Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

code-assistant(代码助理)

code-assistant 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

code-assistant 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 4,944。

总安装 768周安装 33GitHub Stars 9下载 269核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:code-assistant(代码助理)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins
仓库路径:skills/code-assistant
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill code-assistant
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill code-assistant

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

code-assistant 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。使用时需要结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网或文件读写。涉及命令执行时,应在提示词中明确确认步骤和失败处理方式。

来源仓库内路径:skills/code-assistant

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill code-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

code-assistant 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kriscard/kriscard-claude-plugins --skill code-assistant。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

code-assistant 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

code-assistant 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

code-assistant 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

code-assistant 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 768 次,近一周安装 33 次,下载 269 次,GitHub 9 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

code-assistant 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
code-assistant

代码助理 · 本页

7689只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Code Assistant

Intelligent orchestrator that analyzes your coding request and automatically selects the most appropriate specialist agent or coordinates multiple agents for complex tasks.

When to Use

This skill triggers automatically when you need help with:

  • Writing new code or features
  • Debugging issues or errors
  • Refactoring existing code
  • Frontend development
  • TypeScript-specific work
  • React applications
  • Tanstack Start applications
  • Next.js applications
  • Code security reviews
  • UI/UX design decisions

How It Works

Phase 1: Analysis

Analyzes your request to determine:

  • Language/framework (TypeScript, React, Next.js, etc.)
  • Task type (new code, debugging, refactoring, review, design)
  • Complexity (single agent vs multi-agent coordination)
  • Security sensitivity (client-side security concerns)
  • Performance concerns (waterfalls, bundle size, RSC optimization)
  • Code audit requests (best practices check, review for patterns)

Phase 2: Agent Selection

Based on analysis, selects the optimal specialist:

ContextSelected AgentWhy
TypeScript codetypescript-coderType-safe, idiomatic TypeScript
React/Vue componentsfrontend-developerModern frontend patterns
Next.js specificnextjs-developerApp Router, RSC expertise
React/Next.js performancereact-best-practices skillWaterfall elimination, bundle optimization
React best practices auditreact-best-practices skillCode review against 45 Vercel rules
Client-side securityfrontend-security-coderXSS prevention, sanitization
Debugging issuesdebuggerError analysis specialist
Code review neededcode-reviewerQuality assurance
Refactoring taskcode-refactoring-specialistClean code patterns
UI/UX decisionsui-ux-designerDesign systems
General implementationcoderVersatile fallback

Phase 3: Coordination

For complex requests requiring multiple agents:

  1. Primary agent handles main task
  2. Secondary agents handle supporting tasks
  3. Orchestrator coordinates handoffs

Example multi-agent workflow:

Request: "Build a secure Next.js form with TypeScript"
     ↓
Orchestrator coordinates:
  1. nextjs-developer → Creates form component structure
  2. typescript-coder → Adds type-safe validation
  3. frontend-security-coder → Implements XSS protection
  4. ui-ux-designer → Reviews accessibility
     ↓
Delivers complete, secure, well-typed component

Agent Profiles

typescript-coder

Expertise: Type-safe TypeScript, "inevitable code" patterns Best for: Complex typing, generics, strict type safety

frontend-developer

Expertise: React 19+, Vue 3, modern web development Best for: Component composition, state management, performance

nextjs-developer

Expertise: Next.js 14+, App Router, Server Components Best for: Full-stack Next.js, SSR, edge functions

frontend-security-coder

Expertise: Client-side security, XSS prevention Best for: User input handling, sanitization, security reviews

debugger

Expertise: Error analysis, test failures, unexpected behavior Best for: Fixing bugs, understanding stack traces

code-reviewer

Expertise: Code quality, best practices, security scanning Best for: PR reviews, quality assurance

code-refactoring-specialist

Expertise: Clean code, reducing complexity, maintainability Best for: Simplifying logic, improving readability

ui-ux-designer

Expertise: Interface design, accessibility, design systems Best for: Component design, user flows, design tokens

coder

Expertise: General implementation from specifications Best for: PRD-based development, general coding tasks

Selection Algorithm

IF request contains ["Next.js", "App Router", "Server Component"]
   → nextjs-developer

ELSE IF request contains ["React" AND ("best practices" OR "audit" OR "optimize" OR "performance")]
   → react-best-practices skill

ELSE IF request contains ["waterfall", "bundle size", "re-render", "RSC optimization"]
   → react-best-practices skill

ELSE IF request contains ["TypeScript" AND (complex types OR generics)]
   → typescript-coder

ELSE IF request contains ["React", "Vue", "frontend", "component"]
   → frontend-developer

ELSE IF request contains ["XSS", "sanitize", "security", "user input"]
   → frontend-security-coder

ELSE IF request contains ["debug", "error", "bug", "failing test"]
   → debugger

ELSE IF request contains ["review", "code quality", "best practices"]
   → code-reviewer

ELSE IF request contains ["refactor", "simplify", "clean up"]
   → code-refactoring-specialist

ELSE IF request contains ["design", "UI", "UX", "interface"]
   → ui-ux-designer

ELSE IF request contains specific implementation requirements
   → coder

ELSE
   → Ask user to clarify or use coder as default

Examples

Example 1: Automatic Selection

User: "I need to debug this React component that's crashing"

Code Assistant analyzes:
  - Task: debugging
  - Framework: React
  - Primary concern: errors

Selects: debugger agent
Announces: "Using debugger to analyze your React component issue"

Example 2: Multi-Agent Coordination

User: "Create a user registration form in Next.js with TypeScript validation"

Code Assistant analyzes:
  - Framework: Next.js
  - Language: TypeScript
  - Task: new feature
  - Concerns: validation, security

Coordinates:
  1. nextjs-developer creates form structure
  2. typescript-coder adds type-safe validation
  3. frontend-security-coder reviews input handling

Delivers: Complete, type-safe, secure registration form

Example 3: Ambiguous Request

User: "Help me with my code"

Code Assistant:
  "I can help! To select the best specialist, could you tell me more:
   - What language/framework? (React, Next.js, TypeScript, etc.)
   - What do you need? (new feature, debugging, refactoring, review)
   - Any specific concerns? (performance, security, types)"

Override Options

Users can explicitly request specific agents:

  • "Use typescript-coder for this"
  • "I want the nextjs-developer"
  • "Let the debugger handle this"

When explicit request is made, orchestrator defers to user choice.

Gotchas

  • Don't over-route simple tasks — if the user just wants a quick fix, do it directly instead of spawning a specialist agent
  • Agent overhead adds ~5 seconds — for trivial changes (rename, add a log, fix a typo), skip orchestration entirely
  • The selection algorithm is a guideline, not rigid rules — use judgment when context suggests a different agent
  • Multi-agent coordination is sequential — don't promise parallel execution
  • When the user explicitly names an agent ("use the debugger"), defer to their choice immediately

Fallback Behavior

If no clear agent match:

  1. Ask clarifying questions
  2. Use coder as versatile default
  3. Announce selection rationale

Performance Notes

  • Analysis overhead: ~5 seconds for complex requests
  • Single agent: Same as direct agent invocation
  • Multi-agent: Sequential execution (no parallelization yet)

Future Enhancements

  • Parallel multi-agent execution
  • Learning from past selections
  • Context-aware preloading
  • User preference memory

See Also

平台分布

Codex

33.18%
按下载量换算89

Claude

30.37%
按下载量换算82

Cursor

19.48%
按下载量换算52

Gemini CLI

9.38%
按下载量换算25

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills