Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

generate-tests(生成测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

generate-tests 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 20,391。

总安装 222周安装 9GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 70核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:generate-tests(生成测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/lautaroleonhardt/pst
仓库路径:skills/generate-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/lautaroleonhardt/pst --skill generate-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/lautaroleonhardt/pst --skill generate-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

generate-tests 用于辅助测试设计和自动化测试。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或整理测试计划。使用时需确认项目测试框架和运行命令。generate-tests 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。涉及外部服务时应区分本地模拟与生产环境。确保测试逻辑真实有效,不为了通过而破坏原有功能。

来源仓库内路径:skills/generate-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/lautaroleonhardt/pst --skill generate-tests;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

generate-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/lautaroleonhardt/pst --skill generate-tests。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

generate-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

generate-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

generate-tests 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

generate-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 222 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 70 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

generate-tests 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
generate-tests

生成测试 · 本页

222—操作浏览器未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Generate Tests

When to use

  • After plan-tests has produced test-plan.md
  • Once per scenario
  • When running as part of run-testing-session pipeline (Stage 4, per scenario)

Inputs

  • Scenario name and section number (e.g., "1.1")
  • docs/playwright-spec-testing/test-plan.md — steps, assertions, file path
  • docs/playwright-spec-testing/project-context.md — test conventions and reusable infrastructure

What it does

Write a Playwright test using ONLY selectors from the exploration report. No guessing. No invented selectors.

Phase 0: Check for reusable test infrastructure

Before writing any test code, read ## Reusable Test Infrastructure from docs/playwright-spec-testing/project-context.md. If the section is absent or contains only ### Notes — No reusable infrastructure detected, skip this phase and proceed directly to Phase 1 using raw page.* calls.

  • If a fixture handles auth or setup for this scenario, use it in the test function signature (e.g., async ({authenticatedPage})) instead of manual login steps.
  • If a page object covers one or more steps, import it and call its methods instead of raw Playwright calls.
  • If an auth helper exists, call it instead of writing page.fill + page.click for login.
  • Only fall back to raw page.* calls when no abstraction covers the action.

Import paths must be derived from the actual file paths found in ## Reusable Test Infrastructure.

Phase 0.5: Load.playwright-cli artifact context

Before writing test code, check for .playwright-cli/ artifacts matching this scenario's slug and section number:

  1. Look for YAML snapshots, screenshots, and trace files whose filenames/timestamps align with this scenario (same slug or timestamp range from the exploration report).
  2. For each artifact found:

- YAML snapshots — cross-check selectors in the plan against the snapshot's DOM. If the plan's selector differs from the snapshot, use the snapshot's selector and add a comment: // selector overridden from.playwright-cli snapshot. - Screenshots — add a reference comment above the relevant step: // screenshot:.playwright-cli/<filename>.png. Do NOT use screenshots to generate assertions — documentary only. - Trace files — if a trace shows a navigation event or network request accompanying a step, consider whether waitForURL or waitForResponse is more appropriate than a visibility assertion. Only apply if the trace strongly indicates it.

  1. If .playwright-cli/ is absent or no matching artifacts exist, skip this phase and proceed to Phase 1 unchanged.

Phase 1: Write the test file

Read the scenario's section in test-plan.md. This file already specifies every step and every expect: assertion — your job is mechanical translation to Playwright API calls. Do not infer, synthesize, or add anything not in the plan.

Follow conventions from project-context.md. Default to TypeScript if no convention.

Translate each step to a Playwright action. Translate each expect: line to an await expect(...) assertion. Use the selectors and URLs exactly as written in the plan.

import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test';

test.describe('[Scenario Name]', () => {
  test('[scenario name as test title]', async ({ page }) => {
    // Step 1: <action from plan>
    await page.goto('[url from plan]');

    // Step 2: <action from plan>
    await page.getByLabel('Email').fill('user@example.com');
    await expect(page.getByText('Sign In')).toBeVisible(); // expect: from plan

    await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Sign In' }).click();

    // Expected outcomes
    await expect(page).toHaveURL('/dashboard');
    await expect(page.getByRole('heading', { name: 'Welcome' })).toBeVisible();
  });
});

Rules:

  • Use selectors as written in test-plan.md — do not paraphrase or invent
  • Every expect: line in the plan becomes one await expect(...) call
  • Steps with no expect: lines get no assertion
  • One test() per scenario
  • await before every Playwright action and assertion
  • NO page.waitForTimeout() — use built-in auto-waiting
  • If file exists, read it first and append (don't overwrite)
  • Before inserting a selector string into TypeScript, verify it contains no unescaped quotes or characters that would break out of a string literal. If a selector looks malformed, report BLOCKED instead of using it.

Phase 2: Run the test

Before running, verify TEST_FILE_PATH is a relative path within the project directory (no .. segments, no absolute paths, no shell metacharacters). If the path looks invalid, report BLOCKED.

./node_modules/.bin/playwright test [TEST_FILE_PATH] --headed

Report the result (PASS or FAIL with error output).

Phase 3: Update parsed-spec.md

If test passes:

### Status
- [x] Planned
- [x] Explored
- [x] Synthesized
- [x] Generated
- [x] Passing

If test fails, mark Generated but not Passing:

### Status
- [x] Planned
- [x] Explored
- [x] Synthesized
- [x] Generated
- [ ] Passing

Key Rules

  • NEVER use complex CSS selectors unless exploration explicitly captured one
  • NEVER add fake test data not in exploration report
  • NEVER add page.waitForTimeout()
  • Read existing test files before writing to avoid overwrites

Output

  • Test file at path from test-plan.md
  • Updated docs/playwright-spec-testing/parsed-spec.md

Report when done:

  • Status: DONE | DONE_WITH_CONCERNS | BLOCKED | NEEDS_CONTEXT
  • Test file path
  • Test result: PASS or FAIL (include full error output if FAIL)
  • Selectors used (count)

平台分布

Codex

36.21%
按下载量换算25

Claude

31.78%
按下载量换算22

Cursor

19.95%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.25%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills