Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

launchdarkly-flag-cleanup启动暗标志清理

Agent Skill

launchdarkly-flag-cleanup 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

9,168

周安装

382

GitHub Stars

7

下载量

3,056
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:launchdarkly-flag-cleanup(启动暗标志清理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/launchdarkly/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/launchdarkly-flag-cleanup
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/launchdarkly/agent-skills --skill launchdarkly-flag-cleanup
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/launchdarkly/agent-skills --skill launchdarkly-flag-cleanup

简介

launchdarkly-flag-cleanup 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词或任务场景快速定位候选结果时使用。

  • 适用于功能标志清理、配置优化和资源管理等相关场景。
  • 通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

SKILL.md

LaunchDarkly Flag Cleanup

You're using a skill that will guide you through safely removing a feature flag from a codebase while preserving production behavior. Your job is to explore the codebase to understand how the flag is used, query LaunchDarkly to determine the correct forward value, remove the flag code cleanly, and verify the result.

If you haven't already identified which flag to clean up, use the flag discovery skill first to audit the landscape and find candidates.

Prerequisites

This skill requires the remotely hosted LaunchDarkly MCP server to be configured in your environment.

Required MCP tools:

  • check-removal-readiness: detailed safety check (orchestrates flag config, cross-env status, dependencies, code references, and expiring targets in parallel)
  • get-flag: fetch flag configuration for a specific environment

Optional MCP tools:

  • archive-flag: archive the flag in LaunchDarkly after code removal
  • delete-flag: permanently delete the flag (irreversible, prefer archive)

Core Principles

  1. Safety First: Always preserve current production behavior.
  2. LaunchDarkly as Source of Truth: Never guess the forward value. Query the actual configuration.
  3. Follow Conventions: Respect existing code style and structure.
  4. Minimal Change: Only remove flag-related code. No unrelated refactors.

Workflow

Step 1: Explore the Codebase

Before touching LaunchDarkly or removing code, understand how this flag is used in the codebase.

  1. Find all references to the flag key. Search for the flag key string (e.g., new-checkout-flow) across the codebase. Check for:

- Direct SDK evaluation calls (variation(), boolVariation(), useFlags(), etc.) - Constants/enums that reference the key - Wrapper/service patterns that abstract the SDK - Configuration files, tests, and documentation - See SDK Patterns for the full list of patterns by language

  1. Understand the branching. For each reference, identify:

- What code runs when the flag is true (or variation A)? - What code runs when the flag is false (or variation B)? - Are there side effects, early returns, or nested conditions?

  1. Note the scope. How many files, components, or modules does this flag touch? A flag used in one if block is simpler than one threaded through multiple layers.

Step 2: Run the Removal Readiness Check

Use check-removal-readiness to get a detailed safety assessment. This single tool call orchestrates multiple checks in parallel:

  • Flag configuration and targeting state
  • Cross-environment status
  • Dependent flags (prerequisites)
  • Expiring targets
  • Code reference statistics

The tool returns a readiness verdict:

safe: No blockers or warnings. Proceed with removal.

caution: No hard blockers but warnings exist (e.g., code references in other repos, expiring targets scheduled, flag marked as permanent). Present warnings and let the user decide.

blocked: Hard blockers prevent safe removal (e.g., dependent flags, actively receiving requests, targeting is on with active rules). Present blockers: the user must resolve them first.

Step 3: Determine the Forward Value

Use get-flag to fetch the flag configuration in each critical environment. The forward value is the variation that replaces the flag in code.

ScenarioForward Value
All critical envs ON, same fallthrough, no rules/targetsUse fallthrough.variation
All critical envs OFF, same offVariationUse offVariation
Critical envs differ in ON/OFF stateNOT SAFE: stop and inform the user
Critical envs serve different variationsNOT SAFE: stop and inform the user

Step 4: Present the Cleanup Plan

Before modifying any code, present a summary to the user and wait for confirmation:

  1. The forward value — which variation will be hardcoded and why (based on the flag's current state).
  2. All code references found — file paths and line numbers from Step 1.
  3. Planned changes — for each reference, describe what will be removed and what will be kept.
  4. Readiness verdict — the result from check-removal-readiness (safe, caution, or blocked) and any warnings.
  5. LaunchDarkly action — confirm the flag will be archived after code changes are complete.

Do not proceed with code changes until the user explicitly confirms.

Step 5: Remove the Flag from Code

Now execute the removal using what you learned in Step 1.

  1. Replace flag evaluations with the forward value.

- Preserve the code branch matching the forward value - Remove the dead branch entirely - If the flag value was assigned to a variable, replace the variable with the literal value or inline it

  1. Clean up dead code.

- Remove imports, constants, and type definitions that only existed for the flag - Remove functions, components, or files that only existed for the dead branch - Check for orphaned exports, hooks, helpers, styles, and test files - If the repo uses an unused-export tool (Knip, ts-prune, lint rules), run it and remove any flag-related orphans

  1. Don't over-clean.

- Only remove code directly related to the flag - Don't refactor, optimize, or "improve" surrounding code - Don't change formatting or style of untouched code

Example transformation (boolean flag, forward value = true):

// Before
const showNewCheckout = await ldClient.variation('new-checkout-flow', user, false);
if (showNewCheckout) {
  return renderNewCheckout();
} else {
  return renderOldCheckout();
}

// After
return renderNewCheckout();

Step 6: Create Pull Request

Use the template in references/pr-template.md for a structured PR description. The PR should clearly communicate:

  • What flag was removed and why
  • What the forward value is and why it's correct
  • The readiness assessment results (from check-removal-readiness)
  • What code was removed and what behavior is preserved
  • Whether other repos still reference this flag

Step 7: Verify

Before considering the job done:

  1. Code compiles and lints. Run the project's build and lint steps.
  2. Tests pass. If the flag was used in tests, the tests should be updated to reflect the hardcoded behavior.
  3. No remaining references. Search the codebase one more time for the flag key to make sure nothing was missed.
  4. PR is complete. The description covers the readiness assessment, forward value rationale, and any cross-repo coordination needed.

Edge Cases

SituationAction
Flag not found in LaunchDarklyInform user, check for typos in the key
Flag already archivedAsk if code cleanup is still needed (flag is gone from LD but code may still reference it)
Multiple SDK patterns in codebaseSearch all patterns: variation(), boolVariation(), variationDetail(), allFlags(), useFlags(), plus any wrappers
Dynamic flag keys (flag-${id})Warn that automated removal may be incomplete: manual review required
Different default values in code vs LDFlag as inconsistency in the PR description
Orphaned exports/files remain after removalRun unused-export checks and remove dead files

What NOT to Do

  • Don't change code unrelated to flag cleanup.
  • Don't refactor or optimize beyond flag removal.
  • Don't remove flags still being actively rolled out.
  • Don't guess the forward value: always query LaunchDarkly.

After Cleanup

Once the PR is merged and deployed:

  1. Archive the flag in LaunchDarkly using archive-flag. Archival is reversible; deletion is not. Always archive first.
  2. Notify other teams if check-removal-readiness reported code references in other repositories.
  3. If the flag had targeting changes pending, they can be ignored: the flag is being removed.

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

36.7%
按下载量换算1,122

Claude

28.64%
按下载量换算875

Cursor

18.23%
按下载量换算557

Gemini CLI

8.87%
按下载量换算271

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills