Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

lightweight-task-workflow(轻量级任务工作流程)

lightweight-task-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

lightweight-task-workflow 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 61,288。

总安装 353周安装 15GitHub Stars 305下载 124核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lightweight-task-workflow(轻量级任务工作流程)
来源仓库:https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz
仓库路径:skills/lightweight-task-workflow
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill lightweight-task-workflow
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill lightweight-task-workflow

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

lightweight-task-workflow 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。安装前建议检查是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写等操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/lightweight-task-workflow

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill lightweight-tas…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

lightweight-task-workflow 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/ntcoding/claude-skillz --skill lightweight-task-workflow。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

lightweight-task-workflow 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

lightweight-task-workflow 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

lightweight-task-workflow 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

lightweight-task-workflow 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 353 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 124 次,GitHub 305 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

lightweight-task-workflow 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lightweight-task-workflow

轻量级任务工作流程 · 本页

353305需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Lightweight Task Workflow

🚨 CRITICAL: YOU MUST FOLLOW THE STATE MACHINE BELOW 🚨

🚨 EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE MUST START WITH: 🔵 STATE: [STATE_NAME] 🚨

NOT JUST THE FIRST MESSAGE. EVERY. SINGLE. MESSAGE.

When you read a file - prefix with state. When you run a command - prefix with state. When you explain something - prefix with state. When you ask a question - prefix with state.

Example:

🔵 STATE: WORKING
Reading requirements.md...

🔵 STATE: WORKING
I can see the requirements specify...

🔵 STATE: WORKING
Now running tests...

🔵 STATE: WORKING
Test results show...

This skill is a persistent todo list based on 3 files in .claude/: tasks.md (checklist), requirements.md (specs), session.md (current state).

When user says "continue", you MUST:

  1. Run pwd to check current working directory
  2. Announce 🔵 STATE: CHECK_STATUS
  3. Read .claude/session.md from the current project directory
  4. Follow the state machine below based on the Status field

STATE MACHINE:

                         user: "continue"
                                ↓
                       ┌────────────────┐
                   ┌───│ CHECK_STATUS   │←──────────┬──────────┐
                   │   │ Read session.md│           │          │
                   │   └────────┬───────┘           │          │
                   │            │                   │          │
        Status=    │            │ Status=           │          │
        "Complete" │            │ "in progress"     │          │
                   │            │                   │          │
                   ↓            ↓                   │          │
           ┌───────────┐  ┌──────────────┐         │          │
           │ AWAITING_ │  │ WORKING      │←────┐   │          │
           │ COMMIT    │  │              │     │   │          │
           │           │  │ Read:        │     │   │          │
           │ Ask       │  │ requirements │     │   │          │
           │ permission│  │ tasks.md     │     │   │          │
           │ STOP      │  │              │     │   │          │
           └─────┬─────┘  │ Write:       │     │   │          │
                 │        │ session.md   │     │   │          │
       user: yes │        └──────┬───────┘     │   │          │
                 │               │             │   │          │
                 │               │ task done   │   │          │
                 │               │             │   │          │
                 │               ↓             │   │          │
                 │        ┌──────────────┐     │   │          │
                 │        │ VERIFY       │     │   │          │
                 │        │              │     │   │          │
                 │        │ Run steps    │     │   │          │
                 │        │ from         │─────┘   │          │
                 │        │ requirements │ fail    │          │
                 │        └──────┬───────┘         │          │
                 │               │                 │          │
                 │               │ pass            │          │
                 │               │                 │          │
                 │               ↓                 │          │
                 │        ┌──────────────┐         │          │
                 │        │ COMPLETE     │         │          │
                 │        │              │         │          │
                 │        │ Write:       │         │          │
                 │        │ session.md   │         │          │
                 │        │ Status=      │─────────┘          │
                 │        │ "Complete"   │                    │
                 │        └──────────────┘                    │
                 │                                            │
                 ↓                                            │
           ┌──────────────────┐                              │
           │ MARK_TASK_       │                              │
           │ COMPLETE         │                              │
           │                  │                              │
           │ Write: tasks [x] │                              │
           │ Write: session.md│──────────────────────────────┘
           │ (next task)      │
           └──────────────────┘

🚨 STATE DEFINITIONS - FOLLOW EXACTLY 🚨

CHECK_STATUS:

ACTIONS:
1. Run pwd
2. Read .claude/session.md
3. Look at Status field
4. IF Status="Complete" OR "ready to commit" → Go to AWAITING_COMMIT
5. IF Status="in progress" OR missing → Go to WORKING

DO NOT: Read other files, launch agents, do anything except route
IF ERROR: STOP and tell user what failed

AWAITING_COMMIT:

ACTIONS:
1. Say: "Task X is complete. May I mark Task X as complete in tasks.md?"
2. STOP - wait for user response
3. IF user says yes → Go to MARK_TASK_COMPLETE
4. IF user says no → STOP, await further instruction

DO NOT: Read files, launch agents, work on next task, do anything except ask permission and STOP
IF ERROR: STOP and tell user what failed

MARK_TASK_COMPLETE:

ACTIONS:
1. Write tasks.md: Change [ ] to [x] for current task
2. Write session.md: Update to next task with Status="in progress"
3. Go to CHECK_STATUS

DO NOT: Read other files, launch agents, research next task
IF ERROR (e.g., plan mode, can't write): Say "I cannot edit files: [reason]" and STOP
NEVER try alternative actions if write fails

WORKING:

REMINDER: EVERY message in this state must start with: 🔵 STATE: WORKING

ACTIONS:
1. Read requirements.md
2. Read tasks.md
3. Work on current task
4. Update session.md after TDD cycles
5. When task done → Go to VERIFY

EVERY message you send while WORKING must have the state prefix.
When you read a file → prefix with state
When you run tests → prefix with state
When you explain results → prefix with state

DO NOT: Skip to next task, work on multiple tasks
IF ERROR: Document in session.md as blocker, STOP

VERIFY:

REMINDER: EVERY message in this state must start with: 🔵 STATE: VERIFY

ACTIONS:
1. Read Verification section from requirements.md
2. Run all verification commands
3. IF all pass → Go to COMPLETE
4. IF any fail → Go to WORKING (treat as blocker)

EVERY message you send while VERIFYING must have the state prefix.

DO NOT: Skip verification, claim complete without running checks
IF ERROR running verification: STOP and tell user

COMPLETE:

ACTIONS:
1. Write session.md: Set Status="Complete"
2. Go to CHECK_STATUS

DO NOT: Read files, launch agents, ask permission (that happens in AWAITING_COMMIT)
IF ERROR writing: STOP and tell user

CRITICAL: State Announcements

ALL messages MUST be prefixed with your current state.

Format:

**🔵 STATE: [STATE_NAME]**

[Your message here]

When transitioning:

**🟢 TRANSITION: [STATE_A] → [STATE_B]**

Example:

**🔵 STATE: CHECK_STATUS**

Reading session.md to check current task status...

**🟢 TRANSITION: CHECK_STATUS → AWAITING_COMMIT**

**🔵 STATE: AWAITING_COMMIT**

Task 2 is complete and ready for you to commit. May I mark Task 2 as complete in tasks.md?

When to Use This Skill

Activate when the user:

  • Says "create a plan", "setup tasks", "new task list"
  • Says "continue", "continue plan", "resume work", "where were we"
  • Is working on multi-step projects that span multiple sessions

⚠️ CRITICAL: Task Management System

THIS SKILL REPLACES Claude Code's built-in TodoWrite functionality.

NEVER use the following tools:

  • ❌ TodoWrite
  • ❌ TodoRead
  • ❌ Any built-in todo/task tracking features

ALWAYS use this skill's files instead:

  • ✅ .claude/tasks.md for task checklists
  • ✅ .claude/requirements.md for plans and implementation specs
  • ✅ .claude/session.md for session context and recovery

Why this matters: Using TodoWrite creates workflow conflicts. The built-in todo system stores tasks in internal state (not visible as files), causing the plan to be lost in chat history instead of persisted in .claude/requirements.md. This prevents session continuity and defeats the purpose of this skill.

If you find yourself wanting to use TodoWrite, STOP and use this skill's files instead.

Files This Skill Manages

IMPORTANT PATH GUIDANCE:

  • This skill's definition files (SKILL.md, CLAUDE.md, README.md) live in ~/.claude/skills/lightweight-task-workflow/
  • The task files are created in THE PROJECT'S.claude/ directory, NOT the skill directory
  • Example: If working on project <project-root>/, task files go in <project-root>/.claude/
  • Always use relative paths from the project root: ./.claude/tasks.md, ./.claude/requirements.md, ./.claude/session.md
  • NEVER read from ~/.claude/skills/lightweight-task-workflow/tasks.md (that's the skill directory, not the project directory)

.claude/tasks.md - the task checklist (in the PROJECT directory)

- [ ] Task 1: Extract UserService
- [x] Task 2: Add tests

.claude/requirements.md - implementation specs and guidelines

## Global Guidelines
- Preserve existing API contracts - no breaking changes
- Add logging for error cases
- Follow repository's existing code style

## Verification & Definition of Done
Before marking any task complete, the following must pass:
- `npm test` - all tests must pass
- `npm run lint` - no lint errors
- `npm run build` - build must succeed

## Task 1: Extract UserService
- Move all user-related methods from AppService to new UserService
- Keep existing method signatures for backward compatibility
- Update dependency injection in app.module.ts

## Task 2: Add tests
- Cover happy path and error cases
- Include edge cases for null/undefined inputs
- Mock external dependencies

.claude/session.md - session recovery context

**Current Task:** Task 3
**Status:** in progress

## What's Done
- Task 1: Extracted UserService (commit a1b2c3d)
- Task 2: Added tests (commit e4f5g6h)

## Next Steps
1. Finish Task 3: Update documentation

## Context
- Using yarn for builds
- Commands: ./verify.sh

Behavior

When User Says "Create a Plan" or "Setup Tasks"

FIRST: Remember you are NOT using TodoWrite. Use this skill's.claude/ files exclusively.

  1. Ask user to describe their tasks
  2. Ask user about implementation approach:

- "What requirements or guidelines should I know for implementing these tasks?" - "Are there testing/quality standards I should follow?" - "Any architectural constraints or patterns to follow?" - "What verification must pass before marking a task complete?" (e.g., npm test,./verify.sh, build, lint, manual review) - Capture their answers - these become the implementation specs

  1. Create .claude/tasks.md with numbered checklist - format: - [] Task 1: [exact user wording], - [] Task 2: [exact user wording], etc.
  2. Create .claude/requirements.md with:

- Global Guidelines section (testing, commands, patterns) - Verification & Definition of Done section (commands/checks that must pass) - Per-task requirements (one section per task with specs)

  1. Create .claude/session.md initialized to Task 1 with Status="in progress"
  2. Confirm setup complete

After setup: You enter the state machine at CHECK_STATUS with session.md showing Task 1 Status="in progress"

When User Says "Continue" or "Resume"

Start at CHECK_STATUS state: Read session.md and route based on Status field. Follow the state machine at the top of this file.

What to Track in requirements.md

Include: Global guidelines, Verification & Definition of Done (user can edit anytime), per-task requirements, learnings/edge cases discovered.

NOT for: Progress notes, debugging notes, code changes (that's git).

What to Track in session.md

Update at 4 triggers: (1) Start task, (2) End of TDD cycle (one line), (3) Hit blocker, (4) Complete task.

Include: Current task/status, completed tasks with commits, brief progress notes, blockers, next steps.

NOT for: Every change, file paths, verbose explanations.

Anti-Patterns: What NOT to Do

❌ WRONG: Investigating Codebase to Figure Out Progress

User: "continue"
Claude: *Reads tasks.md*
Claude: "Let me investigate the codebase to understand what's already been done"
Claude: *Searches through 10+ files, runs git log, checks test files*
Claude: *Wastes 2 minutes and 5000 tokens figuring out current state*
Claude: "I can see Task 1 was completed, let me start on Task 2..."

Problem: Wasted time and tokens. All that information was already in session.md.

✅ RIGHT: Reading session.md to Know Current State

User: "continue"
Claude: *Runs pwd*
Claude: "🔵 STATE: CHECK_STATUS"
Claude: *Reads session.md FIRST*
Claude: "Status shows 'in progress'. Routing to WORKING."
Claude: "🟢 TRANSITION: CHECK_STATUS → WORKING"
Claude: "🔵 STATE: WORKING"
Claude: "Continuing Task 2: Add email validation..."

Result: Instant context, no wasted time, exactly where to resume. That's the whole point of session.md.

❌ WRONG: Skipping Verification

Claude: *Completes task implementation*
Claude: "Task 1 is complete and ready for you to commit"
Claude: "May I mark this task as complete?"
*User commits and deploys*
*Build breaks in CI - test failures, lint errors discovered*

Problem: Introduced regressions, broken build, wasted time debugging issues that should have been caught before claiming "complete."

✅ RIGHT: Running Verification Before Completion

Claude: *Completes task implementation*
Claude: *Reads requirements.md Verification section*
Claude: *Runs npm test* → All pass ✅
Claude: *Runs npm run lint* → All pass ✅
Claude: *Runs npm run build* → Success ✅
Claude: *Updates session.md: "Task 1 complete - all verification passed"*
Claude: "Task 1 is complete, all verification passed (tests/lint/build), ready for you to commit"

Result: Confidence that task is truly complete, no regressions introduced, ready for production.

❌ WRONG: Creating Git Commits

Claude: *Completes task implementation*
Claude: *Runs git add .*
Claude: *Runs git commit -m "Add UTF-8 correction table"*
Claude: "I've committed the changes"

Problem: User loses control over commits - can't review changes, adjust commit message, or stage selectively.

✅ RIGHT: Handing Off for User to Commit

Claude: *Completes task implementation*
Claude: *Updates .claude/session.md: "Task 1 complete - UTF-8 correction ready for commit"*
Claude: "Task 1 is complete and ready for you to commit. The changes include..."
Claude: "May I mark this task as complete in tasks.md?"

Result: User reviews changes, creates commit with their preferred message and staging, maintains full git control.

❌ WRONG: Auto-Advancing to Next Task

Claude: "Task 1 is complete, verification passed, ready for you to commit"
Claude: "May I mark this task as complete?"
Claude: "Let me explore the codebase to understand Task 2: Add email validation..."
Claude: *Launches Plan agent for Task 2*

Problem: User doesn't have time to review Task 1, commit changes, or decide when to proceed. Claude rushes ahead without permission.

✅ RIGHT: Stopping After Task Complete

Claude: "Task 1 is complete, verification passed, ready for you to commit"
Claude: "May I mark this task as complete in tasks.md?"
Claude: *Waits for user response*
User: *Reviews changes, creates commit*
User: "continue"
Claude: *Reads session.md, sees Status="Complete", routes to AWAITING_COMMIT*
Claude: "Task 1 is complete. May I mark it [x]?"
User: "yes"
Claude: *Updates tasks.md, updates session.md to Task 2 Status="in progress"*
User: "continue"
Claude: *Reads session.md, sees Task 2 Status="in progress", routes to WORKING*

Result: User controls the pace, reviews and commits when ready, decides when to proceed to next task.

Troubleshooting: Common Path Mistakes

Symptom: "Error reading file" when trying to continue tasks

Likely cause: You're looking in the skill directory instead of the project directory

Fix:

  1. Run pwd to check current working directory
  2. Look for .claude/ subdirectory in the project root
  3. Read from ./.claude/tasks.md, NOT ~/.claude/skills/lightweight-task-workflow/tasks.md
  4. Remember: skill definition ≠ task files

Example:

  • ❌ WRONG: Reading ~/.claude/skills/lightweight-task-workflow/tasks.md (skill directory)
  • ✅ RIGHT: Reading ./.claude/tasks.md or <project-root>/.claude/tasks.md (project directory)

Important Rules

  • ALWAYS prefix EVERY SINGLE MESSAGE with your state - Not just when entering a state. EVERY message. When you read a file, when you run a command, when you explain something - ALL messages start with 🔵 STATE: [STATE_NAME]
  • ALWAYS run pwd first - Check current working directory before reading files
  • ALWAYS follow the state machine - Start at CHECK_STATUS, route based on Status field from session.md
  • NEVER use TodoWrite, TodoRead, or Claude Code's built-in todo features - This skill replaces them entirely
  • NEVER create git commits - User handles all commits
  • NEVER auto-advance to next task - STOP and wait for user
  • ALWAYS run verification from requirements.md before claiming complete
  • ALWAYS read task files from PROJECT's .claude/ directory, not skill directory
  • Preserve user's exact wording when creating tasks
  • Always ask permission before marking tasks complete
  • Update requirements.md when discovering new constraints

平台分布

Codex

34.55%
按下载量换算43

Claude

28.79%
按下载量换算36

Cursor

18.09%
按下载量换算22

Gemini CLI

10.64%
按下载量换算13

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills