Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

building-team-culture(建设团队文化)

building-team-culture 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

building-team-culture 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,884。

总安装 222周安装 9GitHub Stars 50下载 70核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:building-team-culture(建设团队文化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus
仓库路径:skills/building-team-culture
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill building-team-culture
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill building-team-culture

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

building-team-culture 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词或任务场景快速定位结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用该技能。使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/building-team-culture

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill building-t…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

building-team-culture 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill building-team-cultur…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

building-team-culture 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

building-team-culture 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

building-team-culture 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

building-team-culture 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 222 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 70 次,GitHub 50 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

building-team-culture 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
building-team-culture

建设团队文化 · 本页

22250只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Building Team Culture

Scope

Covers

  • Diagnosing the *current* culture (strengths, gaps, “sacred cows”, and where psychological safety breaks)
  • Articulating culture as an operating system (principles → behaviors → decision rules)
  • Defining team norms (communication, meetings, decisions, feedback, conflict)
  • Designing a lightweight rituals/cadence map that reinforces the culture
  • Planning rollout + reinforcement (coaching model, hiring/onboarding hooks, measurement)

When to use

  • “Create a culture code / values and behaviors for my team.”
  • “Our team norms are unclear—write decision-making + communication norms.”
  • “Psychological safety is low—propose concrete practices and rituals to fix it.”
  • “We’re scaling fast—help us preserve what works and change what doesn’t.”
  • “I’m a new leader—help me listen first and then evolve the culture.”

When NOT to use

  • You need to design team meeting cadence, rituals, or operating systems (use team-rituals — this skill defines culture principles and norms, not the specific meeting structure)
  • You need engineering-specific practices like code review norms, on-call culture, or incident response culture (use engineering-culture)
  • You need a full org restructure, reporting lines, or span-of-control redesign (use organizational-design)
  • You need to improve your 1:1 practice or manager-report relationship (use running-effective-1-1s)
  • You need an HR/legal investigation, harassment response, or policy/compliance guidance (involve HR/legal)
  • You need to design a full org restructure, comp bands, or performance management system
  • You need to run user/customer research (use conducting-user-interviews) or design a full survey instrument (use designing-surveys)

Inputs

Minimum required

  • Team context: function, size, seniority mix, reporting line, stage (startup/scale/enterprise)
  • Working model: remote/hybrid/in-office; time zones; any planned org changes
  • Current symptoms with 2–5 examples (e.g., slow decisions, blame, low ownership, stagnation)
  • Desired outcomes: what should be *more true* in 4–12 weeks?
  • Constraints: timeline, leadership support, meeting/time budget, “non-negotiables”
  • Existing artifacts (if any): values, handbook, onboarding, meeting cadences, principles
  • Confidentiality constraints (avoid names/PII; use anonymized examples)

Missing-info strategy

  • Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md (3–5 at a time).
  • If specifics are missing, proceed with a default culture OS and clearly label assumptions.
  • Do not request secrets or personally identifying details; ask for redacted summaries instead.

Outputs (deliverables)

Produce a Team Culture Operating System Pack in Markdown (in-chat; or as files if requested):

  1. Culture snapshot (what’s true today; strengths/gaps; root causes; “sacred cows”)
  2. Culture code (v1) (3–7 principles, each with behaviors, “do/don’t”, decision rules, anti-patterns)
  3. Team norms (communication, meetings, decisions, feedback, conflict)
  4. Rituals & cadence map (weekly/monthly/quarterly rituals with purpose + owner)
  5. Rollout + reinforcement plan (socialization, coaching model, hiring/onboarding hooks)
  6. Measurement plan (leading indicators + pulse questions)
  7. Risks / Open questions / Next steps (always)

Templates: references/TEMPLATES.md Expanded guidance: references/WORKFLOW.md

Workflow (7 steps)

1) Intake + constraints + safety

  • Inputs: user context; references/INTAKE.md.
  • Actions: Confirm goals, constraints, and what *must not* change. Identify whether the request includes HR/legal risk; if yes, pause and recommend HR/legal involvement. Clarify what artifacts the user wants (culture code only vs full pack).
  • Outputs: Context snapshot + assumptions/unknowns list.
  • Checks: Decision owner and timeline are explicit; sensitive topics are routed appropriately.

2) “Listen first”: build a culture snapshot (don’t invent culture yet)

  • Inputs: current symptoms; existing artifacts; any examples the user can share.
  • Actions: Summarize what the culture rewards/punishes today. Propose a lightweight “listening tour” plan (questions + who to talk to) if the user hasn’t collected input yet.
  • Outputs: Draft culture snapshot (strengths, gaps, root causes, tensions, sacred cows).
  • Checks: Snapshot is evidence-based (examples), not generic; it distinguishes *stated* vs *lived* culture.

3) Diagnose the few moves that matter

  • Inputs: culture snapshot.
  • Actions: Pick 2–4 priority culture shifts. Identify where “stagnation” exists (lack of visible progress/ambition) and what to change to increase creativity and customer impact. List sacred cows to challenge (and why).
  • Outputs: Prioritized culture focus areas + success signals.
  • Checks: Each focus area has a leading indicator (observable behaviors within weeks).

4) Articulate culture as an operating system (culture code v1)

  • Inputs: focus areas; existing values; constraints.
  • Actions: Write 3–7 principles. For each: definition, behaviors, do/don’t, decision rules, and anti-patterns. Prefer articulating what already works and making gaps explicit.
  • Outputs: Culture code (v1) using references/TEMPLATES.md.
  • Checks: Every principle has behavior-level examples; “culture fit” language is replaced with observable standards.

5) Turn principles into norms + rituals (make it real)

  • Inputs: culture code (v1); team operating reality.
  • Actions: Define explicit norms (communication, meetings, decisions, feedback, conflict). Design rituals that reinforce principles (e.g., weekly customer-impact demo, blameless retro, coaching 1:1s). Assign owners and cadences.
  • Outputs: Team norms + rituals/cadence map.
  • Checks: Rituals have a purpose and an owner; norms reduce ambiguity in common failure modes.

6) Reinforcement plan (coaching > policing)

  • Inputs: culture code + norms + rituals.
  • Actions: Design how the culture will be taught and reinforced: onboarding, hiring signals, promotion expectations, and a lightweight coaching model (peer or craft coaches, not just managers).
  • Outputs: Rollout + reinforcement plan (with a 30/60/90-day view).
  • Checks: Reinforcement mechanisms exist beyond “announce the doc”; responsibilities are assigned.

7) Quality gate + finalize

  • Inputs: full draft pack.
  • Actions: Run references/CHECKLISTS.md and score with references/RUBRIC.md. Add Risks / Open questions / Next steps. Recommend the smallest next experiment (1–2 rituals or norms) to validate impact.
  • Outputs: Final Team Culture Operating System Pack.
  • Checks: Pack is actionable and internally consistent; tradeoffs and risks are explicit.

Quality gate (required)

Examples

Example 1 (new leader, listen-first): “I’m a new Head of Product joining a remote team of 14. Culture feels low-trust and decisions are slow. Create a culture snapshot, a culture code, and explicit decision-making + meeting norms. Include a 30/60/90 rollout and measurement plan.” Expected: full pack with clear norms and rituals; no generic values.

Example 2 (scaling + coaching culture): “We’re growing from 8 → 25. I want to preserve high ownership while adding more coordination. Draft a culture code and a coaching model, plus rituals that keep ambition and creativity high.” Expected: principles + behaviors, coaching model, rituals/cadence map.

Boundary example (HR/legal): “We have a harassment complaint and need to ‘fix our culture’ immediately.” Response: direct to HR/legal for investigation and safety; offer to help later with culture articulation, norms, and reinforcement once appropriate.

Boundary example (redirect to rituals): “Our meetings are chaotic and we need a better weekly cadence and templates.” Response: redirect to team-rituals — this skill defines culture principles and norms, not the specific meeting structure and operating cadence.

Boundary example (redirect to engineering): “We need to improve our code review culture and incident response norms for the engineering team.” Response: redirect to engineering-culture — this skill covers general team culture, not engineering-specific practices.

Anti-patterns (common failure modes)

  1. Values as wall art — Writing aspirational values (“innovation”, “integrity”, “excellence”) without defining observable behaviors, decision rules, or anti-patterns. If a principle cannot be used to make a hard trade-off, it is not actionable.
  2. Top-down culture decree — A leader writes the culture code alone and announces it. Culture articulation should start with listening (what’s already true, what’s not) and involve the team in refinement.
  3. Culture fit as exclusion — Using “culture fit” to filter out people who are different rather than people who disagree on values. Replace “fit” language with observable behavioral standards that welcome diverse styles.
  4. All principles, no enforcement — Defining norms but having no reinforcement mechanism (coaching, feedback, hiring signals, promotion criteria). Culture without consequences is suggestion.
  5. Ignoring sacred cows — Avoiding the hard conversations about entrenched behaviors that contradict stated values. The culture snapshot must explicitly name sacred cows and decide whether to challenge or accept them.

平台分布

Codex

34.38%
按下载量换算24

Claude

30.19%
按下载量换算21

Cursor

18.21%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.34%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills