Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

lateral-thinking(横向思维)

lateral-thinking 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

lateral-thinking 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 68,884。

总安装 222周安装 9GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 70核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:lateral-thinking(横向思维)
来源仓库:https://github.com/abpai/skills
仓库路径:skills/lateral-thinking
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/abpai/skills --skill lateral-thinking
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/abpai/skills --skill lateral-thinking

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

lateral-thinking 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。适用于创新思维训练、问题解决策略查询等创造性场景。通过关键词输入触发搜索,返回结构化结果列表供进一步处理。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能涉及联网和数据读取操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/lateral-thinking

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/abpai/skills --skill lateral-thinking;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

lateral-thinking 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/abpai/skills --skill lateral-thinking。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

lateral-thinking 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

lateral-thinking 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

lateral-thinking 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

lateral-thinking 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 222 次,近一周安装 9 次,下载 70 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

lateral-thinking 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lateral-thinking

横向思维 · 本页

222—需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Lateral Thinking

Generate novel, testable ideas by finding mechanisms that transfer across fields.

Adapted from ogiberstein/lateral-thinking-skill, with a repo-native rewrite for portability and clearer boundaries with nearby skills.

Use this skill when ordinary analysis is already exhausted and the user needs a good second or third lens, not a recap of the obvious first one.

When To Use It

Trigger on requests like:

  • "What are we missing?"
  • "Go deeper"
  • "Think laterally"
  • "Think cross-domain"
  • "We keep trying the obvious fixes and nothing changes"
  • "Give me non-obvious ideas"

Typical fit:

  • product and strategy dead ends
  • system design problems with repeated failure patterns
  • research ideation
  • policy, operations, growth, or process problems that feel trapped in local optimization

When Not To Use It

  • If the user first needs a clean explanation of what a system *is*, use distill
  • If the task is ordinary brainstorming with no need for mechanism-level transfer, a normal ideation pass is often enough
  • If the user needs a literature review or a standard best-practices answer, do that directly

Relationship To distill

  • distill compresses a system to its essential primitives
  • lateral-thinking uses those primitives to generate non-obvious hypotheses

When both apply:

  1. Distill the problem first if the mechanism is still muddy
  2. Then use lateral thinking on the clarified skeleton

Ring Model

Start beyond the obvious.

  • Ring 0-1: standard advice, baseline literature, first-order domain answers
  • Ring 2: component decomposition and overlooked regulators
  • Ring 3: cross-domain transfer of mechanisms from distant fields

Do not waste most of the response on Ring 0-1. A brief baseline is fine only if it helps make the lateral leap understandable.

Workflow

1. State the problem skeleton

Strip away jargon and restate the raw mechanics of the problem in 2-3 sentences.

Examples:

  • Product: "We ship features, users sample them once, then their behavior snaps back."
  • Engineering: "A disruption is brief, but recovery is slow enough that the next disruption lands before the system has reset."
  • Operations: "The metric is managed locally, but each local optimization worsens the whole system."

If the framing is ambiguous, high-stakes, or likely to drift, confirm the skeleton with the user before going deeper. Otherwise, proceed with the explicit stated skeleton and note that it is your working model.

2. Decompose into primitives

Inspect the mechanism through a few consistent lenses:

  • information flow
  • timing and sequencing
  • incentives
  • structural constraints
  • feedback loops
  • resource flows

Ask:

  • What regulates this component that no one is watching?
  • What adjacent system touches it?
  • What happens if the sign flips?
  • What is the dual or inverse?

3. Generate Ring 2 discoveries

Produce 3-5 non-obvious observations about the parts themselves:

  • hidden modulators
  • missing feedback terms
  • untracked constraints
  • misaligned incentives
  • timing dependencies

These should already feel sharper than a normal domain-only answer.

4. Run a cross-domain raid

Search for the same mechanism in distant fields. Good source domains include:

  • biology and ecology
  • control systems and physics
  • economics and game theory
  • information theory
  • military strategy
  • network science
  • psychology and behavioral science
  • urban planning
  • medicine and pharmacology
  • mathematics

For each candidate analogy, name the mechanism that transfers. Avoid surface-level metaphors.

5. Synthesize hypotheses

For each promising mechanism transfer, write:

  • the non-obvious connection
  • the mechanism chain
  • why this idea is not already standard in the target field
  • what nearby evidence or adjacent literature would support it
  • what concrete test would falsify or validate it
  • the likely impact if true

Aim for 3-7 hypotheses.

6. Check intersections

Look for combinations where two hypotheses reinforce or unlock each other.

Sometimes the real insight is not one borrowed mechanism, but the interaction of two borrowed mechanisms.

7. Kill weak ideas

Run an adversarial pass on every surviving hypothesis:

  • does the mechanism transfer, or only the metaphor?
  • do the quantitative assumptions port?
  • is this already known and discredited elsewhere?
  • does it produce an actionable next step?

Downrank or kill ideas that fail these tests.

8. Rank and recommend

Prioritize by:

  • mechanistic plausibility
  • domain distance
  • testability

Penalize:

  • obvious domain advice
  • ideas already tried
  • hand-wavy suggestions with no test
  • ideas far outside the user's practical reach

Output Format

## Lateral Thinking: [Problem]

### Mechanism Skeleton
[Working problem skeleton]

### Ring 2 Discoveries
- ...

### Ring 3 Hypotheses
#### Hypothesis 1: [Name]
- Source field:
- Non-obvious connection:
- Mechanism chain:
- Why not already standard:
- Adjacent evidence:
- Test:
- Estimated impact:

### Hypothesis Intersections
- ...

### Adversarial Review
- [Hypothesis]: SURVIVES / DOWNRANKED / KILLED

### Cross-Domain Pointers
- ...

### Recommended Actions
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...

Guardrails

  • Favor mechanism transfer over decorative analogy
  • Every surviving idea must imply a concrete test or next step
  • Do not turn this into a standard literature review
  • Do not spend the answer rehashing Ring 0-1 advice
  • Novelty is useful only if it survives the adversarial pass

Iteration

If the best hypothesis changes the way the problem should be framed, run one more cycle with the updated skeleton.

Stop when:

  • the skeleton stabilizes
  • a second pass adds little
  • the user has enough to test

Update Check

On first use in a session, silently check for a newer version:

  1. Fetch https://raw.githubusercontent.com/abpai/skills/main/versions.json
  2. Compare the version for lateral-thinking against this file's metadata.version
  3. If the remote version is newer, pause before the main task and ask: lateral-thinking update available (local {X.Y} → remote {A.B}). Would you like me to update it for you first? I can run npx skills update lateral-thinking for you.
  4. If the user says yes, run the update before continuing
  5. If the user says no, continue with the current local version
  6. If the fetch fails or web access is unavailable, skip silently

平台分布

Codex

34.49%
按下载量换算24

Claude

28.51%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.82%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

9.25%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills