Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

leela-ai(艾莉拉)

leela-ai 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

leela-ai 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 66,030。

总安装 269周安装 11GitHub Stars 37下载 86核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:leela-ai(艾莉拉)
来源仓库:https://github.com/simhacker/moollm
仓库路径:skills/leela-ai
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill leela-ai
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill leela-ai

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

leela-ai 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。它能帮助 Agent 组织信息源、过滤无关内容,并输出结构化候选列表供进一步评估。

使用时需明确搜索目标和来源范围,避免依赖单一渠道或忽略时效性限制。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。leela-ai 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/leela-ai

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill leela-ai;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

leela-ai 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/simhacker/moollm --skill leela-ai。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

leela-ai 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

leela-ai 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

leela-ai 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

leela-ai 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 269 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 86 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

leela-ai 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
leela-ai

艾莉拉 · 本页

26937只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Leela AI Skill

*Manufacturing Intelligence -- from theory to industrial application.*

Overview

This skill describes Leela AI's relationship to MOOLLM. Leela develops MOOLLM with an eye toward manufacturing intelligence, using it daily for practical devops, edgebox management, coding, debugging, and design work. The team is exploring how the theoretical foundations of Minsky, Papert, and Drescher might eventually deploy on factory floors.

Leela and Gary Drescher

Leela's foundations lie in Gary Drescher's work at MIT under Marvin Minsky and Seymour Papert. Drescher brought Jean Piaget's developmental psychology into computing: infants learn through sensorimotor experience and build *schemas* (context → action → result). Henry Minsky was exposed to this as a student; years later he reimplemented Drescher's algorithms and, with Cyrus Shaoul and Milan Minsky, founded Leela AI. The name *Leela* is Sanskrit for divine play — the play of creation, destruction, and re-creation.

Key points:

  • Schema mechanism: Leela builds models of the world using schemas that reason about which actions are possible and what changes when an action is performed. Goals are achieved by chaining schemas (planner finds actions whose results match the goal).
  • Self-supervised learning: Leela learns from exploratory actions without labeled examples or explicit reward; it forms and tests hypotheses. In multi-goal grid-world experiments (Kommrusch et al., IWSSL 2020), Leela reached training targets in ~160N² steps vs DQN ~360N^2.7, and does not suffer catastrophic forgetting.
  • Neurosymbolic extension: Later work (Symbolic Guidance for Constructivist Learning, Neurosymbolic Learning on Video Data, Society of LLMs) combines the symbolic schema system with neural perception (object/pose detection, cortical columns, multi-LLM instances). *Society of LLMs* (Kommrusch & Minsky, IWSSL 2024) maps Drescher's schema mechanism onto multi-agent LLMs: curiosity-driven goals, multiple plans, training samples when plans differ and one succeeds, contextual sub-activation (one agent "thinking subconsciously"), and incremental LoRA updates; evaluation target ARC-AGI. Leela Core uses the hybrid for manufacturing video intelligence — causal reasoning and explainability on top of ConvNets.

See: schema-mechanism/, reference/drescher-lineage.yml, reference/publications.yml, reference/society-of-llms.yml.

Core Technology

Neural-Symbolic Vision

Traditional computer vision is pattern matching. Leela's neural-symbolic system is *causal reasoning*.

neural_symbolic:
  layer_1: neural
    - object detection (what is there?)
    - pose estimation (how is it positioned?)
    - motion tracking (where is it going?)

  layer_2: symbolic
    - context inference (what situation is this?)
    - causal reasoning (why is this happening?)
    - SQL queries over temporal event database
    - prediction (what will happen next?)
    - explanation (human-readable "why")

  layer_3: pda  # LLM interface layer
    - generate: natural language → SQL
    - perform: execute queries
    - interpret: results → meaning
    - explain: causation in plain language
    - visualize: charts, timelines, maps
    - remember: query history, preferences

The neural layer provides perception. The symbolic layer provides reasoning. The PDA layer provides natural language interface -- neural at the surface, symbolic in the protocol.

Schema Mechanism (Drescher)

Every inference follows Drescher's schema pattern:

schema:
  context: [observable conditions]
  action: [event that occurred]
  result: [observed outcome]

  learning:
    marginal_attribution:
      - which context features predict result?
    synthetic_items:
      - inferred entities not directly observed
    generalization:
      - when does this schema apply elsewhere?

Edge Computing Architecture

Intelligence at the edge, not in the cloud:

edge_architecture:
  edgebox:
    location: factory floor
    latency: <50ms
    capabilities: [inference, alerting, logging]

  cloud:
    purpose: training, aggregation, analytics
    latency: acceptable for non-real-time

  principle: |
    Real-time decisions happen at the edge.
    Learning and optimization happen in the cloud.
    Data sovereignty stays with the customer.

Applications

1. Safety Monitoring

safety_monitoring:
  purpose: Prevent accidents through predictive awareness

  examples:
    - pedestrian_in_vehicle_zone
    - ppe_compliance (hard hats, vests, glasses)
    - ergonomic_risk (repetitive motion, lifting posture)
    - near_miss_detection (close calls before accidents)

  output:
    alert: real-time notification
    explanation: why this is a safety concern
    recommendation: suggested action
    audit: logged for compliance

2. Process Optimization

process_optimization:
  purpose: Improve efficiency through observation and inference

  examples:
    - cycle_time_analysis
    - bottleneck_detection
    - idle_time_measurement
    - workflow_optimization

  output:
    insight: what is happening
    causation: why it is happening
    recommendation: how to improve
    simulation: what-if scenarios

3. Predictive Maintenance

predictive_maintenance:
  purpose: Fix equipment before it fails

  signals:
    visual: vibration patterns, wear indicators, alignment
    thermal: heat signatures indicating friction or failure
    acoustic: sound patterns indicating mechanical issues

  schema:
    context: [equipment state, operational history]
    action: [detected anomaly]
    result: [predicted failure mode]

  output:
    prediction: what will fail, when
    explanation: why we predict this
    recommendation: maintenance action
    confidence: certainty level

4. DevOps Automation

devops:
  purpose: Apply MOOLLM patterns to infrastructure

  patterns:
    files_as_state:
      - infrastructure as code
      - git as audit trail
      - YAML as configuration

    coherence_engine:
      - detect configuration drift
      - propose remediation
      - explain changes

    speed_of_light:
      - batch operations
      - parallel deployment
      - minimal round-trips

MOOLLM Integration

Rooms as Zones

# Factory zone as MOOLLM room
zone:
  id: assembly_line_3
  type: [production, monitored, indoor]

  contains:
    - equipment: [robot_arm_1, conveyor_2, station_7]
    - personnel: [operator_badge_1234]
    - cameras: [cam_3a, cam_3b, cam_3c]

  exits:
    - to: staging_area
    - to: quality_check

  atmosphere:
    safety_status: green
    production_status: active
    alert_level: none

Characters as Entities

# Forklift as MOOLLM character
entity:
  id: forklift_07
  type: [vehicle, autonomous, tracked]

  location: loading_dock_2
  state: stationary

  current_task: awaiting_clearance

  relationships:
    operator: badge_5678
    cargo: pallet_1234

  needs:
    fuel: 0.73
    maintenance: 0.15  # due soon

Skills as Inference Rules

# Safety protocol as MOOLLM skill
skill:
  id: pedestrian-safety

  activation:
    context: pedestrian detected in vehicle zone

  action:
    - alert vehicle operators
    - log safety event
    - track pedestrian until zone-clear

  advertisement:
    provides: pedestrian-zone-monitoring
    satisfies: [safety, compliance, awareness]

The Team

Team MemberRoleBackground
Henry MinskyCTOMIT AI Lab, NTT DoCoMo, Google Nest. Marvin Minsky's son.
Dr. Cyrus ShaoulChief EvangelistComputational neuroscientist, Digital Garage co-founder/CTO
Dr. Milan Singh MinskyVP ProductVenture-backed startups, RayVio co-founder
Sheung LiVP ApplicationsMachine vision in manufacturing
Dr. Steve KommruschSenior AI Research ScientistDeep learning, AMD/HP/National Semiconductor
Don HopkinsAI ArchitectThe Sims, NeWS, pie menus, MOOLLM

The theory meets the practice. Minsky's ideas, refined through Hopkins's implementation experience and Kommrusch's deep learning expertise, deployed on factory floors.

Ethical Framework

Transparency

transparency:
  principle: Every inference is explainable

  implementation:
    - causal_chains: visible in audit log
    - confidence_levels: always reported
    - uncertainty: acknowledged, not hidden
    - limitations: documented

Privacy

privacy:
  principle: Data sovereignty and minimal collection

  implementation:
    - edge_processing: data stays local when possible
    - anonymization: faces pixelated by default
    - retention: minimal, configurable
    - consent: clear signage, worker awareness

Human Agency

human_agency:
  principle: AI advises, humans decide

  implementation:
    - critical_decisions: require human approval
    - recommendations: clearly labeled as suggestions
    - override: always possible
    - accountability: human remains responsible

Integration Points

SystemIntegration
SCADASensor data ingestion
MESProduction event correlation
ERPBusiness context enrichment
CMMSMaintenance recommendation routing
Safety SystemsAlert escalation

Deployment Model

deployment:
  edge:
    edgeboxes: industrial compute at the source
    latency: <50ms for real-time inference
    resilience: operates offline if cloud disconnected

  cloud:
    platform: customer choice (AWS, GCP, Azure, on-prem)
    purpose: training, aggregation, dashboard
    sovereignty: customer owns their data

  hybrid:
    edge_to_cloud: telemetry, events, learning data
    cloud_to_edge: model updates, configuration

References

  • Drescher, G. (1991). *Made-Up Minds.* MIT Press.
  • Minsky, M. (1985). *Society of Mind.* Simon & Schuster.
  • Kommrusch et al. (2020). Self-Supervised Learning for Multi-Goal Grid World: Comparing Leela and Deep Q Network. IWSSL, PMLR 131.
  • MOOLLM Skills
  • Schema Mechanism
  • reference/publications.yml — papers and case study
  • leela.ai

平台分布

Codex

38.64%
按下载量换算33

Claude

30.31%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

18.35%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

10.35%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills