Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

linkedin-profile-auditlinkedin 个人资料审核

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

11,212

周安装

458

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

3,627
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:linkedin-profile-audit(linkedin 个人资料审核)
来源仓库:https://github.com/nissan/linkedin-profile-audit
安装命令:
openclaw skills install linkedin-profile-audit
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install linkedin-profile-audit

简介

使用浏览器自动化与 LLM 审核 LinkedIn 经历描述的准确性。

  • 适合发现夸大、虚假指标或不实陈述的风险点。
  • 自动比对数据源与描述内容,标记可疑语句。
  • 不能替代人工判断,需确认所有风险提示。linkedin-profile-audit 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 涉及敏感个人信息时应脱敏处理后再分析。

SKILL.md

name
linkedin-profile-audit
description
Audit and correct LinkedIn experience descriptions for overclaims, fabricated metrics, and inaccuracies using browser automation + LLM accuracy review. Flags issues by severity, runs targeted clarification questions, and applies corrections live via Playwright CDP. Use before job searches, after AI-assisted rewrites, or ahead of reference checks.
version
1.0.1
license
MIT
metadata

LinkedIn Profile Auto-Audit & Accuracy Correction

Purpose

Catch the lies on your LinkedIn profile—overclaims, fabricated metrics, vague language you missed—before a recruiter or reference check finds them. Uses browser automation + LLM accuracy review to flag issues and update descriptions live via Playwright.

When to Use

  • Before a job search — profile needs to be referral-safe and stand up to peer scrutiny
  • After AI-assisted rewrites that may have introduced overclaims or fabricated metrics
  • After a period of growth when descriptions may no longer reflect the actual role
  • Before reference checks or background screening

Prerequisites

  • Playwright CDP connection to a live Chrome session logged into LinkedIn
  • Position IDs for each experience entry (visible in LinkedIn edit URLs)
  • User available to answer targeted clarification questions about each role

Process

Phase 1: Extract All Descriptions

Navigate to each experience edit URL and extract current description text—batch all reads in a single Playwright script to avoid repeated round trips—and write results to a local file for review before making any changes.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/{profile}/edit/forms/position/{position_id}/

Phase 2: Accuracy Audit — Flag by Severity

For each description, flag:

🔴 High — Fix immediately:

  • Fabricated or unverifiable metrics (user counts, % improvements, SLA figures)
  • Claimed production deployment when work was PoC, design-only, or local
  • Sole attribution ("I built / I architected") for work done by a team you advised or directed
  • Actions claimed that didn't happen (e.g. "closed a deal" when someone else closed it)

🟡 Medium — Verify with user:

  • "Led" language for tandem or shared leadership roles
  • Specific feature names or technical details not confirmed by the user
  • Partner/vendor relationships described more intimately than reality
  • "Founded/launched" language for roles that were inherited or handed over

🟢 Clear — No change needed:

  • Self-owned company work (founder has full ownership)
  • Confirmed hands-on builds (AI-assisted is still the user's work)
  • Verified, measured metrics
  • Roles with clear sole ownership

Phase 3: Targeted Clarification

For each flagged item, ask ONE precise question. Don't bundle — get clear answers one role at a time.

Key questions:

  • "Did you personally build/deploy this, or did you direct others who did?"
  • "Were these metrics measured in production, or estimated/aspirational?"
  • "Was there someone above you on the [commercial/technical] side?"
  • "What was the actual relationship with [partner] — tool, co-builder, or just conversations?"
  • "Did anything go live or to test, or was this architecture/design phase only?"
  • "Was this your own idea, or a collaborative extension?"

Phase 4: Batch Corrections

Rewrite flagged descriptions with corrected language. Apply all corrections in a single Playwright batch script.

Key verb substitutions:

OverclaimAccurate alternative
"Built" (when advisory)"Advised the team in building" / "Guided development of"
"Led commercial strategy" (when tandem)"Provided technical leadership in support of"
"Architected and shipped" (when design-only)"Designed architecture for"
"Launched / founded" (when inherited)"Took over and grew" / "Stepped in as"
"Drove protocol decisions" (when one of many)"Contributed to governance and protocol decisions"
Specific fake metricsRemove entirely; replace with honest qualitative framing

Critical Accuracy Principles

  • Advisory ≠ Builder — If you guided/directed others, say so. The people who coded it deserve credit, and peers will know the difference.
  • Design ≠ Deployment — Never claim production metrics for work that didn't ship. Local PoCs are valuable — describe them honestly.
  • Tandem ≠ Led — If someone else owned the non-technical or commercial side, reflect that explicitly.
  • AI-assisted is still yours — Using Cursor, Claude, or Copilot to write code you directed and deployed doesn't diminish authorship. No caveat needed.
  • PoC/local ≠ Production — "Built a working local proof-of-concept that validated the approach" is strong and honest. "Deployed to 100K users" when nothing went live is a liability.
  • Collaboration is a feature — Saying "worked in tandem with the CEO" or "guided the Monash research team" signals leadership *and* honesty. Referees will confirm the accurate version.

Playwright Notes

Work with .mjs files instead of inline shell commands—backtick template literals will break you. Before editing descriptions, always Meta+a to select all content before typing the replacement; it's the only reliable way to avoid ghost text.

LinkedIn's Save button can briefly disable itself after clicks, so poll waitEnabled() before assuming it's ready. Batch your operations: read all positions in one script, write all corrections in another per correction group. CDP connects to the local loopback address only (never a remote host):

ws://127.0.0.1:18800/devtools/browser/{browser_id}

Output

  • Corrected LinkedIn descriptions live on profile
  • Fact/data log in memory/YYYY-MM-DD.md for future blog post material
  • Referral-safe profile that stands up to peer review from former employers and colleagues

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

95.83%
按下载量换算3,476

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills