Pages: wiki/sources/

Use source pages to summarize and locate a single source. A source page should include:

  • Source information: original file, URL, author, and date.
  • A one-sentence summary.
  • The question this source helps answer: this must be extracted as a unique question from the original text; do not reuse generic descriptions across pages.
  • Key structure / section clues.
  • Knowledge points worth preserving: these must be concrete judgments extracted from the original text; do not use generic guidance such as “if the article discusses X, preferentially connect it to Y”.
  • Related concept / entity / synthesis pages.
  • Follow-up close-reading tasks.

Entity Pages: wiki/entities/

Use entity pages for people, organizations, products, projects, tools, and similar objects. Entity pages hold facts and background; they should not carry excessively long arguments.

  • Create entity pages only for knowledge objects: people, organizations, products, projects, tools, and similar items should enter the entity layer only when they themselves are analysis objects or when they carry reusable facts. Do not create an entity page merely because someone is the author of a source. Do not maintain article-author lists on entity pages. Keep author information in the source page's source information or in source/ metadata.

Recommended structure: Positioning → Key information (structured fact table) → Core capabilities / product features → Role in the knowledge base → Related sources → Related pages

Concept Pages: wiki/concepts/

Use concept pages for methods, patterns, theories, problem framings, frameworks, and similar ideas. Prefer reusing and updating existing concept pages to avoid synonym duplication.

Recommended structure: Definition → Core understanding / judgments → Relationship to neighboring concepts → Related sources → Related pages

Anti-template rules:

  • Each concept page's “Relationship to neighboring concepts” section must explain concrete relationships one by one. Do not use generic template paragraphs such as “it gathers views scattered across multiple sources into a reusable concept.”
  • Each concept page should include at least: a clear definition, 2+ unique core judgments, and relationship explanations with 2+ related concepts.

Synthesis Pages: wiki/syntheses/

Use synthesis pages for cross-source judgments, frameworks, thematic overviews, case matrices, architecture analyses, and similar compiled knowledge.

Each synthesis page should include at least: a core judgment, multi-source synthesis (not single-source retelling), and cross-references to 3+ source pages.

Comparison Pages: wiki/comparisons/

Use comparison pages to distinguish easily confused concepts, products, paradigms, or solutions, for example Reasoner vs Agent.md.

Recommended structure:

  1. One-sentence conclusion;
  2. Definitions of the compared objects;
  3. Comparison table;
  4. Decision method / usage scenarios;
  5. Common misconceptions;
  6. Relationship to the knowledge-base main threads;
  7. Related sources;
  8. Related pages.

Minimum quality requirements:

  • Column names in comparison tables must not use generic placeholders such as A / B; write the concrete objects being compared.
  • The page must explain “when to choose A and when to choose B”.
  • The page must link to at least 2 concept pages or synthesis pages.
  • Do not reuse generic paragraphs such as “when discussing model capability, first determine...” that could be applied to any comparison page.

Topic Map Pages: wiki/syntheses/

A topic map page is a type of synthesis page. It organizes the Wiki's long-term reading paths and thematic main threads. Do not place it in the Knowledge/ root directory.

Recommended locations:

  • wiki/syntheses/Knowledge Wiki Topic Map.md
  • Or a topic-specific name, such as wiki/syntheses/Agent Engineering Topic Map.md

A topic map should include:

  • The Wiki's current core question;
  • 3-9 thematic main threads;
  • Recommended reading order for each thread;
  • Entry concept pages, key synthesis pages, core source pages, and related comparison pages;
  • Page-type usage notes;
  • Follow-up organization priorities.

Division of responsibilities with index.md:

  • index.md keeps the full entry list and page catalog;
  • The topic map is responsible for knowledge structure, reading paths, and thematic navigation;
  • Do not make index.md carry too much explanatory content, otherwise it will become an overly long essay.

Query Pages: wiki/queries/

Archive question-and-answer outputs with long-term value as reusable pages. A query page should answer a clear question and link back to related source, concept, and synthesis pages.

Core Workflows

Initialize the Wiki

  1. Scan the directories, file types, and source groupings under source/.
  2. Create or update wiki/index.md, wiki/log.md, and wiki/README.md.
  3. Create source pages for the first batch of materials.
  4. Extract entity, concept, synthesis, and comparison pages.
  5. Update the index and log.
  6. Check broken links, encoding corruption, duplicate directories, and empty directories.

Import Materials

  1. Read wiki/index.md first to locate existing related pages.
  2. Read the new source and extract its summary, key structure, entities, concepts, and reusable judgments.
  3. Create or update the source page.
  4. Update existing entity pages, concept pages, and synthesis pages. Prefer updating existing pages; do not lightly create duplicate concepts.
  5. Mark relationships: supports, supplements, revises, contradicts, or needs verification.
  6. Update wiki/index.md and wiki/log.md.
  7. Run broken-link and encoding-corruption checks.

Topic Batch Import

When importing 5 or more materials under the same topic in one batch, do not only create multiple source pages. Establish a topic structure as well.

Steps:

  1. Determine whether a corresponding synthesis page or topic-map entry already exists;
  2. Create a source page for each source;
  3. Create or update a topic synthesis page, for example:

- Claude Code Source Architecture Map - Agent-Era Startup Methodology

  1. Extract shared concepts and entities; avoid creating duplicate concepts for every source;
  2. Present the batch as a group in index.md;
  3. Add the topic's reading path to the topic map;
  4. Record the batch in log.md by topic, rather than as a per-file operation ledger.

Answer Questions Based on the Wiki

  1. Read wiki/index.md first.
  2. Then read relevant pages. Do not scan the entire Wiki by default.
  3. Cite Wiki page links in the answer.
  4. If the answer has long-term value, archive it under wiki/queries/ or update a synthesis page.
  5. Update wiki/log.md.

Wiki-Layer Reorganization / Thematic Refactoring

Use this when source/ already contains many imported materials, wiki/ has grown in page count, and the user wants to improve navigability, thematic clustering, and long-term maintainability.

Steps:

  1. Run the audit script or equivalent checks first, confirming:

- source coverage; - broken links; - index coverage; - UTF-8 issues; - thin pages / template remnants.

  1. Read wiki/index.md, wiki/README.md, wiki/log.md, and existing synthesis pages.
  2. Identify the Wiki's thematic main threads; do not organize mechanically by source directory.
  3. If the page count is large, create or update a topic map page, for example: wiki/syntheses/Knowledge Wiki Topic Map.md.
  4. Clarify the division of responsibilities between index.md and the topic map:

- index.md: full catalog; - topic map: reading paths, thematic main threads, and knowledge architecture.

  1. Prioritize refactoring:

- weak comparison pages; - thin concept pages; - synthesis pages with unclear thematic ownership; - long lists in index.md that are hard to navigate.

  1. Update README.md, index.md, and log.md.
  2. Finally rerun broken-link, coverage, index, and encoding checks.

Enrich Existing Pages

  1. Read the target page and related sources.
  2. If the existing sources are insufficient to support a complete concept, external information may be searched and added with attribution.
  3. After enrichment, update the page's updated date.
  4. Check bidirectional-link completeness.

Page Quality Audit

Regularly check for thin pages and template remnants. Passing broken-link checks does not mean the knowledge quality is sufficient.

Thin Page Identification

The following pages should be reviewed first:

  • Concept pages under 800 characters;
  • Entity pages under 800 characters;
  • Synthesis pages under 1200 characters;
  • Comparison pages under 1000 characters;
  • Source pages that only have summaries and lack “the question this source helps answer” and “knowledge points worth preserving”.

A thin page does not necessarily have to be expanded, but it must be judged:

  • Is it only a temporary placeholder?
  • Should it be merged into an existing page?
  • Should it be upgraded into a full concept page?
  • Should it simply be deprioritized in the index or topic map?

Template Remnant Check

Search especially for:

  • “it answers a long-term question”;
  • “if the article discusses”;
  • A generic “Why it matters” section;
  • “to be added”;
  • “TODO”;
  • A / B placeholder column names;
  • Generic “How to use this comparison” paragraphs.

When template remnants are found, rewrite them into concrete judgments based on the original source materials and related pages. Do not merely delete the heading.

Audit Script

The publishable audit script for the current Knowledge Wiki is located at:

python3 Knowledge/schema/scripts/verify_wiki.py

For compatibility with existing commands, this vault also keeps a root-level wrapper:

python3 Knowledge/verify_wiki.py

When publishing the skill, package Knowledge/schema/scripts/verify_wiki.py as scripts/verify_wiki.py inside the skill package, together with SKILL.md; the root-level wrapper is only a convenience entry point for this vault.

Run the audit script after every batch import, refactor, rename, or topic-map update.

Passing criteria:

  • Sources without ziliao: 0
  • Broken wikilinks: 0
  • Pages not in index.md: 0
  • UTF-8 issues: 0

If script output conflicts with human judgment, human inspection takes precedence, but the reason must be recorded in wiki/log.md.

Do not mechanically create low-quality source pages merely to pass the script. Source pages still need to meet the minimum quality standard for source pages.

index.md Specification

wiki/index.md is the navigation entry point. Recommended structure:

# Knowledge Wiki Index

## Quick Links

## Sources

## Entities

## Concepts

## Syntheses

## Comparisons

## Queries

Each record should preferably include:

- [[Knowledge/wiki/concepts/Context Engineering]] — one-sentence description; status: evolving.

log.md Specification

wiki/log.md is a date-based timeline for phase-level changes, not an overly granular operation ledger. Update principles:

  • Merge by date: imports, refactors, queries, and maintenance performed on the same day should be merged under ## YYYY-MM-DD|Topic Overview whenever possible, using ### to group by topic.
  • Record phase-level results: preserve key sources, key newly created or updated pages, core conclusions, and important maintenance decisions. Do not append a separate entry for every small operation.
  • Create separate detail pages when needed: place bulk mappings, long audit checklists, image migration tables, complex experiment logs, and similar details in the corresponding synthesis page or under wiki/queries/. log.md should only link to a summary.
  • Rewrite the same-day section when updating multiple times in one day: prefer editing and merging the existing section for the day instead of appending fragmented entries.
  • Preserve follow-up direction: a short “Current To-Dos / Follow-Up Directions” list may be maintained at the end, but keep it concise.

Recommended format:

## YYYY-MM-DD|Topic Overview

### Topic One

- Import/update scope: ...
- Created/updated: [[Knowledge/wiki/...]], [[Knowledge/wiki/...]]
- Key conclusion: ...

### Topic Two

- ...

## Current To-Dos / Follow-Up Directions

- [ ] ...

Common topics:

  • Initialization and structural adjustment.
  • Topic-based source import.
  • Concept / synthesis page deepening.
  • Query archiving.
  • Audit and maintenance.
  • Schema / skill rule updates.

Frontmatter Recommendations

Source page:

---
type: source
tags: [source-summary]
source_file: "[[Knowledge/source/...]]"
source_name:
author:
url:
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: initialized
---

Entity page:

---
type: entity
tags: [entity]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: evolving
---

Concept page:

---
type: concept
tags: [concept]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: evolving
---

Synthesis page:

---
type: synthesis
tags: [synthesis]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: evolving
---

Comparison page:

---
type: comparison
tags: [comparison]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: evolving
---

Query page:

---
type: query
tags: [query]
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
status: archived
---

External Search Boundaries

By default, prioritize internal materials under Knowledge/source/ and Knowledge/wiki/. Do not use external search to replace existing sources.

External search may be used when:

  • The user explicitly asks for the latest information;
  • A concept page needs a standard definition or official documentation;
  • Facts in a source are time-sensitive and may affect the conclusion;
  • The latest status of a product, model, company, paper, or regulation needs to be verified.

When using external search:

  • Prefer official sources, papers, and original announcements;
  • Add external source links to the page;
  • Distinguish “the original source's viewpoint” from “externally verified facts”;
  • Do not mix unverified web information into stable conclusions.

Link Rules

  • Use Obsidian Wiki links: [[Knowledge/wiki/concepts/Context Engineering]].
  • When linking to vault files, use paths relative to the vault root. Do not use absolute paths.
  • After renaming files, batch-update all [[...]] links.
  • When responding to the user, prefer clickable Wiki links whenever possible.
  • Bidirectional link principle: when concept A references concept B, B's page should also include a backlink to A. Concept pairs with blurry boundaries (such as Harness / Environment, Vibe Coding / Agentic coding) should explain their relationship on both pages.

Encoding Safety Rules

Chinese content must be written as UTF-8. In Windows / PowerShell environments, writing Chinese directly with PowerShell here-strings, Add-Content, or Set-Content can easily produce question-mark corruption.

Prefer:

  • Use apply_patch to modify Markdown;
  • Or create a .py script and write text with Path.write_text(..., encoding="utf-8");
  • Or verify file content with Python read_text(..., encoding="utf-8").

Avoid:

  • Writing large Chinese blocks directly inside PowerShell command strings;
  • Judging whether a file is corrupted based only on terminal display output.

After every batch write, check for:

  • Repeated question marks;
  • Unicode replacement characters;
  • Typical mojibake markers;
  • Broken links.

Images and Attachments

  • Do not batch-download external images in source/ by default, unless the user requests it or the image is critical for long-term understanding.
  • If images need to be localized, download them to the vault attachment location and convert the Markdown image syntax to an Obsidian image embed: ![[image.png]].
  • The raw material layer is read-only by default. Confirm before localizing images or rewriting original materials.

Safety Principles

  • Do not overwrite the user's original materials.
  • Do not delete non-empty directories unless you have confirmed that their contents have been migrated or the user explicitly requested deletion.
  • Before bulk moves or renames, create a mapping. After execution, check broken links.
  • Explicit user preferences override this schema, for example directory naming, whether reports should be kept, or whether README.md should keep its English name.

平台分布

OpenClaw

92.92%
按下载量换算1,666

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills