Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

leanspec-sdd(精益规格 SDD)

leanspec-sdd 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

leanspec-sdd 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为执行命令;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 59,221。

总安装 392周安装 16GitHub Stars 236下载 127核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:leanspec-sdd(精益规格 SDD)
来源仓库:https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec
仓库路径:skills/leanspec-sdd
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec --skill leanspec-sdd
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec --skill leanspec-sdd

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

leanspec-sdd 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词快速定位候选结果时使用。适用于研究检索类任务,可结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法。

通过 npx skills add 命令从 GitHub 安装,需确认权限范围和维护状态。使用前建议检查是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。当前维护状态和稳定性需结合仓库活跃度进一步确认。

来源仓库内路径:skills/leanspec-sdd

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec --skill leanspec-sdd;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要执行命令,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

leanspec-sdd 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec --skill leanspec-sdd。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

leanspec-sdd 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

leanspec-sdd 需要什么权限?

权限级别是执行命令。安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec --skill leanspec-sdd 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

leanspec-sdd 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

leanspec-sdd 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 392 次,近一周安装 16 次,下载 127 次,GitHub 236 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

leanspec-sdd 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要执行命令,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 不能接受 Skill 在你机器上执行命令的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
leanspec-sdd

精益规格 SDD · 本页

392236执行命令未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

LeanSpec SDD Skill

Teach agents how to run Spec-Driven Development (SDD) in LeanSpec projects using the lean-spec CLI.

Core Principles

  1. Context Economy: Keep specs under 2000 tokens when possible. Split large specs.
  2. Discovery First: Always run board/search before creating new specs.
  3. Intent Over Implementation: Capture why first, then how.
  4. No Manual Frontmatter: Use tools to update status, tags, dependencies.
  5. Verify Against Reality: Check actual codebase, commits, and changes—not just spec status.

SDD Lifecycle

1. Discover

Before creating or modifying anything:

  • Run board to see current project state and identify gaps
  • Run search "relevant keywords" to find related specs
  • If similar spec exists, consider extending it or linking as dependency

2. Create Spec

Use lean-spec create "spec-name".

Always pass all known fields in the create call — title, content, priority, tags, etc. Never create empty specs then populate with follow-up update.

Gather requirements first:

  • Problem/Goal: What needs to be solved?
  • Scope: What's in and out?
  • Success Criteria: How do we know it's done?
  • Dependencies: What needs to exist first?

Naming conventions: kebab-case, descriptive — user-auth-oauth-integration, not bug-fix.

Quality content sections:

  1. Overview (1-3 sentences) — problem and importance
  2. Requirements — - [] checklist, independently verifiable items
  3. Non-Goals — prevents scope creep
  4. Technical Notes (optional) — architecture, APIs
  5. Acceptance Criteria — measurable success conditions

After creation:

  • Link relationships (parent, depends_on) — see "Choosing Relationship Type"
  • Run validate to check quality; check tokens — keep under 2000

3. Refine Spec

Pre-implementation research to ensure the spec is implementation-ready. Use when spec is drafted and approaching in-progress.

Research the codebase:

  • Search for files/modules mentioned in the spec
  • Find existing patterns to follow
  • Locate integration points; review test patterns

Validate technical approach:

  • Do referenced files/APIs exist?
  • Are proposed interfaces compatible?
  • Does architecture match current patterns?
  • Are there existing solutions to leverage?

Update spec with findings:

  • Specific file paths to modify
  • Exact function/class names and API signatures
  • Existing code to reuse; edge cases and blockers

Readiness checklist:

  • All referenced code paths verified
  • Technical approach validated against codebase
  • Dependencies confirmed available
  • No blocking unknowns remain
  • Checklist items are specific and actionable

4. Implement Spec

Before starting:

  • Run lean-spec view <spec> — includes parent, children, depends_on, required_by
  • Set status to in-progress: lean-spec update <spec> --status in-progress
  • If draft is enabled, move draft → planned first (skipping requires --force)

For umbrella specs: Implement children first; parent completes when all children complete.

For child specs: Complete independently once requirements are met.

During implementation:

  • Follow spec's checklist items in order
  • Stay within defined scope boundaries
  • Run tests frequently
  • Document discoveries in the spec

Verification (MANDATORY — do NOT skip):

pnpm typecheck    # Zero type errors
pnpm test         # All tests pass
pnpm lint         # No lint errors
lean-spec validate

All must pass before marking complete. If any fail, fix and re-run.

Completing:

  1. Mark all checklist items as done
  2. Add implementation notes if needed
  3. Set status to complete: update <spec> --status complete

5. Check Progress

Verify spec completion against actual implementation.

Extract from spec: checklist items, acceptance criteria, scope boundaries, technical requirements.

Verify against codebase:

git log --oneline --since="<spec-created-date>" -- <relevant-paths>
  • Verify new files/modules exist
  • Read actual code to verify it matches spec design
  • Check test coverage for spec requirements
  • Run pnpm test

For each checklist item:

  1. Determine if verifiable via code, tests, or manual check
  2. Search codebase for evidence of completion
  3. Mark complete only if implementation is verified

Update status based on findings. Never trust status alone — always verify against actual code.


Managing Specs

Updating Specs

Use during draft/revision phase when requirements are evolving.

Content updates (edit spec file):

  • Add/remove requirements (- [] items)
  • Clarify scope and non-goals
  • Update technical approach
  • Document decisions with rationale

Metadata updates (use tools):

  • Status: lean-spec update <spec> --status <status>
  • Dependencies: lean-spec rel add <spec> --depends-on <other>
  • Parent: lean-spec rel add <child> --parent <parent>

Handling scope creep:

  1. Evaluate fit — does it belong in this spec?
  2. Split if needed — create new spec for out-of-scope work
  3. Link appropriately (parent or depends_on)
  4. Update original non-goals to reference new spec

Organizing Specs

Use when specs need structure, relationships are unclear, or project board is cluttered.

Survey first:

  • board — specs by status
  • board --group-by priority — priority imbalances
  • board --group-by parent — hierarchy
  • stats — overall health

Patterns to look for:

PatternAction
3+ related specs, no parentCreate umbrella and group
Spec can't start without anotherAdd depends_on
Completed spec still in-progressUpdate status
Low-value spec, no activityArchive
Large spec (>2000 tokens)Split into parent + children
Duplicate/overlapping specsMerge or archive redundant one

Status definitions:

StatusMeaning
plannedDefined, work not started
in-progressActive development
completeAll requirements verified
archivedNo longer relevant

Priority levels:

PriorityWhen to Use
criticalBlocking release or breaking production
highImportant for current milestone
mediumStandard priority (default)
lowNice-to-have, backlog

Bulk organization checklist:

  • Review board for misplaced/stale specs
  • Group related specs under umbrellas
  • Add missing depends_on links
  • Correct stale statuses
  • Adjust priorities to match current goals
  • Archive obsolete specs
  • Run validate and stats after changes

Tool Reference

All operations use the lean-spec CLI. Run commands via shell/Bash.

ActionCommand
Project statuslean-spec board
List specslean-spec list
Search specslean-spec search "query"
View speclean-spec view <spec>
Create speclean-spec create <name>
Update statuslean-spec update <spec> --status <status>
View relationshipslean-spec rel <spec>
Set parentlean-spec rel add <child> --parent <parent>
Add childlean-spec rel add <parent> --child <child>
Add dependencylean-spec rel add <spec> --depends-on <other>
Remove dependencylean-spec rel rm <spec> --depends-on <other>
Dependency graphlean-spec deps <spec>
List childrenlean-spec children <parent>
Token countlean-spec tokens <spec>
Validatelean-spec validate
Statslean-spec stats

Choosing Relationship Type

IMPORTANT: Critical decision. Read carefully before linking specs.

Parent/Child (Umbrella Decomposition)

Use when a large initiative is broken into child specs that together form the whole.

  • "This spec is a piece of that umbrella's scope"
  • Child spec doesn't make sense without parent context
  • Parent completes when all children complete

Command: lean-spec rel add <child> --parent <parent>

Example: "CLI UX Overhaul" umbrella → children: "Help System", "Error Messages", "Progress Indicators"

Depends On (Technical Blocker)

Use when a spec cannot start until another independent spec is done first.

  • "This spec needs that spec done first"
  • Both specs are independent work items with separate goals
  • Removal of the dependency doesn't change the spec's scope

Command: lean-spec rel add <spec> --depends-on <other> Remove: lean-spec rel rm <spec> --depends-on <other>

Example: "Search API" depends on "Database Schema Migration"

Decision Flowchart

  1. Is spec B part of spec A's scope? → Parent/child (type=parent)
  2. Does spec B just need spec A finished first? → Depends on (type=depends_on)
  3. Never use both parent AND depends_on for the same spec pair.

Litmus test: If spec A didn't exist, would spec B still make sense?

  • NO → B is a child of A
  • YES → B depends on A

Umbrella Workflow

  1. Create the umbrella spec: lean-spec create <name>
  2. Create each child spec: lean-spec create <name>
  3. Assign children: lean-spec rel add <child> --parent <parent> for each child
  4. Verify structure: lean-spec children <parent>
  5. Add cross-cutting deps if needed: lean-spec rel add <spec> --depends-on <other>

Best Practices

  • Never create spec files manually; use lean-spec create.
  • Always pass all known fields in the create call — never create empty then edit.
  • Keep specs short and focused; split when >2000 tokens.
  • Search first — never create duplicates; link related specs instead.
  • Checkboxes only for actions — use plain lists for non-actionable items.
  • Use parent/child for decomposition, depends_on for blockers.
  • Archive, don't delete — preserve history.
  • Survey before organizing — use board and stats first.
  • Research before implementing — refine specs to avoid surprises.
  • Verify before completing — pnpm typecheck, pnpm test, pnpm lint must ALL pass.
  • Document trade-offs and decisions as they happen.
  • Out-of-scope discoveries become new specs, not scope creep.

See detailed guidance in:

平台分布

Codex

33.5%
按下载量换算43

Claude

33.57%
按下载量换算43

Cursor

18.22%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.95%
按下载量换算11

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

执行命令

安装流程涉及命令执行,可能通过 npx skills add https://github.com/codervisor/lean-spec --skill leanspec-sdd 联网下载 Skill 或依赖。用户安装前应确认命令来源、仓库内容和执行环境。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills