Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

ideation(ideation 搜索)

ideation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

ideation 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,088。

总安装 442周安装 19GitHub Stars 9下载 155核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ideation(ideation 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/ideation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill ideation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill ideation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

ideation 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。使用时需要结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写。涉及命令执行时,应在提示词中明确确认步骤和失败处理方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ideation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill ideat…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ideation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill ideation。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ideation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ideation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ideation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ideation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 442 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 155 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ideation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
ideation

ideation 搜索 · 本页

4429只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ideation

Transform unstructured brain dumps into structured, actionable implementation artifacts through a confidence-gated workflow.

Critical: Use AskUserQuestion Tool

ALWAYS use the AskUserQuestion tool when asking clarifying questions. Do not ask questions in plain text. The tool provides structured options and ensures the user can respond clearly.

Workflow Pipeline

INTAKE → CONTRACT FORMATION → PRD GENERATION → SPEC GENERATION
              ↓
         confidence < 95%?
              ↓
         ASK QUESTIONS
              ↓
         (loop until ≥95%)

Phase 1: Intake

Accept whatever the user provides:

  • Scattered thoughts and half-formed ideas
  • Voice dictation transcripts (messy, stream-of-consciousness)
  • Bullet points mixed with rambling
  • Topic jumping and tangents
  • Contradictions and unclear statements

Don't require organization. The mess is the input.

Phase 2: Contract Formation

2.1 Analyze the Brain Dump

Extract from the raw input:

  1. Problem signals: What pain point or need is being described?
  2. Goal signals: What does the user want to achieve?
  3. Success signals: How will they know it worked?
  4. Scope signals: What's included? What's explicitly excluded?
  5. Contradictions: Note any conflicting statements

2.2 Calculate Confidence Score

Load references/confidence-rubric.md for detailed scoring criteria.

Score each dimension (0-20 points):

DimensionQuestion
Problem ClarityDo I understand what problem we're solving and why it matters?
Goal DefinitionAre the goals specific and measurable?
Success CriteriaCan I write tests or validation steps for "done"?
Scope BoundariesDo I know what's in and out of scope?
ConsistencyAre there contradictions I need resolved?

Total: /100 points

2.3 Confidence Thresholds

ScoreAction
< 70Major gaps. Ask 5+ questions targeting lowest dimensions.
70-84Moderate gaps. Ask 3-5 targeted questions.
85-94Minor gaps. Ask 1-2 specific questions.
>= 95Ready to generate contract.

2.4 Ask Clarifying Questions

When confidence < 95%, MUST use AskUserQuestion tool. Structure questions with clear options when possible.

Question templates by dimension:

Problem Clarity:

  • "What specific problem are you trying to solve?"
  • "Who experiences this problem and how often?"

Goal Definition:

  • "What does success look like for this project?"
  • "What specific metrics should improve?"

Success Criteria:

  • "How will you know when you're done?"
  • "What tests would prove this feature works?"

Scope Boundaries:

  • "What is explicitly NOT part of this project?"
  • "What's the MVP vs. nice-to-have?"

Consistency:

  • "You mentioned [X] but also [Y]. Which takes priority?"

2.5 Generate Contract

When confidence >= 95%:

  1. Use AskUserQuestion to confirm project name
  2. Convert to kebab-case for directory name
  3. Create output directory: ./docs/ideation/{project-name}/
  4. Write contract.md using references/contract-template.md
  5. Get approval before proceeding to PRD

Phase 3: PRD Generation

After contract is approved:

3.1 Determine Phases

Break scope into logical implementation phases based on:

  • Dependencies (what must be built first?)
  • Risk (tackle high-risk items early)
  • Value delivery (can users benefit after each phase?)

3.2 Generate PRDs

For each phase, generate prd-phase-{n}.md using references/prd-template.md.

3.3 Present for Review

Use AskUserQuestion to gather feedback. Iterate until user approves.

Phase 4: Spec Generation

After PRDs are approved:

4.1 Generate Implementation Specs

For each approved phase, generate spec-phase-{n}.md using references/spec-template.md.

Include:

  • Technical approach
  • File changes (new and modified)
  • Implementation details with code patterns
  • Testing requirements
  • Validation commands

Output Artifacts

All artifacts written to ./docs/ideation/{project-name}/:

contract.md              # Lean contract
prd-phase-1.md           # Phase 1 requirements
prd-phase-2.md           # Phase 2 requirements
spec-phase-1.md          # Phase 1 implementation spec
spec-phase-2.md          # Phase 2 implementation spec

Gotchas

  • Confidence scores tend to inflate — score conservatively; a genuine 95% means you could write tests for every success criterion
  • Don't skip the question loop when confidence is 85-94 — those "minor gaps" often hide major ambiguity
  • The user's brain dump may contain contradictions — surface these explicitly rather than silently picking one interpretation
  • Phase boundaries matter: don't generate PRDs before the contract is approved — each phase builds on confirmed outputs
  • Scope creep during question rounds — stay focused on the lowest-scoring dimension, don't expand scope with new ideas

Important Notes

  • ALWAYS use AskUserQuestion tool for clarifications and approvals.
  • Never skip the confidence check.
  • Always write artifacts to files.
  • Each phase should be independently valuable.
  • Specs should be detailed enough to implement without re-reading PRDs.

平台分布

Codex

36.01%
按下载量换算56

Claude

30.2%
按下载量换算47

Cursor

18.68%
按下载量换算29

Gemini CLI

9.08%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills