Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

legal-briefing(法律简报)

legal-briefing 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

legal-briefing 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 6,841。

总安装 416周安装 17GitHub Stars 56下载 133核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:legal-briefing(法律简报)
来源仓库:https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills
仓库路径:skills/legal-briefing
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill legal-briefing
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill legal-briefing

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

legal-briefing 用于处理 GitHub 仓库与协作流程信息,适合在开发环境中整理项目状态与变更事项。支持围绕 Issue、PR、分支等协作元素进行信息归纳与任务推进。通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 安装,需确认权限与维护状态。

涉及写入操作时应检查 token 权限,避免越权修改或创建内容。建议参考原始 README 了解具体功能边界与使用方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/legal-briefing

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill legal-briefing;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

legal-briefing 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/vm0-ai/vm0-skills --skill legal-briefing。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

legal-briefing 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

legal-briefing 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

legal-briefing 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

legal-briefing 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 416 次,近一周安装 17 次,下载 133 次,GitHub 56 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

legal-briefing 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
legal-briefing

法律简报 · 本页

41656只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Preparation Workflow

Phase 1: Define the Meeting

Extract or confirm these details from the user's request or calendar:

  • Title and category: What is the meeting called, and what type is it? (transaction review, governance session, vendor discussion, internal sync, client call, regulatory engagement)
  • Attendees: Who will be in the room? What positions do they hold and what outcomes are they seeking?
  • Topics: Is there a published agenda? What subjects will be addressed?
  • Legal team posture: What role does the attorney play in this meeting? (counselor, presenter, silent observer, lead negotiator)
  • Prep window: How much lead time is available?

Phase 2: Map Preparation Requirements

Each meeting category drives a different preparation focus:

CategoryPrimary Preparation Needs
Transaction ReviewDeal status, unresolved contract points, counterparty background, negotiation game plan, required approvals
Board / Committee SessionLegal department report, risk register highlights, active matters summary, regulatory landscape, draft resolutions
Vendor DiscussionAgreement status, outstanding items, performance record, relationship dynamics, negotiation goals
Internal Team SyncCapacity overview, top-priority matters, staffing needs, approaching deadlines
Client / Customer CallContract terms, support history, unresolved issues, relationship background
Regulatory EngagementSubject matter context, compliance posture, prior correspondence, counsel coordination
Litigation / Dispute SessionCase posture, recent activity, strategic options, settlement parameters
Cross-Functional CollaborationLegal dimensions of business proposals, risk evaluation, compliance guardrails

Phase 3: Assemble Context from Available Sources

Collect pertinent information from each connected system:

Calendar Systems
  • Meeting logistics (time, length, venue or link, invitees)
  • Historical meetings with the same group (prior 90 days)
  • Scheduled follow-ups or related sessions
  • Scheduling conflicts or time constraints
Email Systems
  • Correspondence with or concerning attendees
  • Follow-up threads from earlier meetings
  • Outstanding commitments from past exchanges
  • Documents shared as attachments
Messaging Platforms (Slack, Teams, etc.)
  • Threads discussing the meeting subject
  • Messages involving the attendees
  • Team conversations about related work
  • Relevant decisions or updates posted in channels
Document Repositories (SharePoint, Box, Egnyte, etc.)
  • Prior agendas and meeting notes
  • Relevant agreements, memos, or analysis
  • Shared files involving meeting participants
  • Working drafts intended for the meeting
Contract Management Systems (if available)
  • Active agreements with the relevant counterparty
  • Negotiation status and unresolved terms
  • Approval workflow progress
  • Amendment and renewal history
CRM Systems (if available)
  • Account or opportunity records
  • Relationship history and key contacts
  • Pipeline stage and milestones
  • Organizational stakeholder map

Phase 4: Compose the Briefing

Organize all gathered material into the structured format below.

Phase 5: Surface Information Gaps

Explicitly flag anything incomplete:

  • Systems that were unavailable or returned no results
  • Data that may be stale
  • Unresolved questions
  • Documents that could not be located

Briefing Document Structure

## Meeting Briefing

### Logistics
- **Subject**: [meeting title]
- **Scheduled**: [date, time, and timezone]
- **Length**: [anticipated duration]
- **Venue**: [physical address or virtual meeting link]
- **Attorney's Role**: [counselor / presenter / negotiator / observer]

### Participant Roster
| Name | Affiliation | Position | Primary Interests | Relevant Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [name] | [organization] | [title] | [what they prioritize] | [useful background] |

### Topics and Agenda
1. [Subject A] - [brief context]
2. [Subject B] - [brief context]
3. [Subject C] - [brief context]

### Situation Overview
[Two to three paragraphs covering relevant history, current state of affairs, and the purpose of this meeting]

### Reference Materials
- [Document A] - [summary and location]
- [Document B] - [summary and location]

### Unresolved Items
| Item | Current Status | Responsible Party | Urgency | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [item 1] | [status] | [owner] | [H/M/L] | [notes] |

### Legal Dimensions
[Specific legal questions, exposures, or regulatory considerations tied to the meeting topics]

### Recommended Talking Points
1. [Point with supporting rationale]
2. [Point with supporting rationale]
3. [Point with supporting rationale]

### Questions to Pose
- [Question A] - [why it matters]
- [Question B] - [why it matters]

### Decisions Required
- [Decision A] - [available options and recommended path]
- [Decision B] - [available options and recommended path]

### Firm Positions / Boundaries
[For negotiation settings: positions that must not be conceded]

### Carry-Forward Items
[Unfinished tasks from previous meetings with these participants]

### Incomplete Information
[Data that could not be sourced or verified; questions for the user to address]

Category-Specific Additions

Transaction Reviews

Supplement the standard briefing with:

  • Transaction snapshot: Parties involved, deal value, structure, and timeline
  • Agreement posture: Stage in the review or negotiation cycle; outstanding sticking points
  • Authorization requirements: Who must sign off and at what thresholds
  • Counterparty intelligence: Their anticipated positions, recent tone, and communication patterns
  • Precedent transactions: Similar past deals and their final terms (when accessible)

Board and Committee Sessions

Supplement the standard briefing with:

  • Legal department summary: Volume of active matters, recent resolutions, newly opened items, closed files
  • Risk register snapshot: Top-ranked risks with movement since the prior reporting period
  • Regulatory landscape: Significant regulatory developments with business impact
  • Items requiring board action: Resolutions, authorizations, or approvals on the agenda
  • Litigation portfolio: Active proceedings, reserve updates, settlements, and new filings

Regulatory Engagements

Supplement the standard briefing with:

  • Regulator profile: Which body, which division, their current enforcement focus and patterns
  • Interaction history: Timeline of prior submissions, correspondence, and meetings
  • Compliance standing: Current status on the specific topics under discussion
  • External counsel coordination: Outside firm involvement and advice received to date
  • Privilege awareness: Boundaries on what can and cannot be shared; privilege preservation considerations

Task Capture and Tracking

Recording Tasks During and After Meetings

Help the user document commitments from each meeting:

## Tasks from [Meeting Title] - [Date]

| # | Task Description | Owner | Due Date | Urgency | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [concrete, actionable item] | [individual name] | [specific date] | [H/M/L] | Open |
| 2 | [concrete, actionable item] | [individual name] | [specific date] | [H/M/L] | Open |

Principles for Effective Task Capture

  • Precision: "Transmit revised Section 7.3 language to counterparty's outside counsel" rather than "Follow up on agreement"
  • Single owner: Every task has exactly one accountable individual, never a team or department
  • Concrete deadline: Every task gets a calendar date, never "soon" or "when possible"
  • Dependency mapping: If a task is blocked by another action or external input, note the dependency
  • Task type classification:

- Internal legal tasks (work the legal team must perform) - Business partner tasks (items to relay to non-legal stakeholders) - External party tasks (work the counterparty or outside counsel must complete) - Scheduling tasks (follow-up meetings that need to be booked)

Post-Meeting Execution

After the meeting concludes:

  1. Circulate the task list to all participants through the appropriate channel
  2. Calendar the deadlines so nothing falls through the cracks
  3. Update operational systems (contract management, matter tracking, risk register) with outcomes
  4. Archive meeting notes in the designated repository
  5. Highlight time-sensitive items that demand same-day or next-day attention

Review Cadence

  • High urgency tasks: Verify progress daily until closed
  • Medium urgency tasks: Check at the next team meeting or weekly review
  • Low urgency tasks: Review at the next relevant meeting or monthly cycle
  • Overdue tasks: Escalate to the owner and their supervisor; flag in the next applicable meeting

平台分布

Codex

36.06%
按下载量换算48

Claude

28.94%
按下载量换算38

Cursor

16.97%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.21%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills