Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计异常

do-work做工作

Agent Skill

do-work 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

336

周安装

14

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

112
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:do-work(做工作)
来源仓库:https://github.com/knews2019/skill-do-work
仓库路径:skills/do-work
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/knews2019/skill-do-work --skill do-work
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/knews2019/skill-do-work --skill do-work

简介

do-work 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。
  • 可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。
  • 安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。
  • do-work 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Do-Work Skill

A unified entry point for task capture and processing.

Actions:

  • capture requests: Capture new tasks/requests → creates UR folder (verbatim input) + REQ files (queue items), always paired
  • verify requests: Evaluate captured REQs against original input → quality check
  • work: Process pending requests → executes the queue
  • clarify questions: Batch-review Open Questions from completed work → user answers, confirms, or skips
  • review work: Post-work review → requirements check, code review, acceptance testing, and testing suggestions
  • present work: Client-facing deliverables → briefs, architecture diagrams, value propositions, Remotion videos
  • cleanup: Consolidate archive → moves loose REQs into UR folders, closes completed URs
  • commit: Commit uncommitted files → analyzes, groups atomically, traces to REQs
Core concept: The capture requests action always produces both a UR folder (preserving the original input) and REQ files (the queue items). Each REQ links back to its UR via user_request frontmatter. This pairing is mandatory for all requests — simple or complex.
Capture ≠ Execute. The capture requests action captures requests. The work action executes them. These are strictly separate operations. After capture finishes writing files and reporting back, STOP. Do not start processing the queue, do not begin implementation, do not "helpfully" transition into the work action. The user decides when to execute — always. The only exception is if the user explicitly says something like "add this and then run it" or "capture this and start working" in the same invocation.
Human time has two optimal windows. The system is designed to maximize the value of human attention: 1. Capture phase (capture requests action) — The user is present, actively thinking about the request. This is the best time for back-and-forth: clarifying ambiguities, resolving contradictions, making scope decisions. Use AskUserQuestion with concrete choices here. Every question must present options — never open-ended "what do you mean?" prompts. 2. Batch question review (clarify questions action) — After the build phase completes everything it can without feedback, any remaining pending-answers REQs are surfaced as a batch. The user reviews all builder-decided questions together, confirms or adjusts, and resolved REQs re-enter the queue. Between these windows, the build phase runs autonomously. Builders never block on Open Questions — they mark them - [~] with best-judgment reasoning and create pending-answers follow-ups when they return via do work clarify.

Routing Decision

Step 1: Parse the Input

Examine what follows "do work":

Check these patterns in order — first match wins:

PriorityPatternExampleRoute
1Empty or bare invocationdo work→ help menu
2Action verbs onlydo work run, do work go, do work start→ work
3Verify keywordsdo work verify, do work verify requests, do work check, do work evaluate→ verify requests
4Clarify keywordsdo work clarify, do work questions, do work pending→ clarify questions
5Review keywordsdo work review, do work review work, do work review code, do work code review, do work audit code→ review work
6Present keywordsdo work present, do work present work, do work showcase, do work deliver→ present work
7Cleanup keywordsdo work cleanup, do work tidy, do work consolidate→ cleanup
8Commit keywordsdo work commit, do work commit changes, do work save work→ commit
9Version keywordsdo work version, do work update, do work check for updates→ version
10Changelog keywordsdo work changelog, do work release notes, do work what's new, do work what's changed, do work updates, do work history→ version
11Descriptive contentdo work add dark mode, do work [meeting notes], do work capture request [the request]→ capture requests

Step 2: Preserve Payload

Critical rule: Never lose the user's content.

Single-word rule: A single word is either a known keyword or ambiguous — it is never "descriptive content."

  • Matches a keyword in the routing table (e.g., "version", "verify", "cleanup") → route to that action directly.
  • Doesn't match any keyword (e.g., "refactor", "optimize") → ambiguous. Ask: "Do you want to add '{word}' as a new request, or did you mean something else?"

Only route to capture requests when the input is clearly descriptive — multiple words, a sentence, a feature request, etc.

If routing is genuinely unclear AND multi-word content was provided:

  • Default to capture requests (adding a task)
  • Hold onto $ARGUMENTS
  • If truly ambiguous, ask: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"
  • User replies with just "add" or "work" → proceed with original content

Action Verbs (→ Work)

These signal "process the queue": run, go, start, begin, work, process, execute, build, continue, resume

Clarify Verbs (→ Clarify Questions)

These signal "review pending questions": clarify, answers, questions, pending, pending answers, blocked, what's blocked, what needs answers

Note: This routes to the work action with mode: clarify — see work.md "Clarify Questions" section.

Verify Verbs (→ Verify Requests)

These signal "check request quality": verify, verify requests, check, evaluate, review requests, review reqs, audit

Note: "check" routes to verify requests ONLY when used alone or with a target (e.g., "do work check UR-003"). When followed by descriptive content it routes to capture requests (e.g., "do work check if the button works" → capture requests).

Note: "audit" alone routes to verify requests. "audit code" and "audit implementation" route to review work (see Review Verbs below).

Review Verbs (→ Review Work)

These signal "review the completed work": review, review work, review code, code review, audit code, audit implementation, review REQ-NNN, review UR-NNN

Note: "review requests" and "review reqs" route to verify requests (priority 4), not review work. "review" alone or followed by a target/code-related word routes to review work (priority 5). The review work action also runs automatically as part of the work pipeline — see work.md Step 7.

Present Verbs (→ Present Work)

These signal "generate client-facing deliverables": present, present work, showcase, deliver, pitch, client brief

Note: do work present (no target) presents the most recent completed UR. do work present all or do work present portfolio enters portfolio mode. do work present UR-003 or do work present REQ-005 targets specific work.

Cleanup Verbs (→ Cleanup)

These signal "consolidate the archive": cleanup, clean up, tidy, consolidate, organize archive, fix archive

Commit Verbs (→ Commit)

These signal "commit uncommitted files atomically": commit, commit changes, commit files, save changes, save work

Changelog Verbs (→ Version)

These signal "show release notes": changelog, release notes, what's new, what's changed, updates, history

Note: "updates" (plural) routes to changelog display. "update" (singular) routes to update check. Both are handled by the version action.

Content Signals (→ Capture Requests)

These signal "add a new task":

  • Descriptive text beyond a single verb
  • Feature requests, bug reports, ideas
  • Screenshots or context
  • "add", "create", "I need", "we should"

Examples

Help Menu (bare invocation)

When invoked with no arguments (do work), show a help menu with available actions and example prompts:

do-work — task queue for agentic coding tools

  Capture requests:
    do work add dark mode to settings
    do work the search is slow and the header is misaligned
    do work [paste meeting notes, specs, or a screenshot]

  Process the queue:
    do work run

  Verify & review:
    do work verify requests     Check capture quality against original input
    do work review work         Review completed work (requirements + code + acceptance)

  Present to client:
    do work present work        Generate client brief, architecture, video, and interactive HTML explainer
    do work present all         Portfolio summary of all completed work

  Other actions:
    do work clarify             Answer pending questions from completed work
    do work cleanup             Consolidate the archive
    do work commit              Analyze and commit uncommitted files atomically
    do work version             Check version / updates
    do work changelog           Show release notes

Do not ask "Start the work loop?" — just print the help menu and wait.

Routes to Work

  • do work run → Starts work action immediately
  • do work go → Starts work action immediately

Routes to Clarify Questions

  • do work clarify → Presents all pending-answers REQs for batch review
  • do work questions → Same as clarify
  • do work answers → Same as clarify
  • do work pending → Same as clarify
  • do work what's blocked → Same as clarify

Routes to Verify Requests

  • do work verify requests → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work verify → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work verify UR-003 → Evaluates specific UR
  • do work check REQ-018 → Evaluates the UR that REQ-018 belongs to
  • do work evaluate → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs
  • do work review requests → Evaluates most recent UR's REQs

Routes to Review Work

  • do work review work → Reviews the most recently completed REQ
  • do work review → Reviews the most recently completed REQ
  • do work review REQ-005 → Reviews a specific completed REQ
  • do work review UR-003 → Reviews all completed REQs under that UR
  • do work code review → Reviews the most recently completed REQ
  • do work review code → Reviews the most recently completed REQ

Routes to Present Work

  • do work present work → Generates deliverables for most recently completed UR
  • do work present → Same as present work
  • do work present UR-003 → Generates deliverables for specific UR
  • do work present REQ-005 → Generates deliverables for specific REQ
  • do work present all → Portfolio summary of all completed work
  • do work present portfolio → Same as present all
  • do work showcase → Same as present work

Routes to Cleanup

  • do work cleanup → Consolidates archive, closes completed URs
  • do work tidy → Same as cleanup
  • do work consolidate → Same as cleanup

Routes to Commit

  • do work commit → Analyzes and commits all uncommitted files atomically
  • do work commit changes → Same as commit
  • do work save work → Same as commit

Routes to Changelog (via Version)

  • do work changelog → Displays changelog (newest at bottom)
  • do work release notes → Same as changelog
  • do work what's new → Same as changelog
  • do work updates → Same as changelog
  • do work history → Same as changelog

Routes to Capture Requests

  • do work add dark mode → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work the button is broken → Creates REQ file + UR folder
  • do work [400 words] → Creates REQ files + UR folder with full verbatim input

Payload Preservation Rules

When clarification is needed but content was provided:

  1. Do not lose $ARGUMENTS - keep the full payload in context
  2. Ask a simple question: "Add this as a request, or start the work loop?"
  3. Accept minimal replies: User says just "add" or "work"
  4. Proceed with original content: Apply the chosen action to the stored arguments
  5. Never ask the user to re-paste content

This enables a two-phase commit pattern:

  1. Capture intent payload
  2. Confirm action

Action Dispatch

Each action has an action file with full instructions. How you execute it depends on your environment's capabilities.

ActionAction fileContext to pass
capture requests./actions/capture.mdFull user input text
work./actions/work.md(none needed)
clarify questions./actions/work.mdmode: clarify
verify requests./actions/verify-requests.mdTarget UR/REQ or "most recent"
review work./actions/review-work.mdTarget REQ/UR or "most recent"
present work./actions/present-work.mdTarget REQ/UR, "most recent", or "all"
cleanup./actions/cleanup.md(none needed)
commit./actions/commit.md(none needed)
version./actions/version.md$ARGUMENTS

If subagents are available

Dispatch each action to a subagent. The subagent reads the action file and executes it — the main thread only sees the routing decision and the returned summary.

  • work and cleanup: Run in the background if your environment supports it. Print a status line (e.g., "Work queue processing in background...") and return control to the user immediately.
  • capture requests, clarify questions, verify requests, review work, present work, version: Run in the foreground (blocking). These need user interaction or produce small immediate output.
  • Screenshots (capture requests only): Subagents can't see images from the main conversation. Before dispatching, save screenshots to do-work/user-requests/.pending-assets/screenshot-{n}.png, write a text description of each, and include the paths + descriptions in the subagent prompt.

If subagents are not available

Read the action file directly and follow its instructions in the current session. The action files are designed to work as standalone prompts — no subagent infrastructure required.

On failure

Report the error to the user. Do not retry automatically.

Suggest Next Steps

After every action completes, suggest the next logical prompts the user might want to run. Use fully qualified action names so the user can copy-paste directly.

After capture requests:

Next steps:
  do work verify requests     Check capture quality before building
  do work run                 Start processing the queue

After work (queue processing):

Next steps:
  do work review work         Review the completed work
  do work present work        Generate client-facing deliverables
  do work clarify             Answer any pending questions

After verify requests:

Next steps:
  do work run                 Start processing the queue
  do work [describe changes]  Capture additional requests

After review work:

Next steps:
  do work present work        Generate client-facing deliverables
  do work run                 Process follow-up REQs (if any were created)
  do work [describe changes]  Capture new requests

After present work:

Next steps:
  do work present all         Generate portfolio summary (if multiple URs completed)
  do work [describe changes]  Capture new requests

After commit:

Next steps:
  do work review work         Review the committed changes
  do work [describe changes]  Capture new requests

After clarify questions:

Next steps:
  do work run                 Process answered questions
  do work clarify             Continue answering (if skipped any)

Rules:

  • Only suggest prompts that provide value given the current state (e.g., don't suggest do work run if the queue is empty)
  • Use the full action name (verify requests, not just verify; review work, not just review)
  • Keep it to 2-3 suggestions max — don't overwhelm
  • Format as a simple list the user can scan and copy

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

38.91%
按下载量换算44

Claude

30%
按下载量换算34

Cursor

20.17%
按下载量换算23

Gemini CLI

8.79%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

可疑

Snyk

未通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills