Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

llm-caching(LLM caching 搜索)

llm-caching 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

llm-caching 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 51,696。

总安装 576周安装 24GitHub Stars 18下载 192核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:llm-caching(LLM caching 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/llm-caching
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill llm-caching
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill llm-caching

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

llm-caching 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。它能辅助梳理任务线索、来源信息和候选方案,帮助 Agent 快速缩小范围。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装,具体用法请参考原始 README。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/llm-caching

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

llm-caching 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/bagelhole/devops-security-agent-skills --skill llm-cachi…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

llm-caching 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

llm-caching 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

llm-caching 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

llm-caching 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 576 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 192 次,GitHub 18 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

llm-caching 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
llm-caching

LLM caching 搜索 · 本页

57618需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

LLM Caching

Cut LLM costs and latency with exact match, semantic, and provider-side caching layers.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • The same or similar queries are asked repeatedly (FAQ bots, support tools)
  • LLM API costs are growing and you need immediate savings
  • Serving high request volumes where repeated queries cause bottlenecks
  • Implementing prompt caching for long system prompts (Anthropic/OpenAI)
  • Building offline-capable AI features that need response persistence

Caching Layers

Request → Exact Cache → Semantic Cache → Provider Cache → LLM API
             ↓ hit            ↓ hit             ↓ hit
           instant          ~5ms           50-80% cheaper

Layer 1: Exact Match Cache (Redis)

import hashlib
import json
import redis
from openai import OpenAI

r = redis.Redis(host="localhost", port=6379, decode_responses=True)
client = OpenAI()

def build_cache_key(model: str, messages: list, temperature: float) -> str:
    """Deterministic key from request parameters."""
    payload = json.dumps({
        "model": model,
        "messages": messages,
        "temperature": temperature,
    }, sort_keys=True)
    return f"llm:exact:{hashlib.sha256(payload.encode()).hexdigest()}"

def cached_completion(model: str, messages: list, temperature: float = 0.0,
                      ttl: int = 3600) -> dict:
    key = build_cache_key(model, messages, temperature)

    # Check cache
    if cached := r.get(key):
        return json.loads(cached)

    # Call API
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model, messages=messages, temperature=temperature
    )
    result = response.model_dump()

    # Cache result (only cache deterministic responses)
    if temperature == 0.0:
        r.setex(key, ttl, json.dumps(result))

    return result

Layer 2: Semantic Cache (GPTCache)

from gptcache import cache, Config
from gptcache.adapter import openai
from gptcache.embedding import Onnx
from gptcache.manager import CacheBase, VectorBase, get_data_manager
from gptcache.similarity_evaluation.distance import SearchDistanceEvaluation

# Configure GPTCache with Qdrant backend
def init_gptcache(cache_obj, llm: str):
    onnx = Onnx()                              # local embedding model
    data_manager = get_data_manager(
        CacheBase("redis"),                    # metadata store
        VectorBase("qdrant",
                   host="localhost",
                   port=6333,
                   collection_name=f"llm-cache-{llm}",
                   dimension=onnx.dimension),
    )
    cache_obj.init(
        embedding_func=onnx.to_embeddings,
        data_manager=data_manager,
        similarity_evaluation=SearchDistanceEvaluation(),
        config=Config(similarity_threshold=0.80),  # 80% similarity = cache hit
    )

cache.set_openai_key()
init_gptcache(cache, "gpt-4o-mini")

# Now openai calls are automatically cached
response = openai.ChatCompletion.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is machine learning?"}],
)
# Second call with similar question ("Explain machine learning") → cache hit

Custom Semantic Cache (Production-Grade)

from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
from qdrant_client import QdrantClient
from qdrant_client.models import Distance, VectorParams, PointStruct, Filter, FieldCondition, Range
import numpy as np
import uuid
import time

embed_model = SentenceTransformer("BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5")  # fast, 33M params
qdrant = QdrantClient("http://localhost:6333")

CACHE_COLLECTION = "semantic-cache"
SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD = 0.88
CACHE_TTL_SECONDS = 86400  # 24h

# Create collection once
qdrant.create_collection(
    collection_name=CACHE_COLLECTION,
    vectors_config=VectorParams(size=384, distance=Distance.COSINE),
    on_disk_payload=True,
)

def semantic_cache_lookup(query: str, model: str) -> str | None:
    embedding = embed_model.encode(query).tolist()
    results = qdrant.query_points(
        collection_name=CACHE_COLLECTION,
        query=embedding,
        query_filter=Filter(must=[
            FieldCondition(key="model", match={"value": model}),
            FieldCondition(key="expires_at", range=Range(gte=time.time())),
        ]),
        limit=1,
        score_threshold=SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD,
    )
    if results.points:
        return results.points[0].payload["response"]
    return None

def semantic_cache_store(query: str, response: str, model: str):
    embedding = embed_model.encode(query).tolist()
    qdrant.upsert(
        collection_name=CACHE_COLLECTION,
        points=[PointStruct(
            id=str(uuid.uuid4()),
            vector=embedding,
            payload={
                "query": query,
                "response": response,
                "model": model,
                "created_at": time.time(),
                "expires_at": time.time() + CACHE_TTL_SECONDS,
            },
        )],
    )

def smart_llm_call(query: str, model: str = "gpt-4o-mini") -> dict:
    # 1. Semantic lookup
    if cached_response := semantic_cache_lookup(query, model):
        return {"response": cached_response, "source": "semantic_cache", "cost": 0}

    # 2. LLM call
    response = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": query}],
    )
    text = response.choices[0].message.content
    cost = litellm.completion_cost(response)

    # 3. Store in cache
    semantic_cache_store(query, text, model)

    return {"response": text, "source": "llm_api", "cost": cost}

Layer 3: Provider-Side Prompt Caching

# Anthropic — cache long system prompts (saves 90% on cached input tokens)
import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

# Long system prompt — mark for caching
SYSTEM_PROMPT = open("knowledge-base.txt").read()  # e.g., 50k tokens

def call_with_prompt_cache(user_question: str) -> str:
    response = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
        max_tokens=1024,
        system=[
            {"type": "text", "text": "You are a helpful assistant."},
            {
                "type": "text",
                "text": SYSTEM_PROMPT,
                "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},  # cache this block
            }
        ],
        messages=[{"role": "user", "content": user_question}],
    )
    # Log cache efficiency
    usage = response.usage
    cache_savings = usage.cache_read_input_tokens * 0.9  # 90% discount on cached
    print(f"Cache hits: {usage.cache_read_input_tokens} tokens "
          f"(saved ~${cache_savings * 3.0 / 1_000_000:.4f})")
    return response.content[0].text

# OpenAI — automatic for repeated prefixes (≥1,024 tokens)
# No code change needed; cached tokens appear in usage.prompt_tokens_details
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o-mini",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": LONG_SYSTEM_PROMPT},  # auto-cached
        {"role": "user", "content": user_question},
    ]
)
cached = response.usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens
print(f"OpenAI cached {cached} tokens")

Cache Warming

async def warm_cache(common_queries: list[str], model: str):
    """Pre-populate cache with known frequent queries."""
    import asyncio
    from openai import AsyncOpenAI

    aclient = AsyncOpenAI()

    async def warm_single(query: str):
        if not semantic_cache_lookup(query, model):
            response = await aclient.chat.completions.create(
                model=model,
                messages=[{"role": "user", "content": query}],
            )
            text = response.choices[0].message.content
            semantic_cache_store(query, text, model)
            print(f"Warmed: {query[:50]}...")

    await asyncio.gather(*[warm_single(q) for q in common_queries])

# Warm on startup
import asyncio
asyncio.run(warm_cache(FREQUENT_QUERIES, "gpt-4o-mini"))

Cache Metrics

from prometheus_client import Counter, Histogram

cache_hits = Counter("llm_cache_hits_total", "Cache hits", ["cache_layer", "model"])
cache_misses = Counter("llm_cache_misses_total", "Cache misses", ["model"])
cache_savings_usd = Counter("llm_cache_savings_usd_total", "USD saved by cache", ["model"])

# Use in your smart_llm_call function
if source == "semantic_cache":
    cache_hits.labels(cache_layer="semantic", model=model).inc()
    cache_savings_usd.labels(model=model).inc(estimated_cost)
else:
    cache_misses.labels(model=model).inc()

Redis Configuration for LLM Caching

# redis.conf tuning for LLM cache workload
maxmemory 8gb
maxmemory-policy allkeys-lru    # evict least-recently-used when full
save ""                          # disable persistence (cache is ephemeral)
appendonly no
tcp-keepalive 60

Common Issues

IssueCauseFix
Low cache hit rateThreshold too strictLower SIMILARITY_THRESHOLD to 0.82–0.85
Stale cached responsesLong TTLUse topic-specific TTLs; invalidate on data updates
Cache serving wrong answersThreshold too looseRaise threshold or add model-name filtering
Redis OOMNo eviction policySet maxmemory + allkeys-lru
Slow semantic lookupLarge cache collectionAdd payload index on model + expires_at

Best Practices

  • Start with exact cache — zero cost, instant wins for identical queries.
  • Semantic threshold of 0.88–0.92 balances hit rate vs. accuracy; tune with your data.
  • Set per-model TTLs: longer for stable knowledge (1 week), shorter for news/events (1 hour).
  • Always filter by model name in semantic cache — different models give different answers.
  • Log cache hit rate as a KPI; target 30%+ for FAQ-style applications.

Related Skills

平台分布

Codex

34.78%
按下载量换算67

Claude

28.44%
按下载量换算55

Cursor

20.46%
按下载量换算39

Gemini CLI

10.13%
按下载量换算19

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

未通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills