Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
待分类只读github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

writing-north-star-metrics编写北极星指标

Agent Skill

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

总安装

261

周安装

11

GitHub Stars

50

下载量

92
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:writing-north-star-metrics(编写北极星指标)
来源仓库:https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus
仓库路径:skills/writing-north-star-metrics
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill writing-north-star-metrics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill writing-north-star-metrics

简介

writing-north-star-metrics 用于辅助文档、README 和内容稿件的整理与改写。

  • 适合提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语或整合零散材料。
  • 使用时应保留项目已有事实和路径,避免写成确定结论。
  • 涉及对外文案时需控制语气,防止过度营销或夸大能力。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。

SKILL.md

Writing North Star Metrics

Scope

Covers

  • Defining or refreshing a product/company North Star and North Star Metric
  • Translating a qualitative value model into measurable, decision-useful metrics
  • Creating a simple driver tree: leading input/proxy metrics + guardrails
  • Producing a “North Star Metric Pack” teams can use as a decision tie-breaker

When to use

  • “We need one metric that defines success.”
  • “Teams are optimizing different KPIs.”
  • “We’re setting quarterly OKRs and need leading indicators.”
  • “We’re launching a new strategy and need a metric that aligns decisions.”

When NOT to use

  • You only need OKRs for an already-agreed North Star -> use setting-okrs-goals
  • You need a full analytics taxonomy/event tracking plan from scratch
  • Stakeholders haven’t aligned on the customer value model / mission at all -> use defining-product-vision first
  • You’re choosing a single experiment metric for a one-off test
  • You need to diagnose retention or engagement patterns, not define the top-level metric -> use retention-engagement
  • You need to assess whether you have product-market fit -> use measuring-product-market-fit

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Product/company + primary customer segment
  • The “value moment” (what the customer gets when things go well)
  • Business model + strategic goal (growth, activation, retention, margin, trust, etc.)
  • Time horizon (next quarter vs next year)
  • Measurement constraints (what you can measure today; data latency; known gaps)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
  • If still missing, proceed with clearly labeled assumptions and provide 2–3 options.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a North Star Metric Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if the user requests):

  1. North Star Narrative (value model, tie-breaker, scope)
  2. Candidate metrics (3–5) + selection rationale (evaluation table)
  3. Chosen North Star Metric spec (definition, formula, window, segmentation, owner, data source)
  4. Driver tree (leading input/proxy metrics + guardrails)
  5. Validation & rollout plan (instrumentation checks, dashboard cadence, decision rules)
  6. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always included)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md

Workflow (8 steps)

1) Intake + constraints

  • Inputs: User context; use references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm product, customer, value moment, horizon, constraints, stakeholders.
  • Outputs: 5–10 bullet “Context snapshot”.
  • Checks: You can explain the customer value in one sentence.

2) Define the qualitative North Star (before numbers)

  • Inputs: Context snapshot.
  • Actions: Write a North Star statement and value model from the customer’s perspective.
  • Outputs: Draft North Star Narrative (template in references/TEMPLATES.md).
  • Checks: Narrative can act as a decision tie-breaker (“if we do X, does it move the North Star?”).

3) Generate 3–5 candidate North Star metrics (customer POV)

  • Inputs: North Star Narrative + value moment.
  • Actions: Propose metrics that measure delivered customer value (not internal activity). Include at least one “friction/absence of pain” option when relevant.
  • Outputs: Candidate list with definitions.
  • Checks: Each candidate is measurable, understandable, and not trivially gameable.

4) Stress-test and pick the North Star metric

- Leading vs lagging (avoid “retention as the only goal”; pair lagging outcomes with controllable inputs) - Controllability within a quarter (proxy/input metrics you can move) - Ecosystem impact (what breaks if you optimize this?)

  • Outputs: Selection table + chosen metric + why others lost.
  • Checks: A cross-functional leader could agree/disagree based on definitions and evidence.

5) Write the metric spec (make it unambiguous)

  • Inputs: Chosen metric.
  • Actions: Define formula, unit, window, inclusion rules, segmentation, owner, source, latency, and example calculation.
  • Outputs: North Star Metric Spec.
  • Checks: Two analysts would compute the same number.

6) Build the driver tree (inputs + guardrails)

  • Inputs: Metric spec + product levers.
  • Actions: Decompose into 3–7 drivers; identify leading input/proxy metrics you can move in weeks/months; add guardrails to prevent gaming/harm.
  • Outputs: Driver tree table + guardrails list.
  • Checks: Every driver has at least 1 realistic lever (initiative/experiment) and 1 measurement.

7) Define validation + rollout

  • Inputs: Driver tree + constraints.
  • Actions: Plan validation (sanity checks, correlation to outcomes) and operationalization (dashboards, cadence, owners, decision rules).
  • Outputs: Validation & Rollout Plan.
  • Checks: Plan includes “who does what, when” and works with current instrumentation.

8) Quality gate + finalize pack

  • Inputs: All drafts.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks/Open questions/Next steps.
  • Outputs: Final North Star Metric Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is shareable as-is; key decisions and caveats are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (B2B SaaS): “Define a North Star metric for a team collaboration tool.” Expected: a pack that chooses a customer-value metric (e.g., weekly active teams completing the core value moment), plus a driver tree (activation → collaboration depth) and guardrails.

Example 2 (Marketplace): “Refresh North Star metric for a local services marketplace.” Expected: a pack that measures delivered value (e.g., successful jobs completed with quality), plus input metrics for supply/demand balance and quality guardrails.

Boundary example (redirect): “We already have our North Star metric. Now set quarterly OKRs and key results for the team.” Response: redirect to setting-okrs-goals -- this request needs OKR design from an existing North Star, not metric definition work.

Boundary example (reframe): “Our North Star should be retention.” Response: keep retention as an outcome/validation metric, and propose controllable input/proxy metrics (time-to-first-value, weekly value moments, repeat value delivery) as the operating focus.

Anti-patterns

Avoid these common failure modes when defining North Star metrics:

  1. Revenue-as-North-Star -- Choosing revenue or profit as the North Star metric. Revenue is a trailing indicator of value delivery; it cannot be a decision tie-breaker for product teams. Use a customer-value metric that leads to revenue.
  2. Vanity volume metric -- Picking a metric that only goes up (total users, total messages sent) without a quality or frequency dimension. Always pair volume with a quality or engagement signal.
  3. Uncontrollable lagging metric -- Selecting a metric no team can move within a quarter. The North Star must decompose into leading input metrics with realistic levers.
  4. Driver tree without levers -- Building a decomposition tree where drivers are described as metrics but no team has a concrete initiative or experiment to move them. Every driver needs at least one actionable lever.
  5. Metric without a spec -- Agreeing on a metric name (“weekly active teams”) without defining formula, window, inclusion rules, and segmentation. Two analysts should compute the same number.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.27%
按下载量换算35

Claude

26.76%
按下载量换算25

Cursor

18.71%
按下载量换算17

Gemini CLI

9.09%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills