Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

lfg(LFG 搜索)

lfg 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

lfg 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 13,564。

总安装 9,270周安装 375GitHub Stars 15,913下载 2,910核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lfg(LFG 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin
仓库路径:skills/lfg
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill lfg
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill lfg

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

lfg 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于游戏组队匹配查询、玩家技能评估和多人协作活动组织等场景。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需确认权限范围和联网需求。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法,注意维护状态及是否触发文件读写操作。lfg 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/lfg

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill l…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

lfg 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin --skill lfg。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

lfg 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

lfg 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

lfg 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

lfg 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,270 次,近一周安装 375 次,下载 2,910 次,GitHub 15,913 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

lfg 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 15,913 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lfg

LFG 搜索 · 本页

9,27015,913操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

CRITICAL: You MUST execute every step below IN ORDER. Do NOT skip any required step. Do NOT jump ahead to coding or implementation. The plan phase (step 1) MUST be completed and verified BEFORE any work begins. Violating this order produces bad output.

When invoking any skill referenced below, resolve its name against the available-skills list the host platform provides and use that exact entry. Some platforms list skills under a plugin namespace (e.g., compound-engineering:ce-plan); others list the bare name. Invoking a short-form guess that isn't in the list will fail — always match a listed entry verbatim before calling the Skill/Task tool.

  1. Invoke the ce-plan skill with $ARGUMENTS. GATE: STOP. If ce-plan reported the task is non-software and cannot be processed in pipeline mode, stop the pipeline and inform the user that LFG requires software tasks. Otherwise, verify that the ce-plan workflow produced a plan file in docs/plans/. If no plan file was created, invoke ce-plan again with $ARGUMENTS. Do NOT proceed to step 2 until a written plan exists. Record the plan file path — it will be passed to ce-code-review in step 3.
  2. Invoke the ce-work skill. GATE: STOP. Verify that implementation work was performed - files were created or modified beyond the plan. Do NOT proceed to step 3 if no code changes were made.
  3. Invoke the ce-code-review skill with mode:autofix plan:<plan-path-from-step-1>. Pass the plan file path from step 1 so ce-code-review can verify requirements completeness. Read the Residual Actionable Work summary the skill emits.
  4. Persist review autofixes (REQUIRED after step 3, before residual handoff) Check git status --short. If ce-code-review mode:autofix changed files, stage only those review-fix files, commit them with fix(review): apply autofix feedback, and push the current branch before continuing. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. Do not proceed to step 5, run browser tests, or output DONE while review autofix edits remain only in the working tree. If no files changed, explicitly note that there were no review autofixes to persist.
  5. Autonomous residual handoff (only when step 3 reported one or more residual downstream-resolver findings; skip when it reported Residual actionable work: none.) Do not prompt the user. This step embraces the autopilot contract: residuals must become durable before DONE, but the agent never stops to ask. Never block DONE on tracker filing failures once residuals have been durably recorded. A no_sink outcome is success only when the findings are present in the PR body or in the pushed fallback file.

1. Load references/tracker-defer.md in non-interactive mode. Pass the residual actionable findings from step 3's summary (or the run artifact when the summary was truncated). 2. Collect the structured return: {filed: [...], failed: [...], no_sink: [...]}. 3. Compose a ## Residual Review Findings markdown section from the structured return: - For each item in filed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and a link to the tracker ticket URL. - For each item in failed: a bullet with severity, file:line, title, and the failure reason (e.g., Defer failed: gh returned 401 — tracker unavailable). - For each item in no_sink: a bullet with severity, file:line, and title inlined verbatim so the PR body or fallback file is the durable record. 4. Detect the current branch's open PR without prompting: gh pr view --json number,url,body,state 5. If an open PR exists, update it directly with gh; do not load any confirmation-driven PR update skill. Append or replace the ## Residual Review Findings section in the current PR body, write the new body to an OS temp file, then run: gh pr edit PR_NUMBER --body-file BODY_FILE 6. If no open PR exists, create a tracked fallback file at docs/residual-review-findings/<branch-or-head-sha>.md containing the composed section and the source PR-review run context. Stage only that file, commit it with docs(review): record residual review findings, and push the current branch. If an upstream exists, run git push. If no upstream exists, resolve a writable remote dynamically: prefer origin when present, otherwise use git remote and choose the first configured remote. Then run git push --set-upstream <remote> HEAD. This is the durable no-PR sink. Do not output DONE until either the existing PR body has been updated or this fallback file commit has been pushed. If both paths fail, stop and report the failed commands; do not silently proceed.

  1. Invoke the ce-test-browser skill with mode:pipeline.
  2. Invoke the ce-commit-push-pr skill. This commits any remaining changes, pushes the branch, and opens a pull request. If step 5 already opened a PR (check with gh pr view --json number,url,state 2>/dev/null), skip PR creation but still commit and push any uncommitted changes.
  3. Output <promise>DONE</promise> when complete

Start with step 1 now. Remember: plan FIRST, then work. Never skip the plan.

平台分布

Codex

38.39%
按下载量换算1,117

Claude

31.72%
按下载量换算923

Cursor

18.26%
按下载量换算531

Gemini CLI

9.14%
按下载量换算266

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills