Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

llm-cost-optimization(LLM cost optimization 命令行)

llm-cost-optimization 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

llm-cost-optimization 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 14,502。

总安装 696周安装 29GitHub Stars 18下载 232核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:llm-cost-optimization(LLM cost optimization 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/llm-cost-optimization
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill llm-cost-optimization
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill llm-cost-optimization

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

llm-cost-optimization 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。

它可辅助梳理项目结构、依赖关系和协作流程,帮助 Agent 快速定位关键信息。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,具体用法请参考原始 README。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/llm-cost-optimization

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

llm-cost-optimization 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill llm-cost-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

llm-cost-optimization 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

llm-cost-optimization 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

llm-cost-optimization 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

llm-cost-optimization 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 696 次,近一周安装 29 次,下载 232 次,GitHub 18 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

llm-cost-optimization 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
llm-cost-optimization

LLM cost optimization 命令行 · 本页

69618需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

LLM Cost Optimization

Cut LLM costs by 50–90% with the right combination of caching, model selection, prompt optimization, and self-hosting.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • LLM API spend is growing faster than revenue
  • You need to attribute AI costs to teams, products, or customers
  • Implementing caching to avoid redundant LLM calls
  • Deciding when to switch from API providers to self-hosted models
  • Optimizing prompt length without sacrificing quality

Cost Levers by Impact

StrategyTypical SavingsEffort
Semantic caching20–50%Low
Model right-sizing30–70%Low
Prompt compression10–30%Medium
Provider caching (prompt cache)10–25%Low
Batching offline workloads50% (Batch API)Medium
Self-hosting 7–8B models80–95% at scaleHigh
Quantization30–50% VRAM costMedium

Track Costs First

# Use LiteLLM's cost tracking (automatic per-model pricing)
import litellm

response = litellm.completion(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)
cost = litellm.completion_cost(response)
print(f"Cost: ${cost:.6f}")

# Add custom cost callbacks
def log_cost(kwargs, completion_response, start_time, end_time):
    cost = kwargs.get("response_cost", 0)
    model = kwargs.get("model")
    user = kwargs.get("user")
    # Send to your analytics DB
    db.record_cost(user=user, model=model, cost=cost)

litellm.success_callback = [log_cost]

Model Right-Sizing

# Route by task complexity — don't use GPT-4o for everything
def get_model_for_task(task_type: str) -> str:
    routing = {
        "classification":     "gpt-4o-mini",      # ~30× cheaper than gpt-4o
        "summarization":      "gpt-4o-mini",
        "extraction":         "gpt-4o-mini",
        "simple_qa":          "gpt-4o-mini",
        "complex_reasoning":  "gpt-4o",
        "code_generation":    "claude-sonnet-4-6",
        "creative_writing":   "claude-opus-4-6",
    }
    return routing.get(task_type, "gpt-4o-mini")

# Cost comparison (per 1M tokens, 2025 approx.)
# gpt-4o-mini:          input $0.15 / output $0.60
# gpt-4o:               input $2.50 / output $10.00
# claude-sonnet-4-6:    input $3.00 / output $15.00
# llama-3.1-8b (self):  ~$0.05–0.10 all-in (GPU amortized)

Prompt Caching (Provider-Side)

# Anthropic — cache long system prompts (saves 90% on cached tokens)
import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
    max_tokens=1024,
    system=[
        {
            "type": "text",
            "text": "You are a helpful assistant.",
        },
        {
            "type": "text",
            "text": open("large-context.txt").read(),  # large doc
            "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},     # cache this!
        }
    ],
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Summarize the key points."}],
)
# First call: full price. Subsequent calls: 90% discount on cached part.
print(f"Cache read tokens: {response.usage.cache_read_input_tokens}")

# OpenAI — prompt caching is automatic for repeated prefixes >1024 tokens
# No code change needed; check usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens

Batching with OpenAI Batch API (50% Discount)

import json
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

# Prepare batch requests
requests = [
    {
        "custom_id": f"task-{i}",
        "method": "POST",
        "url": "/v1/chat/completions",
        "body": {
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": f"Classify: {text}"}],
            "max_tokens": 50,
        }
    }
    for i, text in enumerate(texts)
]

# Write JSONL file
with open("batch.jsonl", "w") as f:
    for req in requests:
        f.write(json.dumps(req) + "\n")

# Upload and create batch
batch_file = client.files.create(file=open("batch.jsonl", "rb"), purpose="batch")
batch = client.batches.create(
    input_file_id=batch_file.id,
    endpoint="/v1/chat/completions",
    completion_window="24h",
)
print(f"Batch ID: {batch.id}")  # poll status with client.batches.retrieve(batch.id)

Semantic Caching

import hashlib
import json
import redis
import numpy as np
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer

r = redis.Redis(host="localhost", port=6379)
embed_model = SentenceTransformer("BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5")

SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD = 0.92
CACHE_TTL = 3600 * 24  # 24 hours

def cached_llm_call(prompt: str, llm_fn) -> str:
    # 1. Exact match (free)
    exact_key = f"exact:{hashlib.sha256(prompt.encode()).hexdigest()}"
    if cached := r.get(exact_key):
        return cached.decode()

    # 2. Semantic match
    query_vec = embed_model.encode(prompt)
    cached_keys = r.keys("sem:*")
    for key in cached_keys:
        data = json.loads(r.get(key))
        similarity = np.dot(query_vec, data["embedding"]) / (
            np.linalg.norm(query_vec) * np.linalg.norm(data["embedding"])
        )
        if similarity >= SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD:
            return data["response"]

    # 3. Cache miss — call LLM
    response = llm_fn(prompt)

    # Store exact match
    r.setex(exact_key, CACHE_TTL, response)

    # Store semantic embedding
    sem_key = f"sem:{hashlib.sha256(prompt.encode()).hexdigest()}"
    r.setex(sem_key, CACHE_TTL, json.dumps({
        "embedding": query_vec.tolist(),
        "response": response,
        "prompt": prompt,
    }))
    return response

Prompt Compression

# LLMLingua — compress long prompts by 3–20× with minimal quality loss
from llmlingua import PromptCompressor

compressor = PromptCompressor(
    model_name="microsoft/llmlingua-2-bert-base-multilingual-cased-meetingbank",
    device_map="cpu",
)

compressed = compressor.compress_prompt(
    long_context,
    ratio=0.5,       # keep 50% of tokens
    rank_method="longllmlingua",
)
print(f"Original: {len(long_context.split())} words")
print(f"Compressed: {len(compressed['compressed_prompt'].split())} words")
print(f"Savings: {compressed['saving']}")

Self-Hosting Break-Even Calculator

def break_even_analysis(
    monthly_api_spend_usd: float,
    gpu_cost_per_hour_usd: float = 2.50,   # e.g., A10G on AWS
    utilization: float = 0.70,             # 70% GPU utilization
) -> dict:
    monthly_gpu_cost = gpu_cost_per_hour_usd * 24 * 30 * utilization
    break_even = monthly_gpu_cost / monthly_api_spend_usd
    recommendation = (
        "Self-host now — strong ROI" if break_even < 0.5 else
        "Self-host if traffic grows 2×" if break_even < 0.8 else
        "Stick with API — not enough scale yet"
    )
    return {
        "monthly_gpu_cost": f"${monthly_gpu_cost:.0f}",
        "monthly_api_spend": f"${monthly_api_spend_usd:.0f}",
        "gpu_as_pct_of_api": f"{break_even*100:.0f}%",
        "recommendation": recommendation,
    }

# Example: $5k/month on OpenAI, $2.50/hr A10G
print(break_even_analysis(5000))
# → gpu_cost ~$1,260/mo = 25% of API spend → self-host now

Cost Dashboard (Grafana)

# Emit cost metrics to Prometheus
from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram

llm_cost_total = Counter(
    "llm_cost_usd_total",
    "Total LLM spend in USD",
    ["model", "team", "task_type"],
)
llm_tokens_total = Counter(
    "llm_tokens_total",
    "Total tokens used",
    ["model", "token_type"],  # token_type: prompt, completion, cached
)

def track_call(model, team, task_type, response):
    cost = calculate_cost(model, response.usage)
    llm_cost_total.labels(model=model, team=team, task_type=task_type).inc(cost)
    llm_tokens_total.labels(model=model, token_type="prompt").inc(
        response.usage.prompt_tokens)
    llm_tokens_total.labels(model=model, token_type="completion").inc(
        response.usage.completion_tokens)

Best Practices

  • Use gpt-4o-mini or claude-haiku for 80% of tasks — they're 10–30× cheaper.
  • Enable prompt caching for system prompts >1,024 tokens (Anthropic) or >1,024 tokens (OpenAI).
  • Audit your top 5 prompts by token count — compress or cache them.
  • Set hard budget limits with LiteLLM virtual keys before costs spiral.
  • Self-host 7B–8B models when monthly API spend exceeds $2k/month.

Related Skills

平台分布

Codex

35.19%
按下载量换算82

Claude

32.93%
按下载量换算76

Cursor

18.63%
按下载量换算43

Gemini CLI

10.13%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills